Tag: Singapore

  • 3 Singaporeans Charged In Court For Disorderly Behaviour And Attacking Police Officers

    3 Singaporeans Charged In Court For Disorderly Behaviour And Attacking Police Officers

    Three Singaporean men were charged in court on Saturday morning for disorderly behavior and attacking police officers at a Thaipusam event held earlier in the week.

    Ramachandra Chandramohan, 32, was alleged to have punched, kicked and verbally abused four police officers. He was also charged with disorderly behavior and faces seven charges in total, the highest number among the trio.

    Jaya Kumar Krishnasamy, 28, faces three charges. He was charged with disorderly behavior, allegedly hurling vulgarities at a police officer and obstructing another police officer from carrying out his duties.

    Gunasegaran Rajendran, 33, faces a disorderly behavior charge and is alleged to have abused a police officer.

    The trio were calm and emotionless when their charges were read to them in court through an interpreter.

    They were accompanied to court by four family members and friends. It is unclear how they are related, but one family member who declined to be named said that the three men are cousins.

    The three men were part of a group which hired drummers in the Thaipusam procession. The drummers were asked to stop playing by the police and a scuffle broke out.

    A video of the scuffle was posted online and it sparked online outcry, with some members of the public asking why is music banned at Thaipusam while lion dances and Malay wedding music are allowed in public.

    Responding, Second Minister for Home Affairs S. Iswaran said on Thursday that the ban on music instruments applied to all foot processions, including religious events, since 1973.

    Law and Foreign Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam also said on Friday that lion dances and Malay wedding music are social events, not religious processions. He added that only Hindus are allowed to hold religious foot processions and urged the public to back police’s actions at the Thaipusam event.

    The trio are on police bail and their cases will be heard in court again on March 6. If convicted, they face maximum jail sentences of between three months and seven years, maximum fines of between $2,000 and $5,000, or both.

    Ramachandra Chandramohan is also liable to be caned if convicted of attacking police officers.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Singaporean Man Convicted Of Organising Child Sex Tours Overseas

    Singaporean Man Convicted Of Organising Child Sex Tours Overseas

    A Singapore man was Friday convicted of organising a commercial sex tour overseas and distributing information intended to promote paid sex with a minor outside the city.

    Chan Chun Hong pleaded guilty to seven counts of transmitting obscene material by electronic means, one count of making travel plans, three counts of distributing information to promote commercial sex, and one of having obscene films, The Straits Times reported.

    Another 133 charges, mostly for transmitting obscene material, will be considered when he is sentenced.

    Following a tip-off from the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in 2013, Chan, also known as Chris, was arrested at Singapore’s Changi Airport March 1, 2014.

    Information received suggested he had engaged in child sex tourism in countries such as Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines.

    Investigations showed that he saved his collection of child pornography in his portable hard disk and transmitted it to other users in exchange for new material between Dec 2, 2011 and Sep 6, 2012.

    The obscene photographs and videos included naked or half-naked young girls in various sexual acts and poses. Some appeared to be as young as two.

    The prosecution is seeking a jail sentence of at least six years for Chan, whose lawyer Rajan Nair asked that the case be adjourned to Feb 16.

    The maximum penalty for taking a tour outside Singapore for commercial sex with a minor is 10 years in jail and a fine on each charge.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Mature Singapore Women Prefer Men Who Are More Than 10 Years Younger

    Mature Singapore Women Prefer Men Who Are More Than 10 Years Younger

    Popular mobile dating app Paktor released new data indicating that there is literally no expiration to love. With a 20% surge in app usage in the two weeks leading up to Singles Awareness Day, also known as Valentines’ Day for you lucky couples, both men and women are taking matchmaking into their own hands.

    Not your typical love story

    Words out there in Singapore is that the older man has to go looking for his younger blushing bride. However, age does not seem to be a factor on Paktor. While Paktor’s most users fall within 18 – 35 years old, there has been a steady growth of mature users on the app. Within the last 3 months, mature women tend to match with younger men, with an average age gap of 11 years. As for mature males, they also tend to match with younger females with an average 12 year age gap.

    “Mobile dating is no longer just a young person’s option as we have seen a growing percentage of mature users who have embraced our model of meeting new people and making genuine connections,” says Joseph Phua, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer for Paktor.

