Category: Singapuraku

  • Beraya Solo Dengan Air Mata Syawal

    Beraya Solo Dengan Air Mata Syawal

    Lampu lap-lip di luar rumah Encik Rafi Hassan berkerdipan indah di malam hari, menyambut Lebaran yang bakal menjelang tidak lama lagi. Beberapa botol kuih Raya sudah pun tersaji.

    Bagaimanapun, setiap kali suara takbir bergema, sebak terasa di dadanya mengenangkan ibu bapa dan nenek yang sudah tiada.

    Anak tunggal dan bujang berusia 42 tahun itu sudah biasa hidup menyendiri. Yang dianggap teman penawar duka di rumah tiga biliknya di Tampines Street 41 ialah tiga kucing yang cukup manja lagi jinak, menyambut kedatangan penulis. Flat itu sudah dimilikinya sejak beliau berusia 29 tahun lagi.

    Namun, di ambang 1 Syawal, Encik Rafi, seorang penyelia di syarikat pelancongan, menanti peluang keemasan beraya di kampung ibu saudaranya di Senggarang, Batu Pahat. Sudah lama desa yang sudah dilengkapi dengan kemudahan tandas itu tidak dikunjunginya.

    Sebagaimana ceritanya dalam pertemuan lebih sejam baru-baru ini:

    “Mak cik saya selalu prihatin dan bertanya, ‘Rafi, kau beraya di mana?’ Saya pun terfikir seronok betul kalau saya balik kampung dan rasakan semangat gotong-royong di malam Raya! Lagipun di sana masih ada botol oren dan Sarsi macam zaman saya kanak-kanak dulu.

    “Saya akan tolong mengemas rumah, potong bahan memasak lauk-pauk Lebaran. Maklumlah saya ni suka memasak dan tak kekok di dapur. Cuma menganyam ketupat sahaja saya tak boleh diharap! Nak bakar kuih pun tak ada kesabaran. Pernah cuba bakar kuih tart, tapi semuanya ranap dan hangus!”

    Encik Rafi kehilangan ibunya yang bisu, Cik Aisa Bee Ismail, sewaktu usianya semuda 18 tahun. Ibunya, yang cekal dan bersemangat waja, menghidap tekanan darah tinggi dan meninggal dunia pada usia 47 tahun.

    Bapanya, Encik Hassan Bakar, yang menetap di rumah jagaan warga senja dan pesakit kronik pula pergi menyahut seruan Ilahi pada usia 64 tahun sekitar tiga tahun lalu.

    SUARA TAKBIR

    “Saya memang rindukan mak dan menitis air mata apabila mengenangkannya yang sudah lebih 20 tahun tiada. Ingat lagi saya tatkala ada mak cik panggil mak ‘si pekak’ di sekolah saya dulu. Saya mengamuk tak terima, bahkan sempat tarik baju mak cik tu, marah kerana mak saya dipersenda.

    “Kadang macam berat nak dengar suara takbir sebab pastinya kenangan bersama mak muncul di ruang minda. Sewaktu arwah ayah ada, sekurang-kurangnya saya terhibur juga walaupun beliau dirawat di rumah jagaan. Dapat bawa dia bersiar-siar pada Hari Raya pertama.

    “Terus terang saya katakan, hilang mood nak beraya selepas kehilangan kededuanya dan nenek saya. Tapi apabila difikirkan kembali saya tak harus biarkan kesedihan saya berterusan. Saya masih ada mak cik dan saudara-mara lain khususnya yang lebih tua untuk dikunjungi.

    “Kadangkala teman-teman pun undang saya ke rumah mereka. Cuma saya akui timbul sekelumit kesedihan apabila melihat orang lain beraya bersama isteri dan anak-anak mereka. Tapi, apabila fikirkan betapa saya sudah biasa hidup bersendiri dan bebas membuat pilihan baju, perhiasan rumah dan kuih-muih tanpa merujuk pada orang lain, kelegaan timbul serta-merta,” ceritanya.

