Category: Singapuraku

  • No Pay Increments For Politicians Over Past Three Years

    No Pay Increments For Politicians Over Past Three Years

    The sizes of politicians’ pay cheques have not changed in the past three years, although the salary benchmark for an entry-level minister last year was about 9 per cent higher than 2011 levels.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister-in-charge of the Civil Service Teo Chee Hean told the House yesterday the 2011 annual salary norm of S$1.1 million was kept because changes in the benchmark have been “moderate” — it moved up in two years and down in one, resulting in an overall annual increase of 3 per cent.

    While a ministerial salaries committee recommended the salary framework be reviewed every five years, Mr Teo said “we can continue to adjust salaries within this framework should there be a change in overall salary levels in the coming years”, given that things have been stable and the framework remains valid.

    He was responding to a question from Mr Edwin Tong (Moulmein-Kallang) at the Committee of Supply debate for the Prime Minister’s Office yesterday about how the framework proposed by the committee had been applied and how the benchmark had moved.

    The benchmark for politicians’ pay is based on the median income of the top 1,000 earners who are Singapore citizens, with a 40 per cent discount to reflect the ethos of political service, as recommended by a ministerial salaries committee appointed in May 2011 by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

    This benchmark for an entry-level minister, also called the MR4 benchmark, includes all salary components including individual performance bonuses.

    The MR4 benchmark for last year was S$1.2 million, but the MR4 annual salary norm was kept at S$1.1 million, said Mr Teo.

    In January 2012, the ministerial salaries committee led by charity-sector veteran Gerard Ee had proposed linking the salary framework and National Bonus to the socio-economic progress of average and lower-income Singaporeans.

    Its recommendations, which were backdated to May 2011, included the removal of the pension scheme for politicians.

    Yesterday, Mr Teo said Singapore must continue to keep wages in the Public Service realistic and strike a balance between recognising the ethos of political service and providing a fair salary.

    This would ensure a flow of able and committed leaders into the Government, he added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Khaw Boon Wan: HDB Flats Have Become More Affordable

    Khaw Boon Wan: HDB Flats Have Become More Affordable

    Public flats have become more affordable in recent years, with many Singaporeans able to buy a home within their budget, said Minister for National Development Khaw Boon Wan.

    To ensure that this remains the case for future generations, Mr Khaw said that the Government remains committed to quality housing that is within the reach of most Singaporeans.

    “Every generation will be able to afford their own HDB homes. This is our promise,” he said in the parliamentary debate on his ministry’s budget yesterday.

    Stressing the importance of home ownership, Mr Khaw said his ministry has achieved results in taming the red hot housing market. This was a hot topic in the 2011 General Election.

    Resale housing prices have risen by about 37 per cent since their low in 2009, while new flat prices rose by just 15 per cent without grants. With grants, new flat prices rose by just 6 per cent.

    — SOURCE: MND

    “Measured against the (median) household income increase of 38 per cent, we can see that public housing affordability has substantially improved since 2011,” he said.

    As for whether cooling measures will be lifted, Mr Khaw said that the property market is in transition and that the Government “should not overkill”.

    Mr Khaw also cited a recent Housing Board survey which showed that people were willing to pay up to $300,000 for a new three-room flat, and between $300,000 and $500,000 for a four- or five-roomer.

    In comparison, 90 per cent of new three-roomers last year were sold at below $250,000.

    For new four-roomers, 81 per cent were sold below $350,000, and 89 per cent of new five-roomers were sold below $450,000.

    “These are actual transactions. They paint a comforting picture of young Singaporeans being able to get their first BTO (Build- To-Order) flat, well within their expected budget,” said Mr Khaw.

    Home ownership has also been possible for the lower-income group, added Mr Khaw.

    From March 2012 to July last year, 1,491 families with household incomes below $1,000 had booked two-room or larger BTO flats.

