Category: Politik

  • Damanhuri Abas: Kepimpinan Melayu Tidak Berwibawa, Masyarakat Diperlakukan Sebagai Tidak Setaraf Bangsa Lain

    Damanhuri Abas: Kepimpinan Melayu Tidak Berwibawa, Masyarakat Diperlakukan Sebagai Tidak Setaraf Bangsa Lain

    Pemerintah terus memperlekehkan perasaan orang melayu dengan sesuka hati hanya kerana kepimpinan melayu yang merelakan bangsa sendiri diperlakukan sedemikian.

    Diam dari golongan pimpinan masyarakat yang terdiri daripada pemilik syarikat, pengerusi masjid, presiden/ketua persatuan, tokoh-tokoh masyarakat, golongan asatizah yg berpengaruh, golongan artis, golongan karyawan yg berpengaruh, mantan-mantan pemimpin dll., memungkinkan segala yang telah berlaku ini, kerana di mata masyarakat majmuk jelas tiada kedengaran langsung apapun suara dari golongan pemimpin melayu yg membantah mahupun menyoalkan tujuan dan kebijaksanaan tindakkan pemerintah tergesa-gesa mengubah dasar mereka dengan sesukanya. Ia memberikan persepsi palsu bahawa orang melayu menyokong perubahan dasar ini. Lebih buruk lagi, orang melayu sendiri merasakan seolah-olah pandangan luas masyarakat melayu sudah tidak penting kerana tiada sesiapa dikalangan pemimpin-pemimpin melayu yg berani menyuarakan keprihatinan mereka.

    Yang lebih prinsip lagi ialah dasar baru ini sekaligus menghapuskan adanya kuasa pemeriksa keatas pemerintah yang bebas dan berwibawa dalam menjaga urusan harta simpanan negara demi kepentingan rakyat jelata. Adanya kuasa penghalang adalah genting demi memastikan tertegaknya proses mengawas dan mengawal kemungkinan berlaku penyalahgunaan kuasa oleh pemerintah.

    Sebaliknya apa yang telah berlaku ialah kekeliruan memahami matlamat utama adanya jawatan Presiden terlantik dengan alasan-alasan sampingan yang mengeruhkan isu pokok yang seharuskan menjadi tumpuan kita semua.

    Memperuntukkan jawatan Presiden terlantik untuk orang melayu demi memastikan adanya bangsa melayu menjawat kursi Presiden adalah pendekatan yang sangat bahaya. Ia kerana setelah adanya seorang berbangsa melayu menjadi Presiden terlantik, ia akan mengkaburi isu perkauman yang masih ada dan terus berleluasa bersumber daripada dasar-dasar lain pemerintah sendiri seperti sikap waspada, curiga dan tidak yakin dengan bangsa melayu secara amnya. Ini masih jelas dalam perkhidmatan negara yang terus mengamalkan dasar-dasar yang mengecualikan dan menindas peluang-peluang anak-anak melayu mendapat jawatan-jawatan yang dianggap bahaya untuk diberikan kepada orang melayu.

    Jika benar adanya diskriminasi perkauman dalam masyarakat yang menidakkan kemungkinan orang melayu menjadi Presiden terlantik mahupun apa lagi jawatan tinggi negara, ia harus dikaji sedalamnya dan akar puncanya dimusnahkan. Barulah kita jujur ingin mengatasi masalah perkauman yang masih ada.

    Kita sebenarnya diberi peluang kini dengan pengakuan pemerintah sendiri mengiktiraf adanya penindasan perkauman. Ini masanya untuk orang melayu menyuarakan keprihatinan kita sebagai rakyat Singapura atas kewujudan penindasan ini selama 50 tahun sejak merdeka.

    Orang melayu bersikap matang dan bersabar sepanjang 50 tahun melihat dan merasai sendiri penindasan yang jelas berlaku tiap kali anak-anak melayu yang menjalani perkhidmatan negara dinafikan peluang yang dinikmati kesuluruhannya oleh bangsa lain. Tidak sepatahpun suara menyoalkan kenapa anak-anak melayu diperlakukan sedemikian, apa yang jelas adalah penindasan perkauman.

