Category: Politik

  • Amber Alert As Singapore Slips In Several World Rankings

    Amber Alert As Singapore Slips In Several World Rankings

    For a country that prides itself on staying ahead of the competition, Singapore has slipped down several global rankings over the past year or so.

    From competitiveness and ease of doing business to the ability to nuture and attract talent from around the world, the Republic’s competitors have caught up. Even though Singapore remains one of the top performers globally measured by various yardsticks, the competition is heating up.

    Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say warned as much last month: “Imagine, if we ever allow our cheaper competitors to become better than us, one day, they will be cheaper and better than us. Likewise, if we ever allow our better competitors to become cheaper than us, one day, they will be better and cheaper,” he said at a productivity conference.

    Deloitte’s 2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index, published in March, ranked the Republic at 10th place – dropping one spot from the previous edition three years ago, with Singapore projected to slip further by 2020.

    Swiss business school IMD’s 2016 World Competitiveness Ranking released in May saw Singapore falling one position to fourth, increasing the distance to traditional rival Hong Kong which claimed pole position after moving up from second place previously.

    In October, Singapore lost its coveted status as the world’s easiest place to do business, after an unbroken 10-year streak: Dragged down by factors such as cost and regulatory compliance – which observers had noted were important for security and anti-money laundering efforts – the Republic came in second behind New Zealand in the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Index.

    Most recently, Singapore tumbled five places to 15th in the World Talent Report 2016 released by IMD earlier this week – largely due to lower scores in appeal to overseas talent, and investment and development of home grown talent.

    While these rankings painted a sullen picture for Singapore, experts whom TODAY spoke to said there is no cause for panic or alarm. Still, it is worth looking at where Singapore needs to do better, at a time when its economy is at a crossroads.

    ESSEC Asia Pacific dean Kevyn Yong noted that countries are catching up with Singapore, and it may not be the case that the Republic is losing competitiveness. He said: “Having said that, we should pay attention to these things and never take them for granted… we should always stay vigilant and prepared, to think ahead and think of how we can reinvent ourselves.”

    ‘CHEAPER COUNTRIES BECOMING BETTER’

    Singapore’s rise from Third World to First within a generation has been well-documented. Along the way, it shot up international rankings and became known as one of the most competitive economies around the world, with its clean government, strong infrastructure, an educated workforce and a business-friendly environment.

    But as the saying goes, it is more difficult to stay on top than to get there.

    One reason behind Singapore’s loss of relative competitiveness is the higher labour cost after the Government tightened inflows of foreign manpower. That has resulted in higher business costs and is particularly harmful to the manufacturing sector which, according to the Deloitte study, sees cost competitiveness as the second most influential driver of overall competitiveness.

    The manufacturing sector contributes close to 20 per cent of Singapore’s gross domestic product (GDP) and hires more than 500,000 people. In recent years, some big companies — such as Seagate, Broadcom and Coca-Cola — have relocated all or part of their operations to cheaper locations such as Malaysia, Thailand and even Ireland.

    But experts noted that it is natural that some activities, especially lower-value added ones, exit the market as Singapore transitions into a higher-value added economy. Mr Richard Wong, vice president of Frost & Sullivan’s public sector and government practice, said: “Looking at the direction that the Government is gearing the economy towards, it is somewhat natural that some of these light manufacturing activities or production and assembly related activities that are not very high tech and those that take up a lot of space move out of Singapore. As the Singapore workforce is very educated, these jobs may not be that appealing also.”

    Indeed, some of the companies that relocated part of their operations chose to retain the higher-value added functions in Singapore. Seagate, for instance, manufactures hard disk media at its Woodlands plant and last year expanded its research and development (R&D) presence here with a S$100 million centre.

    Still, Singapore is set to face stiff competition in higher-value added activities, including in electronics, biomedical and chemicals production, as neighbouring nations make their own way up the value chain. Malaysia’s Iskandar special economic zone, for instance, had declared that it intends to attract higher-value added industries, while rapid economic development in Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam would also see them vie for a slice of the pie. With their quicker economic growth, large young workforce and bigger domestic markets, these countries would give Singapore a run for its money, experts have said.

    Meanwhile, Hong Kong, a long-time rival to Singapore’s status as Asia’s business hub, is pulling ahead by capitalising on itsproximity and ties with China to attract investments.

