Tag: Singaporean

  • Li Shengwu’s Eulogy To Lee Kuan Yew

    Li Shengwu’s Eulogy To Lee Kuan Yew

    A “doting grandfather”, a “man of tomorrow” and a “compassionate” nation builder – these were just some adjectives Li Shengwu, eldest son of Mr Lee Hsien Yang, used to described his grandfather Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    “Ye Ye loved his role as a doting grandfather. It delighted him, at each Chinese New Year, when the grandchildren gathered to greet him and receive hongbaos,” Mr Li said in his eulogy during a private wake held at the Mandai Crematorium.

    Reproduced below is his full eulogy:

    “When the grandchildren were very little, Ye Ye would take us on walks to feed the fish at the Istana. We would perch on the edge of the pond, the ripples of our breadcrumbs breaking the mirrored surface of the water. He liked to have the grandchildren nearby as he rode his stationary bike on the green grass.

    “Sunday lunch with Ye Ye was an institution for our family. His voice and his hearty laugh would carry to the children’s table, talking about matters of state, recounting meetings with foreign leaders whose names we neither recognised nor remembered.

    “In a city of continual renewal, my grandparents’ house never changed. It was always the same white walls, the same wooden furniture, the same high windows letting in sunlight. The food stayed the same too; Singapore cooking that would not be out of place at a good stall in a hawker center. Ye Ye and Nai Nai would take the grandchildren on outings, to the Zoo, to the Science Center, to National Day. I remember that when I was a child, the chief benefit of his position was that it came with a great view of fireworks.

    “Ye Ye loved his role as a doting grandfather. It delighted him, at each Chinese New Year, when the grandchildren lined up to greet him and receive hongbaos. After Nai Nai had her second stroke in June 2008, he continued the tradition, preparing himself the hongbaos for his grandchildren.

    “As I grew up, sometimes I would talk to Ye Ye about politics and the State. Always he spoke with the courage of his convictions; with a certainty born of long consideration. As you might guess, we didn’t always agree. At the dining table, he never argued opportunistically – he never took a position he didn’t believe for a tactical advantage. The facts were the facts – our beliefs should accord with the evidence, and not the other way around.

    “To grow up in Singapore is to grow up in his shadow; to see in our skyscrapers, our schools, our highways, and our homes the force of his singular vision.

    “History is full of plans for the total transformation of society. Plato’s Republic. Abbe Sieyes’ What is the Third Estate? The Communist Manifesto. Few plans succeed, and many cause more bloodshed than happiness. As such plans go, his was compassionate – even humane. His objective was that his fellow citizens, you and I, would know peace and plenty. He believed that education, open markets, and clean government would make the people of Singapore a great people.

    “That his plan succeeded is beyond dispute. It succeeded so rapidly, so thoroughly, that to my generation of Singaporeans, the poverty and instability of our beginning feels almost unreal – like a fever dream chased away by the morning light.

    “He was our man of tomorrow. From the day he took office in 1959, he fought to bring Singapore into the future. In real terms, in 1959, the average Singaporean was as poor as the average American was in the year 1860. Today Singapore is one of the most developed countries in the world. The Singapore economy has advanced more in fifty years than the American economy has advanced in 150 years. This is a pace of progress that’s less like economic development, and more like time travel.

    “Once, at the suggestion that a monument might be made for him, my grandfather replied: ‘Remember Ozymandias.’ He was, of course, referring to Shelley’s sonnet about Ramses II, the greatest Pharaoh of the Egyptian empire. In the poem, a lone traveller encounters a broken statue in the desert. On the statue, the inscription: “My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings; look on my works, ye mighty, and despair! Nothing beside remains.”

    “I think his meaning was that, if Singapore does not persist, then a monument will be no help. And if Singapore does persist, then a monument will be unnecessary. And that assessment is accurate: His legacy is not cold stone, but a living nation. And we could no more forget him than we could forget the sky.

    “It is often said that my grandfather built great institutions for Singapore. But what is an institution? It is a way of doing things that outlives the one who builds it. A strong institution is robust – it is persistent. It does not depend precariously upon the individual personalities. It places the rule of law above the rule of man. And that is the sacrifice of being a builder of institutions. To build institutions is to cede power – is to create a system that will not forever rely on you.

    That this occasion passes without disorder or uncertainty shows that he succeeded in this task. We are bereft at his passing, but we are not afraid. The pillars that he built stand strong, the foundations that he built run deep.

