Category: Politik

  • Mohamed Nazem Suki: We Are All Muslims, Don’t Label Each Other

    Mohamed Nazem Suki: We Are All Muslims, Don’t Label Each Other

    When a government preferred with either group/s, the divisions and problems will deepens.

    The irony is, the group/s, whom any governments preferred, will conduct their actions uncompromising towards another ‘opposing’ group/s. These group/s sold their principle and brotherhood and are proud of it. Cheap isn’t it?

    When any government ministers/officials, past or current, seen to be present supporting one group than the other, by default those group/s are legitimate while the others are extremist, assumed ‘terrorist’. Who determine? Some smart deans and professors make reference to opposing groups? Smile all your way, write long thesis to justify your theories, while you sit in, and you didn’t even touch those brotherhood sufferings in the hands of those ‘terror’ governments.

    Civil and nation wars are inevitable when governments have preference for its survival. People lives are no more sacred. Aren’t these governments more extreme forceful terrorist than those other groups?

    These governments are NOT a reference point. We, Muslims, can’t and don’t and shouldn’t look at any government policies and then work backwards in order to fit into these governments’ system.

    We, Muslims, have our reference and the system/s, we have the ‘just and humanist’ solutions ourselves. Sell it, campaign it, convince them, educate them, create the awareness, etc etc, not just any reaction denouncing allegations of terrorism acts all over. We can also in reaction denounced any acts by any governments which does not fulfilled our principle and obligations. We have diplomatic experts and scholars’ channels, talk it out.

    We, Muslims, are NOT terrorists !

    Source: www.facebook.com/talkislam/videos/1007363732687424/

     

    We are ALL Muslims .. Period.

     

    Source: Mohamed Nazem Suki

  • Osman Sulaiman: Be Smart, Work Smart, Join Me

    Osman Sulaiman: Be Smart, Work Smart, Join Me

    This is Mubin Ithnin. He is my Sales & Project Manager. He is just 25 yrs old.

    He is new to the industry. I’ve always given young people without experience the opportunity to gain new skills and gain more knowledge.

    As a job seeker myself before going into business, I was once inexperience and was certainly hopeful someone would hire me and give me the opportunity I needed.

    I believe it’s the opportunity that is the missing ingredient between successful people and the opposite. Given the opportunity, anyone can succeed with the right attitude.

    Today, Mubin has earned himself a handsome salary. This has come not without sweat.

    Mubin is a reserved and soft spoken guy. I’m impressed at how well he has performed so far. It debunks the notion that paper qualification is necessary to earn a good income.

    Behind the scenes, he works diligently and is disciplined enough to put in effort towards realising his goals. Today he reaped what he sowed. There’s no substitute to hard work.

    Congrats Mubin!

    If you have what it takes (determination and discipline), join me. I dont promise you the 5 figure income like those of MLM companies.

    What you can be assured of is a decent salary that is enough to make ur peers envy and to put dough on the table and occasionally the well deserved holidays. ?

    Dont take my word for it. Experience it yourself. Say sayonara to mundane 9-5 energy sapping working hours. You are better off working smart and enjoying more time with your loved ones. Mwaaaaah!

    PS: Do I look younger than him?

     

    Source: Khan Osman Sulaiman

  • Family Mourning Father’s Death Scramble To Find Venue For Wake After Rejected By Marine Parade Town Council

    Family Mourning Father’s Death Scramble To Find Venue For Wake After Rejected By Marine Parade Town Council

    For a long time, I have refrained from posting unless necessary. Pondered long and hard about this before deciding to post this. I hope friends will help to share this reflection as there is a pertinent issue which the future young leaders of Singapore need to understand this fundamental value system and review the workings of the people under them. Only then will we see a better Singapore that we can truly belong to. These are facts with no added imagination.

    A good friend’s father passed away suddenly on the late night of 26 Aug 2016, Fri. Those who have experienced the unfortunate demise of a loved one would know that it is a race against time to secure a location and inform the undertaker for the wake to proceed smoothly and immediately once the dawn breaks.

    Her family stays in Serangoon Avenue 4, under Aljunied GRC management. But due to current home improvement works, showflats occupied their block’s and vicinity blocks’ void decks. Her dad’s wake cannot take place at their house void deck or immediate adjacent blocks as a result. They have no choice but to apply for the multipurpose hall opposite their flat, across a main road which is managed by Marine Parade GRC.

    They called Marine Parade Town Council of that area and was told that the venue for the 4 days which her family needs (27th, 28th, 29th, 30th Aug) IS AVAILABLE, but the booking is still subject to the approval of the senior officer who can only revert the following day by 730am (27th Aug– first day of the wake), leaving the family with very little time to confirm with the undertaker where to setup.

    The next morning (27th Aug), lo and behold, she was told that her request is not approved because they are “not resident of that area”!!!! (Quite frankly, if it were me, I would have sworn with the most beautiful language in that the exasperated and ridiculous situation.) Their family has no time but to scramble to look for a farther venue within Aljunied GRC.

    And the most mind boggling call event took place on the third day of the wake when she received a call from the same officer who rejected her booking as he wanted to update her about the fact that the request is not approved. Upon clarification, it turns out that what he meant by “not a resident of the area” was that her HDB estate does not belong to the Marine Parade GRC because her estate is from the Aljunied GRC.

    What is the point of “updating” her on the third day into the wake when people are mourning? In the family’s moment of need and bereavement, no help or compassion was offered from MPGRC. In fact, the rejection of the booking led to a lot of stress and a mad rush.
    Dear friends….i try to be as objective as possible in this. But there is obviously politics in play here. Or are we reading too much in this?

    The reason for not approving it is simply unacceptable especially given that the venue is available. Just because their residence belongs to the Aljunied GRC (run by Worker’s Party), they are not allowed to use PAP run facilities? Am I assuming too much political play in this? I do not think so. Are we back to the whole game of “ïf you vote for me, then you will enjoy privileges?” tactics which the old regime is so fond of using?

    Why is there the biased assumption that just because their residence is in Aljunied GRC, they voted for the Workers’ Party? We are all Singaporeans. Sure, Politics is a dirty game. But there are OB markers as to where games cannot be played. A bereaving moment qualifies!

    Utterly disappointed, I hope the relevant party reflect on its discriminatory practices and have some compassion.

    Connect, not divide.

     

    Source: Sanson Ng

  • US-Led Forces Strike Syrian Troops, Russia Calls Emergency UN Meeting

    US-Led Forces Strike Syrian Troops, Russia Calls Emergency UN Meeting

    US-led coalition air strikes killed dozens of Syrian soldiers on Saturday (Sept 17), Russia and a monitoring group said, putting a US-Russian brokered ceasefire in jeopardy and prompting Moscow to seek an emergency UN Security Council meeting.

    The United States military said the coalition stopped the air strike against what it had believed to be Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)  positions in north-east Syria after Russia informed it that Syrian military personnel and vehicles may have been hit.

    A US military official said he was “pretty sure” targets mistakenly hit in the coalition strikes were Syrian forces.

    Russia called for an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council after the air strikes, which allowed ISIS militants to briefly overrun a Syrian army position near Deir al-Zor airport.

    The 15-member body is due to meet behind closed doors at 7.30pm EDT (7.30am on Sunday, Singapore time), diplomats said.

    “We are reaching a really terrifying conclusion for the whole world: That the White House is defending Islamic State. Now there can be no doubts about that,” the RIA Novosti news agency quoted Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova as saying.

    She said the strikes threatened to undermine the ceasefire in Syria brokered by Russia, which has been aiding Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad in the civil war, and the United States, which has backed some rebel groups.

    The Russian Defence Ministry said US jets had killed more than 60 Syrian soldiers in four air strikes by two F-16s and two A-10s coming from the direction of Iraq.

