Tag: Singapore

  • Fight In 24-Hour Convenience Store At Geylang Lorong 19

    Fight In 24-Hour Convenience Store At Geylang Lorong 19

    It began with a man accusing another of bumping into him, escalated into an explosive argument and ended with the accuser hitting the other man’s head with two beer bottles.

    Part of the incident, which occurred at a 24-hour convenience store near Lorong 19 in Geylang around 9.40pm on Sunday, was captured on video by a female shop assistant using her mobile phone camera.

    The minimart manager, who wanted to be known only as Mr Liu, 49, told The New Paper yesterday that the assailant, who was a familiar face at the store, was buying cigarettes and soft drinks at the time.

    Mr Liu’s female assistant had told him that the man, who wore a black T-shirt, was paying at the counter when an older man and a friend entered the store to buy cigarettes.

    Suddenly, the first man loudly accused the older man of bumping into him and started swearing.

    “The older man told him that he didn’t like what he was saying,” said Mr Liu in Mandarin.

    As the argument became more heated, the first man suddenly grabbed two beer bottles and hit the older man’s head. The bottles did not shatter but blood started gushing from the victim’s head.

    Mr Liu said: “The shop assistant told me that the blood just kept flowing, staining the older man’s white T-shirt. He was also unsteady and fell down once but he never hit back at the man in the black T-shirt.”

    As the assailant continued spewing vulgarities, the victim shouted at his companion to call the police. When the assailant heard this, he phoned a friend and asked to him to go to the store, said Mr Liu.

    STUNNED

    Meanwhile, the victim’s friend blocked the door to prevent the assailant from leaving.

    Alone in the shop with three angry men, the shop assistant was too stunned to do anything.

    “She told me that she didn’t see the victim bump into the other man,” said Mr Liu.

    When the shop assistant tried to record the attack on her mobile phone, the assailant threatened her.

    Mr Liu said: “He shouted at her to stop or he would call people to go to the shop every day to harass her.”

    When Mr Liu arrived at the minimart around 10pm, the police were already there and four or five people were milling around outside.

    “The assailant’s friend was outside and didn’t enter the store,” he said.

    Mr Liu said that when the assailant saw the police, he sat on the floor and said he felt faint. But he declined to be taken to hospital, said a Singapore Civil Defence Force spokesman.

    The 43-year-old victim was taken conscious to Tan Tock Seng hospital in an ambulance, the spokesman added.

    A police spokesman said they were alerted to the incident at 9.52pm.

    A 34-year-old man was arrested for voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons and means. Investigations are continuing.

    Mr Liu estimated that the minimart lost about $1,000 in takings as a result of the incident.

    He said the police were there for about three hours carrying out investigations.

    “We spent an hour cleaning the shop after that,” added Mr Liu.

    “Some items like the beer bottles next to the counter had blood (on them) and had to be thrown away. It wasn’t the first time a fight has happened but this is the worst so far.”

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Guy Rages At Librarian After Being Told Not To Disturb Others, Librarian Resigns

    Guy Rages At Librarian After Being Told Not To Disturb Others, Librarian Resigns

    Stomper CK‘s wife, who is a librarian at Woodlands Regional Library, got into a dispute with a visitor that subsequently led to her resignation.


    The incident occurred on Aug 30 at about 4.30pm.

    According to CK, his wife had asked the man to use his handphone somewhere else in the library so as to not disturb other readers.

    However, he was apparently not compliant and started shouting at the librarian.

    CK said his wife filmed a video of the incident “as a deterrence” as she was afraid that the guy would lay his hands on her.

    Said the Stomper:

    “A reader was asked to use his handphone at another area within the library so as not to disturb other readers. However, he started turning violent and kicking the entrance door.

    “My wife feared that he would lay hands so she took a video as a deterrence. She had to tender her resignation because of this man.”

    In the video, the man can be heard asking the librarian what her problem was and why she was taking a video.