    Image Credit: Paktor

    Women invest more time online than men

    Behind its cool blue icon, there lies over 1.5 million users in Southeast Asia, with Singapore being one of the most active markets in the region. Surprising statistics shared by Paktor has shown that women in particular tend to spend 20% more time on Paktor compared to men with a general average of almost 13 hours a month per user.

    Swiping across your mobile screen could be considered passive according to the majority of men’s dating advice; hence one would not be surprised if local men were going back to conventional blind dates offline after an online conversation turns stale. In comparison, local women just do what they do best: swipe and wait.

    As a female Paktor user, I do think the dating app is addictive. With greater autonomy over my choice of potential dates, I cannot help but attempt to scrutinize the entirety of the other person’s profile before unlatching any doors.

    Another reason is perhaps women are just using Paktor to pass their time. More often than not, I find myself casually swiping across both male and female photographs during my downtime away from work. Stuck with only a blank wall and computer screen as my best friends, the mobile dating app gives me a glimpse of what could be.

    This sometimes happens. (Image Credit: www.quickmeme.com)

    Online dating now a norm?

    Regardless of duration spent on online dating apps, Paktor has enabled over 40 million matches to date in the entire Southeast Asia region. This could indicate a rising comfort level with online dating with the advent of such apps.

    Phua says, “Most importantly for the industry is that these results from Singapore show how mature the industry is becoming here as more people realise the effectiveness and ease of using technology to meet new people.”

    No doubt there is still a looming cloud of concern of being recognised by a stranger off the street only to realise we’ve been texting every night till 1am. But I think after the initial surprise wears off, it would be nice to meet up face-to-face to officially welcome them into my social life.

    For those who have yet to embrace this modern-day matchmaking method, I daresay just go for it.

    *Article first appeared on Vulcan Post.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Thaipusam Incident – My Side Of The Story

    Thaipusam Incident – My Side Of The Story

    Dear everyone,

    For the past three days, there had been various reports, news & articles with regards to the 3 men arrested for the incident that happened at Thaipusam 2015. I am one of the 3 men who were arrested at the incident. This post would be my part of the story, not to justify what I have done, but to let the public know my point of view.

    My cousin brother was one of the kavadi bearers in Thaipusam. The first time we were approached was at the Perumal temple by the temple officials. They ordered the “Urumi group” boys who were playing the “Thavil(indian traditional instrument)” to stop playing the music. We seeked their cooperation and understanding to allow the boys to play the thavil while he was piercing the 108 spikes, this was so that he can be distracted from the pain. My brother was carrying a traditional kavadi which weighed roughly about 100kg, therefore he needed to be distracted from the pain as well as the piercings. However, the temple officials were adamant about not letting the urumi boys play while he was piercing. When we asked why they could not let the boys play, they replied that these were regulations set by the SPF, and that they were merely following SPF’s orders. We then abided to their rules and regulations and asked the Urumi boys to stop the music.

    We then left the Perumal temple, and started the holy procession in a very solemn manner. The urumi group we hired did not play any music as they were sent off by the higher officials and were not allowed to follow my brother’s kavadi. However, as we approached Kitchener Road, the urumi group boys joined us again. They were playing music for us and followed us till Desker Road. At Desker Road, the urumi boys were then pulled aside again, aggressively this time, by the temple officials . My cousin brother who observed the situation went in to mediate as those urumi boys were engaged and paid by us. He questioned those who pulled the boys away on why they were being pulled away, and that these boys were engaged by us. He argued with them asking why weren’t we allowed to play the Urumi & Thavil which are traditional indian instruments. It was emphasized in the media that we were the one playing the instruments at the procession. However, the truth is, we paid and hired a urumi group to play music for my brother’s kavadi. There were about 15 to 20 temple officials and blue uniformed (unable to identify whether they were police or certis cisco in the chaotic situation) men who were involved in the argument. Suddenly, there were a group of guys (about 20-30 guys) who barged in and started manhandling us, trying to push us away from the urumi group. I noticed that my cousin brother was manhandled, being pulled by his tshirt to and fro to a corner, and i also saw his wife was running behind him, trying to pull the husband away from them. A group of men were pushing me and trying to bring me to the ground violently. At the point of time, I noticed my sister-in-law being pushed to the ground, that was when I got agitated and aggravated and I rushed towards my sister in law. From my point of view, the person who pushed my sister in law was wearing a white tshirt. I broke free from the group of men, and I punched him, thats when10 men pinned me down on the road aggressively, suffocating me. They kneed and backheeled me on my face, and said “you dare to punch a police officer”. That was when I realised this group of men were police officers. We were then brought back to the station.

