Tag: Singapore

  • Sofware Phone Scam Alert!

    Sofware Phone Scam Alert!

    There have been several reports of victims receiving calls from unknown people claiming to be the technical support from major software companies, soliciting user information and passwords, police said in a news release on Tuesday (Jan 6). Victims would see their computers being remotely controlled or files deleted after being duped.

    Police said callers would inform victims that their computers required security or software updates, and victims would be asked to download and install one or more software programmes from the Internet. The victims would also be asked to provide software user account identification codes and passwords to the caller and, in some instances, were instructed to enter some commands into their computers, police added.

    “Some victims observed that their computers were remotely controlled or files were deleted after following the instructions of the callers. The callers would then convince the victims to buy additional software by making online payments or by providing their credit card details,” police stated.

    Police have the following advice for you to protect yourself from being scammed:

    • Ignore such calls. Do not follow the instructions of the callers to install any software for your computer or enter any commands
    • Do not make any payment or divulge your credit card and/or bank account details to the callers
    • If you had followed any of the caller’s instructions, immediately change your computer’s log-in password and all other passwords associated with your online accounts (e.g. social media accounts and email accounts), especially your online banking and credit card passwords. Where possible, try changing the passwords from another computer other than the affected one
    • Scan your computer with a commercial anti-virus software to find out if malware has been installed on your computer
    • If you have any information related to this crime,  call the police hotline at 1800-255 0000, or 999 for urgent assistance

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Paper Generals Should Be Left Out Of Politics

    Paper Generals Should Be Left Out Of Politics

    The Singapore Cabinet comprises the PM, 2 DPMs and 15 ministers. 5 of them, or slightly more than a quarter, had been generals/equivalent in the military before becoming politicians.

    Another country with many high ranking military officers in the government is North Korea. Myanmar which used to parachute generals into top positions in the government have recently begun a cabinet reshuffle to replace ministerial positions held by the military with scholars. It appears Singapore has regressed – the number of ex generals increased after the last election (ex general George Yeo replaced by Chan Chun Sing and Tan Chuan Jin).

    Military men do not make good leaders in the government for the simple fact that they are used to giving orders. They are not listeners but control freaks. This is evident in Singapore where the mainstream media, grassroots organisations and government bodies continue to be controlled by the PAP.

    Our leader, PM Lee, is himself an ex general, the youngest in Singapore’s history. That PM Lee does not listen is obvious from his ‘solutions’ to our chronic problems ie.

    – Overcrowding/increased cost of living – increase the population to 6.9 million under PAP’s PWP.
    – CPF retirement shortfall – sell HDB homes and downgrade with assistance from HDB.
    – CPF and statutory board failure – edit government web pages and continue to conceal data from the public.
    – High cost of public housing – change the Resale Price Index to make prices look lower.
    – Rat infestation – HDB, town council and NEA not responsible but blame feeding of stray dogs.
    – Foreigners displacing Singaporean employees – employ more foreigners because Singaporeans are overpriced and foreigners help to create jobs for us.
    etc.

    Ten years under ex-general PM Lee’s leadership, Singaporeans have only experienced policy failure after failure. Instead of addressing them, the PAP only masks its failure with the implementation of the PGP, dishing out more grants, shoves its own ‘right’ version of Singapore’s history down our throat, attempts to control online media, silence the CPF ‘noises’ at Hong Lim Park, etc.

    What’s worse about our system is that ALL the generals DO NOT have any combat experience. These paper generals have been fast-tracked because of their stellar academic results and nothing else. What are their real achievements? Transformation of the army by throwing tax dollars at costly state-of-the-art weapons? Introducing pixelised uniforms which have been ditched by the US army? It’s a waste of tax dollars to have about 20 to 30? paper generals on a little red dot.

    SAF/President’s scholars are destined for top jobs in the military since day one. These scholars are ‘untouchable’ and their superiors are acutely aware of their limitations. They simply are not able to understand what the rank and file/ordinary citizens go through.

    The 5 (ex) paper generals in our cabinet are:

    1 (Major General) Chan Chun Sing

    Chan is a PAP MP of Tanjong Pagar GRC which was a walkover in the 2011 election. As such, the popularity or unpopularity of Chan is unknown. Chan has not even spoken at an election rally but from this video, you can be certain he will be a flop without the GRC system.
    Chan has not worked a single day in the private sector and his understanding of local issues is suspect. He served in the army from 1987 to 2011 and was (coincidentally) promoted to army chief during his last year in the army.

    Chan was promoted to Brigadier General (BG) in June 2007. Three short years later, he was promoted to Major General (MG) without accomplishing anything significant. He stayed on as the chief of army and ‘retired’ after only 1 year of service/OJT, wasting precious tax dollars. If Chan had already decided to go into politics, he should have allowed others who would have stayed on to contribute to the army. Or was Chan promoted to look better in politics? Combat experience – zero.

    2 (Brigadier General) Tan Chuan Jin

    Like Chan, Tan also served in the army from 1987 to 2011. Among all the newbie ministers, Tan was the most respected. But from Tan’s handling of the CPF issue and the MOM’s reluctance to address the flawed immigration policy, Tan’s credibility has taken a beating. Tan’s fast-tracked career in the military has disconnected him from ordinary citizens. He has yet to realise PAP’s policy failure and prefers to continue with tweaks.