    He also said that he was not taking a picture of her and asked her why she was so sensitive.

     

    Source: http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg

  • This Is The Change A Former Politically Apathetic Millenial Wants To See

    This Is The Change A Former Politically Apathetic Millenial Wants To See

    The mood changed after August 9.

    SG50 had culminated in a spectacular show of fireworks and nostalgia, but now the nation’s joyous jubilee celebration would make way for equally fervent political discourse.

    No one knew when Parliament would dissolve, but we all knew it would be a watershed year for local politics. After all, this is the first election since the passing of former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and the air was pregnant with anticipation.

    It wasn’t long before the barrage of online posts about Singapore’s changing political landscape came fast and furious. From regaling personal stories about meeting their personable and humble MPs, to articulately listing the pros and cons of having a multi-party government, it seemed everyone was now a political pundit and had something to say about something or someone.

    For someone who has never been well-versed in, nor cared much for, politicking, covering the GE forMothership.sg helped me make sense of the online discourse I was seeing. There were two major camps: the conscientiously-researched commentaries, and the ones loosely strung together, just to jump onto the bandwagon and garner Facebook likes and shares. Still, I took them all in – besides, the more poorly structured debates there were, the more the genuinely intelligent ones stood out.

    Then, there were the vocal minority who, upon seeing netizens engage in political discourse, call it hypocrisy because such debate only happens during the GE. This reaction was apparently similar to the online sentiments when Lee Kuan Yew passed. Back then, my Facebook feed had been divided between those praising his deeds and those calling the former hypocrites when they hadn’t extolled him previously.

    And therein lies the main gripe I have with our political discourse, and ultimately, our system – it doesn’t allow for nuanced views.

    If we’re pro-PAP, we’re Yes Men who can’t think for ourselves; if we’re pro-Opposition, we’re unappreciative ingrates. Likewise, call ourselves politically apathetic and we’re irresponsible; have strong views and we’re getting caught in the hype.

    This clear dichotomy between differing views leaves no room for contradictions and grey areas, both essential parts of simply being human, to co-exist – therefore unnecessarily limiting discussion to extreme opinions. The truth is Singapore is a stable and comfortable society, but that incredible safety should not be an excuse to breed complacency and entitlement, whether with regards to opinions or material goods.

    No matter the news we wake up to on the morning of September 12, what I most want to see is significant progress towards cultivating creativity, open-mindedness and a sense of ruggedness in our youth. Provide room and reason for them to grapple with the various degrees of breadth and depth in the nation’s pertinent issues. Challenge our youth to question their own beliefs and ways of life, and in the process, develop more robust and individualistic points of view.

    And perhaps this starts with understanding the beauty of democracy. Knowing the power to change things can lie in a single vote, this heady responsibility can force even the most politically apathetic to keep themselves abreast with the latest happenings, and to remain discerning and well-informed. With an inevitable overload of information, it also means that we learn not to engage with every opinion that we see, but nonetheless appreciate the diversity for keeping our minds sharp and aware.

    There’s nothing hypocritical about deciding to educate oneself on the political scene, nor to want open and candid discussions about your future in this country. We are a highly educated workforce; let’s speak and behave as such – so that it no longer has to mean that if we’re pro-something, we’re automatically anti-something else.

    Because frankly speaking, it’s no longer cool to just care. It’s how we care that makes all the difference.

     

    Source: http://mothership.sg

  • The Government Has Done Well But I Will Vote Opposition To Check PAP

    The Government Has Done Well But I Will Vote Opposition To Check PAP

    There is no right or wrong answers to each of these.

    Unfortunately, it is these questions that invariably have led us to a state of complacency over the decades. What complacency? Aren’t we having a good life right now? Isn’t Singapore one of the best countries in the world for growth, stability and security etc. etc? Didn’t PAP lead us to where we are today? How ungrateful can you get when you question this and that?? Singaporeans are unappreciative of what PAP has done for us over the years etc etc. We should “repent” (sorry for taking a dig here).