    “The next task falls to us. I think my grandfather always saw my generation of Singaporeans with a mixture of trepidation and hope. We are children of peacetime, unacquainted with the long struggle to make Singapore a modern nation-state. We view stability, prosperity, and the rule of law as our birthrights. For good or ill.

    “We have our own visions for what Singapore will be. Some of those visions, our hopes may seem idealistic or far-fetched. But my grandfather’s vision must have seemed pretty outlandish too, when he stood in an impoverished backwater 50 years ago and promised that it would become a metropolis. He showed us that, with courage and clear thinking, Singapore can rise above its narrow circumstances and be a light to the world.

    “Ye Ye, you started by fighting for Merdeka – for our right to rule ourselves. I found out this week that Merdeka has its roots in an old Dutch word, the word means a freed slave. When Singapore was cut adrift from Malaysia, you adopted an orphaned nation and made us all your children.

    “Ye Ye, you chose to forsake personal gain and the comforts of an ordinary life, so that the people of Singapore could have a better life for themselves, and for their children and for their grandchildren. That Singapore is safe, that Singapore is prosperous, that Singapore is – for this we owe a debt that we cannot repay.

    “Ye Ye – We will try to make you proud. Majulah Singapura.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Road Closures For State Funeral Procession

    Road Closures For State Funeral Procession

    Some roads will be closed on Sunday (March 29) during the state funeral procession from Parliament House to the University Cultural Centre (UCC) at the National University of Singapore and the state funeral service.

    Lanes & Roads Affected Period of Closure
    Extreme right lane of South Bridge Road (between North Canal Road and North Boat Quay) 11am to 2pm
    North Bridge Road (between Coleman Street and North Boat Quay) 11.30am to 2pm
    Upper Circular Road 11.30am to 2pm
    High Street (between Hill Street and North Bridge Road) 11.30am to 2pm
    Parliament Place (between North Bridge Road and Saint Andrew’s Road) 11.30am to 2pm
    Saint Andrew’s Road (between Parliament Place and Stamford Road) 11.30am to 2pm
    Coleman Street (between Saint Andrew’s Road and North Bridge Road) 11.30am to 2pm
    Supreme Court Lane 11.30am to 2pm
    Fullerton Road (between Esplanade Drive and Saint Andrew’s Road) 11.30am to 2pm
    Stamford Road (between Raffles Link & North Bridge Road) 11.30am to 2pm
    Esplanade Drive in the direction of Shenton Way (between Battery Road & Nicoll Highway) 11.30am to 2pm
    Nicoll Highway (between Bras Basah Road & Esplanade Drive) 11.30am to 2pm
    Connaught Drive 11.30am to 3pm
    Clementi Road (between Dover Road and Kent Ridge Crescent) Noon to 3pm
    Extreme left lane of Clementi Road in the direction of West Coast Ferry Road 8am to 8pm
    Extreme right lane of Clementi Road in the direction of Bukit Timah Road 8am to 8pm
    Kent Ridge Crescent (between Clementi Road and College Link) 8am to 8pm
    Engineering Drive 1 (between Kent Ridge Crescent and Engineering Drive 3) 8am to 8pm

     

    Members of the public can line the route the 15.4km route, said the State Funeral Organising Committee in a statement.

    The procession will start at 12.30pm. The funeral cortege will leave Parliament House at 1pm. The journey is expected to take 37 minutes.

    It will travel at 25kmh and pass landmarks such as Old Parliament House, City Hall, the Padang, NTUC Centre and Singapore Conference Hall. It will also pass through certain heartland areas.

    The procession will be telecast live on national television and online at www.rememberingleekuanyew.sg.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Lee Kuan Yew’s 10 Most Significant Speeches

    Lee Kuan Yew’s 10 Most Significant Speeches

    When Parliament convened on Thursday to pay homage to its longest-serving member, speaker after speaker referred to the major speeches that Mr Lee Kuan Yew had made in the House at key moments in the nation’s history. Perhaps the Parliament’s most electrifying presence ever, he pulled no punches and spoke with clarity and conviction on the challenges facing Singapore at various stages of its evolution.

    Here are edited excerpts from 10 significant speeches he delivered in the House over his 60 years as MP for Tanjong Pagar:

    JULY 21, 1959: Vow to cleanse the system of the evils of the past

    The People’s Action Party had just swept the 1959 Legislative Assembly General Election, winning 43 out of 51 seats. It was the first time the PAP, which up till then was an opposition party, had come to power.