    Yesterday, 24 MPs rose to ask about issues such as the affordability of housing. Ms Lee Bee Wah (Nee Soon GRC) was one of three MPs calling for the $10,000 income cap to be raised, while Mr Seah Kian Peng (Marine Parade GRC) and Mr Gan Thiam Poh (Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC) wanted flats with shorter leases for the needy.

    Mr Khaw outlined plans to help different segments, from singles to public rental tenants.

    Starting from May, half of all new two-room flats in non-mature estates will be set aside for singles, up from 30 per cent now.

    The Government will look for ways to help non-first-timers who want resale flats near their parents, as well as public rental tenants who aim to own a home.

    It is also prepared to raise the $10,000 income ceiling for public flats, as incomes rise, he said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Rude FT At Pizza Hut Changi Airport Is Giving Singapore A Bad Name

    Rude FT At Pizza Hut Changi Airport Is Giving Singapore A Bad Name

    Dear TRS,

    On Sunday at around 1.45pm, I and a group of family member were at Singapore Changi Airport Terminal 1 to sent off our guest to her hometown.

    While waiting for the check in, we’ve decided to have our lunch at pizza hut as per request from my wheelchair bound aunt.

    The restaurant look calm and not so much patron at that time.. so my mum walk in and approach the service staff which is a pinoy whom was talking to her collegue.

    Mum wanted to asked her if the wheelchair can fit into their restaurant. But was taken aback when she replied “Excuse me ma’am, cant u see that Im talking to my collegue???” That was harsh enough to blow any customer away.

    What more we were damn ashame when our guest heard her saying that. So he stomp in and tell her off that her attitude sucks and that she should priortize the customer. We are giving business.

    Instead of apologising, the pinoy staff replied “Im just doing my job” thats where it sparks another anger.. my guest was so mad and scolded her “Shut up bitch” and the pinoy staff replied the same!!!!!!

    This incident was also witness by a group of eurasion family whom is seated right infront of the entrance.

    Wake up Pizza Hut!!!!!!!! How can u allow such a rude pinoy staff working at our famous changi airport!!!!!

    No apology No remorseful action!!!!

    I came back again to the restaurant after we have sent our guest to the departure gate and spoke to the other manager by the name of Liza… i told her about the bad experience that we have encounter earlier, and while talking to Liza… both the Pinoy manager n the Pinoy staff refuse to come out to apologise. Why???? Fishy right!!!! Wanna cover each other backside is it????

    Dear, Singaporean… how could we let this “bigheaded FT” work and stay here with this kind of uncivilise attitude.. My mum is in her 50’s and is asking her in a nicest way, but was given the shitty service by this FT Pinoy from Airport T1 pizza hut!!!! I seriously am very very upset with the whole incident and sadly, I would say even the management on duty cant handle this well..

    I demand an apology from the rude pinoy staff but was told that is gonna be difficult!!! My on My….. its so easy for her to raised her voice at my mum infront of other patrons but why is it so difficult for her to apologise for her doing!!! Ridiculous!!!

     

    MdKhairi Juwita

    TRS Contributor

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • When Is A Good Time To Buy A Car?

    When Is A Good Time To Buy A Car?

    Is it a good time to buy a car?

    I get that question a lot but, in recent months, it has almost become a de facto greeting. Instead of “hello”, “how are you?” or “it’s a hot day, isn’t it?”, I get: “Is it a good time to buy a car?”

    I will try my best to answer the question which has obviously been keeping many Singaporeans awake at night.

    I will start by saying it is an irrelevant question – for the vast majority, anyway. Today, your decision to buy a car depends much less on where certificate of entitlement (COE) prices are at, than how old your current vehicle is.

    More than half of Singapore’s private car population is currently more than seven years old.

    That is quite a phenomenon, especially when you consider that we had one of the youngest car populations in the world merely a decade ago.

    The state of affairs has to do with how COE supplies are determined here, but more on that later.

    So, with so many old cars on the road, the pertinent question is: How many more months do you have before you need to scrap your current ride?