    Mind you, like many others, I queued for hours to pay tribute to the late LKY and my entire family stood for hours in the rain to send LKY off too. In my mind, showing appreciation where it deserves always makes us a better person. 饮水思源.

    Chasing after stellar economic growth year after year (at all cost) is simply going to wear out the entire nation. Its people. Its only resource. If Singaporeans knew that achieving great GDP growths over the last 2 decades in the way we did will lead to the need to have 6.9m population projection, failure of infrastructure in supporting this massive growth, and housing prices going to reach a point where young people cannot afford it etc, do you think the answer from the common Singaporeans would be a resounding YES, let’s go for it?? Singaporeans can be rather simple-minded (me inclusive). We are too trusting as well.

    Furthermore, what doesn’t sit well with me is that I don’t see how it can be correct, by any stretch of imagination, that all the answers needed to move Singapore forward in the right direction can ONLY come from the current G. Surely in this time and age, there is room for diversity? Asking for complete mandate to govern Singapore (all 89 seats) is unrealistic and in fact moving many many steps backwards in terms of democracy. Remember the famous phrase of “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely”? This is not a suggestion of the G or anyone being corrupt or tends to be corrupt. Quite the contrary, I think we have a very good reputation of incorruptibility (as Singaporeans). Furthermore, isn’t the million dollars ministerial salary a hedge against corruption as the fundamental argument many moons ago (not that I agree that it is a perfect hedge).

    Being too quick to dismiss others is a clear sign of arrogance – something that I cannot agree at all unless we are in North Korea for example, which I don’t think we are.

    Whilst this has nothing to do with the G doing anything materially wrong (in fact they’ve done relatively well previously but had made some mistakes along the way, who doesn’t make mistakes?) or that people should be more appreciative etc, I do not feel that we will be led down the right path somewhat if things continue the way they are. The trust-me-only-and-no-one-else-can-do-a-better-job attitude doesn’t resonate with me at all.

    When you start hearing ministers putting other countries down (however unintended it may be), name calling, etc. is our political scene heading down a very slippery path (again).

    When there are too many complicated questions, it is only human nature (and very Singaporean too because we simply don’t have time to sit back and think) to simply fall back on the so-called tested grounds, go back to status quo, better don’t rock the boat etc. This is called one’s comfort zone. To be clear, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Undoubtedly, why would anyone be? Self-interest sets in.. In fact I caught a headline recently that the PM asked voters to vote in “your own interest”. Over time, if everyone keeps voting in one’s own interest, what kind of society are we building? What are we teaching our children? That we should just think for ourselves? What are the next words that come to mind? Selfish? Self-centred? Is this the national spirit we want to build when people only think for himself or herself?

    I think the whole argument of there-is-too-much-at-stake mentality breeds further complacency in the people.

    I don’t expect WP, SDP or other opposition parties combined to be in a position to form the new G anytime soon. Are their policies and manifestos all good and solid? Absolutely no. In fact, far from it. What about PAP’s policies? They are good to a certain extent but I think many concepts should be more robustly debated and tweaked. Didn’t we have a number of policy U-turns in the last couple of years?

    What I think would be right is for everyone to be given chance to present and debate about various options and for Singaporeans to see/judge that even in a diversified Parliament, we can land at a spot that is for the common good of Singapore. It is not about whose idea is better than others. Didn’t we build this nation embracing diversity of race, language or religion 5 decades ago? Why is it that there is no room for diversity in our very own Parliament?

    Singaporeans love, thrive and pride on effectiveness and efficiency. That’s what we are known for. We don’t want locked-horns Parliament debates that don’t get anywhere. More importantly, if mainstream media is anything to go by and be relied upon, broadcast these debates fully for all to see in the next 5 years. I believe Singaporeans will be very quick to discern who is telling the truth, who has what it takes to move Singapore forward and who is fully dedicated, passionate and puts Singapore and Singaporeans first in policy formation. It is not easy but if we don’t even try, how do you convince people that it won’t work? Only with that can someone come in and tell us this works, that doesn’t.

