Tag: Singapore

  • Stern Warning For Grassroots Leader Who Threatened Amos Yee

    Stern Warning For Grassroots Leader Who Threatened Amos Yee

    After two months of police investigation, the police has decided to issue a “stern warning” to Jason Tan Kok Whee, a grassroots leader over a threatening statement he made online, directed at 16-year old Amos Yee.

    Amos was being charged with harassment, and with allegedly wounding the religious feelings of Christians in a YouTube video. He has since been judged guilty of the offences and currently held in remand, awaiting his sentence.

    Grassroots leader threat
    Mr Tan had posted the comment earlier in March (shown above), “For me, I would cut his dick and put in his mouth for blemish Jesus Christ.”, referring to Yee.

    Mr Tan’s comment was posted under the Facebook handle of “Cookie Tan” on the Facebook page of The Real Singapore.

    cookie1-464x480
    Jason’s images at Telok Blangah CC as grassroots leader

    After netizens got hold of the fact that Mr Tan is a grassroots leader at Telok Blangah., a letter of complaint was subsequently sent to the People’s Association (PA), which oversees all grassroots organisations in Singapore, about Jason Tan’s threatening post. There has been no response from the PA thus far and Jason Tan has since restricted his Facebook page from public view.

    Apart from a letter of complaint to PA, TOC also understands that a number of police reports were made against Mr Tan over the statement he made.

    One of the people who filed the reports, Mr Lee said he was offended by Mr Tan’s comment and decided to file a police complaint against him. He said that Mr Tan’s statement was a criminal threat to Yee.

    Mr Lee said in April, “I am seriously distressed by Jason Tan’s statement that bears the intention to harm Amos Yee physical and sexually. I have checked the penal code of Singapore and it seems that Jason Tan have breached the laws and should be liable to be arrested and be charged in the courts.”

    Mr Lee also explained that Mr Tan has likely breached the law in making that comment against Yee, particularly penal code section 503, 504, 507 and 508.

    Mr Lee added that Mr Tan should be punished according to the penal code section 506.

    Soon after Mr Lee had made his report, he was called up by the investigating officer from the Tanglin Police station for an interview.

    He said that the investigating officer had informed him that “quite a few police reports” have been made against Mr Tan.

    Mr Lee also shared that the police officer had asked why he felt distress about Mr Tan’s Facebook comment. He replied that any ordinary person would feel distressed when they see someone threatening bodily harm against another and Mr Tan’s offence is worse than Amos’ as Amos didn’t threaten anyone with physical harm.

    After close to two months of investigation, the police wrote letters to the people who have filed the police reports against Mr Tan and said that the police has closed the case with a stern warning given to Mr Tan.

    One of such letters was sent to the social-political blog, TR Emeritus and was published.

    jason Tan warning

    The letter writes, “After careful considerations of the facts and circumstances of the case and in consultation with the Attorney-General’s Chambers, it has been decided that a stern warning be administered to the defendant in lieu of prosecution. On 10/06/2015, the defendant was warned by Chief Investigation Officer, DSP Tan Put Seng in the presence of Senior Investigation Officer, Henry Chua.”

    It is understood that the warning letter would be recorded in police records but would not turn up in regular screening by Police.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • 10 Things You Can Buy With $71 Million SG50 Civil Servant Bonus

    10 Things You Can Buy With $71 Million SG50 Civil Servant Bonus

    The Public Service Division, under Prime Minister’s Office, announced recently that there will be a SG50 bonus for all civil servants, amounting to $500 per officer, “in recognition of their contribution towards nation building”.

    The bonus was to be paid with the mid-year Annual Variable Component (AVC) of 0.5 month, in July 2015.

    There is an estimated 143,000 public officers in government service, which means the SG50 bonus would amount to about $71.5 million.

    That’s a lot of dough. So we decided to see what else the SG50 bonus could have actually been spent on, and came up with our favs…

    #1 — 7,150,000 plates of Peach Garden XO sauce chai tow kway

    Chan Chun Sing chai tow kway InSing
    Image credit – InSing

    Openly endorsed by NTUC chief, Minister Chan Chun Sing, $10 for a plate of this prestigious adaptation of the delicious hawker centre favorite is not to be scoffed at. Confirm quite shiok, right? Civil servants and citizens who agree, kee chiu!

