Tag: Singapore

  • How Worker’s Party’s Bernard Chan Worked To The Top

    How Worker’s Party’s Bernard Chan Worked To The Top

    The Workers’ Party has unveiled grassroots organiser, political activist and recent Oxford graduate Bernard Chen as a candidate for the Sep 11 general elections in Singapore. In an interview conducted by Bryan Kwa in early July 2014, Bernard said he did not harbour intentions in being a Member of Parliament but that politics should be about selfless service and that the Singapore narrative should include the peoples’ history.

    This interview is republished with permission and edited to reflect accuracy in dates. The original interview can be viewed here.

    Bernard Chen is a walking contradiction in terms. He has spent close to a decade as a political activist and speaks like a wise statesman even though he is still in his twenties. Moreover, he has just graduated from the University of Oxford despite failing his GCE ‘A’ levels.

    Bernard, who is 29 this year, enrolled in Temasek Polytechnic after his National Service in 2006 for his “last ticket to university”. In 2013, he graduated with honours from the National University of Singapore with a Bachelor of Arts in History. He then went on to pursue a Masters’ degree in Global and Imperial History at the University of Oxford on a Tan Ean Kiam postgraduate scholarship in the humanities.

    On Grassroots Politics

    He joined The Workers’ Party (WP) when he was 21, as he believed that political competition is needed in Singapore and “it’s the most credible and responsible opposition party around”.

    “I wasn’t pissed off with something that compelled me to join the WP. And I don’t think we should wait for the chance for it, for the moment that you get disappointed with the government.”

    He feels that a culture of service “should permeate throughout society” so that Singapore will be “robust, dynamic and sustainable”.

    Bernard wishes to see the zeitgeist of the first generation of Singapore leaders — that is the willingness to sacrifice personal time and serve just for the sake of service — in today’s generation. He feels that there is a need to “cultivate” such a “mindset”.

    “Where is the public-spiritedness? Where is the ability to see things above and beyond themselves?” he asks.

    Bernard has been a legislative assistant since May 2010. It is a part-time job and he is paid a monthly stipend. His main focus is on the Meet-the-People sessions where he helps the Member of Parliament (MP) draft letters based on the constituents’ complaints.

    “It’s very down-to-earth, very ground work. You just have to be there, speak to people, and understand what their needs are,” he says.

    He started as the legislative assistant to Low Thia Khiang, who was the MP for Hougang and subsequently for Aljunied GRC. Since February 2012, he is the legislative assistant to the MP for Aljunied GRC, Muhamad Faisal.

    Bernard harbours no aspirations to be a minister or MP. Instead, he hopes that his story of a 21-year-old with “no job security, no educational security, no achievements to date” devoting his time to politics can inspire others to come forward to serve, and that “anybody can do it”.

    “You don’t have to wait until you are 50, you are super established, and you have a lot of money,” he says.

    He hopes that his “little act of service… can inspire more intelligent young Singaporeans to come forward” to be “politically-involved, whether it is WP or PAP”. PAP refers to the People’s Action Party, which is the ruling party of the day.

    Moreover, he wants Singaporeans to see that politics can be “responsible, constructive and beneficial”. He contends that politics needs not be adversarial and confrontational.

    Bernard thinks Singapore has the potential to have a “number one” political system, one where “national interest is above partisan interest”. He acknowledges that some see this as empty rhetoric but he thinks that Singapore “can actually” make this a reality.

    “We can. But it is difficult. It is challenging because the ball is not only in the court of the political parties, it is also in the court of the electorate,” he opines.

    “Singapore has always prided itself on our airport, shipyards, efficiency, of our standing in the corruption index or what forms of education index. Why can’t our politics be a shining example to the rest of the world?”

    Bernard Chen - Copy

    On Singapore Narrative

    Given his academic training as a historian, Bernard thinks the Singapore narrative is “quite problematic”. He cites the title of former prime minster Lee Kuan Yew’s memoir “My Singapore Story” as an example of a “problematic” phrasing of the narrative.

    “It serves a very political purpose to once and for all put the nail into the coffin saying that this is the narrative that we want to have,” he suggests. While he does not think it is wrong, he “thinks it is not fair, from the view of a historian”.

