Category: Politik

  • Benjamin Netanyahu And White House On Collision Over Iran

    Benjamin Netanyahu And White House On Collision Over Iran

    JERUSALEM – For someone who was educated in the United States, speaks fluent American-accented English and worked as a management consultant in Boston, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sure knows how to rub his closest ally up the wrong way.

    In surprisingly critical and unvarnished comments on Wednesday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest accused Israel of distorting details of the negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program in order to scupper the talks.

    It was the latest in a series of increasingly terse exchanges between Netanyahu’s right-wing government and President Barack Obama’s administration that has brought U.S.-Israeli ties to their worst pass in decades.

    “There’s no question that some of the things that the Israelis have said in characterizing our negotiating position have not been accurate,” Earnest told reporters, after Netanyahu dismissed the emerging deal with Iran as “bad and dangerous” and said he would do what he could to prevent it.

    “We see that there is a continued practice of cherry-picking specific pieces of information and using them out of context to distort the negotiating position of the United States.”

    If Earnest’s words weren’t already stern, it is only the beginning of what is likely to be a tense two weeks in the run up to March 3, when Netanyahu is scheduled to address a joint session of the U.S. Congress on the threat from Iran.

    Netanyahu was invited by John Boehner, the Republican speaker, in an initiative cooked up between Boehner and the Israeli ambassador to Washington, Ron Dermer, without the White House initially being kept informed.

    That has upset the U.S. administration for a couple of reasons: first, because of the impression created that Netanyahu is teaming up with the Republicans to rubbish Obama’s strategy on Iran and attempt to secure new U.S. sanctions.

    Secondly, it tramples on diplomatic protocol by inviting a foreign leader days before an election – Netanyahu will speak just two weeks before Israeli parliamentary elections on March 17, when he will bid for a fourth term. As a result, Obama will not meet him during the visit.

    Relations between the two have always been uncomfortable, but the sense of mutual irritation has deepened in recent months, with Netanyahu increasingly critical of U.S. policy on Iran and the United States pushing back on everything from Israeli settlements to the lack of talks with the Palestinians.

    Gideon Rahat, a professor of politics at Hebrew University, regards the current state of affairs as the worst between Israel and the United States in more than 20 years, since George Bush senior and Yitzhak Shamir were in office.

    “It reminds me of 1992, when there was American pressure on Shamir to stop investing in the settlements in exchange for U.S. loan guarantees,” said Rahat. “At the time, it ended up having an influence on the (Israeli) elections.”

    The White House is determined that Netanyahu should not be allowed to meddle in its efforts to secure a nuclear deal with Iran, which would be a legacy achievement for Obama. Netanyahu meanwhile looks set to stick to his guns and side with the Republicans against a Democrat president.

    Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon, a close confidant of Netanyahu’s, has gone as far as to say that the current U.S. administration “won’t be around forever”. But bad relations with the United States could also hurt Netanyahu come March 17.

    “I don’t really understand what his rationale is,” Rahat said of Netanyahu. “Electorally, I don’t think it’s going to be good for him in the end.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Goh Meng Seng: Alternative Media Sites Must Unite To Balance MSM

    Goh Meng Seng: Alternative Media Sites Must Unite To Balance MSM

    According to a survey done on the comparative strength and influence of Main Stream Media (MSM) vs New Media (NM which includes blogs, TRS, TRE, TOC and other key sites), the MSM influence in terms of readership has dropped drastically and the readership of NM has shot up with the popular usage of Smart Phones which allow people to read articles from NM much easier than MSM.

    The influence of NM and MSM has attained equal status. When the survey asks their interviewees where they get their information and news from, NM and MSM have equal share. This situation poses a tremendous challenge to PAP’s continue dominance of political power. Thus, it is of no surprise that the FIXING of New Media will pick up in momentum as the next General Elections is ticking nearer.

    I sincerely hope that all NM like TRE, TRS and TOC will unite and defend this piece of land of Freedom for all Singaporeans. Without the balancing influence of NM, it will be almost impossible for Singapore to advance the dream of building a more democratic system. Hold on there, TRS! Hold on there, TOC!

