Category: Singapuraku

  • Commentary: Halimah Yacob Could Have United And Broken Up The Community At The Same Time

    Commentary: Halimah Yacob Could Have United And Broken Up The Community At The Same Time

    Still feeling disgusted over what had just happened. Will take some time to ease this off. Life goes on.

    Just let me have my final thoughts here.

    What could be worse, among some friends who are more than happy to welcome HY, with the reasons of being the first, Malay (in 52 years) Muslimah, President in the region, if not among the developed countries, or the world.

    Nothing wrong them being happy, but hasn’t it always that only among our community / race that we seem to be happily accepting anything that’s been given / handed / spoon fed / suap.

    Doesn’t matter the process, procedures, even the main glaring faults (reserved) (meritocracy) (defining Malay) with the strong word overused consolation phrase – Suratan Takdir.

    Are we really that easy to please? Or simply ignorant. Or that all these doesn’t matter because fate.

    Everyone is entitled to have their opinions, and no one shall shove their opinions onto others. Yet it has been debated much among friends and also among different races, telling them off as sour grapes.

    HY could have united and broken up the community at the same time. While I hope to believe that she will do a good job of such magnitude of responsibility, the little part of me had wished she could have just turned down the offer right from the beginning.

     

    Source: Chegu Thamrin

  • Damanhuri Abas: What To Tell My Children About Meritocracy, Racism Realities, Democracy, Malay Community And Singapore’s Future

    Damanhuri Abas: What To Tell My Children About Meritocracy, Racism Realities, Democracy, Malay Community And Singapore’s Future

    Since some remind us to accept and look at the wisdom of the whole episode of a race based Presidential non-election, let me share what I heard, saw, reflected, learned and gathered to tell my children.

    1. Meritocracy

    – It is a good word thrown around to legitimise why some are not up there (just not ‘good’ enough i.e. PM, top civil servant, etc., etc.)
    – It is a good word to justify high paying public salaries i.e. best in private sector will only be attracted to public service for equal salary
    – It is good word to excuse clear conflict of interest situations i.e. no other choice as he/she is the best for the position, even though related to one another i.e. so many out there (nepotism?, cronyism?)
    – It is a bad word used to apply selective affirmative action (symbolism i.e. Reserved PE, tokenism i.e. GRC – serving political interest)
    – It is an abused word – all the while the sacred meritocratic claim is a sad joke

    2. Racism Realities

    – Acknowledged – Majority privilege exposé
    – Racist – Chinese majority
    – Excused – 70% Chinese majority for racial harmony
    – Contradiction – GRC minority racial provision to assure minority representation is transferable to majority race (MYT GRC no By-election)
    – Undesirable – Madrasah, for its religious exclusivism
    – Legitimised – SAP school necessary for elitism
    – Institutionalised – HDB only race quota good
    – Ignored – i.e. Mindef unspoken security policy (Malays full loyalty doubted) poisoning wider society’s perceptions of Malays for the last 52 years of being inherently untrustworthy for no apparent reason
    – Taboo – public not allowed to talk race
    – Abused – government exploits race sentiments for political benefits

    3. Democracy

    – Institutionalised – the parliament
    – Institutionalised – judiciary and legislative
    – Process – election
    – Symbolic – the pledge
    – Reality – no press freedom (world press freedom ranking Singapore 151st position, worst than even Afghanistan at 120th)
    – Reality – controlled on public debate on policies (Think-tanks not allowed to think, IPS, LKYSPP, etc.)
    – Reality – political interest overrides democratic principles and foundations i.e. Constitutional changes with no referendum
    – Reality – constant changing the rules and gaming the system eg. constitutional boundary changes, limited campaigning period, cooling day, reserved PE, etc.

    4. Malays : Compliant Leadership and Voiceless Community

    – Painted as desiring the Presidency even though never consulted and neither asked for it
    – Supportive or silent Malay leadership in Government and community legitimising the reserved PE, not in sync with real community’s ground sentiment
    – Leadership not willing to criticise Government policy as will impact on funding for their community based institutions – beholden to the Government
    – Self-serving impression, prioritising community’s interest above that of the country’s interest to put the best independent individual to be President
    – Leaders colluded in elaborate scheme to deny Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s genuine chance to be President that the people really wanted
    – Sellout community i.e. easily bought and sold for cheaps

    5. Future of Singapore Takeaways

    – Political Maturity – undermined (vote denied), hindered (voiced-out), regressed (forced-acceptance)
    – Democratic Principles – downplayed (not-ready excuse), worsened (power-dominance strengthened), brutalised (people’s rights-trampled)
    – Multi-Racial Society – cosmetic (tokenism over real change), conflicting (racism politicised), compromised (racist policies unchallenged)
    – Overall Feeling – shortchanged (Singaporeans choice denied), cheapened (Malay community’s integrity), sold-out (leadership of yes-man)

    May we draw some wisdom for the sake of our country’s future.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas

  • Commentary: Why Only Protest Against An EP Reserved For Malays? It Involves Only One Job Opportunity..

