Tag: UK

  • Muslim Women Gather At Westminster Bridge To Remember Victims Of Terrorist Attack

    Muslim Women Gather At Westminster Bridge To Remember Victims Of Terrorist Attack

    Woman gathered at the scene of last Wednesday’s terror attack in Westminster and linked arms as a show of solidarity with its victims.

    Wearing blue as a symbol of hope, the women said emotions were “overwhelming” as they stood on the bridge where pedestrians were mown down by 52-year-old terrorist Khalid Masood .

    They formed a human chain by holding hands for five minutes as Big Ben chimed at 4pm.

    People from a range of backgrounds joined the event, organised by Women’s March On London.

    Three members of the public died and many more were injured after Masood sped along the bridge before storming the parliamentary estate and stabbing PC Keith Palmer to death.

    Fariha Khan, 40, a GP from Surbiton, said: “The feeling of what happened here on

    “We thought of the ordinary people who were here and were mown down, standing here like this, it was very overwhelming.”

    She was joined by fellow Ahmadiyya Muslims who said they wanted to add to the condemnation of the violent attack and stand defiant in the face of terrorism .

    Sarah Waseem, 57, from Surrey, said: “When an attack happens in London, it is an attack on me.

    “It is an attack on all of us. Islam totally condemns violence of any sort. This is abhorrent to us.”

    Being present for the demonstration shows people in the city are united in support of democracy, said Ayesha Malik.

    The 34-year-old mother-of-two, also from Surrey, said: “As a visible Muslim I think it was important to show solidarity with the principles that we all hold dear, the principles of plurality, diversity and so on.”

    Londoner Mary Bennett said she was present to make a “small gesture”.

    The retired healthcare worker said: “I am here to show that in a quiet way we continue to go where we like and do what we like in London.

    “This is my city. It’s a very small gesture but life is made up of small gestures.”

     

     

    Source: www.mirror.co.uk

  • Terrorist Khalid Masood: A ‘Nice Guy’ Turned Extremist

    Terrorist Khalid Masood: A ‘Nice Guy’ Turned Extremist

    The man who mowed down pedestrians and stabbed a policeman in Wednesday’s deadly assault outside Britain’s parliament has been identified by police as 52-year-old former convict Khalid Masood.

    Known by “a number of aliases”, London’s Metropolitan Police said he had been convicted for a string of offences but none of them terror-related.

    Born on Christmas Day 1964 in Kent in southeast England, Masood had been living in the West Midlands where armed police have staged several raids since the attack, storming properties in the city of Birmingham.

    The police confirmed he was a British citizen.

    He was brought up by a single parent in the town of Rye, on the southern English coast, according to The Times.

    Over the course of two decades, Masood chalked up a range of convictions for assault, grievous bodily harm, possession of offensive weapons and public order offences, police said, with the incidents taking place between 1983 and 2003.

    Prime Minister Theresa May said he was once investigated by the intelligence service MI5 “in relation to concerns about violent extremism”.

    But Masood had never been convicted of terrorism offences and “was not the subject of any investigations,” the police said, noting there was “no prior intelligence about his intent to mount a terrorist attack”.

    At 52, his age has been highlighted by commentators as unusual, with most Islamist extremists behind similar attacks far younger.

    Although the police believe Masood acted alone, the Islamic State group claimed he was one of its “soldiers” acting on a call to target countries fighting the jihadists in Iraq and Syria.

    ‘A NICE GUY’

    Masood rented the car used in the attack from the Solihull branch of Enterprise, on the outskirts of Birmingham, the company confirmed in a statement.

    According to the BBC, he told the car rental company that he was a teacher.

    A spokeswoman for Britain’s education ministry told AFP Masood was not a qualified teacher and had therefore not taught in any state schools.

    The Sun tabloid said Masood stayed in a hotel on the outskirts of Brighton, a seaside city south of London, on the night before the attack.

    London’s Metropolitan Police would not confirm the newspaper’s report that investigators went to the hotel following the attack after finding a receipt in the hire car.

    British media described Masood as a Muslim convert, with one source telling Sky News he was a “very religious, well-spoken man”.

    “You couldn’t go to his home in Birmingham on Friday because he would be at prayer,” said the source, who Sky said met Masood in a professional capacity.

    “He was a nice guy. I used to see him outside doing his garden,” Iwona Romek, a former neighbour of his told the Birmingham Mail.

    “He had a wife, a young Asian woman and a small child who went to school,” she said. Other media have reported that he was a married father-of-three.

    Romek said the family had abruptly moved out of their house in Winson Green, a neighbourhood in western Birmingham, around Christmas without saying goodbye.

    Romek said she could not imagine him carrying out an attack, adding: “Now I’m scared that someone like that was living close to me”.

    More recently Masood may have been living in a flat next to a Persian restaurant and a pizza parlour in the upmarket Edgbaston neighbourhood, according to reports.

    One neighbour at that address told The Telegraph newspaper they were fearful after the day’s events: “It’s left me so scared and I don’t know what to tell the children. He seemed like a normal calm and kind family man, always with a smile on his face.”

    Following an armed raid on the property overnight, a man working in a shop nearby told the Press Association simply: “The man from London lived here”.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • A Singaporean Stranded – Not Granted British Residential Status Even Though She Married A Briton And Stayed There For 27 Years

    A Singaporean Stranded – Not Granted British Residential Status Even Though She Married A Briton And Stayed There For 27 Years

    She is a Singaporean who is married to a Briton.

