Tag: SDP

  • Damanhuri Abas: Singapore Leaders Must Be Humble In Dealings With China

    Damanhuri Abas: Singapore Leaders Must Be Humble In Dealings With China

    I read this a few years ago. But this is most relevant and current now for us as a nation to pick up wise points on dealing with the new Global powerhouse.

    China will be the economic superpower whether we like it or not. China and her history is vastly different from the crusading self-righteous marauding zealous western invaders that kills, destroys and oppresses millions even in many instances forcing Christianity upon indigenous people at the barrel of the gun or cannon.

    So it would be fatally mistaken for us to swallow the narrative of the declining western powers in demonizing China trying to prop up their failing system that serves only the elite and super-rich.

    China is historically respectful and diplomatic in international relations. But it will retaliate to anyone that behaves arrogantly where it will hurt them the most.

    Lots for Singapore and our leaders to learn about the benefits of humility in dealing with China now, with Uncle Sam no longer around to hide behind as he is now transformed into becoming Uncle Trump.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas

  • SDP: Important Questions For Government To Answer Regarding Seized Armoured Vehicles

    SDP: Important Questions For Government To Answer Regarding Seized Armoured Vehicles

    The SDP is greatly concerned about the recent incident involving SAF armored vehicles seized in Hong Kong. The military and diplomatic implications are far reaching and may significantly impact on our country’s national security.

    In this regard, there are immediate questions that the government must answer:

    1. Is there any reason why the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) thinks it is actually acceptable to ship our military equipment from Taiwan to Singapore via Hong Kong knowing fully the political tensions between Taiwan and the People’s Republic of China?

    2. Why is sensitive military equipment transported using a commercial shipping company? Would MINDEF contract out such operations to civilian companies in times of actual combat? If not, why are we not relying on our naval transport facilities and testing their operational readiness during training?

    3. What steps are MINDEF and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs taking to secure the return of our assets without causing greater fallout with China?

    It is important that Singapore maintains a strong and intelligent defence system. The latest incident raises questions on both fronts.

     

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Chee Soon Juan: Singapore Is Ailing, PAP Serving Her Poison

    Chee Soon Juan: Singapore Is Ailing, PAP Serving Her Poison

    Dr Chee Soon Juan, the Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), wrote an article on the condition of the country stating that Singapore economy is living on borrowed time and innovation is the only antidote.

    “It is what we desperately need for economic regeneration. Welcoming the unknown, taking risks, making mistakes, embracing failure, encouraging derring-do – isn’t this what being innovative is all about?” he said.

    Pointing that countries around the world are changing so drastically politically while Singapore continues to follow its old ways, being “disastrously out-of-sync with rapidly changing times.”. Cocooned in its comfort zone, unaware that Singapore is sinking deeper into dysfunction and mediocrity and passed by societies ready and willing to change.

    This is what he wrote in full :

    THE WORLD is in upheaval. South Koreans throng the streets demanding the removal of their president; Malaysians clash as they profess their love or loathing (depending on whether you don red or yellow apparel) for their prime minister; pro- and anti-Beijing Hong Kongers do battle over whether two young lawmakers should be disqualified from parliament; Pinoys and Pinays elected a Pope-cussing-Obama-hating-gun-happy politician as their national leader; the Brits up-ended order of every conceivable kind when they voted to leave the European Union; and now, half of Americans elected as their president someone whom the other half cannot find enough expletives to hurl at.

    All this is enough to make Singaporeans want to quicken the search for another habitable planet to fly to.

    Cue PM Lee: “In Singapore, we watch all this with concern and we have to ask ourselves how we can prevent ourselves from going in that direction. For 50 years we’ve been very lucky. We are still united, still proud of the country, still moving forward…So be aware that the risks are there, and you have seen what can go wrong in other countries.”

    Translation: Singaporeans are lucky to have the PAP. So shun disruption, stick with the familiar. We may not be able to change the government but that is a good thing because citizens cannot be trusted to make the right decisions – just look at the other countries. The PAP will decide for us and protect us from the world’s madness.

    This is what Singaporeans hear and have been hearing for half-a-century. The thinking has been baked into our national DNA.

    It is also one that will ensure our country’s demise. It is this fear of the unfamiliar, fear of getting things wrong, fear of taking chances that will be Singapore’s undoing. For nothing in such an outlook fosters an innovative culture.

    Welcoming the unknown, taking risks, making mistakes, embracing failure, encouraging derring-do – isn’t this what being innovative is all about?

    The truth is that our economy is living on borrowed time. The dependence on multinationals to transfer skills and know-how, a hard-working and cheap labour force ready to work even harder and cheaper, and a bewildering bevy of government companies controlled by the Prime Minister’s wife is a model that may have worked in the past but is disastrously out-of-sync with rapidly changing times.

    As it is, our economy, teetering on the brink of a recession, has been ailing for the last couple of years – this taking place despite the absence of a major world crisis. The danger is that it may signal the beginning of something protracted.

    Innovation is the anti-dote. It is what we desperately need for economic regeneration. For this, change – including political change, especially political change – is necessary.

    I can do no better than quote Steve Wozniak, Apple’s co-founder, who pointed out that a company like Apple could not have emerged from a place like Singapore: “Look at structured societies like Singapore, where are the creative people?…All the creative elements seem to disappear.”

