Tag: remuneration

  • Why Singaporeans Expecting The “Average Starting Salary” Probably Don’t Deserve It

    Why Singaporeans Expecting The “Average Starting Salary” Probably Don’t Deserve It

    It’s tough to be a graduating Singapore student these days. With the unemployment rate at its highest since 2010, graduating students are likely to find getting their dream job more challenging, with many MNCs cutting entry-level openings meant for graduates looking to kick-start their career in an area of interest.

    We wrote an article last week on how the banking sector has been one of the hardest hit in terms of job cuts, and how many of these jobs lost are unlikely to ever return.

    These are ominous signs that the job market for young Singaporeans may not be as rosy and straightforward as it once was. Gone are the days when people graduate and go into the MNCs or SMEs of their choice, and have their first employer teach them all they need to know about the industry, while earning a decent starting salary at the same time.

    The Problem With Expectations

    Earlier this month, we wrote about the expectations that Singapore workers have when it comes to pay increment and bonuses. These are expectations that are created not through individuals carefully analysing what’s happening in today’s employment market, but rather, by what’s generalised and reported in the media, or by what Singapore workers have come to take for granted based on what they experienced in the past.

    For example, we may expect a 5% annual increment from our employers simply based on what the media reports, which in turn may be based on some observations or survey done by a recruitment company. This may or may not be an accurate reflection of what’s actually happening on the ground.

    But it doesn’t matter for most people.

    The expectations have been set, never mind if the media report wasn’t that accurate to begin with, or if there were other reports that may contradict the report they read.

    The other way expectations are set is based on what people are used to. For example, if I were used to enjoying a 10% increment each year during my first 3 years at work, I would expect a 10% increment in my fourth year as well, even if the economy weren’t doing well, or if the Singapore economy is experiencing deflation for 24 straight months.

    Forming Expectations From What We Read

    How do undergraduates who have yet to enter the workforce get their job expectations from?

    The first way is based on what they read. For example, the media may report that the median salary in Singapore is $3,375 (before employer’s CPF contribution) as of 2015 based on information provided by the Ministry of Manpower.

    Other news report may be based on statistics provided by non-government agencies. For example, the Straits Times reported earlier this year that median salary for university graduates is $3,300, with 9 in 10 graduates finding employment within 6 months of their final examinations. This is based on a Graduate Employment Survey jointly conducted by NUS, NTU and SMU. Not to be outdone, SIM also did its own survey noting that 73% of its graduates found full-time job within 6 months with an average starting salary of $2,766.

    It’s easy to see why these seemingly innocuous reports can lead to expectations being formed. Undergraduates, who may otherwise have no idea about what’s happening in the working world and hence, no expectations about how much they should earn, suddenly find themselves have a salary range in mind when it comes to landing their first job after graduation, never mind if they have zero experiences to begin with, or don’t even know what the heck they want to do.

    Forming Expectations From What We Learn

    The other way expectations are created is based on what graduates are taught in school.

    Due to the importance of attracting young Singaporeans to enrol with them, universities, both public and private, always like to paint a rosy picture of what their graduates can expect. They tend to be a little over optimistic, featuring ex-graduates of theirs who are now working in “successful roles” such as investment banking, private equity and hedge funds.

    No universities would be caught telling their students the harsh truth that their degree is worthless, if they don’t have the relevant internship experience or the right network to get into the career of their choice. Neither do they want to tell you that the banks themselves are cutting headcounts across the board.

    The (Big) Problem With Graduates Who Expect The “Average Starting Salary”

    Many graduates spend way too much time trying to find out what is the “average starting salary” for university graduates. The problem however is that this “average starting salary” really doesn’t matter for you, the job seeker, especially if you want a rich and fulfilling career.

    You see, the graduate who knows what he or she aspires to do is finding ways via internships, networking and self-education to work towards that role. Such a graduate isn’t interested in knowing what the “average starting salary is for year 2016 students.” They already know what they want to do, whether the sector they are looking at is hiring people, and how much they are worth. They also know how useful (or not useful) they really are to hiring companies as a fresh graduate.

    On the other hand, graduates who expect the “average starting salary” because of what others are saying are usually just giving out a signal that they have no idea how else to determine the value of themselves, or what they can offer – which unfortunately usually isn’t very much since they don’t even know what they want to do.

    These are the graduates who are familiar with how much the “average starting salary” is in Singapore, but have no idea what is it that they want to do, even after 3 to 4 years in university.

    Nobody Thinks They Are Worst Than The Average

    Back in secondary school, our maths teacher taught us that median represent the value right in the middle of the data group.

    When it comes to salary matters, it means that 50% of people earn more than the median while another 50% earn less than the median. Hence, earning less than the median is perfectly normal, especially if you know the industry you are in doesn’t pay that much.

    People who know what they want to do wouldn’t be bother about the median. A graduate who intends to go into journalism would know that his or her starting salary is likely to be less than $3,000 due to the nature of the sector.

    For graduates who are not sure about what they want to do, the median becomes a really important figure to take reference from, since they can’t rely on other metrics. A job is only good if it offers at least the median salary. Negotiation is based largely on what the salary package offers, because the person doesn’t really know what else to base it on.

    Put yourself in the employer’s shoes for a moment. We think it’s fair to say that a company would prefer hiring people who knows what they want to do, and who really wants to join and stay with them. Why then would they want to pay the median salary for a person who is simply applying for the job because it sounds doable and pays the “average starting salary”?

