Tag: Singaporean

  • M Ravi Barred From Applying For Certificate To Practice For 2 Years

    M Ravi Barred From Applying For Certificate To Practice For 2 Years

    The Court of Three Judges has decided that lawyer M Ravi who was ordered to stop practising in Feb 2015 should be prohibited from applying for a practicing certificate for a period of 2 years. In its judgment released today (27 Oct), the Court said that this was necessary to safeguard the interests of the public and to uphold public confidence in the integrity of the legal profession.

    Mr Ravi’s case was brought before the Court of Three Judges after he pleaded guilty to four charges of misconduct before a disciplinary tribunal last year. The tribunal, in its report released in December 2015 said that a prima facie case had been established against Mr Ravi since he had “pleaded guilty to the four charges and his mental condition as per the evidence of Dr (Tommy) Tan (a psychiatrist) does not exculpate him for his various acts of misconduct but are mitigating factors only”.

    Mr Ravi had earlier pleaded guilty to four charges of misconduct, which include creating a ruckus at the Law Society premises on 10 Feb 2015 and another charge of making inappropriate statements against the Law Society president and his family members in a Facebook post. He was also found guilty of  making false allegations against two lawyers in Feb 2015.

    The tribunal referred Mr Ravi’s case to the Court of Three Judges as it had no power to penalise a non-practising lawyer.

    On 6 Sep, Mr Ravi’s lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam sought an overall fine of $10,000 ($2,500 per offence) and pleaded for the Court to take his client’s mental illness into account.

    The Law Society’s lawyer, Mr Sean La’Brooy, did not object to a fine. He however, in arguing that Mr Ravi’s condition should not “exonerate” him, sought a higher quantum of at least $5,000 for one of the offences.

    The three judges that heard the case — CJ Menon and Judges of Appeal Andrew Phang and Tay Yong Kwang – described Mr Ravi’s conduct as “reprehensible” and “disturbing”.

    CJ Menon had then asked: “(Are we) not going to hold a solicitor to the standards expected of him? … The whole thing may have been avoided if (Mr Ravi) had taken the doctor’s advice … Should we say because he has a medical condition, we punish him differently?”

    The Court had other sentencing options besides prohibiting Mr Ravi from practicing. Among these options are to censure him, to order him to pay a penalty of not more than $20,000, or to strike his name off the roll of lawyers.

    In delivering the verdict today, CJ Menon said that the Court was presented with a situation where Mr Ravi has a mental condition which has in the past caused him to act in a manner unbecoming of a lawyer. He said that there is a possibility that this may happen again in the future.

    “In this circumstances, we consider that anything short of prohibiting the respondent for a substantial period of time from applying for a practicing certificate would be inadequate,” the verdict read.

    Commenting on the verdict Mr Ravi said the following in his Facebook:

    “The Court of Appeal handed out a judgement today prohibiting me from practising law for a period of two years. I have already been out of practice for more than 18 months. My doctor had certified me fit to practice since December last year.The Law Society had approved my application for Practising Certificate in August 2016. However the Attorney General objected to my Practising Certificate. During the hearing before the Court of Appeal the Law Society had agreed that a fine is an appropriate penalty in line with the recommendation made by the Disciplinary Tribunal below.

    I accept that I did not behave appropriately when I was unwell. However, the Court of Appeal’s Judgment is acutely disproportionate in view of the Disciplinary Tribunals recommendation of a fine. The effect of the Court of Appeal’s judgment means I am put (out) of Practice of Law for close to 4 years.

    However in as much I am devastated, this will not deter me from continuing my work in the field of international human rights and constitutional law and contribute to society where I can. To this extent, I will continue my work by assisting the firm of Eugene Thuraisingam LLP in my current role as a Head of Knowledge Management and Strategic Alliance Division.”

     

    Source: http://theindependent.sg

  • Singaporean Loses $270k In Bogus China Cops Scam

    Singaporean Loses $270k In Bogus China Cops Scam

    A Singaporean in his 60s thought he was protecting his family’s savings when he cooperated with “police officers” from China who accused him last month of being involved in money laundering.

    He ended up losing close to $270,000 from five POSB accounts linked to his name over eight consecutive days last month. This was money that he needed for his family’s expenses and children’s education.

    The case took place as scams involving the impersonation of China officials rose from 179 cases in the first half of the year to 249 in the July to September period. Victims lost at least $21 million from January to September, with one losing $2.38 million, said the police.

    There were 74 impersonation scams from January to last month, where scammers pretended to be from local agencies such as the police force or Ministry of Manpower.

    In the man’s case, it all started one morning when a caller claiming to be a policeman told him that a female “bank employee” who previously contacted him had been arrested abroad. He was told that his accounts, which had been implicated in her crimes, would be frozen unless he called Chinese police officers and followed instructions for them to help.

    The man provided his details and applied for an Internet banking token – a gadget he had never used before. He then called a Chinese number, speaking to a man named Liew for up to an hour every day. About seven times a day, he was asked to read out codes on the token after pushing a button.