    Ditanya tidakkah saudara-maranya mendesak agar beliau segera menamatkan zaman bujang, Encik Rafi, yang juga terlibat dalam bidang peragaan pakaian pengantin, bahkan pernah menyertai peraduan Senior Manhunt, menambah secara berseloroh:

    “Saya tak berkecil hati dengan soalan mak cik saya yang prihatin. Malahan, saya selalu bergurau dengan mereka. Saya kata, ‘Tak ada anak dara yang sanggup menikahi saya sebab mereka tak mampu sediakan hantaran $50,000 serba satu!’

    “Kalau sampai masanya, mak cik tinggal datang saja ke majlis ringkas saya di Pejabat Pendaftaran Pernikahan. Bakal isteri saya pun tak perlu susah payah. Tinggal bawa beg pakaian dan menetap di sini. Dah tak ada mak mentua garang pun yang akan mengawasi mereka sebab saya ni anak yatim.”

    Lawak jenaka menjadi penawar dukanya. Masanya sering disibukkan dengan tugas serta menyertai peraduan memperaga pakaian. Beliau juga pernah menerima tawaran mengacara di beberapa majlis rasmi dan berharap dapat mengendalikan bengkel etika keyakinan diri buat anak Melayu suatu hari nanti.

    Bagaimanapun, di sebalik senda guraunya itu, ada perkara bermain di fikirannya. Katanya mengakhiri perbualan kami:

    “Harapan saya pada Syawal nanti, dapatlah saya menikmati kemeriahan beraya di kampung dalam suasana yang berbeza daripada sambutan di Singapura.

    “Jerih payah saya berdikari dari usia muda menjadikan saya lebih cekal dan yakin meneruskan kehidupan saya tanpa mengira apa tanggapan orang terhadap diri saya atau status saya. Tak semestinya kita hidup membujang hidup kita kurang bahagia. Ada juga teman yang berumah tangga tapi tidak sehati sejiwa dengan pasangan mereka, lantas menjejas keceriaan beraya.

    “Saya belajar erti kerja keras dari bawah. Saya juga hargai erti persahabatan dan membantu orang mana yang termampu. Sungguhpun begitu, saya mengharapkan yang terbaik agar kesihatan saya terpelihara kerana baru-baru ini, doktor khuatir saya ada masalah jantung tersumbat apabila terasa mengah semacam. Tak pasti adakah saya perlu jalani pembedahan.”

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Aide Iskandar: Internal Clashes Contributed To SEA Games Failure

    Aide Iskandar: Internal Clashes Contributed To SEA Games Failure

    It was a resignation which raised more questions than it answered about Singapore’s dismal SEA Games campaign, one which ended in a disappointing group-stage exit and without an expected medal.

    But after staying silent for a month following his shock resignation as coach of the ill-fated national Under-23 football team, former national skipper Aide Iskandar has decided to speak out on a national project that, he said, conceded too many “own goals” within the Football Association of Singapore (FAS).

    “At times it felt like we were battling each other instead of the opposition,” said the 40-year-old of the challenges he faced at the FAS, in his first comments since stepping down immediately after his side’s final group match against Indonesia on June 11.

    In an exclusive interview with The Straits Times, Aide made it clear that he was more than prepared to take the SEA Games fallout solely on his shoulders. But after weeks of soul searching, in which he replayed the events of the past two years in his mind, the former defender has decided to speak out for the sake of the sport.

    He said: “The resignation was my way of taking responsibility for what happened. I was the coach and the buck stops with me. I wanted to protect the team, especially the players, who are still young.

    “But I asked myself, ‘In the end, how is Singapore football benefiting from this episode?’ What happened at the SEA Games would be an even bigger disappointment if we didn’t learn from it and avoid making the same mistakes .

    “Yes, I could have done things better as a coach. But ultimately, my job was also made unnecessarily challenging.”

    “Challenging” was the word he used to describe his tenure as coach when he resigned. It was also the term sports administrators picked up on, as they sought to meet the former coach in the last few weeks to find out just what went wrong.

    For Aide, the “challenges” all arose from the FAS – especially the national teams’ department under head coach Bernd Stange – not being clear about what its key objective for the year was.

    On the one hand, the FAS had announced that the SEA Games would take top priority this year. Yet, at times, it was as if it was merely paying lip service to the idea.

    Initial plans to keep the SEA Games team together for the year went awry when key players Sahil Suhaimi and Faris Ramli were allowed to join the LionsXII in the Malaysia Super League instead of staying as part of Aide’s Courts Young Lions team, who play in the S-League.

    Then came a series of puzzling moves from within the national teams’ department.

    For one thing, fitness coaches were switched late last year, even though the U-23 team were progressing well under Aleksandar Bozenko.

    Bozenko had worked with the team and Aide when they won a SEA Games bronze in 2013 and narrowly missed out on making the next round at last year’s Incheon Asian Games. In South Korea, the team held their own against stronger sides, losing narrowly to Tajikistan and drawing against Oman before beating Palestine, the first win by a Singapore team at the Asian Games since 1990.

    But Aide was instructed to take on German Juergen Raab as his new fitness coach, a move he never signed off on and one which he strongly objected to. Raab, who joined the FAS last October, had previously worked with Stange in Germany.

    Aide was told that Raab had to be assigned to the SEA Games team because funding had been sought from Sport Singapore for him to work specifically with the team.

    Said Aide: “Even when I pointed out how the team did not seem to be responding to Raab and his methods, which resulted in declining fitness levels, I was still asked to keep him on.”

    It was not until April that Aide managed to push the FAS into bringing in former international Kadir Yahaya to help oversee the players’ fitness. Yet, with only two months to go to the Games, there was only so much that could be done.

    It resulted in the team banking on a long-ball game during the SEA Games, a move for which Aide came under heavy criticism.

    Explaining the decision, he said: “The coaches (Kadir and S. Subramani) and I decided that we did not have the fitness levels to play a possession-based game. It would have left us prone to the counter-attack and we would not be able to recover in time.”

    Coaching changes also hampered the team’s preparations just before the tournament. U-23 goalkeeper coach John Burridge asked to be reassigned to the senior team just weeks before the SEA Games. It forced Aide to scramble for a replacement, but more importantly, the change affected his players’ confidence.

    Said Aide: “First-choice goalkeeper Syazwan Buhari actually came up to me and asked, ‘What did I do wrong that John wanted to leave?’”

    Added Syazwan: “John’s departure affected my confidence because it was quite abrupt. When he left, the way we trained changed and it was too late and sudden to adapt to the new training style.”

    Syazwan had a decent Games but made two mistakes in their second match that resulted in both Myanmar goals in the 1-2 loss on June 4.

    Team confidence also took another blow just days before the Games when attacker Iqbal Hussain was dropped from the squad for disciplinary reasons, only to be promoted to the senior squad by Stange for the Lions’ World Cup qualifiers.

    The move infuriated the Young Lions, who felt the German was undermining Aide and creating unnecessary drama at a crucial time. The reserve players on the SEA Games team were also unsettled, wondering if perhaps it would have been better for them to have been excluded from Aide’s team so they could also feature in the senior side.

    Said Aide: “This was the most puzzling move. I told coach Bernd and the management and we decided that it would not have been wise to call up Iqbal given the circumstances. Yet he was called up.”

    The three-time Asean Football Confederation Cup winning defender, capped 121 times by the nation, acknowledged that eyebrows will be raised over his decision to speak up about the torrid campaign.

    Sources acknowledged that there was also a falling out between Stange and Aide, the German’s former assistant. It got to a point where the FAS’ senior management had to step in to prevent the German from upsetting the SEA Games team’s preparation. At times, Aide was more involved in meetings to resolve disputes than coaching.

    When asked about the alleged breakdown in the relationship, Aide declined comment but said he had submitted a report to the FAS about the SEA Games failure.

    “Don’t get me wrong, I am grateful for the opportunity and the resources the team got in terms of training trips to Japan and Turkey,” said Aide of the reported $3.5 million which had been invested in the team to help them at least reach the SEA Games final.

    “But I feel it does not serve Singapore football best if I don’t raise all that went wrong at the SEA Games. This is why I hope lessons can be learnt from the SEA Games disappointment. Many of the problems my team faced could have been avoided.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Ngiam Tong Dow: Civil Servants Must Understand Ground Before Making Policies

    Ngiam Tong Dow: Civil Servants Must Understand Ground Before Making Policies

    Young civil servants should first walk the ground and understand the problems before they formulate policies, said former top mandarin Ngiam Tong Dow at the DBS Asian Insights Conference today (July 10).