    3 (Rear Admiral) Lui Tuck Yew

    As an SAF scholar, Lui was fast-tracked to top navy position within 20 years, including his taxpayers-funded studies of course. He was also the CEO of HDB in 2005.

    4 (Rear Admiral) Teo Chee Hean

    Like scholar Lui, Teo’s military career saw him promoted to head the navy within 20 years.

    5 (Brigadier General) Lee Hsien Loong

    Lee joined the SAF in 1971 and rose through the ranks to become the youngest BG in 1983 within a mere 13 years. Excluding the 5 years of studies funded by taxpayers, Lee achieved his miraculous promotion within 8 years. According to Dr Michael Barr, Lee “graduated in 1980 …by this stage he had risen to the rank of Major .. despite having only served for about three years on operational duty”.
    The interesting thing is Lee’s final years in the army where he had received a promotion every year from 1981 to 1983 without a single day in combat!

    In other democratic countries, it takes ‘forever’ to be promoted when one is already holding a very high ranking position. Guess our generals are not known as ‘paper generals’ for nothing.

    Lee’s phenomenal rise in the SAF?

    With a military career as smooth as silk, it is not that PM Lee doesn’t want to understand the reality of mere mortals like us but he really can’t.

    The table (below) is a summary of our paper generals.

    NAME ENLIST RESIGN YEARS RANK
    LEE HSIEN LOONG 1971 1984 13 BRIGADIER GEN
    TEO CHEE HEAN 1972 1992 20 REAR ADMIRAL
    LUI TUCK YEW 1983 2003 20 REAR ADMIRAL
    CHAN CHUN SING 1987 2011 24 MAJOR GEN
    TAN CHUAN JIN 1987 2011 24 BRIGADIER GEN

    * Lee Hsien Loong holds the world record for attaining the rank of BG in the shortest time, without any combat experience, in a democratic country. Our military is designed by scholars, for scholars. Every Tom, Dick and Harry scholar will become a general so long as he toes PAP’s line.

    PM Lee and DPM Teo were both born with a silver spoon in the mouth. One shouldn’t expect them to understand the struggles of ordinary/low wage citizens and PAP’s flawed policies confirm their disconnect.

    Real leaders should never be fast-tracked to top positions based on academic results. Currently, all paper generals are not really elected because of our unique GRC system designed to perpetuate PAP’s power.

    Running a government requires a consultative approach while it’s a top-down approach in the military. After years of a top-down approach, it becomes impossible to teach old dogs new tricks. Paper general George Yeo has already paid the price for not listening. Paper generals are failed politicians as is evidenced by their refusal to engage in a meaningful manner with their ‘wayangs’.

    Without a doubt, generals are army-trained and best left in the military. If paper generals can run our country, pigs should be able to fly.

     

    Source: http://likedatosocanmeh.wordpress.com

     

  • International  Judges For International Commercial Court In Singapore

    International Judges For International Commercial Court In Singapore

    The new Singapore International Commercial Court (SICC) was launched on Monday at the Supreme Court.

    The specialist court will hear disputes over global business deals. The new court is part of a plan to position Singapore as Asia’s dispute resolution hub, which involves the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, set up in 1991, and the Singapore International Mediation Centre, launched in November last year.

    Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon said in a speech to mark the opening of the legal year: “The establishment of an international commercial court will… build upon and complement the success of our vibrant arbitration sector and make our judicial institutions and legal profession available to serve the regional and the global community.

    “At the same time, it will grow our legal services sector and might even expand the scope for internationalising Singapore law.”

    The international judges appointed for SICC include Mr Dyson Heydon, former judge of the High Court of Australia; Dr Irmgard Griss, former president of the Austrian Supreme Court; and Justice Dominique T. Hascher, judge of the Supreme Judicial Court of France. Some of them will still serve as judges in their own jurisdictions.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Forest City Project Size Limited By Malaysia Environment Department

    Forest City Project Size Limited By Malaysia Environment Department

    KUALA LUMPUR — China developer Country Gardens Holdings can develop less than 405ha, or only a quarter, of its controversial 1,600ha Forest City project in the Johor Straits, under new limits set by Malaysia’s Department of Environment (DOE), a report yesterday showed.

    The Malaysian Insider has learnt that the DOE has verbally informed Country Garden Pacific View, a joint-venture unit of Country Gardens Holdings, of the new limits after complaints from locals and the Singapore Government over reclamation work in the narrow waterway between Malaysia and the island state.

    “The DOE has decided to limit the project to the first phase and wait for a few years to see the impact before looking at future phases,” a source told The Malaysian Insider.

    “The DOE is expected to send an official letter about its decision soon to relevant parties,” he added.

    The Forest City development in the Strait of Johor, near Singapore’s Second Link, involves creating a 1,817ha island almost three times the size of Ang Mo Kio and the construction of luxury homes. The project, which includes a 49ha tourist hub and recreational facilities, is expected to be completed in 30 years’ time.