    Yang bahaya lagi ialah kesan perpanjangan kepada persepsi masyarakat majmuk terhadap bangsa melayu yang telah berakar dan sebati memandang serong bangsa ini dengan waspada dan curiga. Ia menjadikan orang melayu seperti rakyat yang kurang syarat dan sentiasa diperanaktirikan. Akibatnya telah lama dirasakan dalam merata lapisan masyarakat dalam semua aspek dari pendidikan hingga pekerjaan. Inilah kesan buruk yang telah bermaharajalela selama 50 tahun ini.

    Sudah tiba masanya dengan isu perkauman jelas terbuka, untuk kita mendesak pemerintah untuk berlaku adil kepada bangsa melayu dan segara menukar dasar-dasar lain yang bersikap perkauman dan menindas peluang orang melayu dalam negara kita yang tercinta ini.

    Jika pemimpin-pemimpin melayu masih takut untuk dilihat menentang dasar pemerintah, ingatlah tanggungjawab murni anda untuk membela nasib anak-anak melayu kita yang terus menerus berdepan dengan peluang-peluang terbatas tanpa dibela sesiapa. Kita tidak seharusnya diperlakukan sebagai rakyat tidak setaraf dengan bangsa-bangsa lain di negara kita sendiri.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Abas

  • Cherian George: Elected Presidency Missed Opportunity For Multiculturalism, Halimah Yaacob Would’ve Won With No Help

    Cherian George: Elected Presidency Missed Opportunity For Multiculturalism, Halimah Yaacob Would’ve Won With No Help

    What do you make of the proposed changes to Singapore’s elected presidency?

    The impression I get is that it has been framed as a debate between the need for minority representation and an open system that would allow Tan Cheng Bock to possibly become President. And people are lined up on either side. But I do want to see a minority President. I think it is a very important symbol. But, precisely because I understand the importance of having a minority president, I’m disappointed in the way the government has gone about it.

    The assumption seems to be that we don’t now have a minority candidate on the radar capable of winning the presidency in open competition. I think that is wrong. Halimah Yacob can win with no help or handicap. If they picked Halimah Yacob as a candidate, I don’t think they need to block Chinese candidates against her. She is enormously respected, she has extremely strong trade union labour credentials. She is respected by Malays as well as Chinese. This is one of those cases where the PAP as well as some other Singaporeans have a very dim view of Singaporeans, and that view is unrealistically dim. Yes, there might be some prejudice against Halimah on account of her gender, religion and race. But this prejudice probably does not amount to some kind of total trump card that will ensure her defeat. Those backing her might have to fight a little harder. But whatever kind of handicap she carries would just quantitatively amount to a tiny disadvantage. And I don’t see how that can compromise her track record. And I also cannot believe that the PAP with all its machinery and the union movement as well as many Singaporeans wouldn’t go all out to bat for her. After all, how wonderful would it be for Singapore to have a female, Malay, Muslim president?

    I have total faith that there are enough male, Chinese, non-Muslim Singaporeans who will campaign for her. Unfortunately, many others do not have such faith. And I see it as a huge moment of opportunity for Singapore’s multiracialism. This is an opportunity to signal to the world, and ourselves, that after fifty years of nation building, we are ready to embrace a President who is not from the conventional mainstream.

    Instead, what are we heading for? We’re heading for a situation where the PAP has decided to give a Malay candidate a walkover, which will taint the presidency forever. Whoever becomes the president next year will be a token president. Why taint it with the label of tokenism? It’s so unnecessary. I believe that if it were a straight fight between Halimah Yacob and Tan Cheng Bock, Halimah would win hands down.
    Source: www.mackerel.life

     

  • Damanhuri Abas: Malay Community Don’t Want PAP’s ‘Useless Malay President’

    Damanhuri Abas: Malay Community Don’t Want PAP’s ‘Useless Malay President’

    There is no pride for any person to be offered a token position to be a puppet to sing the tune of his or her master. To then use race as a justification when we all know it is a mere excuse to look magnanimous when in reality it is a disgusting use of racial sentiments to further political interest of a Party in power worried that someone else will open up the books.

