Tag: SDP

  • ISA Arrests ‘Point To Need To Tighten Immigration’

    ISA Arrests ‘Point To Need To Tighten Immigration’

    The recent detention of eight radicalised Bangladeshis here under the Internal Security Act (ISA) points to the need to tighten the Republic’s immigration policy, Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan said on Wednesday (May 4) morning.

    Speaking to reporters after a walkabout in Bukit Batok, where he is vying to become the ward’s Member of Parliament, Dr Chee called on the Government to deal with the problem at its “root cause” by preventing more of such radical elements, which endanger Singapore society, from entering the Republic’s shores.

    He was responding to questions from reporters about the Bangladeshis’ detention under the ISA, which he had spoken against previously on human rights grounds.

    On Tuesday, the Home Affairs Ministry revealed that the eight Bangladeshi workers had formed a terror cell here aimed at bringing their homeland under Islamic State’s self-declared caliphate. It is the second reported case involving radicalised individuals from the Bangladeshi community here.

    Responding, Dr Chee did not mention the SDP’s stance on the ISA, but said the Government has been “lax” in its immigration policy by taking in large numbers of foreigners. “You let in hundreds of thousands, millions … there must be people there who are not properly vetted,” he said.

    The Government must “get it at the root cause” and prevent such situations “even before they come in”, he said, adding that if he was elected, he would raise questions on the vetting process with Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam.

    Asked about Dr Chee’s comments, Mr Shanmugam, who was speaking to reporters about the detentions on Wednesday afternoon, said they showed “a lack of understanding of the problem”.

    “So what does Dr Chee suggest? That we say no to all foreign workers? Or we say no to all foreign workers who are Muslim? I think (you) should clarify that. There are tens of thousands of Bangladeshi workers in Singapore, several tens of thousands. They are in our construction sector, working for our town councils, large numbers as cleaners … So what do we do? Send them all back? Who is going to do their jobs?” said Mr Shanmugam.

    “After (the attacks in) Paris, after Jakarta, after all these arrests, they still say abolish the ISA and that all of these are immigration issues … these are serious matters, security issues that require careful consideration and proper thought … We should stop taking cheap political shots and political opportunism.”

    When further queried about its stand on the ISA, SDP central executive committee member Paul Tambyah reiterated the need to address the “root of the problem” and the Government’s “unfettered immigration policy”.

    Meanwhile, the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) corrected Dr Chee’s interpretation of employment data during his rally on Tuesday, calling it “alarmist”.

    Dr Chee had said only 100 jobs were created for locals last year. The MOM said the figures he referred to — local employment — did not refer to the total number of new jobs taken by locals.

    Local employment refers to the difference between total number of locals entering jobs and those leaving jobs, for example owing to retirement. They also pointed out that the difference was 700 last year, not 100.

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • Walid J. Abdullah: Character Applies For Both The Whites And The Reds

    Walid J. Abdullah: Character Applies For Both The Whites And The Reds

    Suddenly, there has been a burst of morality permeating Singapore society. You hear high and mighty proclamations about the importance of ‘character’ by ordinary Singaporeans. ‘Character is most important’; ‘without character one cannot serve as an MP’; ‘one’s character must be assessed to see if one is fit for public office’ etc.

    Undoubtedly, what Dr Chee did about 15 years ago (yes, 15 years, not days or even months) has left a sour taste in many people’s mouths, mine included. I grew up harbouring resentment towards him, because i felt he hindered the growth of the opposition, through that rash act. No doubt, the media made a meal out of it, but the fact remains that he provided the material for them.

    But what truly irks me, and makes me sick to my stomach, is the inconsistency. And double standards. These people who are taking the moral high ground, where were you when, just a while ago, a sitting Member of Parliament was suggesting we fence off foreign workers? Never mind keeping silent; some of these moral policemen (and policewomen) were actually justifying the said MP’s comments!

    Was that statement not reflective of ‘character’? Compare that to Dr Chee chasing former PM Goh: which act is more dangerous to Singapore society? Why was there no angst from these people?

    Now, i am not talking about the supporters of the ruling party who chide Dr Chee, but expressed disappointment at the ‘fencing’ remarks as well. These people, are perfectly entitled to question Chee’s ‘character’. What i cannot stand is those who practise selective outrage; when the politicians they support make mistakes, they keep quiet, or worse, try to make excuses.

    But when it comes to others, they immediately become more Catholic than the Pope, and more Islamic than the Prophet.

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • Former Chee Soon Juan Sceptic: Dr Chee Made Genuine Sacrifices For Politics In Singapore

    Former Chee Soon Juan Sceptic: Dr Chee Made Genuine Sacrifices For Politics In Singapore

     

    Dr. Chee Soon Juan

    Those who talk bad or have ill feeling toward Dr. Chee Soon Juan should relook and rethink again and ask yourselves what has he really done to Singapore in general that cannot be forgiven and forget forever.

