Category: Komentar

Send in your opinion to [email protected].
Kirimkan pandangan anda kepada [email protected].

  • Sounding The Alarm: The PAP Needs To Face Up To Economic Reality

    Sounding The Alarm: The PAP Needs To Face Up To Economic Reality

    In his Lunar New Year message this year, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong referred to the global economic distress, saying: “The Government is watching the situation closely. We do not expect a severe downturn, like the Global Financial Crisis in 2008.”

    Finance Minister Mr Heng Swee Keat, likewise, played down the looming crisis, going so far as to say that Singapore’s externally oriented industries will experience a “subdued performance” and, even then, only for the short term, reflecting “modest growth” in the global economy.

    A cursory review of the analyses coming out from the global business sector paints a picture quite different. Granted some of these reports are speculative and alarmist but there is a considerable amount of data pointing to a more severe, even alarming, picture.

    China’s weakening economy, slumping oil prices, collapse of the commodities market, and signs of an economic slowdown in the United States are all contributing to an ominous outlook ahead.

    The Baltic Dry Index, which measures the transportation cost of raw materials, has dropped to a record low and falling – the lower the index, the slower the global trade. In fact, demand has been so bad that ships are being scrapped faster than they’re built.

    William White, the Swiss-based chairman of the OECD’s review committee and former chief economist of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) warns that the current situation is worsethan what it was in 2007.

    White, who had warned about the 2008 crisis before it happened, blames the situation on high debt levels. The debts, incurred through easy credit since the last crisis, have “reached such levels in every part of the world that they have become a potent cause for mischief.”

    Much of this debt has been incurred by the corporate sector in Asia with Singapore leading the charge. As a percentage of GDP, Singapore has the highest private debt among emerging markets.

    This has led analysts to wonder out loud whether these corporate debts are serviceable in light of the economic downturn. Law firms in Singapore are even warning that rising bond defaults are looking ominously like those in the crises of 2008 and 1998. Bad loans in the country reached a six-year high in 2015 with our economy facing “escalating risk on multiple fronts”.

    All this has an negative knock-on effect for the rest of the economy. Our non-oil domestic exports fell nearly 10 percent in January this year – its third consecutive month of contraction. The oil-industry is doing even worse with petrochemical exports plunging 18.3 percent.

    This has resulted in lay-offs; announcements of retrenchments from banks, IT firms, oil-companies, news portals, etc have become the staple in our daily news.

    The downturn has inevitably caused much pain in the property sector. Dozens of real estate agencies have gone bust with thousands of property agents leaving the industry. A glut of undersold condominium projects with many more coming on in the pipeline have depressed housing prices.

    Homeowners are also feeling the brunt of the crisis. Nearly 80 percent more financially distressed homeowners in Singapore are putting up their properties for auction. (This development is not surprising given that Singapore has one of the highest level of household borrowing relative to GDP in Asia.)

    Bad as the housing market is, business is even worse for commercial properties. There is already excess capacity in prime office space with millions more square feet of new supply coming into the market this year. Rental, having fallen 15 percent in 2015, is expected to nosedive by a further 10 to 20 percent in 2016.

    Clearly, with the way things are going, the economy is not, according to Finance Minister Heng, just “subdued”. It is time the government faces up to the increasingly dire situation here and, to the extent that its actions do not continue to dig a deeper economic hole, start taking steps to put things right.

     

    Source:www.cheesoonjuan.com

  • Malay Lion Dance: Is This PAP’s Version Of Integration?

    Malay Lion Dance: Is This PAP’s Version Of Integration?

    A reader Azman, sent us this video.

    Click link to Watch Video

    He said:

    “The video shows the lion dance troupe, all young malay boys.

    Integration indeed.

    I am actually disappointed that during the recent CNY celebrations, i see a lot of our Malay youths doing the lion dance.

    I know they are probably working for money the halal way, but is there no other good avenues to work?

    Is this how integration is going to be like? Malay youths doing the Lion dance. We don’t see Chinese youths baca takbir raya during Aidilfitri or help sembelih during Aidil Adha.”

    The group on the video are all Malay youths in their late teens to early 20s.

    We have seen quite a number of Malay youths performing in Lion Dance and Chinese funerals.

    Is this the type of integration Yaacob Ibrahim wants?

     

    Source: Almakhazin SG

  • Let’s give help to those struggling with drug issues

    Let’s give help to those struggling with drug issues

    “Mereka yang berusia di bawah 20 tahun naik 51 peratus.
    Penagih dadah muda kekal membentuk majoriti pesalah kali pertama sejak 2011.”

    It’s disheartening to see this. I cried in silence.
    My son saw the sudden change in my facial expression. I tried to hold them back but I just couldn’t.

    Friends and families, I urge each and every one of you reach out to those whom you know struggling with this challenge in life. Don’t be too ashamed to seek professional help. Your denial now could lead to more greater issues in the future and greater issues means more sacrifices needed.