    For God sake, discrimination exists for the last 50 years in their own institutions justified by strange ancient suspicion of an entire race that discounts the malays as untrustworthy for so-called ‘sensitive position’ in the SAF. Solve that misnomer first and be more honest to us as equal citizens of this country. Malays have sacrificed their lives in the hundreds on Bukit Chandu fighting the Japanese. If that is not enough to trust our loyalty to this land than tell us what will, instead of lying to the entire race?

    We don’t want your useless Malay president.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Abas

  • Singapore Committed To Support The Capacity-Building Efforts Of The Palestinian People

    Singapore Committed To Support The Capacity-Building Efforts Of The Palestinian People

    Senior Minister of State for Defence and Foreign Affairs, Dr Mohamad Maliki Osman, who is currently on a working visit to the Palestinian Territories, met Palestinian National Authority (PNA) President Mahmoud Abbas and other PNA leaders on Monday (Nov 7).

    During the meetings, Dr Maliki reiterated Singapore’s commitment to support the capacity-building efforts of the Palestinian people, said a Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) statement.

    MFA added that as a follow-up to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s visit to Ramallah in April 2016, Singapore would appoint Mr Hawazi Daipi as the Republic’s non-resident Representative to the PNA to coordinate Singapore’s Enhanced Technical Assistance Package (ETAP) for the Palestinians.

    “The PNA leaders welcomed the appointment,” the statement said.

    During his visit to Ramallah, Mr Lee had announced a doubling of Singapore’s technical assistance package to the PNA from S$5 million to S$10 million.

    The package covers study visits to Singapore, priority places in training courses on education, anti-corruption and economic development, and postgraduate scholarships.

    Since 2013, Singapore has hosted six study visits under ETAP, including the most recent one last month by a delegation led by the PNA Minister of Education and Higher Education Dr Sabri Saidam. TODAY understands that there has been an increase in study visit requests to Singapore as well as in technical training applications by Palestinian officials since Mr Lee’s visit in April.

    Mr Hawazi Daipi, who was Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Manpower and Education before leaving politics last year, will be resident in Singapore and make occasional visits to the Palestinian Territories.

    The appointment is not a diplomatic one as Singapore does not recognise the state of Palestine. Other countries such as New Zealand and Japan have appointed similar representatives to PNA.

    Dr Maliki is currently on a five-day visit to the Middle East. On Monday, he also met PNA Prime Minister Dr Rami Hamdallah, Foreign Affairs Ministers Dr Riyad Al-Maliki, Dr Saidam, and Minister of National Economy Abeer Odeh.

    In the meetings, Dr Maliki also reiterated Singapore’s consistent position and longstanding support for the two-state solution with Israel and Palestine living side-by-side in peace and security, said MFA.

    “He expressed the hope that both sides would resume negotiations and make progress towards a just and durable solution.”

    Dr Maliki will visit the Palestine Red Crescent Society Headquarters and meet the Mayor of Al Bireh Municipality Fawazi Abed Salim to convey a donation of books provided by the National Library Board to the Al Bireh Public Library on Tuesday, after which he will depart the Palestinian Territories for Jordan.

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • Next Presidential Election To Be Reserved For Malay Candidates: PM Lee

    Next Presidential Election To Be Reserved For Malay Candidates: PM Lee

    The next Presidential Election due next year will be reserved for Malay candidates, based on the hiatus-triggered model, said Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in Parliament on Tuesday (Nov 8).

    Mr Lee also said that as the Constitutional Amendment Bill states that the Government should legislate on when the racial provision should start, it intends to do so when amending the Presidential Elections Act in January next year. It will start counting from the first President who exercised the powers of the Elected Presidency, who was Dr Wee Kim Wee.

    He was speaking during the parliamentary debate on proposed changes to the Elected Presidency system, which started on Monday.

    So for the Presidential Election next year, if a qualified Malay candidate steps up to run, Singapore will have a Malay President again, the Prime Minister said.

    “As Minister Yaacob (Ibrahim) noted yesterday, this would be our first after more than 46 years, since our first President Encik Yusof Ishak,” Mr Lee said. “I look forward to this.”