    Source: Goh Meng Seng

  • SingFirst’s $6 Billion Social Safety Net Will Not Bankrupt Singapore

    SingFirst’s $6 Billion Social Safety Net Will Not Bankrupt Singapore

    SingFirst’s social safety net package is not prepared overnight but is the outcome of several years of research and discussion. It started with the S$60 billion economic plan outlined in the 2011 essay “Creating Jobs and Enterprise in a New Singapore economy – Ideas for Change” by Tan Jee Say, our Secretary-General.

    Our proposal has now been updated following discussions in the last few years with international experts in Finland, Norway, Berlin, Oxford and Harvard. It has also been discussed and debated internally over several months. We took into consideration what the Minister of Finance told Parliament about the use of returns on investment of Singapore’s national assets.

    To help our readers understand our approach, we have decided to use simple illustrations and graphics, rather than post a long article. We believe these simple messages will help to communicate our proposal more effectively and clearly.

    1. The ISSUE – Rising Social Inequality

    Economic growth in Singapore has created a large gap between the rich and poor, leaving a big segment of society behind. Inflation and technology has widened the income gap. Singaporeans have also become the most stressed, unhappiest and least emotional people in the world.

    According to an article in The Economist on 7 March 2014, Singapore is presently the most expensive city in the world as housing, education, healthcare and transport costs are rising day by day.

    ” It has been a long time coming, but Singapore, a tiny city-state of about 5m people, has finally made it: to being the most expensive city in the world. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), a sister organisation of The Economist, after a decade of steadily climbing up the table from 18th place, Singapore now occupies the position usually reserved for the Japanese capital, Tokyo. Paris is now the second-most expensive, ahead of Oslo in Norway”.

    – The Economist (article here)

    Singapore has the biggest income gap among developed countries, as indicated by the Gini co-efficient, an international standard of measure of income inequality. The higher the Gini, the greater the inequality.

    gini1

    Singapore’s economic inequality is highest because its public spending as a percentage of GDP is the lowest among the developed countries.

    gini2

    2. Our PROPOSAL – Social Spending and Social Investment

    SingFirst wants to increase social spending and reduce social inequalities with

    a. Social Safety Net   (S$6 billion per annum)

    b. Social Investment  (S$8 billion per annum)

    This will be funded by the returns on our investment of national assets

    • GIC, MAS, Temasek Holdings etc generate huge investment returns
    • These huge investment returns are more than SingFirst’s proposed social spending amount
    • Principal sum (capital) of national assets WILL NOT be touched.

    2.1 The Government’s existing framework on NIR (Net Investment Return)

    • Returns on investments (R)     : from GIC & MAS
    • Investment income (I)              : from Temasek Holdings
    • R + I = Net Investment Return (NIR)
    • average annual NIR is about S$16 billion

    2.2  The Government’s existing framework on NIRC (Net Investment Return Contribution)

    • ½ R + ½ I = Net Investment Return Contribution (NIRC)
    • In last few years, NIRC has been estimated as S$8 billion
    • Balance ( NIR minus NIRC) = S$8 billion
    • Currently, this balance is RE-INVESTED into GIC & Temasek Holdings

    nirc 2

    To emphasize the above illustration, investment return contribution from GIC and MAS assets is STABLE, is based on expected long term real rate of return and is NOT AFFECTED by year to year fluctuations in actual returns (similar formula used by Norway and Yale University).

    That means the total NIR of S$16 billion is a stable amount year after year.

    In last few years (see illustration below), annual NIR is estimated at S$16 billion. NIRC is estimated at S$8 billion. So the balance for re-investment is S$8 billion on the average.

    nirc

    In the past 4 years, NIRC hovered around S$8 billion per year. So SingFirst proposes to use the NIRC for funding our S$6 billion social safety net package.

    As we are only using S$6 billion per year (75% of NIRC), this is SUSTAINABLE.

    There is a healthy surplus of S$2 billion per year (25% of NIRC) that is not used.