    And to those who are struggling with this, know that there are many genuinely concerned people out there who are ready to render support to you. But please know, that no matter how good the interventions (programme, counselling, therapy) are, the real change is within YOU!
    Don’t go on complaining that your life issues are too great and the only coping mechanism is to depend on that particular substance.
    Millions out there are facing greater trials but chose to face them instead of escaping.
    Let’s be the change, be an inspiration to others, you never know who you might inspire. It could be that enemy of yours, your next door neighbour, that kid on the street or even the buddy of yours whom you are sharing that instrument with.

    Please help me to share this message around, screenshot the message if you have to. We need to raise more awareness. More caring people like you and me.

    Link –> http://berita.mediacorp.sg/mobilem/singapore/cnb-jumlah-pesalah-guna/2516260.html

    Source: Shafiee Razali

  • Fanaticism in supporting your political idols. They can do no wrong!

    Fanaticism in supporting your political idols. They can do no wrong!

    It is always highly amusing to witness fanaticism in action. When a person is uncritically loyal to something/someone – and it is invariably funniest when that entity is a political party – you will hear him/her suspend all forms of rationality when trying to justify a leader’s statements or actions.

    I rarely get surprised when such people express statements in support of their ‘unerring’ idols. Even if those statements/actions are contradictory, or go against their own beliefs and principles that they have been articulating all these while, cognitive dissonance kicks in and they will attempt all sorts of weird ways to justify those statements/actions.

    —–

    ‘Oh we don’t know what (s)he says behind closed doors.’

    (But that politician from the other party, yeah we don’t know what (s)he says behind closed doors, but it can’t be anything positive.)

    ‘Oh (s)he is a good person; time will show this.’

    (That person from the other party, is not a good person, and we don’t need evidence for that.)

    ‘Islam teaches us to think well of others.’

    (But go ahead, think badly of those from the other party)

    ‘Oh (s)he is not politicizing the issue; (s)he is just bringing up an important matter.’

    (But when a person from the other party brings up the same issue, (s)he must be politicizing the matter!)

    ‘Oh it’s not that they contradict each other, we must look at the context in which they said whatever they said.’

    (When the other party’s members contradict themselves, to hell with context!)

    ‘The opponents prayed in public??? Gosh, trying to score political points!’

    (Wow, look at our leaders, always pictured being in mosques and around religious scholars. God bless them!)

    ‘Have you asked what (s)he meant when (s)he said that? We cannot assume things.’

    (But i don’t need to ask the other party for explanations of what they say; after all, i can only judge by what i see! It doesn’t make sense for me to not take him/her at his/her word!)

    —–

    Even if their ‘idols’ said the earth was flat, these people will say: ‘oh (s)he wasn’t wrong, it’s just that his/her words were taken out of context’; ‘there were some religious scholars who used to believe the earth was flat, so we must respect differences in opinions’; ‘let us ask what (s)he really means by that statement, and let us not jump to conclusions.’

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • Only PAP-Approved Version Of Islam Allowed In Singapore?

    Only PAP-Approved Version Of Islam Allowed In Singapore?

    When PAP Minister Masagos Zulkifli made his comment about the hijab ban and gay sex, there was another issue that he mentioned that probably has a much larger repercussion..

    Masagos stated that Islam in Singapura should be practiced according to local context.

    On the surface, it does not look that harmful.

    It supposes differences in context for Muslims living in different parts of the world and at different times..

    Many assume he simply meant that Muslims should take our local context into account.

    But that was not all he said.

    Masagos’ comment was in relation to the PAP government’s decision on the type of Muslim speakers they allow into Singapura..

    It is about the type of Islam the PAP allows to be practiced.

    In discussing the ban on Muslim scholars who believe Muslims should not wish others on their religious holidays..

    Masagos argued that these scholars did not take “into account the teachings of our religious scholars that allows it, and they reject our religious scholars – this is very dangerous.”.

    But his assertion that we should take into account the teachings of local scholars (as though all our local scholars allows it)…

    betrays the fact that there is a difference of opinions among the local scholars.

    PERGAS wrote in their irsyad that the difference of opinion is valid and that this difference should be respected.

    How can he accuse the Ulama as though they are behind the decision to ban these speakers when these Ulama stated they accept the difference of opinions?

    And the ulama do not have the ability to deny anyone entry.

    That ability rests with the PAP government.

    The decision to deny entry was not made by the Ulama.

    That decision was made by the PAP government.

    The PAP government decides on the types of Muslim scholars allowed to enter Singapura based on the type of Islam they allow.

    The “Islam according to local context”…has nothing to do with referring to our local scholars.

    It is about referring to the PAP.

    Masagos’ statement is about creating a version of Islam…

    Created and approved by the PAP.

     

    Source: Almakhazin SG

deneme bonusu