Tag: Singapore democratic Party

  • Damanhuri Abas: Bukit Batok Residents Have Critical Responsibility To Improve Parliamentary Democracy In Singapore

    Damanhuri Abas: Bukit Batok Residents Have Critical Responsibility To Improve Parliamentary Democracy In Singapore

    Dr Chee and Dr Paul meeting residences of Bukit Batok SMC. SDP is serious about making into parliament with this God-sent opportunity.

    SDP BB 1

    SDP BB 3

    The alternative voice for the people in parliamentary debates on policies will be richer with SDP involved.

    A boost to Parliamentary Democracy.

    Our love for this land we call home can be better served with more robust parliamentary debates for the sake of improving our collective conditions.

    Bukit Batok residences will be instrumental to this.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Abas

  • SDP Will Contest In Bukit Batok By-Election

    SDP Will Contest In Bukit Batok By-Election

    The SDP will be contesting in the Bt Batok by-election which we expect will be called soon.

    Our campaign team has been activated and we will work very hard to be the people’s voice in Parliament and continue to be the Competent, Constructive and Compassionate party that Singaporeans want to see.

     

    Source: Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)

  • SDP Parents-CEC Members Call For Inquiry Into Benjamin Lim’s Case

    SDP Parents-CEC Members Call For Inquiry Into Benjamin Lim’s Case

    As parents of school-going children, we have been following Benjamin Lim’s case very closely. What happened to Benjamin is tragic. There are many answers the Ministry of Education owes to parents regarding the issue.

    First, shouldn’t schools be the safest place for our children to be in when they are away from home? Why did the school hand over one of its students to the police without his parents’ or school official’s presence?

    Second, schools have the responsibility to make sure children’s well-being are their top priority, even when faced with demands and pressure from the police.

    In Benjamin’s case, the school could have asked a school counsellor to accompany him to the police station. Even if the police did not allow anyone else to ride in the police vehicle with Benjamin, the school should have sent someone to drive separately to the police station and let Benjamin know that he was not alone.

    This is the whole problem with Singapore where most of us do not know our rights or question the limits of the authorities’ powers.

    Third, there was a school camp the following day which Benjamin was to attend. Students generally like attending these camps and there is no reason to believe that Benjamin was not looking forward to it. According to the family, however, the school called right after Benjamin left the police investigation to inform his mother that he will be excluded from the camp.

    If this account is true, why did the school decide to exclude Benjamin from the school camp and add to his already depressed state of mind?

    Already as a 14-year-old child facing five police officers without the presence of any familiar adult is very daunting. We will never know what went on in Benjamin’s mind when he decided to end his life that day, but his suicide is a wake up call to us.

    Let us make sure that no child ever goes through what Benjamin had to go through. This can only be achieved when an independent Commission of Inquiry is set up to determine exactly the events of his arrest and his treatment while he was under police custody. The current system does not afford adequate protection of minors.

    We owe it to Benjamin and his grieving family to seek justice for a son and brother lost.

    Jaslyn Go
    Jufri Salim
    Bryan Lim
    Mansura Sajahan
    Members
    Central Executive Committee
    Singapore Democratic Party

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • SDP: PAP Clearly Violating MOE Policy Of Maintaining Apolitical Schools

    SDP: PAP Clearly Violating MOE Policy Of Maintaining Apolitical Schools

    Singapore Democrats

    In 2009, the Straits Times reported that Minister for Law K Shanmugam had warned his party members in an editorial in Petir, the PAP’s newsletter, that “younger voters can erode its dominant position should the party fail to convince them that Singapore…needs a strong leadership and a political system that allows for effective and speedy decisions to be made”.

    Mr Shanmugam felt that for the PAP to prolong its power, it needed to “provide greater political education for Singaporeans, in particular, students”.

    Another Straits Times report said that Mr Shanmugam proposed that schools teach “comparative political systems” but to do this in the context of “improving the Government’s effectiveness in reaching out to younger Singaporeans”.

    This is why the SDP applied to the Ministry of Education (MOE) to allow us to conduct talks with students and to present another point of view. The MOE, however, says that “schools are neutral places for learning and not platforms for partisan politics”. The SDP documents here how biased and partisan history and social studies textbook are.