    It is a tragedy that Singaporeans are unable to see that Americans, Hong Kongers, or Britons are unafraid to take political chances, stand up to injustice – perceived or otherwise, and be their nation’s boss. So what if Brexit fails or China cracks down on Hong Kong or Donald Trump’s tenure turns out to be a disaster? They’ll learn, course-correct and improve their political systems in the long run.

    What about us? We continue to be afraid of change because the PAP breeds and feeds the fear of change. We are cocooned in our comfort zone, unaware that we are sinking deeper into dysfunction and mediocrity and passed by societies ready and willing to change.

    It has become a cliche, but still no less true, that this island on which we inhabit has precious little natural resources; nothing to mine for, drill at or grow on. This is why it is so troubling that those in power are strangulating the very thing that will ensure our survival and progress – the minds of our people.

    What fertiliser does for crops, political freedom does for innovation. The messiness and seeming chaos that accompanies democracy must not be seen as societal threats to be bleached from our system. In our desire for peace and security, let us not inadvertently celebrate the peace of the cemetery and the security of the serf.

    Political disruption (unfortunately, to many Singaporeans, this includes the simple act of electing a few more opposition MPs) is needed to energise the human spirit and provide that impetus for positive change.

    May wisdom and courage prevail.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • PAP Has Gotten Worse Since Last GE

    PAP Has Gotten Worse Since Last GE

    <Written by Joseph Tan Kheng Liang>

    The PAP has gotten worse since the last GE!

    One of the most recent landmarks in the Singaporean political calendar was the ‘watershed elections’ of 2011. The term watershed was used because it seemed highly probable at that point in time that the PAP would lose several GRCs. Lee Hsien Loong even apologised and cried in public.

    The key question is this: How has the PAP changed for the better since then? The clear and simple answer is that the PAP is back to their own arrogant ways and Singaporeans are not going to benefit from this! Let me give you some examples to illustrate.

    In 2011, they promised to work harder and apologised for their mistakes, mainly due to a liberal immigration policy and an infrastructure which did not keep up. 5 years later, they have come up with arrogant tactics and a completely befuddling “ownself-check-ownself” governing philosophy.

    We have seen numerous cases of lack of transparency in recent times, including the Hep C outbreak at SGH which was not made public until a later stage, we had the case where residents in Sengkang felt cheated after plans to build a columbarium was labelled as a ‘temple’ instead.

    When the trains have new problems such as mysterious ‘signalling fault’, there was no sound or trace of apology from their favourite fixer Khaw Boon Wan. Instead, he chose to pretend that everything was fine, celebrating openings and gatherings on his Facebook page.

    Looking at the by-election of 2016 (which was caused in part because of the actions of their own MP), ministers and even junior MPs took the liberty to ‘whack’ their opponent’s character. When another by-election took place 3 years before, they resorted to no such thing with Lee Li Lian.

    Their jokes even continued abroad! Mainstream media was so proud that Pinky got invited to a US State dinner but did not boast as much when he later ended up offending China by commenting on their territorial dispute and later prove their foreign policy lapses by offending Trump!

    If the average man thinks that these issues do not affect him, look at the price increases: parking charges and waste collection charges (which Leong Sze Hian dug and found an increased surplus)! Even though there is a drop in transport charges, it is not as much as the drop in oil prices!

    Ask yourselves: has the PAP given you a better life since the last General Elections? If the answer is no, the PAP must be very thick-skinned to tell us that they wish to check themselves! Is this even right given their recent track record?

    I can only conclude that they have gotten worse and need someone like the SDP to keep them in check!

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Damanhuri Abas: Military Action In Myanmar Against Rohingya Amounting To Genocide

    Damanhuri Abas: Military Action In Myanmar Against Rohingya Amounting To Genocide

    This is happening in an ASEAN country. Its becoming a genocide. Countries behave only when they are pressured and cannot get away with abusing their own people or others. The International rule of law is selectively used and influenced by those with much power in the world.

    This BBC report is juz the tip of the iceberg. There are much more brutal accounts via photos and videos on social media that we may have seen but seem helpless to do anything about.

    At the very least we must raise our collective voice to create awareness via whatever platforms we may have some sphere of influence. We need to make people aware about this brutal killings currently taking place in that country.

    ASEAN countries must pressure Myanmmar to stop this genocide of its marginalized Rohingya people.

    Al-Quran, Surah 4. An-Nisa (The Women), Verse 75:

    وَمَا لَكُمْ لَا تُقَاتِلُونَ فِي سَبِيلِ اللَّهِ وَالْمُسْتَضْعَفِينَ مِنَ الرِّجَالِ وَالنِّسَاءِ وَالْوِلْدَانِ الَّذِينَ يَقُولُونَ رَبَّنَا أَخْرِجْنَا مِنْ هَٰذِهِ الْقَرْيَةِ الظَّالِمِ أَهْلُهَا وَاجْعَل لَّنَا مِن لَّدُنكَ وَلِيًّا وَاجْعَل لَّنَا مِن لَّدُنكَ نَصِيرًا

    Translation:
    And why do you not fight for the cause of God, while the weak among the men and the women and the children are crying: Our Lord! Bring us out of this town whose people are cruel oppressors! And, send us Your aid, and send us Your protector!

     

    Source: Damanhuri Abas