    It was not until almost two weeks later that he realised that five of his family’s bank accounts, which were linked to his name, had been cleaned out.

    Money from his children’s and sister’s joint accounts with him had been transferred to one of his own before being siphoned out in sums of between $417 and $2,029. This was done multiple times in a row, mostly recorded as a transaction to a merchant under D2Pay – a direct debit payment system. Other inter-bank fund transfers were also made.

    “It was as though I had been hypnotised, I believed everything they said,” said the victim, who declined to be named. “They told me not to update my bank book, or they would tell the Monetary Authority of Singapore to hold my accounts.”

    When his two children, both in tertiary institutions, realised that money had vanished from their bank accounts, they asked him about it. He had only recently transferred money that he received from their insurance policies into their accounts. “I told them that I took the money out for investments,” he said.

    He has since come clean with them and reported the case to the police. He said he asked the bank why it failed to alert him when multiple transactions were made and was told only that the case is under police investigation. The bank also told him to close his accounts.

    “I don’t know what is going to happen. My life savings… are all gone just like that,” he said.

    In response to queries, a DBS spokesman said the bank is unable to comment on this specific case as it is under police investigation. POSB is a part of DBS Group.

    When asked about D2Pay transactions, the spokesman said: “We inform our customers via SMS of transactions done on their accounts. The same protocol is used for D2Pay transactions.”

    He said the bank has “a robust due diligence process in place” for those who become merchants on D2Pay, as “they first need to become our corporate customers to obtain a corporate account”.

    Instead of allowing customers the option of receiving one-time passwords via SMS, DBS switched to only token authentication last year for better security, he said.

    Other banks said they have security measures such as fraud-monitoring systems to detect irregular activity, as well as two-factor authentication (2FA).

    United Overseas Bank said that once an irregularity is flagged, investigations will take place immediately and it will call the customer to verify the transaction.

    Mr Patrick Chew, head of operational risk management at OCBC Bank, said customers need 2FA for online transactions. While its number of unauthorised transactions has been low, “in such an instance, it is often a case of the individual having inadvertently divulged his security information”.

    A spokesman for Maybank said it introduced an eight-digit code last week for customers who access their accounts online. Users receive this code on their registered phones and key it into a token to generate a one-time password to complete the transaction. In the past, users needed only the one-time password on their tokens.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • He Helped Hide Bullet Fired During Game

    He Helped Hide Bullet Fired During Game

    While on duty at the Tuas Checkpoint in Aug last year, a Certis Cisco corporal decided to have some fun with his revolver.

    But his firing of the weapon led to a series of attempts to cover up the offence and eventually got his colleague fired, fined and jailed.

    Last Aug 13, Gregory Lai Kar Jun, 23, and his then-colleague, Muhammad Dzul Adhar Azmi, who was also a Certis Cisco corporal at that time, were at an observation point at the Checkpoint.

    Lai took out his revolver to play a game similar to Russian roulette.

    Dzul, now 22, was nearby when Lai fired one shot.

    Instead of reporting it to the authorities, Dzul kept mum and even tried to help his friend cover his tracks.

    But they were caught and Dzul was jailed three weeks and fined $2,000 yesterday.

    He pleaded guilty to one count each of intentionally obstructing the course of justice and failing to give information to the police about the rash act Lai had allegedly committed.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Sarah Shi said Lai placed a bullet into the chamber of his revolver at around 2pm on Aug 13 last year before pulling the trigger.

    The weapon did not fire at first, but it went off when Lai pulled the trigger again.

    Lai later found the used bullet under a table at the observation point and took it.

    DPP Shi said: “Lai told the accused that he had an idea to put one bullet in a toilet bowl, following which he would claim that he had lost two bullets while using the toilet.”

    Dzul agreed to help him and they planned to get rid of the used bullet.

    DPP Shi told District Judge Crystal Ong that Lai hatched a plan to hide it in a traffic wand and Dzul agreed to help him.

    After concealing it in the wand, Lai went to a nearby restroom and threw a second bullet into a toilet bowl.

    He then reported the matter to the Tuas Checkpoint operations room.

    In the meantime, Dzul retrieved the used bullet from the traffic wand and placed it inside a cigarette box.

    Police officers conducted their investigation and tried to look for the bullet at around 8.50pm that day.

    Dzul and Lai also took part in the search.

    DPP Shi said Dzul took the discharged round to Bedok Reservoir and threw it into the water at around 2am the next day.

    SERIOUS OFFENCE

    Stressing that Lai’s alleged offence was a serious one, she urged Judge Ong to jail Dzul between one and two months, and fine him $2,000.

    Dzul’s lawyer, Mr Rajan Supramaniam, told the court his client had lost his job with Certis Cisco due to his offences and is now working as a truck assistant.

    He added Dzul had been blinded by his loyalty to Lai and asked for his client to be given the minimum sentence.

    Lai’s case is still pending.

    For intentionally obstructing the course of justice, Dzul could have been jailed up to seven years and fined.

    And for failing to give information to the police about the rash act Lai had allegedly committed, he could have been jailed up to six months and fined.