    Ask ourselves have we ever know him closely or just rashly demonize him believing whatever the Government control medias has always like to portray him.

    He was very young technocrat, NUS lecturer when he first entered politic in 1992 with SDP which was then headed by Mr. Chiam See Tong as its Secretary General.

    I remembered how proud Mr. Chiam was when he introduced his good catch to the mass media and warned the PAP Government not to underestimate his party credibility and potential.

    Sadly just after a year in 1993 there was leadership crisis and Mr. Chiam parted and joined a new party SPP which was formed by his supporters earlier and from that onwards the SDP party was headed by Dr Chee as its Secretary General.

    Being young and charismatic leader of a political party with liberal views followed by his dismissal from NUS hardened him to confront the PAP Government ferociously.

    PAP Government which have hard time with Mr. JB Jeyaretnam in parliament on that time was determined not to make it easy for Dr. Chee who see him as another threat a potential JB.

    The rest is history when the PAP Goverment managed to subdue him into political wildernesses couple with his bad bloods with Mr. Chiam has made his reputation even worse.

    I’m sorry to say that I’m one of them who has the same thinking as most Singaporeans who never think highly of him even though I was quite critical toward the PAP Government then.

    Tonight for the very first time I came to his SDP rally in Bukit Gombak Stadium and observe him closely. I’m very impress with his composure and manner despites all the foul words hurling at him about his past.

    He indeed a changed man more dignified and what impressed me the most was his humility and his sincerity to serve the people and his despise of materialism and monetary reward which was prevalent with PAP ideology.

    He has proven with deeds when everyone know he and his PH.D. wife and his three children can easily live comfortably if he abandons politic altogether and start new life afresh abroad

    I just shake my head in disbelief of his grit and perseverance who is still steady in facing the humiliation and difficulty to shoulder the responsibility as an opposition politician.

    His eloquent language speaking in English and Chinese never fail to captivate his attentive audience who seem started to acknowledge him as a most formidable opposition that can give the Government a hard time.

    His charisma, aura and persona clearly surpass Mr. Murali Pillai his challenger in this Bukit Batok By Election by a wide margin.

    Just look at the long lines people queuing up to get his signature for his books selfies or whatsoever bewildered me how easy he connect and touch the ordinary peoples heart.

    Although I’m not from Bukit Batok, I hope my fellow citizens from that area can see his genuine sacrifice and vote for him into parliament.

    The time is now.

    Sincerely,
    Ismail L. A.

     

    Source: Mohamed Ismail Ismail

  • Lee Hsien Loong: Good Character, Integrity First Requirement For Candidates

    Lee Hsien Loong: Good Character, Integrity First Requirement For Candidates

    “Anyone standing for public office should be prepared to have his past actions examined, transparently and honestly,” Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a statement in response to comments by the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)’s Paul Tambyah on Saturday (Apr 30).

    PM Lee said this is so that “voters can make informed, responsible decisions as to who is fit and best qualified to represent them in Parliament”.

    “Character goes to the heart of the fitness of a candidate, whether to be an MP, or indeed to hold any public office. Is he honest? Does he have integrity? Is he loyal? Is he committed to serve the people? What are his basic motivations? These come first, before we even talk about how able he is, what experience he brings, or what policies he proposes,” PM Lee said.

    The Prime Minister said the importance of character applies to People’s Action Party (PAP) candidates, although he said it was “understandable why SDP, and particularly Dr Chee Soon Juan, should wish it to be otherwise”.

    “Good character and integrity is the first requirement, and it should be so for opposition parties too.”

    Earlier on Saturday, PM Lee had questioned Dr Chee’s character and aptitude to be an MP for Bukit Batok.

    In response, Dr Tambyah said later in a live Facebook video statement: “A person is not defined by his or her actions or words”, adding that an attack on Dr Chee’s character was “uncalled for”, and that “we need to debate the issues, not engage in character assassination”.

    PM Lee’s comments were issued in a statement from his PressLee Secretary.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Full Time Or Part-Time MP – Who Would You Choose?

    Full Time Or Part-Time MP – Who Would You Choose?

    2 people go for a job interview.

    Person A says: ‘This will be my full-time commitment. I will be at the office for many hours, more than the required amount of time.’

    Person B says: ‘I won’t be here always, this is not my full-time commitment. But don’t worry, i will manage. Don’t ask me how; i just know i will manage.’

    Person B gets the job.

    Sounds ludicrous? Not in my country.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah