Category: Agama

  • Almakhazin SG: What Is PAP’s Tudung Policy Really All About?

    Almakhazin SG: What Is PAP’s Tudung Policy Really All About?

    The hijab ban is not because interracial harmony or relationships.

    The ban…which Masagos Zulkifli supported..

    Is about a group of secular fundamentalists trying to control Islam.

    Two nights ago, PAP Minister, Masagos Zulkifli justified his party’s ban of the hijab.

    He claimed that the ban is part of the PAP’s way of ensuring harmony by making every community sacrifice what is important to them.

    He is not alone in the PAP in making such comments.

    Former Prime Minister, Goh Chok Tong said the hijab affects integration.

    Yaacob Ibrahim claimed it is problematic.

    But the claim that the hijab affects harmony or integration does not stand scrutiny.

    According to Assoc Prof Lily Zubaidah Rahim

    “To date, the government has not provided any empirical evidence to support the presumption that allowing Muslim headscarves in primary and secondary schools impedes national unity.

    Indeed, some school principals contend that students who had donned the tudung in the past did not disrupt social integration in class.”

    If harmony and integration are not the reasons for the hijab ban..

    then what is?

    Lily Zubaidah argued the “no-tudung policy for Muslim schoolsgirls bears many similarities to Turkey’s headscarf restriction policy…

    Both states exhibit secular fundamentalist and authoritarian tendencies…”

    As Lily Zubaidah noted “An Naim has observed that this form of authoritarian state secularism is ‘often designed to enable the state to control religion…”

    The PAP’s ban is not about a creating a multiracial, multireligious Singapura.

    It is about a group of secular fundamentalists trying to subjugate Islam.

    Reference:
    Rahim, Lily Zubaidah. Governing Islam and regulating Muslims in Singapore’s secular authoritarian state. Murdoch university. Asia research centre, 2009.

     

    Source: Almakhazin SG

  • Damanhuri Abas: Government’s Policy Of Religious Harmony Based On Mutual Tolerance And Acceptance Is A Failure

    Damanhuri Abas: Government’s Policy Of Religious Harmony Based On Mutual Tolerance And Acceptance Is A Failure

    During the malay program ‘Bicara’, Minister for Environment and Water Resources, Masagos Zulkifli reiterated the continuation of the discriminatory policy that has prevented the employment of Malay/Muslim women who wants to don the Tudung/Hijab in jobs such as nursing and other uniformed group services. Throughout the program, the Minister tried his level best to defend the continuation of the discriminatory policy on several grounds in order to justify it.

    His reasoning ranges from the need to be sensitive to the feelings of other races, namely the majority Chinese population which he implied will be upset when they see Malay/Muslim women donning the Tudung/Hijab as nurses, police officers, military personnel, etc., right up to the fear-mongering scenario of the potential opening a Pandora box of misunderstanding and conflict that may lead to undesirable consequences such as racial conflicts for reasons that he deemed too sensitive to be shared to the public. It is unbelievable that a Minister reasoned almost similarly to a US politician that recently justified the call to ban the entry of all Muslims into his country on grounds that its better to play safe than sorry because Islamophobia is justified.

    It is indeed disappointing to hear such unsubstantiated and almost simplistic justification by a person in the position of a Minister in a public broadcast in this time and age essentially addressing the very community that feels discriminated against and who has tolerated patiently to see wisdom from the government to discontinue the archaic policy that has essentially outlived its shelf life.

    In truth, Singaporeans of all races have grown accustomed to the presence of Tudung wearing Muslim women in public. They are present as teachers in our schools, as employees in the public and private sectors too and raises no concern whatsoever. The implied suggestion that their presence is undesirable on grounds that essentially are Islamophobic are disrespectful to those women specifically and insulting to the whole Muslim community in Singapore.

    It is dishonest of the Minister to mention that any attempt to challenge this outdated discriminatory policy as dangerous and fiddling with religion and politics. The reality is the Minister and the government is precisely politicizing the issue by not dealing with it as a discrimination matter. Instead of addressing the growing anger and frustration of the community being discriminated against by this policy, the Minister chooses to confuse it by comparing the government so-called stand on the LGBT community as further justification. The comparison and a zero-sum approach vis-à-vis the LGBT community, to the issue of discrimination against Muslim women wanting to don the hijab for uniformed group is disingenuous.

    Once again, Singaporeans must honestly ask ourselves whether the efforts of the government all this years to ensure the growth and maturity of our different races and religious communities to mutually tolerate and accept one another and celebrate both our similarities and our differences, has indeed succeeded. By one Minister after another highlighting evidence of failures, it only supports the view that the policies aimed to unite our different communities are flawed and have not produced the desired results and thus have to be reformed and changed to reflect the present times where the communities are no longer separated like in the past and the majority of us, the common folks do live together in HDB flats and chat and interact with one another harmoniously.

    Finally, the Malay community has been quoted by 2 studies done by the government’s own think-tank institution namely the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy and the Institute of Policy Study as being the most tolerant and accommodating of all communities when it comes to acceptance of diversity and differences. Maybe it is time that the focus of the effort to educate our society on tolerance and understanding be on the majority community rather that on the minority. Only then, wisdom based on grounded evidence will prevail instead of baseless justification that borders on political expediency.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Abas

  • PAP Ministers And MPs Should Keep Their Word And Stop Commenting On Religion, Leave It To The Asatizahs

    PAP Ministers And MPs Should Keep Their Word And Stop Commenting On Religion, Leave It To The Asatizahs

    ‘Religion is the domain of religious scholars.’

    Apart from the obvious irony that it was a politician who was giving the said advice, the next time i see a politician (or those who are ever-so-eager to support a politician’s statement) commenting that ‘Islam says this’, ‘Islam permits this’, ‘this is the true Islam’, ‘Islam is about a and b, not x and y’, i will be sure to remind him/her that ‘Islam is the domain of religious scholars’, and not anyone else. ?

    Most definitely, not the domain of politicians.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • Masagos Zulkifli Cut from Same Cloth As Yaacob Ibrahim

    Masagos Zulkifli Cut from Same Cloth As Yaacob Ibrahim

    Over the years, some Muslims in Singapura blame Yaacob Ibrahim for the hijab ban.

    They assume that Yaacob’s personal belief is a major reason for our Muslim sisters not being allowed to wear hijab in school and in several professions.

    Some of them look towards Masagos Zulkifli as a potential saviour.

    Masagos comes from a religious family and is seen to be more Islamic than Yaacob.

    When Masagos Zulkifli became a Minister of Environment, some of these Muslims were happy.

    They were hopeful that it is another step towards Masagos becoming Minister in charge of Muslim Affairs and helping to remove the discrimination against Muslims.

    What many do not realise is that it does not matter how Masagos used to be.

    It does not matter if he used to be religious (or is still religious in his personal life).

    When someone joins the PAP, they adopt and accept the PAP’s values.

    They will be socialised to the PAP’s views. norms and goals.

    They will speak the language that the PAP expect them to.

    Take the hijab ban for example.

    Last night, Masagos justified the ban by equating it with gay sex ( in defending the ban, he said the government not only disallow the hijab but also gay sex).

    He then claimed “we have remained as a harmonious society not because every community is given its rights, but because each community has sacrificed something that is very precious to them for the sake of that harmony.”

    The question of course, is why would the wearing of hijab affect harmony?

    The PAP claim to be the best party in managing interracial relations.

    Yet after more than 50 years in power, the harmony they claim to have built can be destroyed because some Muslim women wear hijab?

    And coming from a Muslim Minister who is supposed to believe that the hijab is a religious obligation…

    he prioritizes his party’s ban over Allah’s commands?

    Masagos is a classic example of a politician who has been socialised by his party.

    It does not matter how you were prior to joining the PAP.

    It does not matter whether you pray, fast, go to haj in your personal lives.

    When you join a party that is based on racism and Islamophobia…

    You will speak, think and behave like them too.

     

    Source: Almakhazin SG

  • MUIS Asatizahs Must Step Up And Guide Community, Stop Remaining Silent

    MUIS Asatizahs Must Step Up And Guide Community, Stop Remaining Silent

    Minister Masagos’ comments are of concern.

    Firstly, saying that raising issues like the tudung would ‘easily lead us to open old wounds that can instigate riots’ , to our minds, smacks of fear-mongering. What evidence is there that a rational look at the tudong issue would lead to riots? In fact, many Singaporeans regardless of race or religion do support the wearing of tudung by our nurses and those in uniformed services.

    Secondly, merely stating that religion needs to be practiced based on context can be misleading without proper elucidation on the issue. For instance, what if someone were to say the command to fast came about during the Medina stage of the prophetic struggle. We now live in the Meccan stage, esp in SG. So fasting is not obligatory on me. Also the order for salat came in the late Meccan stage. We are very much in the era of Nation states. The khilafah will not be established anytime soon. Therefore why should I pray?

    We ask the asatizahs in MUIS to comment on this.

    If salat and saum is not something that would be applicable to the KPI in MUIS, then perhaps the next example would.

    In context of Islamic history, zakat is paid to the khilafah. There is no khilafah for almost a century. Why then should we give out zakat?

    We really ask the asatizahs in MUIS to guide us.

    Wallahualam.

     

    Source: Singapore Muslims for an Independent MUIS

deneme bonusu