Tag: Sangeetha Thanapal

  • Sangeetha Thanapal: Chinese Allies Must Be Clear – Any Racism Is Unacceptable

    Sangeetha Thanapal: Chinese Allies Must Be Clear – Any Racism Is Unacceptable

    I want to say a little about Chinese allies in Singapore, given some recent events and experiences.

    By and large, I find myself deeply disappointed with them. I see a lot of Chinese allies like and share my work, but who do not actually call out Chinese racists. It does not escape my attention then when I am attacked, it is minorities who come to my aid, i.e. the people who are already disenfranchised.

    Chinese people are mostly unwilling to use their privilege and power to make clear to other racists that racism is unacceptable. That task inevitably falls back onto my shoulders, and other minorities.

    Still, many Chinese people I know (yes, many of you on reading this now) consider yourself allies.

    Firstly, ally is not a term you give yourself. It is not a calling card. It has to be given to you by minority communities, and only when you have proven yourself to be one; meaning when you have earned this by actually doing something, not just by talking a good game and posting anti-racist things on your social media once in a while.

    Chinese allies in Singapore really need to step up their game, because to a lot of you, not being racist or not saying racist things is enough. It is not. It will never be.

    Meeting the minimum standards of decency is not enough to be seen as not racist, let alone be considered an ally.

    Until you are actively giving money, access to power and opportunity to minorities, do not pat yourself on the back. Your Chinese allyship means nothing without the transfer of resources and structural power.

    A lot of the ‘good’ Chinese people become incredibly defensive the moment you point out that something they might have said or done is problematic. Instead of thinking of it as an attack on your Good Chinese Ally status, Chinese people need to understand that they are socialized into this, that they will mess up every now and then, and to simply listen when minorities tell them something makes them uncomfortable.

    In this climate, Cher Tan’s approach to writing about Chinese privilege was so refreshing. When she spoke to me, I told her that her ability to even write about it and be paid for it, is something no one has ever given me.This in itself is a function of her privilege.

    She then offered to either not write it, or have me write it instead.

    I want to point out how rare this is. I want to point out that a Chinese person willingly giving up access to opportunity to a minority, and a minority woman at that, is so extraordinarily uncommon, that even this most basic of gestures was appreciated tremendously by me, because it is more than most Chinese people have ever been capable of.

    She went on to write a piece that addressed Chinese people, from the point of view of a Chinese person, and she made sure she included many minority voices speaking for themselves.

    This was then referred to as Chinese guilt by some people, which is mind boggling to me. So a Chinese person doesn’t talk about racism and that’s not okay, but they do and that’s not okay as well? Here is a Chinese person using her privilege by centering minority voices and opinions, but that’s apparently just an issue of her exercising her guilt to you? Even if it was though, so what? Guilt as a position is useless to me, but using your Chinese guilt to address racism in Singapore is a valuable exercise of this guilt.

    Chinese people ask me everywhere I go what they can do to combat Chinese privilege. This is an example. Visibility and access to opportunity are the main starting points of being an ally. Do you have the ability to vacate a space you have or have been given for a minority? You should do that. You should be constantly aware of how much of what you have is because of your privilege.

    Use your privilege for good. Challenge the people around you. Remember that whatever repercussions you may face, you will never be on the receiving end of as much hatred and ignorance as those talking about this without the safety of their privilege.

    Be suspicious of everyone who takes easy positions. Be wary of the people who speak out against racism when it is easy and convenient, when it costs them nothing and nets them social capital. Be especially careful of those who perpetuate racism on a regular basis by stealing our words and ideas, passing it off as theirs and then being invited to write and speak about that which they have no understanding or experience of.

    “Allyship is active. Discomfort is necessary.” — Kat Blaque

    Are you uncomfortable? Good. That’s a start. Now go do something about it.

    Sangeetha Thanapal

    Source: https://medium.com

  • Sangeetha Thanapal: City Harvest Church Incident Shows Double Standards In Which Islam And Christianity Are Held Accuntable

    Sangeetha Thanapal: City Harvest Church Incident Shows Double Standards In Which Islam And Christianity Are Held Accuntable

    What’s interesting to me in all this City Harvest stuff, is that no one is talking about this as a peril of Christianity. No one is using this as an example of how there’s something wrong with Christianity and Christians who are so easily misled and brainwashed.

    Compare this to any rhetoric on anyone who is vaguely brown and Muslim. It immediately becomes about Islam, a failure or inherent flaw in Islam and these Muslims who are so easily radicalized and brainwashed.

    As always, western religion when practiced by Chinese people gets a pass. They get to be people in their own right, not strereotypes to be made fun of.

     

    Source: Sangeetha Thanapal

  • K Shanmugam To Lodge Police Report Against Sangeetha Thanapal For “Inaccurate And Seditious” Facebook Post

    K Shanmugam To Lodge Police Report Against Sangeetha Thanapal For “Inaccurate And Seditious” Facebook Post

    Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K Shanmugam says he intends to lodge a police report against independent scholar Sangeetha Thanapal on Friday for a Facebook post he called “inaccurate and seditious”.

    He said her post – which has since been taken down – had misrepresented remarks he made at a Singapore Press Club talk on Thursday on how regional trends can affect Singapore.

    “What Ms Thanapal wrote is inaccurate and seditious, and attributes to me sentiments that I do not hold and have never held,” he said in a Facebook post last night.

    “I intend to file a police report about this tomorrow.”

    He added: “She unfortunately twisted what I had said and suggested that I was an ‘Islamophobic bigot who thinks Malay-Muslims are a threat’. I had not said anything like that.”

    Ms Thanapal, 33, took her post down less than an hour after Mr Shanmugam’s post was put up at around 8pm. She also said she was seeking legal advice.

    Mr Shanmugam, responding on her Facebook at about 11.15pm, said he held “no personal animosity” towards her, and said he would be happy to speak to her.

    Shortly afterwards, she responded saying: “I am very sorry for all that has happened. The post took on a life of its own, and came out differently from how I intended. Thank you so much for agreeing to speak with me. I will make myself available anytime you wish to do so.”

    Mr Shanmugam then asked for a telephone number and said he would contact her today. As at midnight, there was no indication in the exhanges about whether he would still file a police report.

    When Mr Shanmugam first posted about Ms Thanapal’s remarks, he said the point he actually made at the event was that the Malaysian education system was not good for integration.

    “The Chinese leadership in various local areas in Malaysia want to maintain control over the Chinese population. It suits them to have Chinese students go to Chinese schools instead of mainstream Malaysian schools. And the schools are more Chinese (because they are effectively single race),” he wrote.

    “At the same time, many mainstream schools in Malaysia are becoming more Malay (because the students are largely Malay) and Islamic (e.g. through the way some principals and teachers handle matters) which discourages the Chinese from going into those schools. So you end up with having more Malays going to mainstream schools, and more Chinese going to Chinese schools. As a result, the different races are kept apart from a young age.”

    Ms Thanapal’s Facebook post appeared to take issue with Mr Shanmugam saying that mainstream schools in Malaysia were “becoming more Malay and Islamic”.

    She wrote: “The only reason you would consider this important enough to make statements about, is if you are an Islamaphobic bigot who thinks Malay-Muslims are a threat.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com