    “This is what people usually call the elite discourse. So people who wins power, gets it. So just as someone below should not totally dismiss the Singapore narrative, people on top should also not dismiss subaltern history or peoples’ history of Singapore.” Subaltern history refers to history told by people outside the hegemonic class. (See Singapore Memory Project below)

    “The study of history is never meant to be politicised. It’s meant to be enlightening, to bring light to grey areas, to bring light to areas that are totally dark. That’s history’s contribution. If I can shine a light into a corner, it may not be complete, but someone after me will shine another light to bring out the issue. That’s my contribution. My contribution is to shine the light, his contribution is to shine the light from a different perspective.”

    He posits historians should not “make moral value judgments” but “see where it’s lacking and try to fill it”. He points out that we lack a “comprehensive history of the PAP from a non-Lee Kuan Yew perspective”.

    This is significant. Tham Yuen-C writes in a commentary published in The Straits Times on February 16, 2014 that “a new narrative… forged together by the masses… reminds us that Singapore got to where it is today through the efforts of an entire generation”.

    Bernard continues, “Have we actually asked about the grassroots worker standing beside LKY when he first won Singapore from the government of the British? No. Is it valuable? Yes. What was he thinking? Where does he come from? What is the occupational make up of LKY’s first group of volunteers? It tells a lot about the kind of Singapore we have and how far we have come.”

    Fortunately, a step in this direction has been taken. During the National Day Rally, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong highlighted the contributions by Lee Kuan Yew’s former driver Rahmat Yusak, who drove the former prime minster around the island in the 1960s to rally support for the battle against the communist.

    His Singapore Dream

    For Bernard, an ideal Singaporean society is “one that Singaporeans are able to see things above and beyond themselves. A society that is fair and just”.

    “One that a person like me who is born into a working class family, whose father has a secondary three education, whose mother has a secondary four education, has never achieved anything much in life, can still ensure that their children can have a brighter future than they do.”

    At the heart of all his grassroots and political work is his wish to leave a stronger Singapore that is better than the one he inherited.

    “I inherited a good Singapore and it is a privilege to give back to what this country has given me. So for those who have been given much, I think much should be given back to the country by them,” he says.

    Singapore Memory Project

    The Singapore Memory Project (SMP) is a nationwide movement, created with the objective of documenting and collecting noteworthy memories associated with Singapore. Established in August 2011, the objective of the project is to gather five million personal memories and a significant amount of published materials on Singapore by 2015.

    One recent campaign by the SMP, titled A Tribute To Our Pioneer Generation, ran from February to June. It focused on preserving stories of the Pioneer Generation, where thoughts and reflections of nation builders such as hawkers, teachers and builders are collected and showcased to the public – thereby ensuring that the people’s history is included in the Singapore narrative.

    Featured photo: Courtesy of Bernard Chen for Bryan Kwa
    In-line photo: The Workers’ Party

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • MacPherson, Radin Mas And Bukit Batok SMCs To See 3-Cornered Fights

    MacPherson, Radin Mas And Bukit Batok SMCs To See 3-Cornered Fights

    The single-seat wards of MacPherson, Radin Mas and Bukit Batok will face three-cornered fights at the Sept 11 polls, two more than in the 2011 General Election.

    The Workers’ Party’s (WP) rookie candidate Bernard Chen, 29, a funeral services company executive, will go up against the PAP’s Ms Tin Pei Ling and the National Solidarity Party’s Mr Cheo Chai Chen in MacPherson, which was carved out of the Marine Parade GRC.

    In Radin Mas, PAP incumbent Sam Tan will face off against Mr Kumar Appavoo of the Reform Party and an independent candidate, blogger Han Hui Hui.

    Another independent, businessman Samir Salim Neji, 45, is contesting Bukit Batok against the Singapore Democratic Party’s Sadasivam Veriyah and the PAP’s David Ong.

    The other 10 single-seat wards and 16 group representation constituencies (GRCs) are seeing straight fights.

    At the 2011 polls, there was only one three-cornered fight – in Punggol East between the PAP’s Michael Palmer, the WP’s Ms Lee Li Lian and Mr Desmond Lim Bak Chuan of the Singapore Democratic Alliance.

    Mr Palmer won with 54.54 per cent of the vote, with Ms Lee garnering 41.01 per cent and Mr Lim losing his electoral deposit after scoring just 4.45 per cent.