    Together, they have lived in Britain for 27 years and have two grown-up sons who are British citizens. Even her granddaughter was born in England.

    But now Irene Clennell, 52, who lived with her husband in Country Durham, faces deportation after being detained during a routine appointment in January at an immigration reporting centre in Middlesborough, reported BBC.

    While Mrs Clennell was given indefinite leave to remain in Britain after her marriage, it appears as if periods she spent in Singapore caring for dying parents was the deal-breaker which revoked her residential status, added the report.

    Before her arrest. Mrs Clennel told the BBC: “The kids were born here, my husband is from this country so I don’t see what he issue is. But they keep rejecting all the applications.”

    She told reporters last year: “I have got no family in Singapore and I have no property in Singapore. My parents are dead. My only family is a sister, and she is working in India. My husband is British. I do not see why I cannot stay.”

    She told BBC she had made repeated attempts – both in Singapore and back in the UK – to re-apply for permission to live with her husband.

    The Clennels tied the knot in 1990. Mrs Clennell does not claim state benefits and is not allowed to work. Mr John Clennel, 50, who is a gas engineer is in poor health, reported the Daily Mail.

    Irene said she was her husband’s primary caregiver.

    She added: “My granddaughter – I want to see her grow up. And my husband is not getting any better. I want to be with my family. If I do go back, I don’t know when I’ll be able to see them again.”

    Mr Clennell told BBC: “Since Irene’s been detained, my mum’s been coming over to get my meals and so on.”

    He told BuzzFeed: “I just can’t believe this is happening. It’s a disgrace. She hasn’t claimed any benefits here and I’ve worked nearly all my life, so I can’t see what the problem is. She doesn’t cost the state anything.”

    Director of UK’s Migrant Voice Nazek Ramadan said Clennell’s case is one of the many cases of how arbitrary policies “tear apart families and ruin lives”.

    “These kind of bureaucratic decisions are a direct result of a relentless drive towards unrealistic migration caps that don’t take real lives into account.”

    When asked for a response, the Home Office told the media: “We do not routinely comment on individual cases.”

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

  • 75 Years Ago Today, Singapore Was Invaded

    75 Years Ago Today, Singapore Was Invaded

    On this day 75 years ago, Singapore was invaded by the Japanese 25th Army.

    Over the next 8 days, we’ll be recapturing the key moments from the Battle of Singapore.

    It is from history that we learn about who we were then, who we are now, and who we want to be in the future.

    We remember the sacrifices made and lessons learned – Our SAF exists and is strengthened by National Service to make sure history never repeats itself again.

    #LestWeForget

     

    Source: The Singapore Army

  • We, Muslims Are Proud Singaporeans!

    We, Muslims Are Proud Singaporeans!

    “We, Muslims are proud Singaporeans”, were the flinty words a Singapore national servicemen reportedly told The Diplomat magazine in 2014.

    He complained that Muslims serving in the Singapore military [were] routinely kept away from critical roles in air and naval units.

    His comments to The Diplomat magazine was prefaced by what had happened in Singapore in February 1915. Inexplicably the history books in the city-state have excluded the explosively, seismic event from its curriculum even as it had paralleled the Maria Hertogh riots of 1952.

    Still if there is something largely forgotten in Singapore, is the Sepoy Mutiny of 1915 when bands of Indian soldiers, namely Muslims, roamed the streets in the weeks of February 1915 hunting down and killing Europeans. The disgruntled troops were outraged when they learned – though falsely – that they would be sent to fight their co-religionists in Turkey during World War I. After breaking out of their barrack lines in what is today’s Dempsey Road, the mutineers began an orgy of rampage and killings. They even had the help of some Germans interred in Singapore.

    The outbreak occurred during Chinese New Year that year. But thanks to some Japanese, French and Russian reinforcements which the British summoned, the mutiny was quickly suppressed.

    All the mutineers were then court-martialled and tried and found guilty of the probable crime of treason.

    They were all executed in broad daylight at where now stands the Outram Park MRT to the perverted delight of onlookers who cheered when British marksmen began taking aim to shoot and kill the men standing blindfolded before them.

    It was something that British would never dare want to do in their own home turf.

    As how The Diplomat pointed, for some South Asian historians, the Singapore Mutiny is a sequel to the 1857 Sepoy Mutiny and an important milestone in the struggle for independence. The 5th Light infantry would be disbanded shortly after World War I after serving with the British Army in East Africa. Yet, Singapore would again be the site of another important rebellion involving colonial Indian troops. In 1942, the fall of Singapore, placed 40,000 Indian troops of whom nearly 30,000 would join the anti-British First Indian National Army (INA) under nationalist leader Mohan Singh. That army collapsed but, a second INA under Subas Chandra Bose joined Japanese forces during the Burmese campaign. During World War II, similar but smaller units of Indian soldiers were raised by both Germany and Italy from among Indian POWS. (http://thediplomat.com/2015/02/singapore-a-mutiny-like-no-other)

    Next week marks the 102nd anniversary of that uprising and what has been sobering is that has never received any mention in Singapore’s history books.

     

    Source: www.theindependent.sg