    #2 — 8,937,500 heart bypass surgeries

    Image - The Straits Times
    Image – The Straits Times

    If National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan can get it at the bargain price of $8, any civil servant and citizen should be able to! And let’s face it, after all that XO chai tow kway, it is better to be safe than sorry, as you can’t really depend on Medishield to cover you for everything!

    #3 — 31,630 Kate Spade bags

    Image - justonebyte.com
    Image – justonebyte.com

    Nothing but the best to tote around with in swanky Singapore, forking out $1,900 for a piece of this will seem like a breeze with that much bonus. Civil servants can now emulate their favorite politician or celebrity. Good for both the guys and gals!

    #4 — 1,430 HDB flat subsidies for single-parent families

    hdb

    It’s SG50, so lets not fuss too much about all this and share a little! And with about 500 single parent births registered in a year, $50,000 per family is surely not too much to ask, just to level things up a bit for everyone.

    #5 — 35,750,000 neighbourhood kopi tiam kaya toast sets

    Image - TripAdvisor.com
    Image – TripAdvisor.com

    We are not letting this go without gunning for the bread and butter issues (literally)! Another local favorite, something enjoyed by uncles, aunties and children alike, the sweet aroma of a $2 kaya toast set is just irresistible. A great perk for the civil servant rushing to work, and the best gift of appreciation for your Minister boss!

    #6 — A year’s worth of pocket money for 99,305 needy primary school students under the Straits Times School Pocket Money Fund.

    Joseph Schooling (image - The Straits Times)
    Joseph Schooling (image – The Straits Times)

    If Joseph Schooling can do it, so can our government! Needy primary school students receive $60 a month from the Fund, so why not help bolster it so that The Straits Times can spend the money somewhere else, like hire better journalists?

    #7 — Palliative care for 2,958 elderly people a year

    elderly

    Our silver generation, unfortunately, does not come with the silver dollars. Annual fees for a patient staying at a non-profit palliative care home chalks up about $24,000. If we can give billions for the Pioneer Generation Package, this should not be too much to ask!

    #8 — 14,300 collumbarium slots

    chinese temple fernvale

    Fortunately, we do not have to contend with the potentially sky-high prices at the now defunct Fernvale Columbarium. But a regular slot at any columbarium hovers around $5,000 a niche. So let’s not skirt around the death issue and face it with a bit of realism. In cash.

    #9 — 143 units of dignity for our Ministers

    Lim Wee Kiak meme dignity

    Surely our civil servants would think nothing of sacrificing their SG50 bonus for their bosses! $500,000 for a bit of dignity, what a steal!

    #10 — 2.1 years of good government for all Singaporeans

    Lee Kuan Yew Goh Chok Tong

    Ok, so we were wrong, this one surely beats the XO chai tow kway.

    “The price of good government is $34 million a year – just $11 per Singaporean a year – or the cost of five plates of char kway teow per citizen. And the price of bad government? It could have been $3,166 per Singaporean, said Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong.”

    The man has spoken, ’nuff said.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Amos Yee Is Talking To Himself And Hallucinating In Prison

    Amos Yee Is Talking To Himself And Hallucinating In Prison

    Ever since Amos Yee was forced into 3 weeks remand, there has been little news about his condition apart from the revelations by his lawyer Alfred Dodwell who has since been censored for publishing court documents.

    A reader alerted us to Amos’s mothers Facebook which clearly shows the ill-effects of prison life taking its toll on Amos’s mental health.

    Amos’s mother Mary said:

    “Amos’ cellmates told him that he could be suffering from hallucinations. He was seen talking to himself and hitting the walls repeatedly. He became worried as he could not remember any such things done. He also has difficulty falling asleep, having only about 2 to 3 hrs of sleep everyday.

    Amos looks even skinnier today. He said pimples have grown on his body and made him feel itchy. When I told him that Dodwell & TOC were told to remove the ‘Firm Letter to Court’, he kept asking, “Why? Why remove?” At one point, he hit repeatedly on the glass piece separating us apart so hard that it invited 3 police officers over.”