    Mr Ngiam, who had served 40 years as Permanent Secretary in various ministries, was one of the panellists discussing the topic, How Can Singapore Future-proof its Relevance for the Next 50 Years.

    Responding to a question from the audience on whether high salaries in the civil service are diverting talent and growth away from the private sector, he said that civil servants are worthy of their salaries but the way they are trained is important.

    “When a young scholar comes back, he should not be sent to the Ministry of Finance’s Treasury division and become the regulator. He should really be sent to the Economic Development Board (EDB), or the Housing and Development Board, and serve an internship of a year to learn the problems of the ground,” said Mr Ngiam, who is an adjunct professor at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy.

    “Unless the civil servant knows the problems on the ground, he would become just a regulator. And regulators, there are too many (of them) in Singapore,” he added, prompting applause from the audience of about 900 Government, business and thought leaders.

    Weighing in on the question, Banyan Tree Holdings executive chairman Ho Kwon Ping said that while tweaks to the public sector’s pay structure may have to be considered along the way, it is better to “err on the side of overpaying”.

    “It is better to tweak and reform the system from where we are today than to have a system where civil servants are all forced to be corrupt because they are so underpaid,” he said.

    However, he noted the danger that this approach poses to the private sector. “(Companies) either have to keep up with the salaries, which are high, or you have an overbalance, or perhaps a hollowing out of the best and brightest in Singapore all going to the public sector. That may not be good for Singapore in the long run,” he said.

    Mr Ngiam added that well-educated Singaporeans should be spread across various segments of society and not concentrated in the public sector. “If you just keep them within the Government, in the long run, (they) become an elite, become fossilised,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Mohd Khair: Pinkdot Agendas Undermine Familial And Social Fabric Of Singapore

    Mohd Khair: Pinkdot Agendas Undermine Familial And Social Fabric Of Singapore

    Talking about intolerance, we Singaporeans have been a very tolerant society.

    When a Muslim goes to a non-halal eatery and ask for halal food but none could be served by the eatery, we don’t see Muslims in Singapore suing the owner of the eatery for any form of distress caused by the rejection of the request. In fact, there’s no distress whatsoever.

    Likewise, when a non-Muslim goes to a halal eatery and ask for pork or liquor to be served, we don’t see non-Muslims in Singapore suing the Muslim owner of the eatery for any form of distress caused by the rejection of the request. And really there’s no distress at all.

    Why?

    Because we respect each other’s beliefs and value systems.

    Alcohol drinkers don’t go around suing Muslims just because the latter believe and say that drinking alcohol is wrong based on their religious belief.

    Likewise, we don’t find Muslims in Singapore suing others who say that polygamy is wrong. We don’t. We simply don’t find that in Singapore.

    Why?

    Because this is Singapore, and we are Singaporeans who are very tolerant to different beliefs so long as they do not tear down our basic familial and social fabric. But the moment anyone or any activism is going all out to undermine that familial and social fabric, we Singaporeans will stand up and unite together to defend it at all costs. Defending that familial and social fabric that have been the bedrock of Singapore’s development and progress all these years cannot be deemed as intolerance, cannot be defined as bigotry and cannot be accused of propagating hate speech.

    Instead, those labels should be directed at those who undermine that familial and social fabric that we Singaporeans cherish and protect.

    Why?

    Because they are the ones that are intolerant. Any form of disagreement will be immediately labelled as bigotry and accused of propagating hate. And that is happening now even with the 377A still around. It is not hard to imagine the kind of absolute intolerance we can face if 377A is abolished from the Penal Code.

    How come?

    Well, just look at what is happening right now in the US. Refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay marriage results in a legal suit. Refusing to solemnise gay marriages is now a crime. And yet lgbt activists here claim that legalising same-sex marriages will not affect anyone at all. It is instead absolutely clear from that legalising same-sex marriage will result in the absolute intolerance on the part of the lgbt activists. The slightest disagreement with them will result in lawsuits or even being charged in court for alleged crimes.

    So, to those lgbt activists and sympathisers, don’t go round saying that we are intolerant as a society in Singapore. Singaporeans have been and will continue to be tolerant so long as the familial and social fabric are not threatened. Once threatened, we will defend it. PERIOD.

    And Singaporeans are neither stupid nor illiterate. We know what the lgbt activism has done to other parts of the world once same-sex marriage is legalised.