    Got it? Now, just before the end of that period would be a good time to buy.

    Going by anecdotal evidence, this is how motorists have been behaving. Because COE prices are so high, most people are keeping their cars until the last possible day of the vehicle’s 10-year statutory lifespan.

    I say most people because there are those with means who will buy regardless of price. These folks do not ask “is it a good time to buy a car?” Rather, their de facto greeting tends to be “what is a good car to buy?” If you belong to that group, you can stop reading now and go to Life! Motoring to check out this week’s suggestions.

    For the rest of you, and I count myself among you, I stand by my earlier recommendation: Use your car to the fullest – it not only makes good economic sense, but it is also environmentally sound.

    That is exactly what I am doing with my Toyota Wish, which is 91/4 years old now. I bought it in 2006, with a $9,000 COE.

    COE premiums are highly unlikely to ever go back to that level. Singapore’s human population has grown by 23 per cent – or one million people – since 2006.

    So, demand for cars has gone up significantly.

    The way COE supply is formulated has also changed. Today, supply – determined every three months – hinges on the number of vehicles scrapped in the preceding three months.

    Thus, supply tends to lag behind real demand. In the past, the allowable annual growth of 3 per cent might have masked this lag. But now, with the allowable growth rate at 0.25 per cent, any new injection of COEs is too minuscule.

    To illustrate, this rate translates to merely 134 fresh car COEs per month in the current quota period. Or 3.5 per cent of the total number of COEs available to car buyers.

    It is not a pretty picture. Nevertheless, the quota is poised for a dramatic growth between now and 2017, before it starts to taper again from mid-2018.

    With this supply explosion, prices will be on a downward trend. They could be as low as $30,000 for Category A (cars up to 1,600cc and 130bhp) and $40,000 for Category B (cars above 1,600cc or 130bhp). When? Sometime between 2016 and 2017.

    But that is irrelevant if your car is due to expire earlier.

    If your car has a couple more years before its time is up, you are in a good position because the ensuing COE bonanza is likely to translate to prices substantially lower than at present.

    This will happen provided the Government does not hold back some certificates for the next “dry spell”, which is due to start in late 2019.

    Even though Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew first mooted this three years ago, there has been no word yet on whether he will do it.

    There has been much speculation. One recurring theory is that the Government will not do anything that is as unpopular as this before elections.

    And indeed it will be unpopular even though, over the long term, it will lead to more stability for car buyers and sellers. Unpopular because it will lead to tens of thousands of car-owning households not being able to own a car, at least in the medium term. And it will lead to COE prices heading for the moon in the near term.

    This implies that any decision to hold back COEs will be made after the polls.

    I know what you are thinking now. Better buy soon, before the election is called. But that would be foolish. One, very few people know when elections will be called. Two, a pre-election rush to the showroom will lead to only one thing: higher prices.

    Barring systemic changes, I stick to my original advice: Buy only when your car is near expiry. And if prices are still high then, consider revalidating your COE for another five or 10 years. It may still be a costly move but, in the long run, far less expensive than buying another car.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Today’s Young Singaporeans Will Be In Relatively Good Shape To Retire

    Today’s Young Singaporeans Will Be In Relatively Good Shape To Retire

    Singaporeans who work regularly and make prudent housing choices should have no worries in meeting their retirement needs through the mandatory Central Provident Fund (CPF) system, Manpower minister Tan Chuan-Jin has said, as he told the House that the retirement picture for younger Singaporeans was “relatively healthy”.

    He was addressing concerns that Singaporeans might not save up enough in their CPF accounts to meet the Basic Retirement Sum, now that they will be given more flexibility and options to use their CPF savings.

    Citing the example of a 25-year-old polytechnic graduate earning S$2,200 and assuming this CPF member works 32 out of 40 years, the minister estimated that this worker would have a nest egg of about S$55,000 by the age 65. With compounded interest earned in the Special Account, he would have about S$165,000 at age 65 – three times what was put in.