    It appears that Amos is not coping well with prison and may be suffering from a mental breakdown. Is this how Singapore treats our 16 year olds? What do you think? Does Amos deserve such harsh and draconian treatment?

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • 90% Of People Polled Say They Will Vote For Opposition

    90% Of People Polled Say They Will Vote For Opposition

    “90% of those polled say they will vote for opposition”.  That’s the kind of sensational headline that will grab the attention of the reader.  That’s what my unrepresentative poll results indicate.  Hopefully, you have, by now, picked yourself up after falling off your chair.

    Poll results

    I had carried out an online poll that attracted 135 persons to vote.  It is a small sample and hardly indicative of the actual voting pattern in the country.  My readers are, quite obviously, largely opposition voters.  So, the 90% vote in favour of the opposition is indicative of the profile of my readers rather than being indicative of how Singaporeans are likely to vote.  From the outset, I had no intention to find out about the level of support for PAP.  My little survey was motivated by a recent research finding released by Blackbox Research that indicated that 80% of Singaporeans felt that PAP would either perform better or the same as the last elections if elections are to be held now.  Blackbox went on to conclude that “the PAP are now in the box seat to improve on their 2011 election result”.

    I was a little skeptical about the conclusion.  My gut instinct is that there is a general perception right now that either PAP will perform better or the same as the last elections and this perception is largely a result of pessimism among individuals that would themselves vote for the opposition anyway.  Poll results that indicate that there is a perception as to how PAP will perform are not at all indicative of how those that were polled would themselves vote.  So, Blackbox Research’s findings are neither here nor there.  My conversations with friends (who are largely opposition voters) after the passing of LKY has provided me with anecdotal evidence that there is a high degree of pessimism in the opposition camp.  Three factors loom large in the assessment of many opposition voters:

    1.   LKY’s death and the propaganda overdose following that

    2.   SG50 celebrations and the feel good factor that is likely to be generated (with taxpayers footing the bill)

    3.   WP’s continuing legal troubles with Town Council management.

    It stands to reason that middle ground voters may veer back to the PAP (as it happened in 1997) or there may be a stalemate and we may not see any change between 2011 and 2015 in terms of the popular vote.

    Given the negative sentiments among opposition voters, it is quite inevitable that Blackbox Research’s findings indicate a low 20% stating that they thought PAP will perform worse than in 2011. My view is that their research should not be interpreted to indicate that there will in fact be a vote swing towards the PAP.  Blackbox didn’t ask the crucial question: “Who would you vote for?”

    If that question had been asked, we might have ended up with a result that indicates 35% to 40% stating that they would vote opposition and nevertheless 80% stating that PAP would perform better or the same.  The other problem with the Blackbox findings is that they don’t indicate the percentage that stated that PAP would perform better and those that stated that it would perform the same.

    My poll was done to show that there exists a deviation among opposition voters.  There are a significant number of opposition voters that would vote for opposition but are nevertheless pessimistic about the general outcome in the current elections.  Among the 135 that voted, 90% would have voted for the opposition but only 66% felt that PAP would do worse.  This strongly attests to the fact that even in my small sample of 122 opposition voters, there must have been a significant percentage that were pessimistic about the opposition’s chances in the coming elections.

    There is a percentage deviation of 23% between the actual votes by opposition voters and the perception of improvement in the opposition performance.  In the course of the two weeks that I kept the poll open, at various stages of voting I saw this voting-perception deviation fluctuate from a low of 15% to a high of 25%.  For the most part, the percentage was hovering between 20% to 25%.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the findings of Blackbox Research are somewhat tainted by the fact that there exists this voting-perception deviation.  I suspect that it does exist at a national level.  So, whilst my small sample yielded a 23% deviation, at the national level this figure is bound to be different (higher or lower) but without data, it is impossible to arrive at any conclusion.  Blackbox didn’t ask the crucial question as to which party would those polled vote for.  All we have is a finding that indicates that only 20% think that PAP will do worse.  This does not mean that only 20% will vote for the opposition.  It indicates, merely, the existence of a certain degree of pessimism among those that would vote for the opposition.  It is not inconceivable that we might have had 40% of those polled intending to vote for the opposition with a large number of them feeling that PAP will perform the same or better (thereby contributing to the statistics provided by Blackbox).