    Mr Palmer later resigned after publicly admitting to an extramarital affair. Ms Lee won the subsequent by-election in 2013.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Ismail Kassim: New PAP Candidates Should Be Principled, Follow Lead Of S Dhanabalan

    Ismail Kassim: New PAP Candidates Should Be Principled, Follow Lead Of S Dhanabalan

    To the PAP new candidates, I extend my best Qi greetings. I am sure all of you are sincere, dedicated and think of nothing except to do your best to serve the people.

    I like to say that I have no quarrel with any of you. My grouse is against your top party leadership and some of their policies on the key issues that will determine how we will develop as a nation.

    For example, I am against abuses of the law to strike down against opponents, to destroy their lives and their families in the name of strengthening the government. The Amos Yee case comes to mind.

    I am also against putting the glory of the nation above that of the welfare of the ordinary citizens.

    What for become the world’s No 1 in this field and that field, when the majority of the people cannot join in the joy.

    Many of you are from the best homes and come from the world’s greatest universities and left richly rewarding jobs in order to serve the people.

    It is no secret that a select few among you will be groomed for the very top leadership, while others will be rewarded with lucrative appointments commensurate with their ability and talent.

    You may all know it already, but there is no harm in being reminded that holding office has a corrupting, corroding influence.

    Just look at the world around you. See how many idealistic and selfless leaders have succumbed to temptation once in office, more so if they overstayed.

    There is no such thing as self-check. Without proper checks and balance institutions, power corrupts. Even the purest of steel will eventually become rusty.

    It is only natural when you have a desirable post to want to hang on to it, and to hope to get a better, higher post. It’s only human nature.

    But one can also try to resist; every office-holder has to decide for himself the price he is prepared to pay if a conflict arises with his principles or religious precepts.

    It is better to draw your line now and make it firm than later, because it is tempting to change the goal posts, to extend the boundary and make it more accommodating. This is also human nature, reflecting the survival instinct in all of us.

    In the PAP, there is the fine example set by Dhanabalan. He decided to leave the Cabinet after he would not in good conscience support the detention of the so-called Marxist conspiracy.

    Even then it took him years to extricate himself from office, and even more years before the public hears of his deed.

    Years later, two devout Christians opposed the Casino Bill in Parliament as it conflicted with their religious beliefs. But many other very religious MPs from all faiths opted to stifle their conscience.

    People like Dhanabalan are a rare breed these days. Many office-holders here and elsewhere will put their posts right up the altar, above everything else.

    If the crunch ever comes, you will have to decide whether you want to be a Dhanabalan or his opposite, and unless you have drawn a firm line earlier it will be all too easy to rationalise.

     

    Source: Ismail Kassim

  • Foreign Worker Angels Returned Me My Wallet

    Foreign Worker Angels Returned Me My Wallet

    Just 30 minutes ago my doorbell rang, upon hearing it I was thinking to myself, this better not be some irritating salesman cuz I was enjoying my off day slacking on my bed. I dragged myself off my bed and out of my room to answer the door.

    Through the peep hole I saw 3 Indian men standing in front of my house, I thought to myself “what the hell do they want!!”.

    Still puzzled and with much suspicion I opened the door. I stared @ them and suddenly my eye zoomed into the middle guy’s hand (later introduced as “Muru Muru”), I saw a familiar item on his hand and think to myself “Why TF is he holding on to my IC and what is my wallet doing on his hand!!!”.

    Speedily I unlocked my gate and walked out to them, Muru Muru said,” is this yours? Check the one thousand dollars note inside!!”. Still blur from my evening nap I immediately realized that they are angels sent from heaven to deliver my lost wallet that I haven’t even realized is gone @ that time.

    I took over my IC and pulled out my 1000 dollars note kept inside my wallet and before I said anything, he said,” I am rich, I don’t need your thousand dollars”and laughed, and his two friends laughed along.

    Upon saying that muru2 asked the second Indian guy “Radja” to take a picture of me and him, immediately after I said “thank you guys so much, omg, omg, omg, thank you”. I shook their hands and hugged them individually. I asked the last guy for his name but he refuse to say, he just kept wobbling his head. I insisted a group photo taken with my phone, right after that they just walked towards the lift.