    There is also no desire to convince anyone here because everyone is entitled his/her own views and opinions. I do strongly believe that appropriate use of social media is necessary and important.

    As far as I’m concerned, I have made up my mind in giving people a chance to prove themselves, not because they say they are better or others are worse. I believe there is always 2 sides to a coin.

    May the best man (or woman) wins. Good luck.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

     

  • 12 Fearmongering Scenarios If PAP Voted Out Of Power

    12 Fearmongering Scenarios If PAP Voted Out Of Power

    <Facebook contribution by Thomas Soh>

    (1) Are you prepared to accept the possibility of a freak election result where the opposition forms a coalition government since many people assume that there will always be enough people to vote PAP into government, thus it will still be safe to vote for opposition ? Your vote could be the swing.

    (2) Will you be comfortable for the current slate of opposition candidates to speak on Singapore’s behalf in international affairs and forums? Can any of the current opposition candidate be able to make us proud like DPM Tharman during his interview at St Gallen ?

    (3) Why do the opposition mostly focus on domestic issues and not international matters? Are they only capable of handling domestic issues? What are their views on world affairs as Singapore is very dependent and vulnerable to her external environment ? Will they be able to engage and talk in depth with the world leaders and business leaders?

    (4) Are you confident that the opposition can continue to maintain our good international relationships with other nations, especially given the sensitive relations with our neighbours and the big countries? How will they handle the haze from Indonesia and water issue from Malaysia etc? They cannot conveniently tagged on PAP’s solutions if PAP is voted out of government.

    (5) Is it so important to have a different voice in Parliament just for the sake of it regardless of the quality and credibility of that voice ? Does this voice truly speak for the people or merely to serve their personal agenda or grudge against PAP ?

    (6) Are you looking at the big picture or do you only care about the details? If Singapore does not have enough water for its people, do you think we will still complain about MRT breakdown? Without the existing framework of stable and strong government, social harmony, economic prosperity, do you think you will still complain about foreign workers? We might have to be foreign workers ourselves.

    (7) What are some of the knee jerk reactions if PAP is voted out of the government? Market will react, foreign funds will flee Singapore immediately, our currency will lose its value and our investments will drop. Do you think investors will risk their money and wait for the new government to prove itself? No investor like a politically unstable country. As soon as a whiff of a political unrest is detected, the ringgit went into a free fall.

    (8) Why do you want to give your vote to a new and unknown candidate who did not even contribute to the community before and penalize the person who has been serving the community through grassroots work ? Have he or she earned it ? Some candidates only appear every 4-5 years when election comes.

    (9) It’s very easy to be popular by saying what people want to hear and promise to give more, but it is even more courageous to implement the right policies for the nation long term and be unpopular short term. Nobody like to be the one to give hard truths, but someone has to do it.

    (10) Is there a perfect government in this world ? Why are countries sending their diplomats to study from a small little red dot if our government didn’t get most of it right?

    (11) Do you want a paralyzed parliament which is bogged down with bickering over short term national issues to gain political points from voters? You need a government with foresight and do long term planning. Marina Bay, Changi Airport expansion, PSA ports etc cannot be built in a one election cycle. Do you think a weak government fighting for political survival will have time for these long term projects ?

    (12) Why do we have to keep striving to be among the best in the world? Would other nations or MNCs or investors bother with a little red dot if we are just mediocre? There are so many big cities around the world with many natural and human resources, so how does Singapore stand out if we are just average? What captures the world’s attention on Singapore? As our PM said, the work is never done, there are still more peaks to scale. Can we afford to remain stagnant and be complacent as a little red dot?

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

deneme bonusu