Tag: youth

  • Young Punks The Bane Of Taxi Drivers

    Young Punks The Bane Of Taxi Drivers

    Instead, the easy-going veteran cabby prefers to take everything in his stride.

    He told The New Paper: “To tell you the truth, the bad overrides the good most of the time (in this industry). Perhaps it is my nature to forget them and not take them to heart.

    “The day is still long, tomorrow will be a better day. So as far as possible, I try to make it easier on myself so that the job is less stressful.

    “We give and take, we cannot take things too hard to survive in this world.”

    So how does he deal with difficult passengers or bad days?

    Mr Gan takes coffee breaks, sometimes with his ‘kakis’ to recharge. TNP PHOTO: Noor Ashikin Abdul Rahman

     

    “If I can sense that the passengers are (up to no good) and purposely making me drive all around the island, I will advise them to split cabs as that is more cost-effective for them. Usually, I’m pretty successful,” he said.

    And if passengers end up evading the fare, he let it slide.

    “If it’s only $10 or $20 then it’s not a big bomb. Is it worth making you so unhappy? Forget it,” said Mr Gan, who drives a Trans-Cab taxi.

    Mr Gan, who does the early shift, became a taxi driver in 1990 after his renovation business failed.

    The sole breadwinner and father of three grown children has been with multiple taxi companies over the years, including Comfort and CityCab.

    On weekdays, he usually starts at about 6.30am and ends at 5.30pm.

    Mr Gan with some of his fellow cabby buddies at lunch. TNP PHOTO: NOOR ASHIKIN ABDUL RAHMAN

     

    He might be in his 60s and has been in the trade for far longer than his younger counterparts but he is far from “jaded”.

    Eager to learn and improve himself, Mr Gan signed up as a driver-partner with ride-hailing service GrabCar in 2013.

    He had initial reservations about the service but was eager to try it out for himself.

    He admitted that many of his friends – both taxi drivers and non-taxi drivers alike – constantly debated the pros and cons of ride-hailing services like GrabCar.

    “There was even quarrelling among ourselves, with some saying that it was stealing their rice bowl. I told them, ‘If you can’t beat them, join them. Why not?” he said.

    According to Mr Gan, he has enjoyed a 15 per cent increase in income since joining GrabCar.

    Before this, he earned anything from $20 to $100 daily.

    But a steady income is little comfort for some of his cabby friends within his age group.

    “Some of them are not willing to learn, some are also stubborn. But I always tell them that is they are not willing to change or upgrade, they will become obsolete one day,” he said.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • A Youth’s Election Prediction Results And Fears For The Future Of Governance

    A Youth’s Election Prediction Results And Fears For The Future Of Governance

    MY PREDICTIONS

    6 MEMBER GRC 

    ANG MO KIO RP 40+%

    Pasir Ris Punggol SDA 40+%

    5 MEMBER GRC

    Nee Soon WP Close to 50%

    Tanjong Pagar SINGFIRST 40+%

    Sembawang NSP close to 45%

    Tampiness NSP slightly above 40%

    Aljunied WP close to 60% (Opposition Win)

    Bishan Toa Payoh SPP Close to 50%

    Marine Parade WP slightly below 50%

    Jurong SINGFIRST close to 40%

    4 MEMBER GRC

    East Coast WP 50+% (Opposition Win)

    Choa Chu Kang PPP Above 40%

    Holland-Bukit Timah SDP close to 60% (Opposition Win)

    West Coast RP slightly above 40%

    Jalan Besar WP Slightly above 50% (Opposition Win)

    Marsling – Yew Tee SDP Slightly above 50% (Opposition Win)

    SMC

    Bukit Panjang SDP slightly above 50% (Opposition Win)

    Bukit Batok  SDP Close to 50 %Win, PAP Above 35%, Samir Salim Neji less than 15%

    Fengshan WP Slightly below 50%

    Hong Kah North SPP Below 40%

    Hougang WP More than 65% (Opposition Win)

    Mountbatten  SPP slightly above 50% (Opposition Win)

    MacPherson  PAP above 50+% win, WP slightly above 40%, NSP less than 10%

    Punggol East WP Close to 60% (Opposition Win)

    Pioneer NSP 40+%

    Potong Pasir SPP slightly above 55% (Opposition Win)

    Radin Mas RP 40+% Win Close to 40% PAP Tan Hui Hui 15+%

    Sengkang West WP slightly above 50% (Opposition Win)

    Yuhua SDP 50+% (Opposition Win)

    MY FEARS

    In my above analysis, 12 constituencies will have Opposition parties winning, with 28 opposition politicians making up the total number of 89 seats in parliament. This means PAP still makes up at least 50% of the seats and will form the government as such. It might be a watershed election this year or it might not? This is just a assumed guess based on comparison to 2011 GE results, news coverage, as well as the popularity and prominence of the candidates and their respective parties. Thus, the results may turn out totally different.