    The hiatus-triggered model means that while presidential elections will generally be open to candidates of all races, but if there is not a President from a particular community for five consecutive terms, then the next term will be reserved for a President from that community. This means that in the course of six terms, there should be at least one President from the Chinese, Malay, Indian and other minority communities, provided qualified candidates appear, he explained.

    ENSURING MINORITY REPRESENTATION ‘MOST DIFFICULT QUESTION’

    Mr Lee also noted that amongst all the proposed changes in this complicated Bill, the one hardest thought about and where the most is at stake is the question of ensuring multiracial representation in the Elected Presidency.

    He said as the Head of State for Singapore, the candidate must represent all Singaporeans and the office must be multiracial. If the President always comes from the same race, not only will the President cease to be a credible symbol of our nation, the very multiracial character of the nation will come into question, the Prime Minister said.

    “Every citizen, Chinese, Malay, Indian or some other race, should know that someone of his community can become President, and in fact from time to time, does become President,” Mr Lee said.
    He pointed out that Singapore is building a “radically different society”: Multiracial, equal and harmonious, gradually enlarging the shared Singaporean identity while celebrating different cultures and faiths. It is also allowing minority communities ample space to live their own ways of life, and not forcing everybody to conform to a single norm set by a single majority group.

    “We have to work consciously and systematically at this,” Mr Lee explained. “It will not happen by itself, nor will we get there if we blithely assume that we have already arrived.”

    ELECTED PRESIDENT AN ‘IMPORTANT STABILISER’ 

    The Prime Minister reiterated why the Elected President is an important stabiliser for Singapore, noting that founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew proposed the idea of the office because he was worried that there would be a freak election result one day, and the nest egg of reserves would be “squandered by a profligate Government”.

    He added that Singapore’s system is unique and “very difficult to get right because the balance is a delicate one”. This is because the President is a symbolic Head of State but elected through a national ballot, and as such has a popular mandate but not a mandate to govern. The President can also use his mandate to say no in certain specified areas, but not push for policies or to initiate action.

    The Prime Minister also argued against vesting the powers of safeguarding Singapore’s reserves in the Parliament instead of a separate institution. He said that while it may help, the pressure in Parliament is to do more rather than spend less. Making everything depend on just one institution – the Parliament – “creates a single point of failure”, he added.

    Doing so will mean everything hinges on the outcome of a single general election, and on the Government elected into Parliament with that one vote every five years, he said.

    Mr Lee said the Presidential Election itself presents difficulties, particularly in a fiercely contested campaign where “emotions and sentiments can build up and issues that have nothing to do with the role of the President can become hot”.

    He cited the 2011 Presidential Election, when one candidate championed a S$60 billion economic plan supposedly to create jobs and enterprise, while another made proposals such as better recognition for national servicemen and more help for the poor and unemployed.
    These, Mr Lee noted, are the Government’s responsibility, and for the Prime Minister and Cabinet to decide. “But in 2011, some candidates’ attitude was: Never mind, just say it. Get elected first, worry about the Constitution later on.”

    The Prime Minister referenced the US presidential election, saying that while the two candidates – Mr Donald Trump and Mrs Hillary Clinton – represent radically different world views, people can take some comfort in the strong checks and balances in the US political system.

    He cited James Madison, one of the country’s founding fathers, who wrote in the Federalist Papers: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.

    “A dependence on the people is no doubt the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.”

    “That is wisdom,” noted Mr Lee, adding that while a system like the US one cannot work for Singapore, the city-state needs some stabiliser besides the primary control of the Government, and that is the Elected President.

    CHANGES ARE ‘MY RESPONSIBILITY’: PM

    As for the timing of the changes, the Prime Minister reiterated that he has been involved with the Elected Presidency almost from the beginning and knows the system – from the intent and design to how conditions have changed and ideas evolved.

    “These changes are my responsibility,” he said, “I am doing it now because it would be irresponsible of me to kick this can down the road and leave the problem to my successors.

    “They have not had this long experience with the system, and will find it much harder to deal with.”

    In an exclusive interview with Mediacorp in September, Mr Lee said he believed this is something which needs to be done, and if it is not done, this would mean trouble for Singapore – “not today, not tomorrow, but 10 to 15 years’, 20 years’ time definitely”.

     

    Source: ChannelNewsAsia

deneme bonusu