    The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development’s World Investment Report 2016 found that Hong Kong was the second highest recipient of foreign direction investments (FDI) globally last year with US$175 billion flowing into the economy. This far outpaced Singapore who received US$65 billion in the same year and placed seventh worldwide.

    “China’s economy has a more significant impact on Hong Kong’s economy, relative to Singapore’s economy. With the speed of innovation and growing economy in China, it’s only natural for Hong Kong’s economy to be relatively more competitive,” said Prof Yong.

    ‘BETTER COUNTRIES BECOMING CHEAPER’

    At the big boys’ table, countries such as South Korea and Japan – which dominate the higher-value added manufacturing space – are ahead of Singapore in terms of innovation. The 2016 Bloomberg Innovation Index placed South Korea on top of the global rankings, with clear daylight between the country and its closest Asian competitors Japan (4th) and Singapore (6th).

    The South Koreans have consistently been among the highest spenders on R&D. Data by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development showed that South Korea spent around 4.3 per cent of its GDP on R&D in 2014. In comparison, Singapore’s expenditure in this area was 2.2 per cent of its GDP.

    Observers have credited South Korea’s aggressive spending in R&D for helping the country transform from one of the poorest nations in the 1960s to a high-tech economy and home to leading innovative companies such as Samsung and LG.

    Experts noted that regardless of which development stage Singapore’s rivals are at, the size of their labour force gives them an edge over the Republic. SIM University senior lecturer Walter Theseira said: “In larger countries, labour and talent shortages are less acute because of domestic migration and the larger scale of their labour force. The main way we have remained competitive is to be very open to foreign labour, but that is a policy that has considerable political costs.”

    He added: “(There) is almost certainly a catch-up process from both the developing and developed world, and that is not something Singapore can do anything about. What will be crucial is (increasing) Singapore’s strengths and advantages in high value added sectors of the economy.”

    Experts said the key for Singapore to stay competitive is innovation – a strategy which the Government has identified. Various schemes and assistance measures have been launched to nudge businesses to be more innovative, amid the constraints on land and labour.

    PwC Singapore’s strategy leader Richard Skinner described innovation as the “magic bullet” to spur growth and competitiveness. “Innovation is a necessity if Singapore is to remain competitive,” he said. Prof Yong added that innovation can help businesses achieve scale more effectively, which will in turn result in greater cost-efficiency.

    He pointed out that at the same time, Singapore should not abandon its strengths in resource-heavy activities such as water treatment innovations, in which Singapore is a global leader. There is also the need for new ideas to be created in the country, instead of simply adapting workable concepts into the domestic context, he added. “Singapore has always been very good at implementing innovations and we should keep that. But it is no longer sufficient to adopt a successful innovation from elsewhere, say Amazon, and create our own version of it. We need new ideas like Grab and MoolahSense,” he said.

    He reiterated: “Singapore competitiveness may not be driven by being the cheapest option, but we can be competitive by creating the most value.”

    In the manufacturing space, the Republic can utilise its hub status to anchor other Southeast Asian countries to compete globally as a regional bloc, said Ms Ng Jiak See, Deloitte Southeast Asia’s industrial products and services sector leader. “Aside from cultivating strong industrial competencies in R&D and a diverse and high quality supplier base, Singapore should also think about its ecosystem approach,” she said.

    Should Singapore fail to restructure and loses competitiveness, “everything is at stake”, Mr Skinner warned. “If competitiveness declines, foreign inbound investment from small and medium enterprises to multinational corporations alike will decelerate, leading to decreased economic vibrancy and dynamism,” he said. “This will in turn have an adverse effect on innovation, job creation and trade, ultimately leading to a decline in competitiveness and attractiveness as an investment destination and the vicious circle will repeat itself.”

    For local companies and the thousands of workers they employ, whether Singapore continues to stay ahead of the chasing pack could make a difference between boom and bust.

    Mr Melvin Tan, managing director of engineering firm Cyclect, said the company has benefitted from foreign inbound investments as it clinched projects with the Formula 1 Grand Prix and Universal Studios Singapore. “These projects allowed us to offer jobs to Singaporeans. Without them and the income that they bring us, we won’t have a reason to hire,” he said.

    Mr Lawrence Chong, chief executive of innovation and design consultancy Consulus, added: “Singapore is increasingly seen as a place where new policies, new ways of urban planning are experimented, and where ideas are being created. That’s our trump card when we compete internationally, so if Singapore fails to reinvent, that’s bad news for us.”