    As they were leaving I had so many goosebumps, as I was seeing them off, I had so many thoughts running in my mind, I wanted to offer them money but thought to myself I spent my very last 10 dollars note on lunch and all I have is a can of coins in my room, I was thinking all so vigorously what can I give back, should I offer my one thousand dollars note since they’re the one who found my wallet? If not how can I say thank you, how can I show gratitude?

    They went into the lift and so they’re gone.

    These thoughts, these feelings, this need to do something filled my 20 seconds walk into my room.
    I grabbed a handful of coins and ran downstairs in hope to find them and probably treat them food or drinks or anything but they are gone.

    Thank you Muru Muru, Radja and third Indian man. What u did is really beautiful. So graceful and untainted. I am very grateful to have you guys who found my wallet, to have you guys as neighbor, to share this space with people like you.

     

    Source: Sugie Phua

  • Marine Parade Resident: I Am Unimpressed By Workers’ Party

    Marine Parade Resident: I Am Unimpressed By Workers’ Party

    Dear A.S.S,

    I refer to your posting http://www.allsingaporestuff.com/…/wp-introduces-final-batc… that concludes all the WP’s candidate introduction for this GE. I have been particularly curious, focusing on all the WP’s slate as I am a resident of Marine Parade in Marine Terrace. I remain proud that we boost the highest resale pricing for HDB flats in the whole of Singapore.

    Back to the topic on the WP team, I cannot help but deeply ponder over whether its better for our Marine Parade and Macpherson family to have the PAP or WP representing our interest after my brief encounter with Mr Bernard Chen of the WP. I accompanied a distant relative at Bedok North St 3 to see her Kaki Bukit MP 2 years back over some housing issues and did not get a good impression of either Mr Chen or Faisal Manap.

    Seated at table 2, I saw and overheard Mr Chen arguing unhappily with a Malay middle aged man at the next table over his job and welfare problems that I’m not sure if Mr Manap is unable or unwilling to help as the session ended with the resident expressing his disappointment at the WP for not being his “voice of conscience” so to say. Mr Chen then retorted by challenging the resident to see some Kahar Hassan instead if he could. Needless to say, my relative’s housing issue remains unresolved and calls/messages to a number Mr Manap provided on his call card went unanswered. I feel this is very unbecoming of an MP to be conducting himself in such an irresponsible manner.

    Now, I see a different picture when I head to Blk 80 Circuit Road Hawker Center to eat my favourite Nasi Lemak at Nurhajar Muslim Food who happens to be a grassroots leader. I see the poor of all races, warmly hugging and receiving the same from Ms Tin Pei Ling who is their fierce advocate. This sharply contrast what Mr Chen said by merely paying lip service exclaiming that residents’ small issues mattered to the WP but do a turtle when elected. Technically, can I trust that I will be able to approach the WP should I (touch wood) encounter any unforeseen problems in the future?

    Questions also remain for the entire WP strategy on candidate placement. I fail to see why Islamic religious teacher Mohamed Fairoz is favored over the strongest Malay candidate, Mr Firuz Khan for the “sure win” East Coast GRC. Wouldn’t it be more logical to place all your “big guns” in 1 place if you really want to win that area? What can Ustaz Fairoz bring to the table if elected, compared to Mr Khan who has a wider exposure and diversity, even bringing in the complex Royce Chocolate to our shores! And why is Ms He Ting Ru sent to battle ESM Goh? Wouldn’t it make more sense to field her in Macpherson than the coffin boy if WP is serious about gunning this area down?

    The Marine Parade candidates also do not seem to be united on the whole and I sense some internal cracks in their team. Mr Yee Jenn Jong and Khan is walking together in 1 group while Mr Terrance Tan and Ms He walks in another. Mr Dylan Loh is a constant MIA. Compare this with the PAP’s Marine Parade team who orderly takes turns to conduct ESM Goh’s MPS every Wednesday without fail in his absence.

    The above described situation of the WP should not be happening at all unless there is an intention and ulterior motive to deliberately allow only 1 team to win and not the others’. I see the same in the AHPETC issue that Ms Sylvia Lim has failed to answer. The questions boil down to: “Why does AHPETC seek to make Ms How rich and if this “alliance” has since broken down due to Ms Lim’s inability to continue with the contract. And is the Town Council “technically insolvent” as insinuated by the DPP. If so, then we should start asking ourselves if this is what we seek in a WP which is doing what it is accusing the PAP of.

    Sheh Begum
    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

deneme bonusu