    3. PROPOSAL 1 – Social Spending

    The table below illustrates our social spending to defray the current high cost of living for all Singaporeans.

    safety net

    3.1 Monthly Benefits for Singaporeans

    A simple illustration below of how our social spending will benefit a family with 2 elderly parents, 2 parents and 2 young children on the monthly basis.

    family

    3.2 Tax Restructuring – to phase out GST

    1

    2

    3

    4

     4. PROPOSAL 2 – Social Investment

    Presently, the Ministry of Finance has re-invested approximately half of the net investment returns back into Temasek and GIC which are then used for Portfolio Investment. SingFirst proposes to broaden re-investment to include social investment (eg hospitals, schools). NOT only back into Temasek or GIC.

     

    5

    6

    7

     4.1 Our Proposed Initiatives

    9

     

    4.2 Reserves are not RAIDED by our proposals

    4.3  Pro-growth Social Package

    Our package is not wasteful consumption but will give a strong boost to the local domestic economy. We will create a strong, stable and diversified economy that benefit local businessmen and families.

    • Social safety net                          $ 6 billion
    • Social investment                        $ 8 billion
    • Healthcare (from defence)         $ 5 billion     (over 5 years)
    • Consumer (from GST)                $ 9.5 billion  (over 5 years)
    • Re-investment per year over 5 years   $14 – 28.5 billion

    4.3  Fair Society, Strong Families and Esteemed People

    With this package, SingFirst will deliver

    11

    In Conclusion: Our difference from the PAP

    At the Forbes Global CEO Conference on 28 October 2014, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that he wanted Singaporeans to always be paranoid about someone else stealing their lunch.

    05slide1

    “Looking forward beyond the 50th anniversary, I think that is what Singapore needs to do – to be aware, to be paranoid so you always know that somebody can take your lunch away…”

    While PM Lee wants Singaporeans to be paranoid (“kiasu”), SingFirst prefers to put esteem into Singaporeans. Do you want to feel inferior and be “kiasu” or do you want to stand tall and be esteemed?

    You have a choice. Choose wisely.

    Stand tall. Vote SingFirst.

    SF_LOGO

     

    Source: http://singfirst.org

     

     

  • LBW Structurally Certifies HDB Flats In Own Ward

    LBW Structurally Certifies HDB Flats In Own Ward

    Khatib Court is a HDB BTO project launched in September 2013 [Link]. It is sited next to the Khatib MRT station. The development consists of two 14-storey residential blocks and offers 310 units of Studio Apartments and 3-room flats. The expected completion date is in 2nd quarter of 2017.

    Specifically, it is located at Yishun Neighbourhood 8, part of Nee Soon South ward. Nee Soon South generally encompasses Yishun Neighbourhood 8 (Khatib), part of Neighbourhood 7 and private residential areas along Sembawang Road (near Sembawang Army Camp).

    Nee Soon South used to be an SMC but was absorbed into Ang Mo Kio GRC in 1997 after SDP narrowly lost there in 1991 GE. It remained in Ang Mo Kio GRC till 2011 GE when it was merged together with other wards in Yishun to form the present Nee Soon GRC.

    The PAP MP specifically in-charge of Nee Soon South is Er Dr Lee Bee Wah. She is also the grassroots adviser there [Link].

    The reader who forwarded the information on the BTO project at Khatib highlighted that the C&S (Civil and Structural) engineering service has been awarded to LBW Consultants LLP, a consultancy owned by MP Lee Bee Wah [Link]:

    LBW Consultants LLB

    Ms Lee was a Malaysian before she became a Singaporean MP. Her consultancy firm, LBW Consultants, provides “civil, structural, project management and golf course design services” while her other company, LBW Engineering, provides turnkey solutions and product distribution for satellite communications.