    The ambitious project involves massive land reclamation work. Singapore had previously expressed concern about the possible transboundary impact of the reclamation work near its sea border.

    Another source said Malaysian environmental authorities made their decision after Singapore presented videos and documentary proof of continued reclamation work for the China-Malaysia joint-venture project.

    It is understood that the evidence was presented at the last Malaysia-Singapore Joint Commission on Environment, which met last month.

    Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs did not issue a response to TODAY’s request for comment.

    Analysts said it was difficult to gauge how much interest the project has generated among Singaporeans, but that it was likely investors would have already been cautious about the mega-project because it was on reclaimed land.

    “At this point, I think the news hasn’t reached the majority of their consumers,” said Mr Sean Tan, general manager of iProperty Singapore.

    “And as a Singaporean investor, obviously they would have to relook how that would affect their investment overall. I think Singaporeans being Singaporean investors, they will have a wait-and-see attitude until the formal letters and legislation have been put through.”

    The reclamation work had also affected Malaysia’s nearby key transshipment hub, the Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP).

    Last September, the Johor government said it wanted Country Garden Pacificview, the developer of Forest City, to comply with an Environmental Impact Assessment study before developing the project.

    Johor Chief Minister Mohamed Khaled Nordin had said it was important to ensure issues such as the environment were given full attention and that regulations were adhered to.

    A public dialogue on Forest City’s Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment turned chaotic on Sept 2 when the developer was confronted by locals affected by the project who were unhappy about not being consulted before its implementation, which was seen as polluting the environment and jeopardising the area’s marine ecology.

    The developers had reportedly voluntarily stopped sea reclamation to build the island, which was 30 per cent completed, on June 15 last year, although there was no official DOE notice.

    The Forest City project, which has gross development value (GDV) estimated at RM600 billion (S$225 billion) on reclaimed land, is a joint venture between KPRJ, a Johor state government owned subsidiary, and Country Garden Holdings.

    The China developer ventured into Johor in 2012 when it acquired 22ha of waterfront land in Danga Bay for nearly RM1 billion. It launched Phase One of the Danga Bay project in 2013, when more than 1,500 units were snapped up in three days.

    It launched Phase Two of the Danga Bay project last year, selling more than 6,000 units to date. Danga Bay is part of Malaysia’s ambitious Iskandar Region corridor, a project to develop the southern state as a special development and economic zone that would attract foreign investors.

    Country Gardens Holdings is China’s seventh-largest property developer with a market capitalisation of HK$63 billion (S$10.8 billion) as of Dec 31 last year.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Criminal Legal Aid Scheme To Be Enhanced To Preserve Interests Of Criminal Lawyers

    Criminal Legal Aid Scheme To Be Enhanced To Preserve Interests Of Criminal Lawyers

    While greater access to justice is being provided for, the expansion of the Criminal Legal Aid Scheme (CLAS) this year must be properly structured, so it does not “cannibalise” the fee-paying work of criminal lawyers, said Law Society president Thio Shen Yi.

    The enhancements to the scheme — which is expected to benefit up to 6,000 accused persons annually or half of the total number of cases each year — will allow the society to scale up their delivery of criminal legal aid, said Mr Thio at the opening of the legal year yesterday.

    “However, we must structure and means-test CLAS, so it doesn’t cannibalise fee-paying work of criminal lawyers,” he said. “Our target end-users are people who, but for our help, will face the criminal justice system, unrepresented, unadvised and alone.”

    CLAS is run by the Law Society’s Pro Bono Services Office and various Community Legal Clinics. If the enhanced scheme reaches the targeted number of persons assisted within five years, it will mean a 15-fold jump in the current workload. Last year, the Law Society said honorariums, also known as a nominal allowance, and training schemes will be provided to get more volunteer lawyers to join the scheme.

    Criminal lawyer Josephus Tan felt that concerns that the scheme could cannibalise the fee-paying work is an undue worry. “People who even qualify for this scheme, they are actually marginalised, the underprivileged in our society, who couldn’t ordinarily afford the so-called private lawyers to begin with,” he said.

    Other initiatives by the society that will have a direct impact on the man in the street include looking at making pamphlets informing laypeople of their basic legal rights available at police stations and courts; quicker access to counsel for accused people; as well as video-taping police interviews. The Government had previously rejected the last suggestion. In 2008, then Senior Minister of State (Law and Home Affairs) Ho Peng Kee said videotaping is not a foolproof solution; one could, for example, allege a threat was made before the camera was switched on.

    Yesterday, Mr Thio said video-taping police interviews has the potential to deliver a win-win result: Protection for the accused, the investigating officers and the integrity of the evidence. “In this case, both efficiency and justice are the winners.”

    On disciplinary matters, Mr Thio — who noted that the number of complaints has not increased despite the rise in society membership — said the group is looking at enhancing its complaints process. It has worked with the Ministry of Law to change the law so that from this year, lawyers who are subjects of complaints must be given a copy of the complaint. Previously, lawyers would be told of the complaint, but could not obtain a copy.

    “This may help lawyers explain themselves before an Inquiry Committee (IC) is empanelled and may result in fewer referrals,” Mr Thio said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu