Category: Singapuraku

  • Egotistic Former Bank Employee Would Rather Eat Instant Noodles Than Let Go Of His BMW

    Egotistic Former Bank Employee Would Rather Eat Instant Noodles Than Let Go Of His BMW

    We’ve often received stories about people (or friends of people) that sank into a snowball of debts after overbuying with their credit cards or their payslips. However, this single story stood out, because he isn’t bankrupt, and he looked perfectly successful in front of others, but deep inside him, he’s struggling just because of a car.

    Johnny (may or may not be his real name) worked in a local bank when he graduated from university, and admitted that he had a few job offers even before he graduated. His starting pay was relatively high: at more than $4,500, he earned more than his peers and was set for a debt-free life.

    In the first few months of his work, he had some sort of “culture shock”: when he was schooling, he gave private tuition and was earning about $600 a month. All of a sudden, that ballooned to $3,600 (after his CPF deduction)—that’s way too much for him to handle all of a sudden!

    He applied for almost all the credit cards that promoters in MRT stations offered to him—one by one, he received tens of credit cards and was feeling “rich” from the credit limit given to him. In fact, he thought he had become “$100,000 richer” simply because everyone was so willing to loan him money.

    But the trouble didn’t start from those plastic cards. It started when he decided to buy a car.

    During that time, it was still possible to buy a car with $0—all they needed was his payslip and ta-da: he could walk away with a brand new car, having only to fulfil the monthly instalment. But here’s the thing: the monthly instalment must be fulfilled, because failing which, he would lose a reasonable amount of money.

    Johnny got a BMW (he didn’t specify which model) and paid $1,000++ every month for the monthly instalment. All was good (not very, but to him, it was)—with him earning $3,600, he could still survive on a $1,000++ monthly expenses.

    But a few years later, he lost his job.

    We’re not sure whether he was retrenched or fired, but even when he lost his job, he couldn’t let go of his car. He claimed that the monthly instalment must still be fulfilled, or he’ll lose “tens of thousands of dollars”.

    The first thing he did was to find a job—fast. He got one as an executive in a financial institution, but the take-home pay of about $2,000 was just enough to pay for his instalment, petrol and maintenance.

    Then he admitted something: he could have let go of his car and pay his debts slowly. But he didn’t want to—because his friends, family members and everyone around him knew him as the successful banker who drove a BMW. He would rather eat instant noodles and bread than to lose his only status symbol that was “keeping him alive”.

    It has been a few years now, and with him drawing only $2,000++ and paying $2,000 for his car monthly, his concern now is what would happen next year (2017), when the COE of his car expires. He won’t have enough to renew the COE or buy a new car.

    Well, when he posed the question in his email, he replied to it himself: “What were I thinking?’

    Seriously…Johnny, all we can say is that you’re not alone, and thank you for sharing your story, because it really showed us that the latest policies about car ownership have helped people and not harm others.

    After all, the moral of the story is simple: don’t buy a big hat if you’ve got a small head.

     

    Source: www.goodyfeed.com

  • Singapore – More Pleasant Than Hong Kong?

    Singapore – More Pleasant Than Hong Kong?

    Whoever thinks Hong Kong is a cool place should take a look at Singapore because it is a mini paradise and an efficient one at that.

    Yes, the heat is unbearable, which is odd when you think of Christmas in Hong Kong, but it didn’t ruin our family holiday. We were happy. No sweat.

    But it seems nothing is “free” in Singapore. I mean free speech, for instance, is not really free.

    There are too many rules but compared with Hong Kong in general, Singapore stacks up rather well.

    It’s also smart.

    Catching an air-conditioned double decker is a pleasant experience which is multiplied when you see a digital display of how many seats are available in the upper deck.

    Driving in Orchard Road, you’re struck by digital signages that show the number of available parking spaces in major malls.

    These conveniences are just some of the little things you’ll fall in love with.