    The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a Britain-based monitoring group with contacts across the country, cited a military source at Deir al-Zor airport as saying that at least 80 Syrian soldiers had been killed.

    The ceasefire, which took effect on Monday, is the most significant peacemaking effort in Syria for months but has been undermined by repeated accusations of violations on both sides and by a failure to bring humanitarian aid to besieged areas.

    As well as the US and Russian involvement, Assad is supported by Iran and Arab Shi’ite militias, while Sunni rebels seeking to unseat him are backed by Turkey and Gulf Arab states.

    All those warring parties are also sworn enemies of ISIS, whose territory extends along the Euphrates valley from the Iraqi border, including around Deir al-Zor, up to land near Syria’s frontier with Turkey.

    In its sixth year, the conflict has cost hundreds of thousands of lives, displaced half of Syria’s pre-war population, prompted a refugee crisis in the Middle East and Europe and inspired a wave of  Islamic militant attacks across the world.

    Syria’s army said the strikes, which took place at around 5pm (10pm Singapore time) were “conclusive evidence” of US support for ISIS, calling them “dangerous and blatant aggression”.

    The US military said in its statement that Syria was a “complex situation” but that “coalition forces would not intentionally strike a known Syrian military unit”.

    ISIS said via its Amaq news channel it had taken complete control of Jebel Tharda, where the bombed position was located, which would have allowed it to overlook government-held areas of Deir al-Zor.

    The city’s airport and some districts have been entirely surrounded by ISIS since last year, with the airport providing their only external access.

    However, Russia and Syrian state media said the Syrian army later recaptured positions it lost. The Observatory monitoring group said at least 20 ISIS fighters were killed in heavy Russian air strikes during that fighting.

    The incident threatens to undermine not only the ceasefire agreement, but also proposed joint targeting by the United States and Russia of ISIS and some other jihadist groups across Syria.

    SHAKY TRUCE

    Earlier on Saturday, Russia and Syrian rebels cast doubt over the prospects for the increasingly shaky ceasefire, with Moscow saying the situation was worsening and a senior insurgent warning that the truce “will not hold out”.

    While the ceasefire has reduced fighting, some violence has persisted across Syria. Meanwhile, there has been little movement on promised aid deliveries to besieged areas and both sides have accused the other of bad faith.

    Russia’s Defence Ministry said conditions in Syria were deteriorating, adding that it believed the ceasefire had been breached 199 times by rebels and saying the United States would be responsible if it were to collapse.

    After the Deir al-Zor air strike, it said Moscow had told the United States to rein in the Syrian opposition and make sure it did not launch a new offensive, adding that it had told Washington about a concentration of rebels north of Hama.

    Insurgents say they only reluctantly accepted the initial deal, which they believe is skewed against them, because it could relieve the dire humanitarian situation in besieged areas they control, and blamed Russia for undermining the truce.

    “The truce, as we have warned, and we told the (US) State Department – will not hold out,” a senior rebel official in Aleppo said, pointing to the continued presence of a UN aid convoy at the Turkish border awaiting permission to enter.

    Rebels have also accused Russia of using the ceasefire to give the Syrian army and allied Shi’ite militias a chance to regroup and deploy forces ready for their own offensives.

    OVERNIGHT SHELLING

    Both sides have accused the other of being responsible for aid deliveries being stuck far from Aleppo, where army and rebel forces were supposed to pull back from the Castello Road which leads into besieged, insurgent-held eastern districts.

    Russia on Friday said the Syrian army had initially withdrawn but returned to its positions after being fired on by rebels, who in turn say they saw no sign of government forces ever leaving their positions. “There is no change,” said Zakariya Malahifji, an official for a rebel group in Aleppo on Saturday, asked whether there had been any move by the army to withdraw from positions along the road.

    Syria’s government said it was doing all that was necessary for the arrival of aid to those in need it in all parts of the country, particularly to eastern Aleppo.