    If it really ends up as a watershed election, I’m quite apprehensive because as much as I know there are loopholes in our current system, and change will be good after so many years of being governed by a one-party system, I do fear if there will be clashes in direction and ideas in parliament due to the different voices, which might hamper the government from being a united, efficient and effective system. Nonetheless, since my prediction is that PAP will still form the main government, the changes will not be that extreme.

    Will inter-party differences drown out the important national issues? How do we strike a balance if the various parties have different ideologies? Also, are new changes worth risking the stability? If it brings about good change, that is wonderful but if the opposite occurs, the next 4 years might be one hell of a ride. Hence, I hope the election results will not show a drastic change, but a good balance of both new and old faces. A progressive change to me, is better than a sudden and hasty one that may lead to unchangeable consequences.

    At the same time, the diverse views and alternative voices would definitely offer a positive change to the government in terms of viewing issues faced by the people from a different angle, and also speaking up more on left-wing issues e.g. which place an increase focus on the rights, needs, and well-being of the people, rather than just striving for economic growth.

    What I hope is Singaporeans do not vote for a party that is just a second PAP. Because if it a second PAP, I might as well have PAP since they have more stability. Secondly, I hope people do not vote for an opposition that might not be competent, but do it for the sake of being anti-PAP or wanting change. Look at the long-term over the short-term. Thirdly, I do not believe in spoiling your votes just because you like neither parties in your constituency. It is an important responsibility that does not only determine your life, but also that of your neighbors and community living around you, as well as Singaporeans since the candidates will also speak up in parliament on national issues.

    Thus, Singaporean adults who have the time and resources really should read up on the parties manifestos of their constituencies, attend their rallies, follow news regularly from both mainstream and non-mainstream sources, compare progress and changes of the competing parties and candidates from the past to now, and form your decision from an objective and long-term angle of who or which team you feel can do a better job at leading the needs of our people and country well.

    What I can say for GE202 is that if the oppositions really do well for the next 5 years, there is a chance PAP may fall below 50%, and the opposition parties may come together as a strategic move to form a coalition government, which will put PAP by the sidelines. However, if they do poorly for the next 5 years, chances are that PAP will go back to being the incumbents. If some opposition parties do well, their popularity will increase and they may end up slowly forming the main government.

    Honestly, all parties were either once, or are presently opposition parties, even PAP. The next party to become the ruling party would be forgotten as a opposition party, and Singaporeans would start to hate on them again because of the fact that they are the ruling party, and pick on the loopholes which are ever present in every governing system, just like the anti-PAP people now. It is a continual cycle. It’s quite an irony. PAP was once a opposition party that the people love, but the trend is now changing. The next party to become the ruling government will also slowly go from being the party people love, to the party people start to question and pick on likewise.

     

    Source: https://offbeatperspectives.wordpress.com

  • Youths Will Be Careful With Votes

    Youths Will Be Careful With Votes

    First-time voter Tan Yu Jun, 22 is excited about casting his first ballot. The economics undergraduate and West Coast GRC resident says: “I feel privileged to have a say in the direction Singapore will be taking.”

    Law undergraduate Ian Low, also 22, and who lives in Tanjong Pagar GRC – which saw a walkover in GE2011 – agrees: “I finally have the right to suffrage, and I have a say in who governs my country.”

    This year, there will be an estimated 245,500 young voters aged from 21-25, most of whom will be voting for the first time, and 220,700 voters aged 26-30, according to the population census figures of citizens as of June 2014.

    Of the 25 first-time voters Insight spoke to, issues like the accessibility of education and social welfare are what they would like to see politicians address on the hustings.

    Part-time relief teacher Francoise Lee, 23, who lives in Hougang SMC, appreciates the education policies that have allowed her to earn a degree in sports science and management. But business student Joshua Wong, 24, who is in East Coast GRC, thinks more can be done, saying there is still a stigma surrounding polytechnics and the Institute of Technical Education (ITE).

    Referring to upgrades such as a $380-million ITE mega campus that opened two years ago, he says: “Just revamping these schools and providing financial support is not sufficient. More has to be done with employers to ensure it is not a paper chase.”

    Mr Tan, meanwhile, wants to hear more about social welfare policies. More can be done to help less fortunate Singaporeans, especially “those struggling to keep a roof over their head and make ends meet”, he says.

    Physics undergraduate Jackson Leow, 24, who lives in Ang Mo Kio GRC, admits some policies for the lowest tier of society are comprehensive, but ” the middle-class earners are left by themselves”.

    National University of Singapore (NUS) political scientist Reuben Wong thinks education, jobs and housing will be the key issues among youth. “I am not sure Singaporeans aged 21-30 are so much more confident about their jobs and future as they were in 2011,” he says.

    East Coast GRC resident and law student Godwin Tan, 22, says it is untrue that only the older generation appreciates the People’s Action Party’s (PAP’s) work. He says: “The peace and prosperity in Singapore do not go unnoticed, especially among the younger generation.”

    Young voters have been a concern for the PAP, as they prefer more diverse views in politics, which is seen as a disadvantage for the ruling party.

    NUS sociologist Tan Ern Ser believes that young voters want greater diversity in Parliament, but they will vote only for credible opposition parties.