    Educate students about politics, says Shanmugam
    By Zakir Hussain
    Straits Times
    19 December 2009

    For 50 years, the PAP has stayed in power because it has delivered progress to the people, its leaders often point out.

    But Law Minister K. Shanmugam feels younger voters can erode its dominant position should the party fail to convince them that Singapore, more than most countries, needs a strong leadership and a political system that allows for effective and speedy decisions to be made.

    He gave this warning to his party members in an editorial in the latest People’s Action Party bi-monthly magazine, Petir.

    Mr Shanmugam appears to have his eye on the clock when he issued his word of caution, saying no political party had stayed in power continuously for more than 70 years.

    The way for the PAP to outlive this record, he feels, is to provide greater political education for Singaporeans, in particular, students.

    However, he said: ‘The education should not trumpet the virtues of any particular system.’

    Instead, students should be taught, among other things, how political systems work in different cultures, the impact of geographical and social factors on societies and why city states rise and fall.

    ‘This will make people look carefully at the liberal democratic model and help them decide which aspects best suit Singapore,’ he said as he set out how the PAP can communicate better its message that Singapore needs good governance and that only the PAP can deliver it.

    His concern comes at a time when a younger generation of better-educated voters feels the political process and system in a democratic state should be based on the Western model of liberal democracy.

    Mr Shanmugam and government leaders reject the view, arguing that the best systems are those that fit the society they govern.

    ‘Not every aspect can be transplanted in toto across cultures, without regard to different economic, social and geostrategic situations,’ said the Law Minister.

    It is a position he has argued vigorously in favour of in the past three months: first to a group of international lawyers meeting here in October, then the Harvard alumni in Singapore last week, and now, PAP members.

    Mr Shanmugam, who is also Second Home Affairs Minister, said the PAP’s message had resonated with the older generation who experienced the turmoil of Singapore’s early years.

    ‘But the collective memory of this is not as strong among newer generations, whose viewpoints will increasingly influence the political process,’ he added.

    Younger Singaporeans may therefore believe that the Western model of liberal democracy can be adopted without trade-offs, he said.

    ‘Singaporeans are entitled to decide whether they want the trade-offs.

    ‘And if the majority chooses slower development and a lower quality of life, and is willing to accept more tensions within our society in return for changes in the political system, then so be it,’ he said.

    ‘But that choice must be an informed one,’ he added.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • MOE: SDP’s Request To Conduct Socio-Political Talks In School Rejected

    MOE: SDP’s Request To Conduct Socio-Political Talks In School Rejected

    The Singapore Democratic Party’s (SDP) request to conduct talks in schools to engage youth on socio-political issues has been has been turned down by the Ministry of Education (MOE).

    Responding to TODAY’s queries, an MOE spokesperson said today (Feb 12): “We cannot allow it because schools are neutral places for learning and not platforms for partisan politics.”

    On Feb 2, the SDP had said in a press statement that the party will “approach our schools and educational institutions to initiate a conversation with our youth on national issues that concern them and their future”.

    Titled “Foster, Forge, Future: Conversations With Our Youth”, the initiative was “aimed at bringing politics and policy-making closer to our students, challenging them to engage in thoughtful analysis on issues facing Singapore”.

    In the statement, the party said that “exposure to alternative points of view is essential”, if the “goal is to cultivate independent thinking” among students”.

    “And if the objective is to foster creative thought, injecting open-minded enquiry into the educational system is necessary,” they added. The party said they would write to the MOE as well as secondary schools, junior colleges, polytechnics and universities with the request.

    Two days later, the party said in a post on its website it had been rejected by the MOE, and that the ministry had said schools are neutral places for learning. While the party was “gratified” by this, it said it was puzzled that “history textbooks approved by the MOE for secondary school students are so partisan”.

    According to the SDP, one textbook stated that the late David Marshall, Singapore’s first Chief Minister and founder of the Workers’ Party, was a “weak and indecisive leader”, and that opposition politician Lim Chin Siong “adopted violent strategies through riots and street demonstrations”, among other things.

    It also cited some questions and answers from a self-study revision book for Secondary 2 students “based on the new syllabus by Ministry of Education”, to highlight its point about history textbooks being partisan.

    In its reply, the MOE said that the textbook segments quoted by the SDP in its post “are not from a MOE history textbook”, while the self-study revision book in question is not endorsed by them.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com