Category: Politik

  • No Need To Mourn For Malaysians Who Left For Singapore

    No Need To Mourn For Malaysians Who Left For Singapore

    PETALING JAYA: There is no need to cry over the estimated 7,828 former Malaysians who gave up their citizenship for our neighbour, Singapore, an Utusan Malaysia editor has said.

    Zulkifli Jalil, in a column, said the only thing to mourn was those who chose to renounce their citizenship on the grounds the republic gave such quarters more benefits.

    He was responding to a statement by Ong Kian Ming of DAP, who said he felt saddened by Malaysians, a majority of whom were Chinese, who chose to become Singapore citizens as it deprived the nation of professionals and a highly-skilled workforce.

    Zulkifli, however, said it was best to just let them leave.

    “There are still many more professionals among the 30 million Malaysians who are committed and want to serve their beloved country.”

    Zulkifli said that while the current economic situation made life difficult, it had not come to a point where one needed to renounce one’s citizenship.

    He then reminded the 7,828 former Malaysians that it would be difficult for the country to welcome them back as citizens, citing complications experienced by British Overseas Citizen (BOC) passports holders in 2014.

    The issue arose when Ng Wei Aik of DAP claimed the government had agreed to bring back more than 500 BOC passport holders.

    BOC passport holders are Malaysian citizens who had chosen to give up their citizenship to apply for UK citizenship instead.

    Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi had in 2014 said citizenship would not be given automatically and that applicants had to adhere to stipulations spelt out in the Immigration Act.

    For BOC passport holders, Zulkifli said, there was no forgiveness.

    “Maybe Kian Ming should learn a thing or two from Wei Aik in managing those who renounced their citizenship.”

     

    Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com

  • Nicole Seah: Low Key Wedding Was Perfect

    Nicole Seah: Low Key Wedding Was Perfect

    Being in the political spotlight several years back – she was the youngest female candidate in the 2011 Singapore General Elections and the second most popular politician online – taught Nicole to be cautious about revealing too many details about her life. In fact, she told Her World magazine in May in 2014 that publicity had its price, and it had made her extremely reticent about her personal matters.

    However, since moving to work in an advertising firm in Bangkok, Thailand, Nicole is now more open and even chatty about romance and her marriage to Bryan, a 29-year-old Singaporean engineer based in Australia. She declined to reveal his last name.

    We find out more from Nicole, also 29, who tied the knot in a low-key ceremony in August 2015, and was in the process of moving back to Singapore from Bangkok for good by the end of December 2015.


    “I was crying non-stop during the solemnisation, and so were our mothers,” says Nicole. Corded lace and satin mermaid gown from Rico-A-Mona. Silk flowers, from Inside The Knot.

    You’ve had several high-profile relationships previously, but little is known about Bryan. What can you tell us about him?
    I met him when I was holidaying in Australia three years ago. Our mums introduced us and his mum later got him to help me with an errand. After spending just one day together, he ended up asking me out for the next two weeks. At first, we didn’t think it was a good idea to get serious as we both lived in different countries. Then he downloaded Whatsapp and Skype the day I left, and we’ve been talking non-stop ever since.

    What makes him different from the rest?
    I’m very comfortable with him. As someone who used to have a high profile in the media, I like that Bryan sees me as I really am, and doesn’t care about what others think or say.

    How have your past relationships shaped your outlook and approach towards your relationship with Bryan?
    I appreciate the importance of being in a relationship where both parties respect each other wholeheartedly. There is no room for compromise in that area. It’s also important to be with someone you can count on a friend as well. We’ve taken a very pragmatic approach to our relationship. The decision to be together is a conscious choice we make every day, and this keeps our feelings for each other strong.


    Nicole and Bryan at their solemnisation ceremony at the Registry of Marriages.

    When did you know that he was the one?
    I’ve seen many friends in long-distance relationships and there was always emotional turbulence. Bryan and I work well as a team. Sure, there were challenges along the way, but our relationship is great.

    So how did he pop the question?
    It was a very HDB-style proposal, as we are both not romantic people. I was in Australia visiting him and we were discussing the future of our relationship when he logged on to the ROM website. We got married on August 21. I don’t have an engagement ring because I feel diamonds are too dressy for everyday wear.

    We understand Bryan will be moving back to Singapore. Will this be for good or is there a chance you’ll live in Australia later on?
    He misses Singapore very much and we’re both happy to be coming home. To be honest, I don’t see us moving to Australia. I’ve been to a few cities there, but I still prefer living in Singapore. We both want to settle down here.