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • Indonesian General Gets Life Sentence For Embezzling S$17 Million Through Arms Procurement

    Indonesian General Gets Life Sentence For Embezzling S$17 Million Through Arms Procurement

    In a landmark ruling, the Jakarta Military Court has sentenced a one-star Indonesian Military (TNI) general to life for embezzling US$12 million (S$17.18 million) through defence weaponry procurement between 2010 and 2014.

    The verdict, which was read out in an open hearing on Wednesday (Nov 30), sent a positive signal that the TNI and the Defence Ministry were serious in cracking down on corruption, which allegedly plagues the nation’s weapon procurement deals.

    The general identified as Brigadier-General Teddy Hernayadi was found guilty of transferring the US$12 million of state money to his bank accounts when he served as the Defence Ministry’s finance division head from 2010 to 2014.

    The ministry’s inspector-general Hadi Tjahjanto said the ministry appreciated the ruling because not only did it sentence Teddy to life in prison for his offences, but also demanded he return the US$12 million to the state coffers.

    “We are waiting for the defendant to comply with ruling and return the embezzled money to the state,” Mr Hadi told The Jakarta Post on Wednesday.

    He further said a team from the ministry who had observed the months-long trial discovered that Teddy was not the only perpetrator, adding that the ministry would resume investigations into the case to pursue more suspects both from the ministry and private sector who allegedly received shares of the embezzled money.

    The inspector-general hoped that the verdict would serve as a warning for other ministry officials on the severity of embezzlement.

    “We will follow up the ruling to find out who the other recipients of the embezzled money are. Around 53 witnesses confirmed that they had accepted money (from Teddy). If the 53 witnesses include civilians, we will let the National Police investigate them,” Mr Hadi said.

    Mr Hadi said the case started when the ministry’s inspectorate-general discovered US$12 million had been funnelled from the ministry to Teddy’s bank accounts in 2014.

    “The ruling was expected but nonetheless was appreciated (by the ministry). The ministry will continue to carry out internal reforms,” Mr Hadi said.

    Meanwhile, Teddy reportedly said he would use the seven days given by the court to decide whether to appeal against the sentence to the Jakarta High Military Court.

    Separately, military expert Al Araf said the verdict confirmed long-standing public suspicions that the country’s procurement of defense systems was marred with corruption, thus, it was important for the ministry to probe past procurement deals.

    “In the past, we have heard about alleged corruption concerning the procurement of Sukhoi (fighter jets), Leopard tanks and missiles from Brazil. The verdict should open the door for President Joko ‘Jokowi’ Widodo’s administration to investigate the procurement of defence weaponry in the past,” Al Araf said.

    He said the ministry should ask the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) for assistance in the investigation of past cases.

    By 2024, the country expects to have reached its minimum essential force requirement. Some 150 trillion rupiah (S$15.8 billion) was spent to pay for the modernisation of the nation’s weapons-defence system between 2010 and 2014.

    KPK chairman Agus Rahardjo said the anti-graft body was ready to assist the ministry, adding that the KPK was closely monitoring the process of Teddy’s trial at the military court.

    “We are monitoring the hearing,” Mr Agus said.

     

    Source: The Straits TImes

  • Trump’s Breezy Calls To World Leaders Leave Diplomats Aghast

    Trump’s Breezy Calls To World Leaders Leave Diplomats Aghast

    On Thursday, the White House weighed in with an offer of professional help. The press secretary, Josh Earnest, urged the president-elect to make use of the State Department’s policy makers and diplomats in planning and conducting his encounters with foreign leaders.

    “President Obama benefited enormously from the advice and expertise that’s been shared by those who serve at the State Department,” Mr. Earnest said. “I’m confident that as President-elect Trump takes office, those same State Department employees will stand ready to offer him advice as he conducts the business of the United States overseas.”

    “Hopefully he’ll take it,” he added.

    A spokesman for the State Department, John Kirby, said the department was “helping facilitate and support calls as requested.” But he declined to give details, and it was not clear to what extent Mr. Trump was availing himself of the nation’s diplomats.

    Mr. Trump’s conversation with Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif of Pakistan has generated the most angst, because, as Mr. Earnest put it, the relationship between Mr. Sharif’s country and the United States is “quite complicated,” with disputes over issues ranging from counterterrorism to nuclear proliferation.

