Tag: Sedition Act

  • CAN Singapore: Amos Yee Beaten Up In Changi Prison, Free Him Now

    CAN Singapore: Amos Yee Beaten Up In Changi Prison, Free Him Now

    <Credits: Community Action Network – CAN Singapore>

    #freeamosyee, interestingly, we have been informed that Amos has been transferred from Changi’s Men’s Prison to Tanah Merah Prison… Amos has said that Tanah Merah Prison has mostly Malay youths.

    We have also been informed that he has been threatened, slapped on the back and kicked while he was climbing up the stairs. A complaint has been lodged with the Prison Authorities, who had efficiently replied to say they will look into the matter.

    Amos’ mother has put in an urgent request for Amos to be moved to Home Detention.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Filipino Nurse Ello Ed Mundsel Bello Convited Under Sedition Act

    Filipino Nurse Ello Ed Mundsel Bello Convited Under Sedition Act

    Philippine national Ello Ed Mundsel Bello, 28, who made disparaging remarks about Singaporeans onFACEBOOK earlier this year, pleaded guilty to three charges on Wednesday (Aug 26).

    He was convicted on one count under the Sedition Act, for promoting feelings of ill-will and hostility, and on two counts of providing false information to police. An additional charge under the Sedition Act, and another for lying to police, will be taken into consideration during sentencing.

    In hisFACEBOOK post, Bello called Singaporeans “loosers (sic) in their own country”. “We take theirJOBS, their future, their women, and soon, we will evict all SG loosers out of their own country”, Bello added, saying that Singapore would be the “new Filipino state”.

    The Filipino also stated that he would be “praying that disastors (sic) strike Singapore and more Singaporeans will die”. He will “celebrate” if this happens, he said.

    He ended his Facebook post with the declaration: “REMEMBER PINOY BETTER AND STRONGER THAN STINKAPOREANS.”

    Bello did this while employed as a nurse at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, which subsequently dismissed him over the incident, after discovering through their own investigations that Bello had made three other online posts in the same vein in 2014.

    In court on Wednesday, Deputy Public Prosecutor Kumaresan Gohubalan said that Bello’s comments were “xenophobic, derogatory and inflammatory” in nature, further aggravated by the fact that his comments were published to “an enormous audience”, and that Bello displayed a total lack of remorse for his actions.

    Investigations revealed that he had regularly commented on reports and articles relating to Singapore, often in a “vile, derogatory and offensive” nature, and on sensitive issues such as race and nationality.

    Bello’s comments came under the spotlight when they were posted on The Kaki News Network, aFACEBOOK page with a significant public following of 30,000FACEBOOKusers. The comments went viral, and were also the subject of several police reports made against Bello.

    Alarmed by the hostility generated by his comments, Bello deleted them, and lodged a report with police, stating that he was “shocked and furious that these comments had been attributed to him”.

    He told police on three occasions that he did not make the offending comments on Facebook, and that hisACCOUNT had been accessed without his permission. Bello only admitted to his lies in his fourth statement to police, when “he found he could not keep up the lie”, Bello’s lawyer, Mark Goh, said.

    Mr Goh also told the court that as the “delicate golden threads” of race and religion that bind Singaporean society had not been touched on by his client’s comments, Bello should be granted a lower sentence of six weeks, as opposed to the prosecution’s submission of 20 weeks’ imprisonment.

    In response, DPP Kumaresan told the court that comments of this nature are “detrimental to society” and “cannot be trivialized or underestimated”, especially in a cosmopolitan society like Singapore.

    Bello will be sentenced on Sep 16.

    For promoting feelings of ill-will and hostility between different races or classes of the population of Singapore, Bello could have received a fine of up to S$5,000 or a jailTERM of up to three years, or both.

    For giving false information to police, Bello could have faced a jailTERM of up to one year, a fine of up to S$5,000, or both.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • PM Najib Razak Explains Sedition Act May Be Used Against Anti-Church Protestors

    PM Najib Razak Explains Sedition Act May Be Used Against Anti-Church Protestors

    The Cabinet today agreed that police must investigate the protest by a group of residents against a church in Taman Medan, and warned that action could be taken under the law.

    Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said that the Sedition Act or other existing laws could be used against the protesters.

    “The protesters should have discussed with the church, instead of taking actions that have created worry and restlessness in this multi-racial country.

    “Police will investigate the group that protested in Taman Medan. If they are found to have violated any laws, action can be taken under the Sedition Act or other laws,” Najib said in a statement this evening.

    “The people must abide by the country’s laws and practice respect of other religions as enshrined in the Constitution.