    Mr Lee Kuan Yew was 35 years old when he delivered his first speech in the Legislative Assembly as Prime Minister, attacking those who stood against the PAP and even the civil servants opposed to its policy changes. He also assured voters that the PAP stood with the masses and that party leaders remained dedicated to the service of Singapore.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    DEC 14, 1965: Quest for a just and enduring future for everyone

    In the first Parliament sitting after Singapore became an independent country, then Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew spoke to the House, denouncing the opposition Barisan Sosialis and exposing their communist links. He discussed racial politics in Malaysia and how it would impact Singapore. This speech set the tone for the country’s multiracial policies in the decades ahead.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    SEPT 8, 1967: Maintaining confidence in Singapore’s continued stability

    In 1967, the British announced that they would be withdrawing their military presence from bases all over Asia, including Singapore. The British bases in Singapore, built from the 1930s, contributed as much as 20 per cent of Singapore’s economy at the time. In his speech to the House, Mr Lee Kuan Yew laid out the difficult options on the table.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    FEB 23, 1977: Make the right decisions, even if they are unpopular

    In one of former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s longest speeches ever, he held forth for nearly four hours in a wide-ranging parliamentary address.

    Former prime minister Goh Chok Tong recently singled out this speech as memorable, recalling how, as a young MP listening to it, “my bladder was about to burst”. Mr Lee spoke on leadership, succession, fighting the communists and winning elections in his address to 11 young MPs – Mr Goh included – who had just entered the House.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    JULY 30, 1986: Absurd to suggest judges fall in line with Govt’s wishes

    As Prime Minister in the 1980s, two of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s fiercest opponents were veteran opposition politicians Chiam See Tong and the late J. B. Jeyaretnam, the MPs for Potong Pasir and Anson respectively.

    In this speech, Mr Lee rebuts allegations of government interference in the Subordinate Courts by Mr Jeyaretnam – the subject of a Commission of Inquiry which found no evidence of it – as well as Mr Chiam’s remarks that the PM “dominates the universities, the civil service, statutory boards, I think, even Members of Parliament”.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    JAN 26, 1987: Teh Cheang Wan case: No way a minister can avoid investigations

    This jaw-dropping speech revealed then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew’s zero tolerance of corruption. He kicks off the parliamentary session by reading out a suicide note addressed to him, written by the Minister for National Development Teh Cheang Wan, who had died suddenly a month before. Mr Lee goes on to reveal for the first time that Teh was being investigated for accepting bribes.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    NOV 1, 1994: Higher pay will attract most talented team, so country can prosper

    In debating the motion to change the formula to calculate ministerial pay, Mr Lee Kuan Yew, then Senior Minister, put up a robust argument for paying ministers good salaries.

    He said that the private sector had taken away many good men and women from the Government, and without good people, the country would suffer.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    NOV 24, 2004: English for trade; mother tongue to preserve identity

    This speech in its entirety, made in support of a revised, more flexible Chinese-language curriculum while he was Minister Mentor, is one of the most complete statements of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s views on bilingualism and language policy.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    APRIL 19, 2005: IRs needed for Singapore to keep abreast of the top cities

    In the debate over whether to bring in the integrated resorts and casinos to Singapore, Mr Lee stood up to state that he was against gambling.

    He had initially resisted the move to bring casinos into Singapore but he eventually changed his mind because he saw the benefits that it could bring to the country.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

    AUG 19, 2009: ‘Equality is an aspiration, it is not reality, it is not practical’

    In a motion to continue to affirm the tenets in the National Pledge when debating government policies, Nominated MP Viswa Sadasivan questioned if it was time for Singapore to move beyond race and treat everyone as an equal.

    The next day, Mr Lee Kuan Yew delivered one of his last major speeches in Parliament and took it upon himself to “bring the House back to earth”. He argued that equality of men is an aspiration rather than the reality.

    READ THE SPEECH HERE

     

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Lee Kuan Yew “Nepotism”: Lee Lee Hsien Loong Is History Says Kenneth Jeyaretnam

    Lee Kuan Yew “Nepotism”: Lee Lee Hsien Loong Is History Says Kenneth Jeyaretnam

    The son of Joshua “Ben” Jeyaretnam, Lee Kuan Yew’s biggest political rival who campaigned regularly for free speech and democracy, has called for the Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to step down and pave the way for a complete change of regime in the tiny South East Asian island nation.