    You had a very low-key wedding with just close friends and family present. Was this deliberate? 
    Yes, I don’t like fanfare and dealing with too many groups of people. Ours was a very intimate and emotional ceremony.

    How did you put it together?
    I set up a Facebook chat group to coordinate with everyone, as my in-laws lived in Australia, I was in Bangkok and my family was in Singapore. I managed the occasion like I would a work project with checklists and constant work-in-progress updates. I also checked on everyone to make sure they all knew what was going on, and that they were happy with the plans.  The entire process took about three months in total. I know that to many people, it’s a once-in-a-lifetime event, and details matter. But I just have a different way of expressing my commitment to my better half. I also didn’t want to have so many things afterwards as it creates physical clutter in a home. The marriage cert was enough for us.

    Did you have a theme?
    Not at all. In fact, we dropped by a flower shop in Tanjong Pagar on the day itself for the bouquet because my mum insisted on it. After searching for images, I told the florist that I wanted a simple bouquet with a mix of soft colours.


    “I appreciate the importance of being in a relationship where both parties respect each other wholeheartedly.” Crystal-embellished chiffon gown, from Digio Bridal. Hydrangea, David Austin rose tulip and ranunculus bouquet, from Green Point Flowers.

    What was the highlight or most precious moment on the day you got married?
    It was that moment during the solemnisation when we looked into each other’s eyes and said our vows while Bryan held my hand very firmly. It was quite overwhelming. Every word was significant and meaningful. One particular line in the vows encapsulated what love and marraige are all about: “I vow to always keep our love as pure as it is today.”

    Was the wedding what you imagined it would be?
    Even as a girl, I’d never thought about my own wedding, so I didn’t have any preconceived notions about it.

    Will you be holding another reception later?
    Probably. We want to settle back in Singapore first, so timelines are still tentative.

    Your wedding outfits were pretty chic and unique. Was that how you planned it?
    Not at all. I got my dress in a sale here at 70 per cent off. I liked that it was simple. We bought Bryan’s suit from Uniqlo in Bangkok.

    Where did you get your engagement and wedding rings from? Did you choose them or were they a surprise from Bryan?
    We looked at rings together in both Australia and Thailand. I ended up getting our bands from Tampines Mall, and during the Great Singapore Sale earlier in 2015. We had a long conversation over the rings on Facebook, and I negotiated with the jeweller to let Bryan change the design if he didn’t like his band. He ended up liking the design I chose for him.

    What have you learnt as a newly-wed? 
    There are more responsibilities when you are dealing with two sets of families!

    Any tips for future brides?
    I’d tell them to enjoy the process, and to remember that the marriage is always more important than the wedding. Also, everyone will want to have a say in the wedding, and it is easy to become overwhelmed. At the end of the day, remember that your loved ones have your best interests at heart. But you still need to be very clear about what you want, and take ownership of the decisions you make.

    This story was first featured in Her World Brides December 2015, which is available at local newstands and major bookstores.

    Photography: Vernon Wong
    Styling: Steve Thio
    Assisted by: Michelle Lee & Ashley Phan
    Hair: Reno Tan / Hairloom, using Goldwell
    Makeup: Larry Yeo, using Nudestix

     

    Source: www.herworldplus.com

  • Stamford Raffles And John Crawfurd Believed That Malays Were Inferior To The British

    Stamford Raffles And John Crawfurd Believed That Malays Were Inferior To The British

    For the Malays who love their colonialists..

    What did Raffles and John Crawfurd (the Second Resident of Singapura) think of the Malays?

    Raffles:
    “He held that Malays were a rude, uncivilised and degraded race, much in decline from a high point of civilisation that they had once attained.

    No development in thought and science was thus expected of them except for the most rudimentary aspects of knowledge. He found them to be generally indolent.

    Although he later acknowledged them as being advanced in civilisation, albeit at varying degrees, and of varied characteristics, he maintained the view that Malays were no match to the British at that time,but were to be compared only with “some of the borderers in North Britain, not many centuries ago.”

    John Crawfurd:

    The second Resident of Singapura was a little kinder. He referred to the Malays as imbeciles, ignorant and not deserving of notice.

    “Crawfurd thus contended that ‘the traditions of the Malays themselves are altogether undeserving of notice’, given that, on their level of civilisation:

    Their imbecility of reason and their ignorance as to matters of fact are equally beyond the comprehension of any one accustomed only to European society.

    And we still look up to the colonialists?