    “It matters to them that whichever government they vote in must deliver stability, good jobs and a decent standard of living,” he says.

    Similarly, political science undergraduate Henry Lim, 24, of Sembawang GRC, believes his peers will be discerning: “We are not anti-establishment. While conservatives may worry that youth will opt for the opposition for the sake of (it), many young voters also recognise that many opposition parties are just not there yet.”

    But some first-time voters are concerned about having enough opposition voices in Parliament.

    Singapore Management University law undergraduate Benedict Chan, 22, of Aljunied GRC, says: “While I do believe that healthy debate can occur within a single party, having two parties of different values does contribute greatly to having differing, but not necessarily opposing, views.”

    Jurong GRC resident Amanda Yeo, 21, an accounting undergraduate, says: “Although the opposition is not as strong as the PAP, they are capable and persuasive. Also, it helps to keep PAP on its toes if they do not want to be overtaken by the opposition in the future.”

    However, biological sciences student Benjamin Goh, 22, a Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC resident, feels opposition voices should not come at the expense of residents’ well-being. He says: “The most important thing for an MP has to be the capability to work for your voters.”

    Ultimately, the youth Insight spoke to emphasised candidate quality rather than political party branding. Mr Chan of Aljunied GRC says: “Candidates should be able to communicate their ideas well but, more importantly, communicate well with residents and translate their opinions in Parliament.”

    Computer science undergraduate Wong Jing Yao, 22, of Sengkang West SMC, says: “It is not about PAP or the opposition parties, but the components and talents that make up these parties. I will vote for those who can lead us, regardless of their party.”

    Miss Dew Yang, 23, a pharmacist from Sembawang GRC, says: “My vote, though small, can affect the future of Singapore. With that in mind, I will vote wisely for the most deserving candidates who will be able to lead Singapore for another 50 years.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Chinese Youth In Malaysia Beaten On Bus By Assailants High On Drugs

    Chinese Youth In Malaysia Beaten On Bus By Assailants High On Drugs

    A group of youths, believed to be high on drugs, assaulted a student in a bus on Sunday, China Press reported.

    Teh Kian Wei, 17, said the group of about 10 in their early 20s approached him and his female friend (not girlfriend) on the bus they were travelling in from Batu Pahat back to his house in Pontian, Johor, telling them to “go back to China”.

    He said they were on their way home at around 7.15pm after watching a movie at a mall in Batu Pahat.

    “We were seated in the last row when the youths boarded the bus.

    “They told us that this place was their ‘territory’ and asked us to go back to China,” he said.

    Despite ignoring them, Teh said the group punched and kicked him.

    “One of them even used an iron ring to hit me,” he said.

    He also added that he suffered bruises on his back, shoulder and ears.

    Teh said the bus conductor, who tried to intervene, was threatened.

    “They told the conductor they would beat him up too if he didn’t mind his own business,” he said.

    He added that his watch and a smartphone worth a total of about RM2,000 was snatched from him.

    The driver later sent Teh to a police station to lodge a report and to a government clinic for treatment.

     

    Source: www.thestar.com.my

  • Singaporean Youth Put On Restriction Order Under ISA After Probe Into Extent Of Radicalisation

    Singaporean Youth Put On Restriction Order Under ISA After Probe Into Extent Of Radicalisation

    A Singaporean youth who was arrested so that investigations could be carried out into the extent of his radicalisation, has been placed on a Restriction Order (RO) under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for two years starting this month .

    The 17-year-old youth, who was arrested last month and was not named, has been released from custody but is required to abide by conditions specified in the RO, the Ministry of Home Affairs said in a statement on Monday.

    The ministry said investigations showed that the youth had become radicalised after viewing videos and materials on websites and social media materials propagated by “radical ideologues and terrorist elements”.

    “He had wanted to engage in armed violence alongside the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and had started making preparations to carry out his plans,” the statement said without elaborating on what these plans were.

    Having been released from custody, the youth is required to abide by a series of conditions.

    He will have to attend religious counselling and must stop accessing violent or extremist online material. He will also not be allowed to leave Singapore without permission or be able to issue public statements.

    The ministry said that the youth’s release on a Restriction Order with conditions attached, “provides a balance between rehabilitation and preserving public security”.

    “Further measures will be taken against him if he breaches the conditions of the RO, or if it is assessed that further measures are needed to protect public security.”

    In April 2015, another youth was detained under the ISA for terrorism-related activities.

    M Arifil Azim Putra Norja’i, 19, had planned to carry out violent attacks in Singapore and to assassinate President Tony Tan and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong if he was unable to go to Syria to join ISIS.

    In its statement on Monday, the ministry reiterated that the community has an important role to play in protecting fellow Singaporeans from radicalisation and terrorism.

    Family members and the public can call the Internal Security Department Counter-Terrorism Centre hotline at 1800-2626-473 should they know of or suspect that someone is radicalised.

    “This could save such individuals and allow them to be helped and counselled, so that they are prevented from engaging in violent activities that may cause harm to themselves and others,” the statement added.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com