    It was stated in all the reports and media news that “3 men were arrested and they smelled strongly of alcohol”. I would like to clarify this statement because this is not the truth at all. I do not consume alcohol AT ALL. There were tonnes of other people at that chaotic situation, & the alcohol smell could have came from anyone at all. So it was wrong for them to have accused us of being drunk and creating nuisance. How could media like “Channel NewsAsia, Vasantham Tamil News, Straits times etc” publish in their news that I was drunk and creating nuisance. Under what basis or what proof did they release this news? Was the conclusion that we were drunk based on the report giving by the SPF?

    Secondly, how can a policeman (whose identity was later revealed) push a woman down to the ground? Isn’t it a violent act against a woman (under the woman’s charter)?Why is it that in all the media, this action of the police force was not justified? In my point of view, this is not the behaviour of a police officer, but it is more of a rowdy act. My nephew and niece who witnessed the whole incident were traumatised and could not stop crying. In that chaotic situation, it did not hit my mind that it was a police officer who behaved such.

    Also in the statement provided by Minister S ISWARAN in the article “S ISWARAN: PLEASE DON’T OVERREACT ABOUT THE THAIPUSAM INCIDENT posted on 5 Feb 2015 in “The Real Singapore”, “He acknowledged that three people were arrested at the Thaipusam procession on Tuesday for playing drums.” My question to you is Sir, How could you have acknowledge a statement which was not true? We were not drummers or we were not playing the instruments. All instruments were played by the Urumi group we hired.

    Thirdly, the root cause to all this chaos was the playing of traditional indian instruments, such as Urumi and Thavil. Being the organizers of Thaipusam, the Hindu Endowment Board should stand up for the Indians and justify the playing of indian traditional instruments for a holy procession. I voiced out to the officials that if Lion Dance are allowed for chinese events and kompangs are allowed for malay events, why aren’t Indians allowed to play our traditional instruments. I did not mean it as a racial remark, but just as a comparison. But I was labelled a racist, giving racist remarks, which is again a false accusation.

    In summary, this is my point of view. I am not here to justify my actions, but just to create awareness amongst the public who had been giving different stories everyday. It is NOT TRUE that I was drunk during this chaos as mentioned in all the official news reports. In my opinion, I feel Hindu Endowment Board is not deemed fit to represent us, Indians. They do not know what are our needs, and I believe they could have handled the situation better, and giving us proper explanations when we questioned them, and not pushing the blame to the police and the Govt.

    It is heartwarming to see people from the public coming forward to give their opinion and feedback about the whole situation. I believe they are entitled to their freedom of the speech and should not be questioned or interrogated by any of the higher officials

    Thank you for taking the time to read through this post.

    Regards,
    Mohan.

    Note: This post first appeared on Mohan’s Facebook under the moniker of King Chola Hercules.

     

    Source: www.facebook.com/pages/The-Alternative-View

  • Did Yaacob Ibrahim Delegation Obtain Increased Quota Of Haj Participants From Singapore?

    Did Yaacob Ibrahim Delegation Obtain Increased Quota Of Haj Participants From Singapore?

    In a Facebook post on Friday evening, Minister for Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim said that he had met with Saudi Arabia’s Hajj Minister, Dr Bandar Bin Mohamed Al-Hajjar, on Thursday to discuss arrangements for the upcoming pilgrimage in September.

    Readers who had seen Yaacob’s post, however, were left confused on whether there would any increase in the Hajj quota this year. Although the minister mentioned that both he and Dr Bandar “agreed that the safety, welfare and security of the Hajj pilgrims must be given utmost priority”, he did not mention whether Dr Bandar had ever agreed to any increase in the Hajj quota.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

deneme bonusu