    His comments follow the passing of Lee Kuan Yew on 23 March, who was the first prime minister of Singapore and is widely regarded to have transformed the country into the economic superpower it is now.

    “Lee Hsien Loong needs to step down. He’s been prime minister for 10 years and he owes his position to his father. Whatever people say, it’s a clear example of nepotism,” Kenneth Jeyaretnam, the leader of Singapore’s Reform Party tells IBTimes UK. “There needs to be a change. Singapore is not the Lee Family and we need to get rid of the climate of fear.”

    The formation of the Reform Party

    Kenneth has long had a difficult relationship with the Singapore government.

    He watched his father JB Jeyaretnam, the leader of the Workers’ Party, Singapore’s biggest opposition party and a member of parliament, be persecuted and briefly imprisoned in 1986 for allegedly falsely accounting party funds (a conviction overturned by the Privy Council of the United Kingdom), before finally becoming bankrupt in 2001 for not being able to keep up with payments of libel suit damages to the People’s Action Party (PAP).

    Kenneth says the stigma around his father extended to him and he was unable to find work in Singapore after graduating from Cambridge University, and thus had to work abroad in Hong Kong and London for 20 years.

    But in 2008, three months before JB Jeyaretnam died aged 82, he set up the Reform Party, seeking to form a new democratic party and stand as a candidate for future elections. But he died of heart failure and Kenneth stepped into the fold to continue his work.

    “We are a democratic party that stands for accountability. We’re not there for check and balance. We are there for regime change. We’ve been saying this since 2009,” says Kenneth.

    In the 2011 general elections, the Reform Party gained a similar number of votes to other opposition parties but did not win any seats. This is not uncommon given the current state of politics in Singapore and is why change is needed, Kenneth stresses.

    Government policies that need to be changed

    There are several key policies the Reform Party wants to see changed, which include giving Singaporeans the right to own freehold of the state-owned HDB flats, reducing National Service and allowing the people to decide what happens to their Central Pension Fund (CPF) accounts.

    “We don’t want the situation where the Singapore government owns 80% of the land – Singaporeans should not be on 99-year leasehold agreements. And with CPF, at the moment we save far too much of our income in proportion to possible investment opportunities. We should let the individual decide how much they want to save,” Kenneth stresses.

    There’s also the issue of not having a free and fair media, and the fact the judiciary is not independent but is often used to legislate against opposition parties to the extent that it is difficult for the parties to do much at all.

    He said: “And we need an independent judiciary with restriction from political suits. Our party can’t even publish a newspaper without getting a permit from the government, and to receive that we have to state all the salaries and assets of the editors and leaders of the party. This scares people off.”

    Kenneth also mentioned all Singapore news sites are required by law to place a SDG$50,000 (£25,000, $37,000) deposit with the Media Development Authority (MDA). If the government agency sees something it feels is inappropriate and the relevant news site is not willing to take the content down, it forfeits its deposit.

    Increasing transparency of the budget

    One of Kenneth’s biggest gripes with the PAP is the fact that the budget is not transparent, and he is not happy with the way Temasek Holdings – the Singapore government investment company – and GIC – Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund – are managed.

    He is also bothered that Ho Ching, Lee Hsien Loong’s wife, is the CEO of Temasek Holdings, and feels this is a “huge conflict of interest”.

    “Temasek and GIC should be transparent to parliament and we should try to privatise them and list them on the stock market, with shares handed out to citizens so that everyone has a share of the national wealth,” says Kenneth.

    “I’m calculating conservatively here, but I estimate that there should be SGD$200,000 of assets per Singapore citizen.”

    Kenneth fears Singapore is falling behind due to Lee Kuan Yew’s policies and he says the only way to get ahead is to completely change the way the country does things.

    “To me, there’s been a seamless transition from one autocrat to the other,” says Kenneth, mentioning Lee Hsien Loong, like his father, continues to take a heavy hand against Singaporean bloggers when they make defamatory statements, like the case of Roy Ngerng.

    “We are mired in yesterday’s industries. The hub strategy of our Changi Airport is now being challenged by Dubai and Abu Dhabi in the Middle East. We need to start with political reform and basic freedoms. Without democracy, you can’t have true prosperity.”

    Sending condolences

    Some Singaporeans feel that during the time of national mourning for Lee Kuan Yew, there should not be criticism of his policies or doubts raised about the PAP or Lee Hsien Loong’s rule, but Kenneth disagrees.