    Two convoys of aid for Aleppo have been waiting at the Turkish border for days. The UN has said both sides in the war are to blame for the delay of aid to Aleppo, where neither has yet withdrawn from the Castello Road into the city.

    The government said the road was being fired on by rebels, which they deny, so it could not give convoys a guarantee of safety.

    Senior UN officials have accused the government of not providing letters to allow convoys to reach other besieged areas in Syria.

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • EP Voting Process ‘Must Not Be Turned Into A Farce’

    EP Voting Process ‘Must Not Be Turned Into A Farce’

    Should an election still be held for an unopposed presidential candidate? Would some Singaporeans view the proposed changes to the Elected Presidency (EP) as the Government facilitating a preferred candidate next year?

    These were among the questions raised on Sunday (Sept 18) in the latest of a series of dialogues on the EP scheme and the Government’s White Paper released on Thursday.

    Responding to the question on whether an unopposed candidate should still secure a majority vote to become the President, Law and Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam said Singapore must ensure the voting process is not opened up to criticism and ridicule.

    The scenario of an individual who steps forward to run for the position but does not get a majority vote could make Singapore a “laughing stock”, he said, as the country would not have a President and would have to call another election.

    “We must balance between the ability to represent and also make the process something that doesn’t turn into a farce,” Mr Shanmugam said to the 1,300 residents and grassroots leaders from Central Singapore District who attended the dialogue.

    He referred to how founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew had won elections unopposed, with no question whether Mr Lee lacked the moral authority, given that he had presented himself for elections but no one wanted to contest against him.

    “We have the rules — people can take part. If they don’t take part, then whoever takes part becomes the President. I think it’s a neater process,” he said.

    Mr Shanmugam had spent about 40 minutes of the two-hour session at the Institute of Technical Education College Central explaining the Government’s response to the Constitutional Commission’s recommendations.

    In response to a participant who doubted Singaporeans would vote for a minority candidate, Mr Shanmugam said that while the majority of Singaporeans are capable of voting for a minority President, race remains a factor within a segment of the population.

    Referring to the Group Representation Constituency system, which guarantees minority representation in Parliament, he noted how it prevented people from discussing race during elections.

    Another question asked was whether five terms, or 30 years, is too long before a reserved election is called for a particular race that has not had an Elected President.

    To this, Mr Shanmugam said: “Many people would say we don’t need (a reserved election), many people will say we need it, and it cannot be 30 years (or) five terms — it should be shorter. The Government is trying to do what is right here.”

    And on whether the Elected President from a reserved election would have the moral authority to disagree with the Government, he noted that regardless of race, the President has to meet the same qualifying criteria.

    These candidates would also have to prove themselves and win the most number of votes if there is a contest. “I think such a person will have the credibility and competence to say no to the Government when necessary,” he added.

    While there are potential minority candidates from the private sector, Mr Shanmugam declined to name any when asked if he could identify some potential Malay candidates under the higher qualifying threshold, given that it has been a while since Singapore had a Malay president.

    To another question, he said the Council of Presidential Advisers should not be elected to avoid politicising their roles.

    And on the suggestion that the qualifying criteria be pegged to a percentage of the country’s Gross Domestic Product, Mr Shanmugam said there could be other qualifying criteria to consider in future.

    Speaking to TODAY, Bizlink senior trainer Zainbu Mohamed Ghouse, 57, felt that the session seemed to centre on the Government’s plans for the EP rather than on reaching out to the ground.

    “We feel that the purpose of having this session was just for formality, just to let you know that you’re being heard, but it may not be the situation,” said Ms Zainbu, who is also a grassroots member with Jalan Besar Bendemeer Residents’ Committee.

    But businessman Terry Lee, 47, who is a grassroots leader with Potong Pasir Neighbourhood Committee, said the session was useful to him, as he will be able to verbalise some of the issues raised to other residents.

     

    Source: TODAY Online

deneme bonusu