    In fact, her companies have a lot of experience participating in numerous residential, commercial, industrial and institutional projects in Singapore [Link]. They even include military ones:

    • Proposed Airport Emergency Services (AES) Training / Live-Fire Fighting Facilities at Paya Lebar Airbase
    • Proposed Upgrading of Khatib Camp
    • Proposed Upgrading of Kranji Camp
    • Proposed Upgrading & Renovation of Hangars in Sembawang Air Base
    • Proposed Upgrading of School of Ammunition in Rifle Range Road Camp II
    • Proposed Upgrading of Airfield Ground Service Section in Sembawang Air Base

    Last month, it was reported that she intends to set up 50 more designated public spots in Nee Soon South, where smokers can smoke (‘More light-up shelters to curb second-hand smoke’, 28 Jan). It was reported that the decision was made, “following a successful year-long pilot scheme”.

    Six shelters for smokers have been erected during the pilot. The shelters were funded by NEA with the objective of reducing second-hand smoke in Nee Soon South.

    To see how “successful” the pilot scheme has been, TRE sent a correspondent to Nee Soon South to take a look at the smoking shelters during lunchtime on 3 Feb. It didn’t appear to be as “successful” as what Ms Lee had told the media, observed the correspondent (‘Countering LBW’s claim smoking shelter scheme works‘).

    In any case, it should be comforting for the new residents of Khatib Court to know that their HDB flats are structurally being certified by their very own MP, Lee Bee Wah.

    UPDATE:

    Since last year (2014), Ms Lee’s consultancy has been merged with Meinhardt Group International:

  • NSP: For Benefit Of Residents, Do Not Politicise Town Councils

    NSP: For Benefit Of Residents, Do Not Politicise Town Councils

    The National Solidarity Party (NSP) has called on the government not to penalise residents Aljunied residents, tighten the framework of the Town Council Act and to depoliticise town councils so that it does not hinder the ability of MPs to serve as the people’s representatives.

    The remarks were made in a statement issued by NSP’s new secretary-general Mr Tan Lam Siong, in the wake of the parliamentary debate on the financial audit by the Auditor-General’s Office (AGO) on Aljunied Hougang Punggol East Town Council’s (AHPETC) accounts.

    NSP called on the government not to withhold the service and conservancy charges (S&CC) grant to AHPETC in the light of the adverse findings by AGO, but instead to continue disbursing the grants to let AHPETC pay for essential services.

    “As it is, the collection of S&CC charges from residential and commercial units is insufficient to cover all town council expenses and hence a government grant is required,” wrote Mr Tan. “Any withholding of the S&CC grant amounting to S$ 7 million per year will therefore affect residents if AHPETC is unable to pay for essential services.”

    NSP also supported the move to enforce greater standards of accountability and governance, but said that this should not lead to a penalty framework in the management of town councils that would impact on town councillors who are, first and foremost, Members of Parliament.

    “A MP’s fundamental duty is to represent his constituents who elected him or her and to participate in the functions of Parliament,” said Mr Tan. “This duty cannot and should never be subjugated to any other duty. By putting in place a penalty framework in relation to town councillors who are also MPs, the concern is whether such a framework would lead to their secondary role as town councillors overshadowing and undermining their primary role as MPs.”

    NSP also noted that the constant accusations of an un-level playing field and political bias, which opposition MPs have often raised against the government.

    “NSP hopes that the government will re-examine the political wisdom of the notion that the competency of political parties aspiring to form the national government can be tested through their management of town councils,” said Mr Tan. “Such a notion has no empirical basis. The ability to manage a town council and the ability to govern the country have no correlation whatsoever. Any suggestion of a correlation would imply that the best people to govern the country are town planners and estate managers, which cannot be true.”

    Mr Tan recalled that the first generation of government leaders were “fully capable of governing the country” although they were by no means managing town councils, and they have depended on a politically neutral civil service to fulfil that task.

    “NSP urges the government to consider allowing town councils to be managed by a statutory board or a centralised agency instead,” said Mr Tan, “so that residents will not only benefit from a seamless continuation of all services when there is a change of town councillors who are MPs from a different political party but also from lower S&CC charges because of economy of scale.”

    “Residents will be spared the vagaries of a political change in what is essentially a municipal function that can be performed by those equipped with the knowledge and skills to manage estates. If the management of town councils continues to be politically charged, public confidence in our political system will continue to be eroded.”

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com