Tag: Singapore

  • Lina Chiam: SPP Will Stand In Potong Pasir No Matter

    Lina Chiam: SPP Will Stand In Potong Pasir No Matter

    In a media interview today (28 July), NCMP Lina Chiam said that she will continue to contest in Potong Pasir SMC and that her party “will not budge” even if there’s a 3-cornered fight in Potong Pasir.

    “The SPP will not budge and I’ll still be standing in Potong Pasir even if it’s a three-cornered fight. Because I promised the people of Potong Pasir that I’ll return and I shall return,” Mrs Chiam said.

    “I’ll be continuing to do what is needed for the residents of Potong Pasir regarding feedback, whatever improvements that they want to that still needed to be done. I’ll be continuing to do the work that was left by Mr Chiam.”

    Mrs Chiam lost to PAP MP Sitoh Yih Pin by just 114 votes in GE 2011.

    Financial counsellor Leong Sze Hian told TRE that Mrs Chiam has been attending to residents every week even though she isn’t their elected MP. Mr Leong himself is helping Mrs Chiam in Potong Pasir by giving free financial counselling to the residents.

    “I’ve been helping Mrs Chiam for a few years already. She herself has also made it a point to meet the residents every week even though she is not their MP,” Mr Leong told TRE earlier in response to NTUC Chief Chan Chun Sing’s recent remarks about opposition politicians may be contesting in elections not for the residents but only for winning elections (‘Chan to oppo parties: Your heart must be pure‘).

    “In fact, we see residents from all over Singapore. We don’t turn them away just because they are not from Potong Pasir,” Mr Leong added.

    DPP Pwee ‘optimistic’ about Potong Pasir

    The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has earlier indicated that they also want to contest in Potong Pasir. In fact, DPP’s secretary-general, Mr Benjamin Pwee, is optimistic regardless of how many people will be contesting.

    “If we have one very strong opposition candidate that can stand up against the PAP, it will ultimately be a two-man fight and not a three-cornered fight. But definitely we feel that it would be wonderful to have a very strong alternative candidate that can stand in Potong Pasir against Sitoh Yih Pin and win Potong Pasir back from the PAP,” said Mr Pwee.

    However, quite a number of netizens are not enthusiastic to see a three-cornered fight in Potong Pasir (‘DPP slammed for provoking multi-cornered fights‘). Many are quick to condemn the actions of DPP with one saying on TRE:

    “Guaranteed to lose terok terok if you enter into a 3-cornered fight. Don’t tiew nian ok.”

    Another said:

    “Fly-by-night parties that ‘wake’ up during GEs gunning for multi-cornered fights better understand their own strength before they jump. Opposition supporters will vote for only credible and viable candidates, not the more vocal or those with dubious track record.”

    Yet another wrote a heartfelt open letter to Mr Pwee (‘A heartfelt open letter to DPP’s Benjamin Pwee‘):

    Dear Mr Pwee :

    I will be nice to you.

    The task at hand is to free Singapore from the curse of the great white sharks, or at least put up an effective check on their excesses. I do not know what your objectives are, but surely I do think that they are noble and that you have very good alternative plans for the people, and that you would be an effective voice in Parliament if you and your colleagues get voted in.

    However, please be realistic at this moment in time. We are at a very crucial point in history – make or break. The stake is monumental : the taking back of Singapore from the sharks and returning it to Singaporeans.

    It is not about catching rats, or building a walkway, or fighting dengue or making buses more reliable and less crowded (which not even the WP has the ability yet). Not the local neighbourhood issues. It is not about which party can serve which HDB blocks better. WE are all past there.

    We are now tackling gigantic national issues which have plagued Singaporeans at all levels –

    • the non-stop intake of immigrants
    • the ever squeezing of transportation
    • diminishing apartment sizes (corridors shrunk to < 1.2m)
    • the fixation on extracting more and more money from the people
    • turning our PMETs into taxi drivers and security guards
    • refusal to let us claim our CPF at 55
    • Etc

    Only by going 1-to-1 against the PAP do we have any hope of increasing Opposition seats in Parliament. Please work out a plan with the other parties, in a coordinated attack plan.

    Despite an absence from the electoral scene for some 14 years, this is not the first time the DPP has entered into multi-cornered fights. In 1997, a 4-cornered fight in Chua Chu Kang SMC saw DPP’s Tan Soo Phuan lose his deposit with a mere 1.9% of the valid votes. This set a new record for the lowest share of popular votes until 2013 when SDA had less than 1% of the votes.