    I know some Hong Kong startups that are planning to develop an app that shows this kind parking data but they’re being hampered by difficulties including a lack of a proper business model.

    In Singapore, these apps are free.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if Singapore, already a popular stop in the Formula One circuit, will be the cradle of the driverless car.

    I’m sure the Ferrari and Lamborghini drivers I happened to bump into at the South Beach Hotel would have no objections.

    Big data works best in a small city.

    Look at how well Singapore organised itself to farewell its founder, Lee Kuan Yew, when he died in March.

    Lee left behind a proud nation which is often compared with Hong Kong, with its can-do spirit, but often comes out on top.

    Singapore taxi drivers, unlike many of their Hong Kong peers, have so much positive energy to share about their city.

    One of them asked us if we had seen a beggar.

    No, we said, why? Because the government knows when people are unemployed, he said.

    The government helps them find shelter and a job that pays S$800 (HK$4,385) a month.

    Singaporeans can use their pension fund to pay for a public housing flat, which in general is about twice the size of a Hong Kong apartment.

    If you’re curious if mainlanders cause any trouble there, the short answer is no, according to two drivers we spoke to.

    We haven’t seen any obscene things either in the five times we have spent a holiday there.

    Yes, Singapore is a small, smart and super.

     

    Source: www.ejinsight.com

  • Employee Of Gadget Terminal At Sim Lim Square Jailed 28 Weeks For Cheating

    Employee Of Gadget Terminal At Sim Lim Square Jailed 28 Weeks For Cheating

    A former employee of the now-defunct Sim Lim Square electronics shop Gadget Terminal was sentenced to 28 weeks’ jail on Tuesday (Jan 5) for cheating two customers in September and October 2014.

    Justin Chew Chee Kin, 36, admitted to conspiring with the boss of Gadget Terminal, Gavin Chung Choon Cheik, 33, to cheat the shop’s customers. Chew was employed as a sales executive and earned S$1,800 a month, plus a commission on profits made by Gadget Terminal.

    Chung Choong Cheik, former general manager at Gadget Terminal. (Photo: Ngau Kai Yan) 

    Chew worked under Chung’s instructions to offer mobile devices to customers at an attractive price, before confronting them with various sales tactics after the customer made payment.

    On Sep 30, 2014, customer service officer Zhang Zhengqiang called the police after Chew demanded an additional S$480, on top of the S$300 that Chew had already collected from Mr Zhang for an iPhone 4S. When Mr Zhang refused to hand over more money, Chew threatened to complain to Mr Zhang’s employer. Despite the police’s involvement, Chew returned Mr Zhang just S$12, citing a “cancellation fee”.

    Chew cheated a second victim, student Gao Erxu, about one month later on Oct 20, 2014. Mr Gao’s girlfriend called the police after the couple paid Chew with a S$1,000 note and he refused to return them S$620 in change. Again, despite the police’s involvement, Mr Gao lost S$215 in “cancellation fees”.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhammad Faizal Nooraznan pointed to the vulnerability of the two victims as an aggravating factor in the case. Both Mr Zhang and Mr Gao are Chinese nationals, and Mr Zhang has “limited English proficiency”, the court heard. The victims were “exploited and cheated” and Chew “unmoved by police presence”, said the DPP.

    As Chew presented the matter to police as a “contractual dispute”, it was difficult for police to know that any illegality was involved, the DPP said.

    DPP Muhammad Faizal cited the prevalence of this kind of offences in recent times as well. Over the past three years, the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) received 2,000 complaints against retailers in Sim Lim Square, Lucky Plaza and People’s Park Centre.

    The DPP also referred to past cases of cheating salesmen at Sim Lim Square. Jover Chew, the former boss of the now-defunct Mobile Air, and four employees were sentenced to jail last year for employing a similar modus operandi to cheat several customers of thousands of dollars.

    Chung and three other former salesmen have also been charged with cheating offences. Their cases are still before the courts.