    In a remarkably candid readout of the phone call, the Pakistani government said Mr. Trump had told Mr. Sharif that he was “a terrific guy” who made him feel as though “I’m talking to a person I have known for long.” He described Pakistanis as “one of the most intelligent people.” When Mr. Sharif invited him to visit Pakistan, the president-elect replied that he would “love to come to a fantastic country, fantastic place of fantastic people.”

    The Trump transition office, in its more circumspect readout, said only that Mr. Trump and Mr. Sharif “had a productive conversation about how the United States and Pakistan will have a strong working relationship in the future.” It did not confirm or deny the Pakistani account of Mr. Trump’s remarks.

    The breezy tone of the readout left diplomats in Washington slack-jawed, with some initially assuming it was a parody. In particular, they zeroed in on Mr. Trump’s offer to Mr. Sharif “to play any role you want me to play to address and find solutions to the country’s problems.”

    That was interpreted by some in India as an offer by the United States to mediate Pakistan’s border dispute with India in Kashmir, something that the Pakistanis have long sought and that India has long resisted.

    “By taking such a cavalier attitude to these calls, he’s encouraging people not to take him seriously,” said Daniel F. Feldman, a former special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan. “He’s made himself not only a bull in a china shop, but a bull in a nuclear china shop.”

    Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistani ambassador to Washington, said his government’s decision to release a rough transcript of Mr. Trump’s remarks was a breach of protocol that demonstrated how easily Pakistani leaders misread signals from their American counterparts.

    “Pakistan is one country where knowing history and details matters most,” Mr. Haqqani said, “and where the U.S. cannot afford to give wrong signals, given the history of misunderstandings.”

    At one level, Mr. Trump’s warm sentiments were surprising, given that during the campaign, he called for temporarily barring Muslims from entering the United States to avoid importing would-be terrorists.

    His conversation with Mr. Sharif also came a day after an attack at Ohio State University in which a Somali-born student, Abdul Razak Ali Artan, rammed a car into a group of pedestrians and slashed several people with a knife before being shot and killed by the police. Law enforcement officials said Mr. Artan, whom the Islamic State has claimed as a “soldier,” had lived in Pakistan for seven years before coming to the United States in 2014.

    Mr. Obama never visited Pakistan as president, even though he had a circle of Pakistani friends in college and spoke fondly of the country. The White House weighed a visit at various times but always decided against it, according to officials, because of security concerns or because it would be perceived as rewarding Pakistani leaders for what many American officials said was their lack of help in fighting terrorism.

    “It sends a powerful message to the people of a country when the president of the United States goes to visit,” Mr. Earnest said. “That’s true whether it’s some of our closest allies, or that’s also true if it’s a country like Pakistan, with whom our relationship is somewhat more complicated.”

    Mr. Trump’s call with President Nursultan A. Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan raised similar questions.

    Mr. Nazarbayev has ruled his country with an iron hand since 1989, first as head of the Communist Party and later as president after Kazakhstan won its independence from the Soviet Union. In April 2015, he won a fifth term, winning 97.7 percent of the vote and raising suspicions of fraud.

    The Kazakh government, in its account of Mr. Trump’s conversation, said he had lavished praise on the president for his leadership of the country over the last 25 years. “D. Trump stressed that under the leadership of Nursultan Nazarbayev, our country over the years of independence had achieved fantastic success that can be called a ‘miracle,’” it said.

    The statement went on to say that Mr. Trump had shown solidarity with the Kazakh government over its decision to voluntarily surrender the nuclear arsenal it inherited from the Soviets. “There is no more important issue than the nuclear disarmament and nonproliferation, which must be addressed in a global context,” it quoted Mr. Trump as saying.

    Mr. Trump’s statement said that Mr. Nazarbayev had congratulated him on his victory, and that Mr. Trump had reciprocated by congratulating him on the 25th anniversary of his country. Beyond that, it said only that the two leaders had “addressed the importance of strengthening regional partnerships.”

    Source: The New York Times

  • Osman Sulaiman: Myanmar’s Treatment Of Its Minorities Are Appalling, Why No Condemnation?

    Osman Sulaiman: Myanmar’s Treatment Of Its Minorities Are Appalling, Why No Condemnation?

    Aung Sang Suu Kyi is a Nobel Peace Prize winner but yet remain deafeningly silent on the treatment of Rohingyas in Myanmar.