     

    Source: The New Paper

  • Ex-SCDF Director Who Was Sentenced To 10 Weeks’ Jail Cleared Of Misappropriating 2 iPads

    Ex-SCDF Director Who Was Sentenced To 10 Weeks’ Jail Cleared Of Misappropriating 2 iPads

    A former senior civil servant, originally sentenced to 10 weeks’ jail last year after he was found guilty of misappropriating two iPads, walked out of court a free man on Thursday (Oct 20) after he was acquitted of the charges.

    Mr Jeganathan Ramasamy, 65, who was director of the technology department at the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF), had maintained that the two Apple tablets handed to him by IT vendor NCS in 2011 were personal purchases, for which he had yet to make payment.

    He gave one to his daughter and sold the other to SCDF’s then senior director of emergency services for $200. Each iPad 2 was worth $939.

    But the prosecution, which brought two charges against him for criminal breach of trust, contended that the two iPads were meant to be used to test mobile apps that NCS was developing for SCDF.

    In acquitting Mr Jeganathan on Thursday, Judicial Commissioner See Kee Oon said there were “inconsistencies and gaps” in the evidence of both the prosecution and the defence. He said “ample doubt” had been raised in the case against Mr Jeganathan, making it unsafe for the conviction to stand.

    The judicial commissioner noted that the two iPads did not come loaded with any apps, contrary to the prosecution’s case that the devices were meant for testing purposes.

    He also noted that it did not make sense for Mr Jeganathan to sell one iPad to a senior officer in the same organisation if he had obtained it through wrongful means.

    The judicial commissioner pointed to text message exchanges with NCS’ then group general manager, Mr Wong Soon Nam, in which Mr Jeganathan asked to pay for the devices on at least three occasions.

    In a message after he received the devices, Mr Jeganathan said: “Tell me the amount I have to pay.” Mr Wong replied that the iPad 2 “is meant for all the new mobile apps that we are rolling out for SCDF and for you to trial”.

    Shortly after this exchange, Mr Wong phoned Mr Jeganathan.

    Mr Jeganathan testified that Mr Wong told him over the phone to try out the iPads first and they could talk about the price later. Mr Wong initially testified that he did not communicate further with Mr Jeganathan but when confronted with the call records, said he could not remember the contents of the call.

    The judicial commissioner said text messages are a “fertile ground for miscommunication” and that the contents of the call can change the interpretation of the text message exchange.

    Approached for comment after he was acquitted, Mr Jeganathan, who was defended by Mr Sanjiv Rajan, said he was “thankful” that “justice prevailed”. He left SCDF in 2012.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • Hassan In Limbo

    Hassan In Limbo

    The Football Association of Thailand (FAT) confirmed yesterday (Oct 17) that the country’s top football competition, the Thai Premier League (TPL), has ended.

    It means that Army United, where Singapore goalkeeper Hassan Sunny plies his trade, will be relegated to Division 1.

    Hassan, the Singapore No. 1, is hoping he can secure a loan move and stay in the top flight.

    Speaking to The New Paper yesterday, the 32-year-old, who kept five clean sheets for his club this season, said: “I still have one more year on my contract with Army United, so I will have to play in Division 1 if they want me to.

    “No disrespect to Division 1, but I would like to still play in the top division if possible, as I feel I can still play at this level.

    “I have had some verbal interest from some TPL clubs, although given my contract circumstances, they would have to pay a transfer fee to sign me on a permanent deal, which is more common for locals than imports here.

    “There is a new chairman at my club, so I’m not sure now what direction they want to take for next season.

    “I will meet with him soon and hope to get a clearer picture.

    “If I don’t fit in their plans, I will request to go on loan at another TPL club.”

    The FAT announced the conclusion of the 18-team TPL season with three matches to go following the death of King Bhumibol Adulyadej last Thursday.

    The league standings at the time were deemed final, with Muang Thong United crowned champions and the bottom three – Army United, Chainat Hornbill and BBCU – relegated, while upcoming cup finals would be decided by a draw.

    According to Thailand daily Siam Sport, Army United had complained of “unfair relegation with three matches and nine points to play for”, as there were teams ahead of them they still could have caught.

    After a meeting with the affected clubs, the FAT upheld the original decision.

    Hassan can look back at two fruitful seasons in the TPL in which he has become a fan favourite with his committed and commanding displays.

    Earlier this year, he was named by British newspaper The Telegraph as the 18th-best goalkeeper in the world.

    “I love the challenge here in Thailand,” said Hassan.

    “Week in, week out, every game feels like an international match here in terms of the standard of play, the intensity and the environment.

    “We can all feel the excitement of a game day and it’s a league which every Singaporean footballer should aspire to play in.

    “I have always given 100 per cent 
in every game I play and it’s nice that the fans acknowledge that and tell us they appreciate us regardless of the results.

    “The team I play for are not one of the strongest or richest, and there’s definitely pressure to perform as an import, but I have really enjoyed my time here and I’m looking forward to playing in the TPL for at least another season.”

     

    Source: The New Paper