    “We also need to have an attitude of tolerance and mutual respect among communities of different religions,” Najib said.

    In the incident on Sunday, some 50 people gathered outside the new church to demand that the cross affixed to the building be removed.

    The protesters said the presence of a cross in a Muslim-majority area posed a challenge to Islam and could sway the faith of youths in their community. The cross was taken down by church leaders a few hours later.

    The Selangor government today announced that the church did not need to register itself with the local authorities nor did it need a permit to operate on the basis of constitutional guarantees on the freedom of religion.

    The Inspector-General (IGP) of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar and Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi were initially at odds over whether the protest was seditious.

    The IGP cleared the protesters of any wrongdoing, saying that they were only protesting the location of the church and were not against Christianity itself.

    But Zahid said the protesters’s actions were seditious and action could be taken against them.

    Khalid today said the police would investigate the matter and he would not interfere, even if action was taken against his older brother, Datuk Abdullah Abu Bakar, who had participated in the protest.

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

  • Couple Behind The Real Singapore Charged On 7 Counts Of Sedition Each

    Couple Behind The Real Singapore Charged On 7 Counts Of Sedition Each

    The couple behind socio-political website The Real Singapore – a 26-year-old Singaporean man and a 22-year-old Australian woman – were on Tuesday (Apr 14) each charged with seven counts of sedition.

    Yang Kaiheng and Ai Takagi allegedly published seditious articles on the website between October 2013 and February 2015. One of these articles falsely claimed that an incident between police and some members of the public during a Thaipusam procession earlier this year had been sparked by a Filipino family’s complaint that the drums played during the procession upset their child.

    Yang is Singaporean, while Ai Takagi is Australian.

    According to the charge sheets, the particular articles have the “tendency to promote feelings of ill-will and hostility between different groups of people in Singapore, name, between ethnic Indians in Singapore and Philippine nationals in Singapore”.

    The pair also face an eighth charge, this time under the Penal Code, for failing to produce documents to a police officer from the Criminal Investigation Department.

    Under the Sedition Act, the duo are liable, on conviction for a first offence, to a fine of up to S$5,000 or to imprisonment for a term of up to three years, or to both. As for the charge under the Penal code, they are punishable with imprisonment of a maximum of one month, or a maximum fine of S$1,500, or both.

    Court bail for each was set at S$20,000, and the case will be mentioned again on May 12.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Najib Razak Defends Use Of Sedition Act To Prevent Acts Of Terrorism

    Najib Razak Defends Use Of Sedition Act To Prevent Acts Of Terrorism

    The police are justified in making arrests under the colonial-era Sedition Act 1948 to prevent acts of terrorism in the country, Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today.

    The prime minister said use of the Act was a preventive measure and if not used, more people could become victims to acts of terror.

    The controversial law, criticised by many here and abroad for quelling legitimate dissent, was useful in preserving ethnic relations, he added.

    “We also place importance on ethnic and religious relations and that is why we are strengthening the Sedition Act. All this is meant to forestall something bad from happening to our country.

    “As the saying goes in English, ‘prevention is better than cure’. I believe that it is better for us to have preventive detention laws than having someone commit an act of terror.

    “If terrorism were to happen, many lives may be sacrificed,” Najib said in a speech to the police force at the 208th Police Day anniversary in Kuala Lumpur today.

    Najib said there was no reason for the government to apologise for using the Sedition Act, despite international criticism against the colonial-era law.‎

    “We should not be apologetic. Some may say this is not democratic, this ‎(violates) rights to freedom, and more.

    “But I want to say that there is no absolute freedom. There is no place for absolute freedom without responsibility in this country,” said Najib.

    He also gave his assurance that the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which will be tabled in Parliament soon, would not be used for political purposes.

    Najib added that the executive arm of the government would have no say in whether to detain an individual under the new act.

    “The government has no intention of using the new act for political purposes. That is why the power to detain is not placed under members of the administration.

    “We will place it under a credible body so that only those truly involved in terrorism can be detained under the new act. That way, we can guarantee Malaysia will continue to be safe,” said Najib.

    He also reminded Malaysians not to belittle the efforts of the police force in ensuring public safety.‎

    “We should not disrespect the police and look down on them by using words and insults that are unsuitable, as if the police act ‎freely as they like.

    “The groups that insult the police’s honour are completely irresponsible,” said Najib.

    The police have come under heavy criticism after nearly 90 anti-goods and services tax (GST) protesters were arrested on Monday as they were demonstrating at the Customs Department headquarters in Kelana Jaya.

    Opposition politicians have also accused Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim of taking selective action and targeting opponents of Barisan Nasional (BN).

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com