    Same-sex marriage has become the demon that is out to destroy the institution of marriage and family in those countries. If ever 377A is abolished and same-sex marriage is legalised in Singapore, the same level of intolerance or more will also set foot. SSM will then be used to knock out anyone, any organisation, any religion and any law (including AMLA – Administration of Muslim Law Act) that is against same-sex marriage.

    So, don’t ever say that pinkdot is an innocent movement just for a group of lgbts and their supporters to celebrate diversity and the freedom to love. Pinkdot is a political movement that is intolerant of the familial and social values so dearly upheld by Singaporeans all these while. These are the very familial and social values that have seen us through the ups and downs of Singapore’s development and progress. Pinkdot wants us to abolish Section 377A and legalise same-sex marriage. And should that be allowed to happen, the pinkdot will transform itself into a demon that will be so intolerant to any form of disagreement to same-sex marriages and to its lifestyle choice of freedom to love anyone and anything at all.

    And by the way, Singaporeans have long been tolerant of lgbts living in our midst. They live, work and play together with all of us for as long as we can remember. The Government also acknowledges that they are in almost every sector of the economy, including the public sector and public service. And for the record too, no lgbts have been persecuted in Singapore by the Courts just because of them being lgbts. But the lgbt activism at the level we are seeing right now, especially in the form of pinkdot, is a recent phenomenon fuelled by external parties, and has now become brazen and emboldened with the recent US Supreme Court ruling. We Singaporeans have been a tolerant society all these while. The very existence of pinkdot now in our midst is testimony to that. But that does not negate our right to say that it is wrong and that we are against pinkdot in Singapore.

    And why are we against pinkdot in Singapore?

    Because pinkdot is pushing for the repeal of Section 377A and the legalisation of same-sex marriage. These two pinkdot agendas will undermine the very familial and social fabric that Singapore has been based on in its years of development and progress. And if we can sum up what PM Lee Hsien Loong has said in recent weeks, it would be this: The society in Singapore is deeply religious. The social sphere has developed taking into account the religious and ethnic beliefs of the multireligious and multiracial societies found in Singapore. So don’t push it.

     

    Mohd Khair

    Source: We Are Against Pink Dot

  • Berjimat! Beli Minuman Ringan Di Expo Raya

    Berjimat! Beli Minuman Ringan Di Expo Raya

    Pintu Expo Raya di Singapore Expo masih belum dibuka tetapi ramai yang telah mula berkumpul di luar untuk membeli minuman ringan.

    Promosi membeli minuman ringan itu menjimatkan pada harga $5.90 bagi satu karton.

    Seperti kata Cik Razidah Adeqah:

    “Biasanya di luar satu karton minuman $16.90. Itu sebab saya datang ke ekspo ini untuk berjimat sempena Hari Raya.”

    Beliau adalah antara pengunjung ke Expo Raya yang datang untuk membeli satu karton atau 12 botol besar 1.25 liter minuman berkabonat pada harga $5.90.

    Melalui promosi anjuran Berita Harian-Orange Coach Travel dan Orange Events Media itu, pengunjung mesti membeli senaskhah Berita Harian di gerai B28 di Dewan 4.

    Di dalam akhbar ini terdapat kupon pembelian. Kupon ini perlu dicop di kaunter BH bagi membolehkan anda membeli minuman tersebut.

    Pelbagai jenama minuman ringan ditawarkan. Bagi satu karton bersaiz 1.5 liter pula, ia dijual pada harga $9.90.

    Hanya akhbar yang dibeli di Expo Raya sah untuk promosi ini. Promosi ini akan diteruskan pada hari ini hingga lusa.

    Promosi ini dibuka mulai 10 pagi hingga 12 tengah malam.

    Dalam masa yang sama, gerai BH turut menawarkan pakej melanggani akhbar ini.

    Jika melanggan akhbar ini, pelanggan akan mendapat baucar $50 pasar raya NTUC FairPrice.

    Mereka yang melanggan juga layak melakukan cabutan bertuah yang pasti akan menang.

    Anda boleh membawa pulang alat pengecas telefon bijak ‘powerbank’, pemacu pena USB, alat pemasak magic cooker, Samsung Galaxy Tab serta Samsung Google Nexus 10.

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

deneme bonusu