    Commentary: Why Only Protest Against An EP Reserved For Malays? It Involves Only One Job Opportunity..

    SENSITIVE! BUT I AM SAYING IT AS A MATTER OF FACT:
    Some people are organising a protest against Reserved Presidential Election tomorrow @Hong Lim Park. They claim it is for fairness & an open system. This year’s EP was RESERVED FOR THE MALAYS.
    They can do as they wished. I only wish to ask the organiser/s & supporters:
    (i) Did you protest when the Government build SAP schools RESERVED FOR THE CHINESE?
    (ii) Did you protest when Malay-Muslims were not recruited to serve the military [NS or full-time]? Thus well-paying jobs in our armed services were RESERVED FOR NON-MALAYS / NON-MUSLIMS.
    Why you only protest against an EP RESERVED FOR THE MALAYS? It involves only ONE JOB OPPORTUNITY & ONCE AFTER 47 YEARS!
    And you do it for fairness & an open system? Come on! Let’s not lose our ability to give & take in some cases. I thought we are used to it. All for the sake of national unity.

     

    Source: Maidin Packer

  • Damanhuri Abas: Pemimpin-Pemimpin Melayu PAP Diam Sepi Membisu, Membolehkan Pemerintah Terus Menerus Lakukan Diskriminasi

    Damanhuri Abas: Pemimpin-Pemimpin Melayu PAP Diam Sepi Membisu, Membolehkan Pemerintah Terus Menerus Lakukan Diskriminasi

    Siakap senohong gelama ikan duri.
    Bercakap bohong lama-lama mencuri.

    Peribahasa yg penuh hikmah diketepikan bangsa sendiri demi menegakkan benang yg basah.

    1. Jangan sekali-sekali menipu kerana ia akan menjadi tabiat buruk yg membinasakan.

    2. Pemimpin Melayu PAP dulu sekarang dan selama-lamanya kini kelihatan berani menggunakan kononnya pegangan mereka kepada keadilan dan anti-perkauman dalam menyoalkan rakyat yg ingin menggunakan hak mereka bersuara dan menentang penipuan. Rakyat marah terhadap cara. Agama kita murni dan mendidik niat tidak boleh menghalalkan cara. Kenapa kita rela menggadaikan nilai kita hanya demi kepentingan puak kita. Kerana pulut santan binasa, sebab mulut badan binasa.

    3. Di mana pula pemimpin-pemimpin ini, apabila pemerintahlah yg sebenarnya bertanggungjawab terhadap semua perkara yg mereka menuduh pihak lain lakukan. Kenapa mereka diam sepi membisu sahaja selama 52 tahun. Padahal pada waktu itu sesiapa yg bersuara menentang perkauman dituduh anasir oleh mereka sendiri yang kononnya akan menjejas keharmonian kaum.

    4. Mereka jugalah pemimpin Melayu yg telah membolehkan pemerintah terus menerus lakukan diskriminasi sewenangnya terhadap anak-anak muda melayu kita dalam perkhidmatan negara dengan segala alasan kepentingan dan maslahat lebih besar yang masih terus berlaku. Kenapa kesetian bangsa kita dipersoalkan tidak mereka tentang dan berani membela. Malahan merekalah yg paling di hadapan mencari alasan untuk Tuan mereka walaupun mereka bersikap dan bersifat perkauman.

    4. Sungguh Allah Maha Mengetahui, dolak dalik serta percobaan untuk mengelirukan rakyat akan menempelak ke muka mereka sendiri akhirnya.

    Budaya bangsa memberi peringatan agar jangan mudah terpedaya dengan kata-kata dan slogan manis. Lihat pada sejarah untuk mengenal musuh kesatuan kaum melalui tindakan dan apa yang mereka telah dan masih lakukan. Memang benar peribahasa melayu, indah kabar dari rupa.

     

     

    Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas

  • Certis Cisco Guard Fires Shot At Changi Airport In An Accidental Discharged Accident This Morning

    Certis Cisco Guard Fires Shot At Changi Airport In An Accidental Discharged Accident This Morning

    A Certis Cisco security guard fired his gun at Changi Airport early on Friday morning (Sep 15).

    The shot was fired in a restricted staff-only area, and there were no injuries, a spokesperson for the security firm confirmed.

    Certis Cisco added that it has launched an investigation into the incident.

    Channel NewsAsia understands that the firearm was accidentally discharged.

     

    Source: http://www.channelnewsasia.com