    For each charge of cheating, Chew could have faced up to 10 years’ jail and a fine.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • 47 Year Old Man Arrested For Making False Bomb Threat At Golden Mile Tower

    47 Year Old Man Arrested For Making False Bomb Threat At Golden Mile Tower

    A 47-year-old man was arrested yesterday for allegedly making a false bomb threat at Golden Mile Tower.

    In the prank call made on Monday night, he had claimed that a friend who was about to travel to Kuala Lumpur by bus was a “terrorist with a bomb in his luggage”, Lianhe Wanbao reported.

    His friend – a businessman, 47, who declined to give his name – said he received the call as he was about to board the bus from Golden Mile Tower.

    The suspect told him he wanted to buy a bus ticket as well and asked him to hand the phone over to the ticket staff of the tour bus company.

    Over the phone, the man allegedly told the staff member to “be careful” as his friend was a “terrorist from Dubai” who had a “bomb in his luggage”.

    The 40-year-old employee later told a colleague to stop the businessman from boarding and called the police in secret.

    The businessman said he was confused as the staff refused to tell him why he could not board. He also said he suspected his friend was envious because he was going to Kuala Lumpur.

    Police said they received a call at 9.59pm on Monday requesting assistance at 6001 Beach Road because of a bomb threat.

    Officers arrived 10 minutes later, but found no bomb in the luggage.

    The suspect was taken into custody yesterday morning under a breach of Prohibition Against False Threats Of Terrorist Acts.

    If convicted, he faces a jail term of up to five years, and/or a fine not exceeding $100,000.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • LTA Amends Tamil Names Of Four Downtown Line Stations

    LTA Amends Tamil Names Of Four Downtown Line Stations

    The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has amended the Tamil names of four more Downtown Line stations after it was discovered that one of them was wrong, The Straits Times has learnt.

    Changes have been made to the translations for Promenade, Downtown, Telok Ayer and Cashew for “better clarity and more accurate pronunciations”, an LTA spokesman said.

    The station signs were changed before the second stage of the Downtown Line, the DTL2, opened on Dec 27.

    Cashew is a new station on the DTL2, while Promenade, Downtown and Telok Ayer opened three years ago as part of the Downtown Line 1.

    During the open house for the DTL2 on Dec 5, a commuter noticed that one of the 12 new stations, Tan Kah Kee, had an inaccurate Tamil translation as “paan kah kee”.

    The LTA apologised for the error and has since rectified it.

    Following the incident, the LTA said it reviewed the Tamil names for all Downtown Line stations.

    Asked about the four new names, Dr A Ra Sivakumaran, a language specialist, said: “The enunciation is clearer and sounds more like how it is pronounced in English.”

    For example, the previous Tamil name for Promenade was pronounced as “pro-ma-net”, but the new one reads better as “pro-ma- nat”, said Dr Sivakumaran.

    The original Tamil name for Downtown was “down-tavun” but the new one is “down-town”.

    Mr J S Sasikumar, a member of the National University of Singapore’s Tamil Language Society, said the old name Telok Ayer sounds like “teh-luk-aayaer”, but is more accurate as “teh-luk-aayer”.

    “They sound more natural. In the Tamil language, a change in a single letter can alter the sounding of the entire word drastically,” said the 23-year-old undergraduate. “So it’s essential that the Tamil letters are selected carefully, as they’ve done so here.”

    Dr K Shanmugam, head of the Tamil Programme at SIM University, said that because many names of MRT stations are proper nouns, there is no way one can translate the literal meaning. He added: “The name would have to be translated using transliteration, which is something like writing the words phonetically in another language.”

    Commuter Shervani Nair, 32, an education trainer, said the new names sound phonetically closer to the English ones.

    “For example, Cashew in the old sign had been translated as ‘kay-shee-you’, but in the new sign it is translated as ‘kay-sh-u’, which is much closer,” she said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

     

deneme bonusu