    Will 2015 prove to be déjà vu for DPP?

    More promises of facilities for Potong Pasir from PAP MP Sitoh if elected

    Meanwhile, PAP MP Sitoh Yih Pin said more facilities are in the pipeline if he is re-elected in Potong Pasir.

    “Our responsibility and focus and our attention must be to the residents and the voters there. While we have done a lot in the last four-and-a-half years, both in terms of hardware and software, a lot more needs to be done in the next five years,” said Mr Sitoh.

    “So when the election comes, I hope our voters can give me another opportunity to complete the journey we have started.”

    In 2006 before the GE that year, Mr Sitoh was gunning for Potong Pasir. At the time, Mr Chiam was the incumbent MP and he was trying to unseat Mr Chiam then.

    He also promised a lot of things as reported by ST on 5 Feb 2006 [Link]:

    PAP’s Sitoh has 10-year facelift plan for Potong Pasir

    THE People’s Action Party (PAP) man in Potong Pasir, Mr Sitoh Yih Pin, provided clear indications that he will contest the next election there when he spoke yesterday of his 10-year plan for the opposition-held ward.

    WOULD YOU LIKE MORE?

    Speaking before he helped serve abalone porridge to some 4,000 residents attending a Chinese New Year celebration he hosts annually, he said that he wants to see the constituency transformed. Through what he termed his ‘five-plus-five-year’ plan – till 2011 and 2016 – he hopes to have lifts upgraded and stopping on every floor as this will benefit the ageing population in HDB estates there.

    And the Kallang River, which runs through the ward, will be given a facelift so canoeists and watersports enthusiasts can use it, while joggers and others can have activities along its banks.

    Fuller details will be made known over the next two months, he said.

    Mr Sitoh, who is adviser to grassroots organisations in the constituency, contested the 2001 election but lost to long-serving Potong Pasir MP Chiam See Tong of the Singapore Democratic Alliance by just 751 votes.

    He has remained active there since, meeting residents and organising activities, including offering shark’s fin soup for $1 during National Day celebrations, free haircuts for senior citizens and organising $88 one-night trips to Port Dickson in Malaysia.

    Although there have been rumours recently that these would be suspended if Mr Sitoh loses to Mr Chiam again, the 42-year-old accountant said that such talk was unfounded.

    ‘The ice-cream auntie told me people think that maybe next year, there won’t be abalone porridge any more,’ Mr Sitoh told residents, speaking in both English and Mandarin.

    ‘But that’s not true. We will continue to do these as long as you support us and our programmes.’

    Since winning Potong Pasir in 2011, it’s not known if he still continues to dish out abalone porridge to the residents there.

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • PAP Suicide Squad In Opposition Wards Gets Media Cold Shoulder

    PAP Suicide Squad In Opposition Wards Gets Media Cold Shoulder

    In the recent slew of political news that dominated headlines the past week, PAP candidates contesting in Opposition wards are getting ignored even from the government-controlled media.

    There has been no mention of the PAP candidates by the media who be contesting in Aljunied GRC, Hougang SMC and Punggol East SMC. Even the ruling party itself did not reveal who will be contesting in these areas.

    More notably, the former PAP candidates who contested in the two SMCs, Desmond Choo and Koh Poon Poh, have been publicly re-deployed by their party to Tampines GRC and Ang Mo Kio GRC respectively. There have been no replacements for the two in Hougang SMC and Punggol East SMC.

    According to rumours by an anonymous PAP member to States Times Review, the likely candidates for the three wards are as follow:

    1) Aljunied GRC: Victor Lye Thiam Fatt (far left), the rest are unnamed

    Photo from Facebook

    2) Hougang SMC: Lee Hong Chuan

    Photo from Facebook

    3) Punggol East: Yee Chia Hsing

    Photo from Facebook

     

    Source: http://statestimesreview.com

  • 11 Years My MP Never Visit Me, Now They Appear As Elections Looms

    11 Years My MP Never Visit Me, Now They Appear As Elections Looms

    Am from Tanjong Pagar GRC Cantonment Close. Have lived here since 2004 and never had any MP visited our block in this 11 years.

    Last Sunday was the first time we had an MP come visit us and it was made into a big event, announcing in lifts and even with a big poster downstairs. Elections really coming, me and my neighbors thought…

    Well, today I got a big surprise when I saw this giant poster in the name of “SG50″… With the slogan, “our residents, our inspiration”. If we really do inspire you, house visits should be a little more often than one in eleven years?