    Have The Right Expectations For The Right Reasons

    This article isn’t meant to say that graduate shouldn’t have any pay expectations. It’s always good to know what’s available out there and what these jobs are paying. But you must also know how these jobs fit to your interest and career ambitions.

    As a fresh graduate, your job is to have an understanding of what is it that you are interested in, and what are the skills sets and experience that your currently lack to get to the role that you aspire for.

    It also only by knowing these things that you can set expectations on what you want out from your first job, rather than aimlessly applying for jobs with an expectation based on what you read online.

     

    Source: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com

  • Certis Cisco Officer Reveals Low Pay And Excessive OT Hours

    Certis Cisco Officer Reveals Low Pay And Excessive OT Hours

    The government keeps saying that Singaporeans don’t want the jobs, like in this Certis Cisco case. They turn to foreigners because no Singaporeans can do the jobs. I want to prove a point that the reason why Singaporeans keep resigning is because of low pay and very bad working conditions.

    When I signed on, I was promised a pay package in a contract black and white, but the company always finds ways to pay me lesser. I am a Singaporean and i don’t mind the long hours of work, in fact i requested for OT. But they are not giving what I deserve.

    You can see how many hours I worked in November.

    Today they say that they need 600 APOs but cannot find enough Singaporeans, so they hire 120 Taiwanese. They say Singaporeans don’t want the job so they no choice, must find foreigners. Such a big lie when they make Singaporeans resign by shortchaging them.

    Above is the contract they promised in august and 2nd photo is part of my pay slip for last mth Nov 2016.

    This is how Certis Cisco treats Singaporean Auxiliary Police Officers  (armed) which they claimed to be short of. Ironic much?

    Now you know why they short?

    L.C.
    A.S.S. Contributor

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Non-Graduate Teachers Feels New Remuneration System Is Fairer

    Non-Graduate Teachers Feels New Remuneration System Is Fairer

    In line with the move within the Public Service to recognise skills beyond paper qualifications, the Ministry of Education (MOE) will be abolishing the differences in salary structure for graduate and non-graduate educators, including allied educators.

    Also, some 30,800 educators in schools here will be getting a pay raise from October, to ensure their wages keep pace with the market.

    The merging of salary structures for teachers will kick in from October, while the same is targeted to take place next April for allied educators, who provide students with additional support such as in counselling in classrooms.

    With the latest change, non-graduate and graduate teachers may still start off at different salaries “reflecting market practice”, but both groups will progress and be remunerated along the same salary structure. The incentive for long-serving teachers will also no longer be differentiated between graduate and non-graduate teachers.

    Details of the merged structure for allied educators will be announced at a later date.

    About 30,000 teachers and school leaders will see their monthly salaries go up between 4 per cent and 9 per cent, depending on their seniority level, while some 800 allied educators will have their salaries increased by about 5 per cent.

    There are currently about 33,000 teachers and 2,300 allied educators. In response to queries, the MOE said for those who are not eligible for this round of salary adjustments, it is because “their salaries are generally in line with the market”.

    Commenting on these changes in a Facebook post today, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat said the move to create a single salary structure is “one of the most significant in recent years”.

    “We are going beyond qualifications … I am glad to see MOE taking the lead in changing mindsets about skills, and supporting the critical SkillsFuture initiative,” Mr Heng said.

    Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the launch of commemorative notes for SG50 today, Mr Heng noted there will be no change in the way educators are being assessed, which includes criteria such as classroom teaching and how they develop students.

    “Our focus continues to be on performance of teachers … At the end of it, the assessment in promotion of teachers depends on performance and contribution and what they bring to the classroom and to the education system,” Mr Heng said.

    From next month, the Public Service Division will merge career tracks for graduates and non-graduates.

    Last August, the MOE announced that non-graduate teachers with outstanding performance would be placed on the graduate salary scale without the need to obtain a degree.

    Currently, the gross starting monthly salary of graduate teachers ranges from S$3,010 to S$3,310 while that of non-graduate teachers ranges from S$1,580 to S$1,920. For allied educators, salaries range between S$1,500 to S$4,300.

    The last round of salary adjustments for educators was in September 2012. Mr Heng, when queried, debunked talk that the increments were election-related.

    Salary revisions, he said, are “periodic”.

    “It is part and parcel of how the public service operates,” he said. “In this cycle, we took almost a year to finalise many of the details to create a single (salary) scheme of service to support the efforts of SkillsFuture, in creating (an) emphasis on skills to go beyond qualifications.”

    The MOE will also be giving cash payouts of between S$500 to S$700 to teachers every September from next year to educators for learning-related expenses such as computers and magazine subscriptions, instead of staff having to file claims for them.

    Non-graduate teachers TODAY spoke to welcomed the single salary structure, calling it a long-time coming. A 36-year-old teacher who is currently studying for his degree, and has been teaching for seven years, said non-graduate teachers “are always behind in terms of remuneration even when facing the same expectations … as graduate teachers”. He did not want to be named.

    Another teacher, 28, who does not hold a degree, and has been in service for the past six years, pointed out that all teachers have the same workload regardless of their qualifications. It is “fairer” to be remunerated on the same scheme, she said, adding: “Hopefully, this will make them more motivated and give them more opportunities in their career progression.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com