    “This is not magic – it is just basic mathematics and is a very conservative estimate because I did not account for any wage growth at all and whatever savings he has accumulated in his Ordinary Account after paying off his flat. And if you add those, clearly, he would have even more.”

    As he walked the House through a typical CPF member’s stages in life, Mr Tan said that at age 65, the member would have to decide whether to withdraw up to 20 per cent of his Retirement Account savings in a lump sum.

    The minister also announced that from January 2016, members will need to choose from among the three payout streams to subscribe to under CPF Life from age 65 – up from the current 55. They will also have to decide whether they want to start receiving CPF Life payouts at age 65, or between age 65 and 70.

    The Manpower Ministry (MOM) will also restore the contribution rates for workers aged 50 to 55 to the same level as younger workers, as employment rates for this age band have improved and are almost on par with that of younger workers, he said.

    During Monday’s Committee of Supply debate, MP David Ong suggested raising CPF contribution rates for workers above 55 to the same level as younger workers.

    But Mr Tan said the employment rate for those above 55 was still much lower than those who were younger, so it would not be prudent to raise contribution rates of this group too quickly. The higher rates would also put employers off hiring older workers, he said.

    To encourage the employment of older workers, Senior Minister of State Amy Khor said the government has launched an additional Special Employment Credit (SEC); employers who hire Singaporean workers aged 65 and up and who draw up to S$4,000 a month will receive up to 3 per cent of the monthly wage bill under this SEC.

    This is on top of the current 8.5 per cent SEC for hiring Singaporean workers above 50.

    The government is supporting employers in improving workplace practices so as to attract and retain mature workers, said Dr Khor, who added that the government is putting in place legislation to extend re-employment to 67 in two to three years.

    Employers should also tap existing measures available to put in place age-management practices, so that they can be better prepared to hire older workers, she added.

    Mr Tan urged CPF members to be prudent with their housing purchases, especially when buying or upgrading a property later in life.

    “I think it’s important to pay attention to this because older members may have to take on loans with shorter tenures, higher monthly instalments; they should also factor in any decline in CPF contributions as they age, which may mean that they may need to service their monthly housing instalments with cash on top of CPF.”

    In response to calls for more targeted help for non-working women with low CPF balances, MOM’s support for this group is two-fold, noted Mr Tan.

    Firstly, it has encouraged non-working women to rejoin the workforce, which has led to higher Labour Force Participation Rates (LFPR) among women; as a result, the difference in average CPF balances between men and women have started to narrow, he said.

    Secondly, with families remaining a pillar of support for women, the rules have been tweaked to make it easier for CPF members to transfer their CPF savings to their spouse’s CPF.

    He added that the government is providing attractive interest rates to encourage such transfers: from next year, those aged 55 and above can earn an extra 1 percentage point of interest for the first S$30,000 in their combined CPF balances.

    As for Ms Foo’s suggestion that such transfers be made automatic or require spouses’ joint consent before withdrawals from the Retirement Account, Mr Tan replied that those were ‘very personal decisions” and “best left to couples to decide”, as it would be intrusive for the government to intervene.

    MPs Zaqy Mohamed and Seng Han Thong asked how MOM was communicating the various changes to its members.

    The House was told that, under efforts in this direction, a guided one-to-one retirement-planning service to CPF members would be launched so they can get a better understanding of the various CPF options before making their choices.

    The ministry has completed a three-month trial project and will pilot a retirement-planning service in the second half of the year. The plan is to ramp up the service gradually from next year, with priority given to those turning 55, said Mr Tan.

    In his speech, he stressed that the fundamental principles of CPF will not change and that retirement adequacy remained the scheme’s primary objective.

    And while Singapore’s social safety nets for the vulnerable need to be strengthened, the government and the CPF system alone will not be able to solve all problems.

    “There is a role of collective responsibility – individuals, families, employers, social groups. We all need to step in to provide the assistance and support.”

     

    Source: www.businesstimes.com.sg

deneme bonusu