    Another problem with the Blackbox Research findings is that they have conveniently failed to indicate the percentage of those that think that there will be no difference in the voting and those that think that PAP will do better.  I wouldn’t be surprised if the actual figures were along the following lines (speculating, of course):

    50% –  PAP will perform better

    30% –  PAP will perform the same

    20% –  PAP will perform worse

    We don’t know why Blackbox chose not to give a breakdown of the ‘better’ and ‘same’ categories.

    For Blackbox to make the assertion that PAP is in the box seat to improve on its performance in 2011 is a rather bold step.  Another research firm, BMI Research, whilst being generally positive on the outlook for the PAP, did not venture to assert that the vote share will improve.  “While it is difficult to ascertain whether or not the PAP’s vote share will fall again in the upcoming election, the party’s ability to form a strong majority in the parliament is virtually assured,”  Personally, I think that a general election this year is not going to threaten PAP’s majority in Parliament.  The only thing that we are really speculating about is the increase or decrease in their vote share.

    For those in the opposition camp that feel a little despondent after reading the Blackbox report, they should brush aside polls like these as they serve only to measure voter perception rather than how those voters would in fact vote.  There is bound to be a deviation between the two.  For those in the PAP camp, they would be well advised to avoid being too complacent.  Don’t underestimate the actual anger and dissatisfaction on the ground.

     

    Source: https://article14blog.wordpress.com

  • 50 Aussie-Style BBQs Across The Heartlands On Jun 28

    50 Aussie-Style BBQs Across The Heartlands On Jun 28

    Come Jun 28, the heartlands — from Jurong to Tampines — will be alight with 50 Aussie-style barbecues, as part of the Australian High Commission’s celebrations to mark Singapore’s Golden Jubilee, as well as 50 years of friendship between the two nations.

    The barbecues will be held at 22 sites across the island, including Toa Payoh Central Community Club, Jem Shopping Mall, Block 516 Tampines Central 7, Punggol East Road and Haji Lane.

    About 500 Australian volunteers will be firing up the grills to serve 10,000 beef and lamb steaks which weigh 1,000kg in total, about the weight of an average car.

    The event will bring Australians and Singaporeans together “to share our mutual love of good food and a chat”, said Australian High Commissioner Philip Green in a statement announcing the barbecue locations.

    The 50 BBQs event is the last of Australia’s 50 Bridges arts and community programme to celebrate SG50. Singaporeans can also take part in the 50 Bridges photo contest where they can submit up to 20 photos of either 50 Walls artworks or a 50 BBQs event, capturing the Australian-Singaporean relationship in a creative way.

    They stand to win a pair of return business class tickets to Melbourne.

    For more details about the competition and the list of sites for 50 BBQs, visit sg50oz.sg or the Australia In Singapore Facebook page.

    List of sites involved in ’50 BBQs’:

    1. Toa Payoh Central Community Club
    2. Pavilion in front of Block 30 Telok Blangah Rise
    3. Pek Kio Community Club
    4. Tanglin Community Club
    5. Viz Holland Condominium
    6. Bishan Park
    7. Serangoon Community Club
    8. Block 516 Tampines Central 7
    9. Rooftop garden at multistorey carpark of Block 890 Tampines Ave 1
    10. Punggol Hardcourt at 50 Punggol East Rd (opp Riviera LRT)
    11. Multipurpose Court next to Block 166 Yishun Ring Road
    12. Bukit Timah Community Club
    13. ACE The Place Community Club (Woodlands Ave 1)
    14. Block 202 Bedok North Street 1
    15. Kampong Park, Serangoon Ave 3
    16. Jem Shopping Mall
    17. Bukit Batok East Community Club
    18. Block 106 Bukit Batok Central
    19. Teck Whye Garden
    20. Pavilion in front of Block 104C, Depot Road
    21. James Cook University
    22. Haji Lane

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

deneme bonusu