    In United Nation’s own word, Rohingya maybe enduring crimes against humanity and Myanmar is carrying out ethnic cleansing of Rohingya.

    Today, I went to the Embassy of Myanmar to hand deliver a letter from a few concerned citizens about the plights of the Rohingyas.

    Their representative spoke to us from a distance as we were not allowed to enter its premises. They refused to accept our letter and thereafter instructed the security guard to communicate with us.

    After a few short exchanges, we were told to drop our letter outside the gate in what seems like a letter box.

    While all this is happening, the representative hid behind the security counter, not even brave enough to accept a harmless letter from us.

    They are only good at killing defenceless humans but shudder to even receive a letter.

    Myanmar’s treatment of its minorities is appalling and should be condemned by ASEAN Leaders. Humanity must transcend politics.

     

    Source: Osman Sulaiman

  • Focus On Resolving Difficulties In Rakhine Rather Than Exaggerating Them, Says Suu Kyi

    Focus On Resolving Difficulties In Rakhine Rather Than Exaggerating Them, Says Suu Kyi

    Amid international accusations that the Myanmar military is leading a crackdown against the Rohingya Muslim minority in Rakhine, Myanmar State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi said she wants to make the situation better.

    Asked if the problem is intractable, she said no. “We have managed to keep the situation under control and to calm it down,” she stated.

    “But I would appreciate it so much if the international community would help us to maintain peace and stability and to make progress in building better relations between the two communities instead of always drumming up calls for, well, for bigger fires of resentment, if you like.”

    Speaking in an exclusive interview with Channel NewsAsia’s Lin Xueling on Friday (Dec 2) during her official visit to Singapore, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate called for understanding from the international community and explained that the issue is a highly sensitive and delicate one.

    “It’s not just Muslims who are nervous and worried. The Rakhine are worried too, they are worried about the fact that they are shrinking as a Rakhine population percentage-wise, and of course, we cannot ignore the fact that the relationship between the two communities has not been good and we want to try to make it better.

    “But it doesn’t help if everybody is just concentrating on the negative side of the situation in spite of the fact that there were attacks against police outposts which began on Oct 9.”

    The attacks were blamed on “terrorists” although the government had previously pointed at the Rohingya Solidarity Organisation, and since then, troops have poured into an area along the border with Bangladesh, which is largely home to the Rohingya minority.

    Thousands have fled their homes as security forces hunt down more suspects who may be in hiding. Myanmar’s army has denied reports from activists that civilians have been killed, gang raped or had their homes torched.

    When it was put to her that it is not solely the international community that is the root of the problem, Ms Suu Kyi said: “I know that. I’m not saying there are no difficulties, but it helps if people recognise the difficulty and are more focused on resolving these difficulties rather than exaggerating them so that everything seems worse than it really is.”

    ASSESSMENT OF HER ADMINISTRATION

    One result that Myanmar’s de-facto leader is satisfied with is “the fact that the ministers are not corrupt”, Ms Suu Kyi said when asked about what she is most pleased with in the nine months since her administration took over. She noted, however, that “some of the junior officers are still not quite what we would wish them to be”.

    Ms Suu Kyi expressed hope that things can be improved, as she drew inspiration from Singapore’s example: “When I went to meet your corruption investigation bureau, they gave me a piece of paper, on which one of the things they said was that corruption is a fact of life, not a way of life. I like that very much, because this is how it is in our country. People accept it not as a way of life, although they recognise that is the fact of life, which means that the practice of corruption has not become embedded in our culture and that is very encouraging.”

    On Myanmar’s journey from half a century of military rule to a democratically-elected civilian-led government, Ms Suu Kyi, despite being one of the world’s most prominent democracy icons, made it clear it is not driven by her alone.

    “I have to keep reminding people that I was under house arrest for 15 years and they’ve (the military) only managed to retain public support during that period, and we managed to keep our party going in spite of the great difficulty. So, you must not underestimate the ability of many, many ordinary members of our political party, and our members are really the public, and we are very close to the public.”

    She is optimistic that Myanmar, and whoever succeeds her, will be able to stay on the path of democracy. “How successful I am, as a leader, will be decided by how dispensable I can make myself, and I hope that I’ll be able to make myself totally dispensable, that they will not need me to go on, neither my party, nor my country.”

     

    Source: ChannelNewsAsia

deneme bonusu