Tag: Singapore

  • New Seletar Airport Terminal Could Handle 700,000 Passengers A Year

    New Seletar Airport Terminal Could Handle 700,000 Passengers A Year

    The new passenger terminal at Seletar Airport is designed for 700,000 passenger movements a year – up to four times the estimated maximum capacity of the current airport.

    The two-story, 9,500-sqm terminal on the eastern side of Seletar Airport is expected to be completed by end-2018, the airport operator said at the new terminal’s groundbreaking ceremony on Thursday (Oct 20).

    The new terminal will be capable of parking up to three scheduled turboprop flights – such as those flown by regional airline Firefly – in its adjacent bays during peak hours. Turboprop aircraft operations will be shifted from Changi Airport to Seletar Airport once the building is ready, freeing up capacity for jet aircraft operations at Changi Airport.

    Seletar Airport General Manager See Seng Wan said the change in the airport’s operating model was to make “better use of resources at both airports, which will benefit Singapore’s aviation ecosystem in the long run”.

    To handle the expected increase in passenger traffic, the new facility promises a more streamlined boarding and arrival process featuring four check-in counters, four immigration counters, and two security screening stations. In comparison, the existing facilities only have one of each. The gate holding room in the new terminal will also be able to seat 200 passengers waiting for their flights, compared to the current capacity of 70.

    Other improvements include a dedicated space for business aviation passengers with its own private drop-off, check-in and lounge areas, a landscaped garden in the middle of the terminal and tropical design features to provide a warm and relaxed air.

    Plans for the existing terminal remain to be decided, according to Seletar Airport.

     

    Source: ChannelNewsAsia

  • Primary 5 Boy Falls To Death After Failing Exams For The First Time

    Primary 5 Boy Falls To Death After Failing Exams For The First Time

    In his first four years in primary school, he had never fared poorly in any examination subject, usually averaging about 70 marks.

    But in this year’s mid-year exams, the Primary 5 pupil found out that he had failed two papers – mathematics and Higher Chinese.

    On May 18, the boy was found dead at the foot of his Sengkang block, just nine days after his 11th birthday.

    He was due to collect his exam results that day for his parents to acknowledge.

    A coroner’s inquiry into the boy’s death yesterday was told that his 45-year-old mother thought he had killed himself over his exam results by jumping from his bedroom window in the 17th-storey flat.

    But his father, a 47-year-old customer service engineer, felt his son had accidentally fallen to his death.

    The identities of the boy, his family members and his school cannot be disclosed because of a gag order.

    Yesterday, investigation officer Inspector Lynn Ong told State Coroner Marvin Bay that the boy’s mother, a housewife, had expected him to score at least 70 marks per subject for his exams.

    He had scored about 70 marks for every subject from Primary 1 to Primary 4.

    If he did not meet her expectations, she would cane his palm lightly, Insp Ong said, adding: “She would hit him once for every mark short of 70 marks.”

    However, she would cane him only if his average score across all subjects was below 70 marks.

    “Sometimes, she would look through his examination papers first, and if they were difficult, she would not hit him.”

    His mother also rewarded him when he did well, such as buying him a gift.

    For the mid-year exam, he had asked for a kite, and she bought one for him on May 14, even before the results were out. He went out to fly the kite with his father the next day.

    The school principal described the boy as an average performer who was generally able to cope with school.

    The principal also said that pupils tend to see a dip in their exam results in Primary 5 because of changes in the exam format to prepare them for PSLE.

    The boy found out his results before May 18, when the exam papers were returned to the pupils for checking.

    Out of 100 marks, he scored 50 for English, 53.8 for Chinese and 57.5 for science. He fared poorly in two subjects, scoring 12 marks for Higher Chinese and 20.5 for mathematics.

    UPSET

    The boy’s Chinese and Higher Chinese teacher noticed that he was visibly upset after receiving the results for both subjects.

    However, his science teacher saw him on May 17, a day before he was supposed to take his results home to show his parents, and he was cheerful and bubbly as usual, the court heard.

    On May 18, his father noticed that he was taking a longer time than usual to get ready for school.

    His mother tried to open the bedroom door, but it was locked.

    She used a spare key to unlock it, and when they entered the room, he was nowhere to be seen.

    The couple, who also have a 16-year-old daughter, looked out of the window and saw their son lying on a grass patch at the foot of their block.

    His mother called the police at around 6.50am.

    She called his school about 15 minutes later and told the principal what happened and said she needed help as her husband was distraught.

    Insp Ong said that when the principal arrived at the scene, the mother was “very emotionally unstable”.

    “She heard her lamenting in Mandarin, saying ‘I only asked for 70 marks, I don’t expect you to get 80 marks,’” Insp Ong added.

    A paramedic pronounced the boy dead at the scene at around 7am.

    The police do not suspect any foul play.

    The cause of death was found to be multiple injuries, consistent with those sustained after a person had fallen from height.

    Coroner Bay will deliver his findings today.

     

    Source: The New Paper

  • Ex-SCDF Director Who Was Sentenced To 10 Weeks’ Jail Cleared Of Misappropriating 2 iPads

    Ex-SCDF Director Who Was Sentenced To 10 Weeks’ Jail Cleared Of Misappropriating 2 iPads

    A former senior civil servant, originally sentenced to 10 weeks’ jail last year after he was found guilty of misappropriating two iPads, walked out of court a free man on Thursday (Oct 20) after he was acquitted of the charges.