    Oh, and looking at today’s giant poster… Cannot help but wonder again… Hmmm…. Has campaigning started already?

     

    Albert Chan
    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Workers’ Party Walkabout Coverage – ST Sabotage?

    Workers’ Party Walkabout Coverage – ST Sabotage?

    Dear SGHardtruth

    When I first saw the report by ST showing Workers Party walkabout at Rivervale Plaza on Sunday morning, my immediate thought was, how can ST purposely show Workers Party going about collecting donation? Isn’t that a smear campaign?

    Video source – ST

    I was infuriated. I mean how can ST, being a national news agency have such an anti-opposition stance? Is ST, like what most people say, a PAP’s mouth piece?

    So, I decided to check out WP’s Facebook to refute ST.

    But when I saw the photo posted by WP, I am speechless. So WP’s walkabout is about…Selling their paper and asking for donations. So this is not the usual walkabout to interact with residents. Because if they are busy selling their newspaper and raising fund, they won’t have time to have a sincere talk with residents isn’t it?

    So disappointing.

    Jim Seow

     

    Source;

  • Walid J. Abdullah: Multi-Cornered Fight Is Good, Vote-Splitting Will be Rare

    Walid J. Abdullah: Multi-Cornered Fight Is Good, Vote-Splitting Will be Rare

    Some people have expressed their fears of multi-cornered fights in the upcoming GE (they are mostly either opposition supporters or people who want the PAP to be in government but wish to see more opposition voices in Parliament). I do not share their fears and have more faith in Singaporeans in this regard: not because i believe that all Singaporeans are politically astute in all aspects, but because there have been evidence to suggest that Singaporeans have learnt the potential effects of multi-cornered fights.

    In the 2011 Presidential Election, Singaporeans were divided between three candidates: eventually, Dr Tony Tan won the election with the tiniest of margins. A substantial amount of people who voted for Tan Jee Say (25%) must have regretted their choice, as had they casted their votes for Dr Tan Cheng Bock (who would be the natural next option: one cannot imagine a person who voted for TJS preferring Tony Tan over TCB), TCB would have been the president.

    Fast forward to 2013: Punggol East by-election. There were two things that did not receive sufficient attention in the aftermath of the sensational electoral outcome: 1) the disastrous performances of Desmond Lim and Kenneth Jeyaretnam (Desmond’s one is particularly important), and 2) SDP was completely ignored by WP when the former attempted to devise creative plans to mount a ‘unified’opposition to PAP.

    In the 2011 GE, Desmond contested the Punggol East constituency against PAP and WP candidates. He received 4.45% of the votes. In 2013, he attained just 0.57% of the vote share. While both results were atrocious, the second one was particularly so. I argue that Singaporeans had learnt from the Presidential Elections that every vote truly mattered in a multi-cornered contest, and hence were less likely to waste their votes on candidates who had no serious chance of winning (in the first place, a significant portion of the 4.45% he received in 2011 could have been purely out of sympathy, and when the going gets tough, there really is less room for sympathy or other considerations). The fact that SDP withdrew very early on, suggests that its leaders probably believed this from the start too.

    In Political Science literature, the above phenomenon is known as the ‘psychological effect’ in voting, and was made popular by Duverger. I believe we have seen the psychological effect occurring in Singapore, and that we will see more of it if there are more multi-cornered fights.

    Hence, I contend that the following will be likely to happen:

    In the constituencies that WP is contesting, the other opposition parties who decide to contest will not get their deposits back. In fact, I do not expect them to get more than 3% of the votes. This is regardless of which are the other parties.

    In the constituencies that WP is not contesting but there are multi-cornered contests, it depends on which parties are contesting. If SDP and NSP contest, then maybe the votes would be significantly split: this is because both are parties of similar stature, and opposition supporters may be divided as to which would be the party that would get more votes.

    In the constituencies that WP is not contesting, and only either SDP or NSP is contesting with the other smaller parties, one can expect the other parties to not get their deposits back.

    So perhaps the opposition parties should take heed from lessons of the 2011 Presidential Elections and 2013 Punggol-East By-Election: be prepared to lose your money in the multi-cornered fights, because vote-splitting between the opposition parties will be rare.

    In any case, Singaporeans should not be overly-worried about having more parties in electoral contests: such a situation is ultimately good in enhancing democracy.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

deneme bonusu