    “You should see Lee Hsien Loong’s disgraceful condolence letter to me and my brother when my father died, compared to the much nicer one I wrote to him this week,” he says.

    “In his letter, Lee Hsien Loong accused my father of being against everything we stood for, that he sought to bring down the PAP and the government. My father stood up for democracy and the right that the government should be accountable to parliament.”

     

    Source: www.ibtimes.co.uk

  • Lee Kuan Yew – The Devoted Husband

    Lee Kuan Yew – The Devoted Husband

    At the special session where Members of Parliament paid tribute to Founding Prime Minister of Singapore Mr Lee Kuan Yew, a bouquet of white flowers occupied his empty chair. Image: Ministry of Communications and Information

    On March 26, 11 of Singapore’s members of Parliament paid heartfelt tributes to Founding Prime Minister of Singapore Mr Lee Kuan, who passed away this week at the age of 91.

    A bouquet of white flowers was placed poignantly on Mr Lee’s empty seat at the House of Parliament, with the attending members of parliament dressed in black and white to mourn the late Singapore leader. A minute of silence was observed after the eulogies were read by the members of Parliament.

    One of such notable, emotional speeches was made by Dr Ng Eng Hen, Minister for Defence and Leader of the House of Parliament.

    Dr Ng spoke movingly about Mr Lee as a husband, who would routinely call and speak to his sick wife nightly, even while he was away on an official trip in Malaysia.

    He also shared how Mr Lee had kept his word of celebrating his 90th birthday at the Parliament, even while being ill and frail and against his doctor’s advice.

    Here, we share an excerpt of Dr Ng Eng Hen’s speech, in tribute to the Founding Prime Minister of Singapore.

    Dr Ng Eng Hen:

    “Indeed, Mr Lee has had such a monumental impact on all Singaporeans that each would have his or her own special memory of him.

    For myself, two personal encounters have left lasting impressions.

    In 2009, Mr Lee led a delegation on an official trip to many states of Malaysia. DPM Tharman and I were part of it. The delegation was having dinner together, when Mr Lee asked to excuse himself so that he could speak on the phone to Mrs Lee.

    Due to previous strokes, Mrs Lee could not speak but remained conscious and aware. Mr Lee had made it a routine to speak and read to her each night. He did not want to break this routine, even though he was in Malaysia on a long trip.

    He asked the nurse to put the phone to Mrs Lee and spoke to her. He did this every night while we were in Malaysia.

    We stood aside to respect their privacy, but that image of Mr Lee, hunched over the phone speaking to Mrs Lee who could not speak back, will stay with me for a very long time as a simple but pure picture of true devotion.

    Mrs Lee passed away in 2010 and the impact on him was visible physically. Many people noticed this.

    Mr Lee had indeed become frail as he approached his 90th birthday in 2013. He had problems in swallowing and food would go down the wrong way into his windpipe, infecting his lungs repeatedly. As eating could cause aspiration pneumonia, he needed intravenous nutrition as supplement but became progressively thinner.

    Parliament was sitting on Sept 16th, his birthday and we wanted to acknowledge his 90th birthday. I called on Mr Lee at the Istana and told him about our plans. He said he would be in Parliament that day on Sept 16th.

    Unfortunately, when that day came, a dehydrated and weakened Mr Lee had to go to hospital and be put on a drip. His doctors advised him not to attend Parliament. We were informed and called off our plans.

    But just before Parliament adjourned, we were surprised when Mr Lee entered this Chamber. I found out later that he overruled his doctors, saying that he must attend Parliament because he had given his commitment.

    He wanted to walk but thankfully his doctors persuaded him that it would be acceptable for a 90 year old on intravenous nutrition to be wheeled into the chamber. That September 16th, this House had the last privilege to wish him happy birthday together.

    After Parliament adjourned, he stayed on as we cut his birthday cake and sang him a birthday song. At age 90, frail and dehydrated, Mr Lee kept his word to be here.

    Great strength of character, determination and integrity. Lee Kuan Yew had all of these qualities and more. He kept his promises. What he said he would do, he would and more – whether it was for individuals or an entire nation.

    There will not be another Lee Kuan Yew who made us better than we are or could be. Mr Lee Kuan Yew founded, moved and lifted a nation. Because of his unwavering devotion and a life poured out for Singapore, he has made all our lives better and for many generations to come. Few mortals have accomplished so much in their lifetime.

    We in this House are honoured to have lived and served with him. His legacy will live on through us and through this nation.”

    Source: www.herworldplus.com