    References:
    Aljunied, Syed Muhd Khairudin, Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied, and Barbara Watson Andaya. Rethinking Raffles: A Study of Stamford Raffles’ Discourse on Religions Amongst Malays. Marshall Cavendish International, 2005.

    Crawfurd, J. 1814. History and languages of the Indian islands. Edinburgh Review 23(45): 151–89.
    quoted in:

    Müller, Martin. Manufacturing Malayness: British debates on the Malay nation, civilisation, race and language in the early nineteenth century. Indonesia and the Malay World, 2014, Vol.42(123), p.170-196

     

    Source: Almakhazin SG

  • PERGAS: Islamic Scholars Divided Over Festive Greetings To People Of Other Faiths, PERGAS Of The View That It Is Acceptable In Singapore Context

    PERGAS: Islamic Scholars Divided Over Festive Greetings To People Of Other Faiths, PERGAS Of The View That It Is Acceptable In Singapore Context

    Will the PAP MP Dr Maliki Osman retract his statement?

    On 26th January 2016, Dr Maliki made a comment about Islam in Parliament that has been proven wrong.

    The PAP MP Dr Maliki Osman….in his speech about extremism..

    Referred to discussions among Muslims that it may not be permitted for Muslims to wish non Muslims for their festivals.

    As reported on ChannelnewsAsia…

    when discussing the opinion that it is not allowed in Islam..

    “Dr Maliki said senior, respected scholars have spoken up and contradicted the message. Citing a report in Berita Harian, the MP said that such bans have no basis in Islam.”

    The PAP MP Dr Maliki appears to have made an unequivocal statement that is has “no basis in Islam”.

    And yet..

    The Singapore Islamic Scholars & Religious Teachers Association – Pergas

    has sent out guidance to Muslims in Singapura with regard to the issue.

    According to the guidance, there is a difference in opinion on whether it is allowed in Islam.

    Pergas provided a rather balanced position.

    Pergas 1

    Pergas 2

    Pergas 3

    Pergas 4

    Pergas 5

    Importantly, they provided the Islamic evidence for those who believe it is not permitted (and those who believe it is)..

    Dr Maliki Osman claimed there is no basis…the scholars said there is.

    Will Dr Maliki Osman now retract his statement?

    Source:
    http://www.channelnewsasia.com/…/all-hands-on-…/2458936.html

     

    Source: Almakhazin SG

  • SDP: Minister’s Silence On Benjamin Lim’s Suicide Is Troubling

    SDP: Minister’s Silence On Benjamin Lim’s Suicide Is Troubling

    The SDP expresses our deepest sympathies to the family of Benjamin Lim. His suicide is a tragedy that could have been avoided.

    There is a reason why the law and society treat minors differently from adults: They are presumed to not possess the full maturity in thought and deed as adults. Common sense would have indicated to the authorities to proceed with caution when dealing with minors. Yet, five police officers were dispatched to arrest the boy.

    Even if the police were concerned that Benjamin would not be co-operative and could overpower the officers and escape, how far could he have run? And even if he did make a getaway, did the police not have his family, school and classmates that they could contact?

    Also of concern is whether the number of officers sent to arrest Benjamin signaled an aggressive police mindset that was carried over into the interrogation room.

    School officials must be aware that their duty is, first and foremost, to protect students’ welfare as well as their families’ interests. Doing this would not impede law enforcement officers from carrying out their duty. It would, on the other hand, help to prevent tragedies like Benjamin’s suicide from taking place.

    But there is something else that is equally disconcerting. The Ministers for Law, Education, and Home Affairs have kept silent on the matter. Given that a teenager has committed suicide resulting from a series of actions involving the police and the school, it behooves the Ministers to, at the minimum, address the situation and see how the matter is resolved and future incidents prevented.

    Instead of looking into the matter, Todayonline runs a headline saying: “MPs, experts laud police review of interview process involving minors”. Why are MPs and the media not speaking up on investigating the circumstances that led to a 14-year-old committing suicide after police interrogation? Instead, they are lauding the review of a procedure that should not have been in practice in the first place.

    In any developed country, the standard operating procedures (SOPs) would require minors to be accompanied by a parent, guardian or lawyer during interrogation. Its SOPs would also require video recordings of all police interrogations. Without these protections of minors’ rights – indeed the rights of all persons under interrogation – we will never know the treatment meted out to Benjamin during the three hours or so in police custody.

    The public is upset over this incident and deserves full accounting from the Government.

    Dr Wong Souk Yee
    Chairperson
    Singapore Democratic Party

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

deneme bonusu