Tag: qualifications

  • Gilbert Goh’s 10 Reasons Singaporeans Should Reject Fake Degrees From Labour Market

    Gilbert Goh’s 10 Reasons Singaporeans Should Reject Fake Degrees From Labour Market

    Ten reasons why Singaporeans must strongly reject fake degrees from our labour market:-

    1. Mockery of our educational system – Singaporeans study hard and make it through our educational system the meritocratic way and fake degree is a slap to our face.

    It also humiliate those who take the effort and pain to earn their way into the competitive labour market by studying hard for a degree.

    Fake degree is a unfair nasty short-cut into our lucrative labour market and must be totally eradicated.

    It also stains the clean corrupt-free environment we have all along.

    2. Mockery of our labour system – fake degree made our government look bad as it exposes the laxity in the way it tries to bring in foreigners by the hundreds of thousands.

    Checking them.all will take light years and our government believes that the only way to do it is to allow them in first before lightly applying the selective screening method.

    Degree cheaters were exposed previously and jailed but their numbers are too little to make an impact.

    It is believed fake certificate cheaters should figure in the thousands or more and if remained unexposed will leave behind untold grave consequences on our labour market.

    3. Unlevelled playing field for locals – fake degrees created a unlevelled playing field for local professionals as they are competing against people who say they possess certain relevant qualifications but do not have in reality.

    Thousands of local PMETs stay jobless because these cheaters manage to beat the system and get a job the unethical way.

    4. Encourage cheaters – fake degrees also encourage other foreigners to come in with their fake degrees and try to beat the system as there is minimum screening process in place.

    Singapore will be the ultimate loser as we have in our workplace incompetent and unskilled foreign workers pretending to be experts in their own field.

    One can’t imagine having fake doctors in our midst.

    5. Lowering productivity – it is no wonder our productivity has nosedived alot lately as those who work with us are not truly who they profess to be.

    Fake certs will hurt the reputation of Singapore and damage our image in the eyes of the world.

    Our productivity has went down alot in recent years and this could be due to our false belief that we are getting quality workers but in reality they are not.

    6. Meritocracy down the drain – fake degrees also makes a mockery of our stern belief in meritocracy – long practised by our founder Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    Singaporeans took many years to earn their degree often through the hard way and fake degrees certainly hurt the efforts of our own people.

    It devalues their hard-earned educational qualification and humiliates them even further when companies like IDA recognises them by believing in the employee’s story.

    7. Reinforce foreigner-first policy – the recognition of the fake master degree of a IDA’s employee reinforced the belief that Singaporean companies have all along adopt a foreigner-first mentality.

    People are wary of the government’s approach to foreign talent nowadays and such incident gives room for more speculation that foreigners are better treated and let off easily.

    8. Overall suspicion of foreign talents – the recent fake degree saga also unfairly discriminated against those foreign talents who came in with genuine qualifications.

    Colleagues will now view foreigners with disdain especially if they fail to show result after a while.

    Its unfair and totally unjustified as they will be foreign talents who came in with real qualifications but they pay the price for those who falsify their resume.

    9. Who is ultimately responsible – many people pinpoint the blame on MOM but who is ultimately responsible for the fake degree saga?

    Some blame the FTA which stipulates that we must bring in X number of foreigners from India or else…

    In the bid to show that we honour the agreement, our government has no choice but to openly show that it has allowed in the number of foreigners from a certain country – regardless of whether they are fake talents or not.

    10. End of a 5-decade-long regime – the fake degree saga once again highlights the incompetence of a government that fails to deliver time and again.

    From transport fault to the huge influx of foreigners into our shore, the current government has revealed its shortcomings.

    One feels that the regime’s time is up and the recent failings only reinforced the fact that it could not live up to the demands of a new Singapore which prefers a new form of governance and bearing.

    Lee Kuan Yew’s passing may signal the end of a regime that still stubbornly stick to the patriach’s old style of control and total dominance.

    Unless the new leadership changes its tact and style, the writing is very much on the wall for the near-demise of the current regime as the young voters will surely prefer something new and refreshing.

     

    Source: Gilbert Goh

  • ITE Graduate Looked Down By Interviewer Because Of Poor Qualifications

    ITE Graduate Looked Down By Interviewer Because Of Poor Qualifications

    Dear All Singapore Stuff,

    I’m going to share my thoughts regarding an interview with a certain company for the position of Test Technician and after the interview, I left feeling horrible, depressed and really upset. The interviewer was rude and unprofessional. I found this job opening through jobstreet.

    First of all, I waited for almost an hour before the interview commenced because the HR recruitment specialist had an appointment and forgot about the interview. How convenient. That is unprofessional and they should have told me beforehand. The interviewer didn’t introduce his name, what his position was or which department here was from. So we’ll call him Mr Nice guy.

    So Mr Nice guy asked me regarding my last drawn salary, from two previous companies. He asked “why is your salary low?”. I explained that I worked only for a few days during the course of the employment and probably that’s the reason why it’s not that high. Mr Nice guy wasn’t satisfied with my answer and raised his voice and said “NO NO YOU’RE NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION”. At this point of time, I felt that this interview had gone sideways. Mr Nice guy critiqued how could I possibly work with the company if I couldn’t answer a simple question.

    In the first place, is this question even relevant? You employ someone based on merit and skills, not on previous pay and I did give an answer. I’m sorry if you are not satisfied with my answer.

    Mr Nice guy proceeded with the interview and I answered as best as I could, in a polite manner even though I felt like walking out the door. He was rude throughout the interview and asked me questions that are not related to the job scope. All the while he behaved in a condescending manner and constantly undermined my credibility. Mr Nice Guy kept hinting that the company is looking for “highly educated people” He seem to have a prejudice against ITE graduates like me.

    The ad that they posted is misleading to future applicants on what are the required qualifications. I have met the necessary requirements. I have a Nitec in the relevant course and I have the relevant experience. The interviewer looked down on me just because I was an ITE graduate. He also continously undermined my capabilities throughout the interview and he was hinting that ITE graduates have no place in the company.

    Education is very important in Singapore. But it is wrong to stereotype someone just based on his/her qualifications. Even if you are from ITE, it doesn’t make you less of a person. What does it matter if you have a PhD but you’re an asshole. Is someone deemed highly educated just based on his qualifications? Everyone should be treated equally regardless of their education. There should be no prejudice against people who has less education than you. What’s important is the attitude of someone and I believe that is what you should look for in an employee.

    Mr Nice guy concluded the interview by bluntly saying that according to him, I had failed the interview because of my attitude and I wouldn’t ever get a good job in Singapore and that the way I answered his first question was unreasonable and unprofessional.

    I believe he was the one who was rude and treated me with no respect. If i wanted to be interrogated I would’ve just gone to a police station. Where did he learn his interviewing skills from? He was rude and inconsiderate from the start and he didn’t even know that he was rude. He spoiled my day with his attitude. I dont have any background in human resource but i doubt that that is a how an interview should be held.

    I have lodged a report with TAFEP and am currently awaiting a personal apology from the interviewer itself for being rude to me. I hope other people don’t go through what I have been through.

    PS: Interviewer is a foreigner. At first I didn’t want to mention it for fear of readers having clouded judgements but due to recent cases, i thought this factor should be taken into consideration.

    Disgruntled Applicant
    A.S.S. Contributor

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com