    Mr Jeganathan Ramasamy, 65, who was director of the technology department at the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF), had maintained that the two Apple tablets handed to him by IT vendor NCS in 2011 were personal purchases, for which he had yet to make payment.

    He gave one to his daughter and sold the other to SCDF’s then senior director of emergency services for $200. Each iPad 2 was worth $939.

    But the prosecution, which brought two charges against him for criminal breach of trust, contended that the two iPads were meant to be used to test mobile apps that NCS was developing for SCDF.

    In acquitting Mr Jeganathan on Thursday, Judicial Commissioner See Kee Oon said there were “inconsistencies and gaps” in the evidence of both the prosecution and the defence. He said “ample doubt” had been raised in the case against Mr Jeganathan, making it unsafe for the conviction to stand.

    The judicial commissioner noted that the two iPads did not come loaded with any apps, contrary to the prosecution’s case that the devices were meant for testing purposes.

    He also noted that it did not make sense for Mr Jeganathan to sell one iPad to a senior officer in the same organisation if he had obtained it through wrongful means.

    The judicial commissioner pointed to text message exchanges with NCS’ then group general manager, Mr Wong Soon Nam, in which Mr Jeganathan asked to pay for the devices on at least three occasions.

    In a message after he received the devices, Mr Jeganathan said: “Tell me the amount I have to pay.” Mr Wong replied that the iPad 2 “is meant for all the new mobile apps that we are rolling out for SCDF and for you to trial”.

    Shortly after this exchange, Mr Wong phoned Mr Jeganathan.

    Mr Jeganathan testified that Mr Wong told him over the phone to try out the iPads first and they could talk about the price later. Mr Wong initially testified that he did not communicate further with Mr Jeganathan but when confronted with the call records, said he could not remember the contents of the call.

    The judicial commissioner said text messages are a “fertile ground for miscommunication” and that the contents of the call can change the interpretation of the text message exchange.

    Approached for comment after he was acquitted, Mr Jeganathan, who was defended by Mr Sanjiv Rajan, said he was “thankful” that “justice prevailed”. He left SCDF in 2012.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • Ustaz Abd Al-Halim: Is ARS Just A Mechanism For Asatizahs To Be Controlled By The State?

    Ustaz Abd Al-Halim: Is ARS Just A Mechanism For Asatizahs To Be Controlled By The State?

    AsSalaam’alaikum!

    I recently attended a seminar on making the Asatizah Recognition Scheme mandatory. It is clear that asatizahs are worried that if they resist the ARS scheme i.e. teach even if they are without ARS, they could be arrested and put to jail. One person actually asked that question during the Q & A. Of course, there is as yet no passing of any laws. There is no police force to watch over the asatizahs for now. But the indications that the speakers gave is that there will be law enforcement. One speaker spoke of levying fines upon asatizahs who do not comply. It is one thing to come up with a questionable policy but entirely another to implement it. I wonder if such enforcement is to be done by the government which is, by the way, secular. If so, will we have a secular non-Muslim government sending police officers out to arrest asatizahs who do not have ARS but are nonetheless qualified to teach given that they have been teaching for years and years and that they have been appointed to teach by ulama before ARS came along?

    I spoke to a senior person who is knowledgeable in Islam afterwards. He is not convinced that making ARS mandatory is about stemming “ajaran sesat” (deviant teachings). Instead he, like many others know that this is becoming a draconian mechanism to control the asatizahs. He further quipped that if they are concerned with ajaran sesat, there are many ideas that the religious authorities themselves seem to propagate that can be classified as “ajaran sesat” such as the idea that all religions are the same and that it is ok to praise Lee Kuan Yew who is a non-Muslim (Kafir) in the mosque during Jumaat sermon even though the Jumaat sermon is part and parcel of our ibadah and that the Masjid should not be politicised.

    It is glaring that the President of Pergas had to assure the audience that those behind making ARS mandatory are not agents of the government – pointing to the panelists and making the audience repeat after him several times that they are not agents of the government but instead they are Warathatul Anbiyaa’ (Inheritors of the legacy of the Prophets).

    I was there and those who were there and reading this can verify or debunk what I say here.

    May Allah swt save this ummah from internal and external enemies. Amiin!

     

    Source: Ustaz Abd Al-Halim

  • Syukrina Iwana Sofhian Dilapor Hilang, Polis Rayu Orang Ramai Beri Maklumat

    Syukrina Iwana Sofhian Dilapor Hilang, Polis Rayu Orang Ramai Beri Maklumat

    Polis merayu orang ramai tampil memberikan maklumat tentang keberadaan seorang budak perempuan.

    Kali terakhir Syukrina Iwana Binte Sofhian, 12 tahun dilihat adalah di Blok 817 Jurong West Street 81 pada 17 Oktober sekitar pukul 1.00 tengah hari.

    Menurut kenyataan Pasukan Polis Singapura (SPF) yang dikeluarkan hari ini (19 Okt), Syukrina Iwana, yang setinggi kira-kira 1.5 meter dan berkulit cerah, kali terakhir dilihat memakai t-shirt berwarna hitam, berseluar panjang dan memakai selipar.

    Beliau juga memakai beg silang berwarna kelabu, tambah SPF.

    Sesiapa yang mempunyai maklumat, diminta menghubungi hotline polis di 1800 255 0000 atau menyerahkannya di laman www.police.gov.sg/iwitness.

    Source: Berita MediaCorp

deneme bonusu