Category: Sosial

  • REACH Cancels Public Forum, Wrongly Informs That Dr Tan Cheng Bock Did Not Register

    REACH Cancels Public Forum, Wrongly Informs That Dr Tan Cheng Bock Did Not Register

    Government agency, REACH, was to organise an public forum on the Presidential Election. Presidential hopeful, Dr Tan Cheng Bock, successfully registered to participate in the forum.

    I was looking forward to attending a REACH public forum on the Presidential Election set for today. Minister Shanmugam was due to speak and I wanted to hear what he had to say. I registered my attendance last week and was happy to receive a confirmation for my attendance. I was planning to attend with a few friends and family.

    So Dr Tan was understandably disappointed when the forum was eventually cancelled. REACH explained that the cancellation was due to poor response. The agency also indicated that there was no registration under the name of Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

    reach-explanation

    But why would someone of Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s stature lie online about registering for the event?

    Turns out, he Dr Tan wasn’t. He had in fact registered under the alias ‘Adrian Tan’, which is recorded in his NRIC. He also provided all his personal details during the registration.

    In response to REACH that I did not register?

    I did register under my alias Adrian Tan which is in my NRIC, the registration also asked for my NRIC number, mobile, address, and occupation which I supplied. My acceptance letter is attached, as well as my alias in my NRIC.

    reach-confirmation

    So what really was the reason for the cancellation of the forum? Your guess is as good as mine.

     

    Dr Who

    [Reader Contribution]

  • Sembawang Hostage Situation Was Over A Lovers’ Tiff

    Sembawang Hostage Situation Was Over A Lovers’ Tiff

    It started as a lovers’ tiff and escalated into a 17-hour stand-off with the police after a man locked himself in a Sembawang flat with his girlfriend’s two-year-old son on Tuesday evening.

    The stand-off ended at around noon yesterday when the police stormed into the fifth-storey unit and apprehended the 39-year-old man. The boy was rescued unharmed.

    The man was arrested for wrongful confinement, possession of a scheduled weapon and drug-related offences.

    His girlfriend, a widow in her 30s with four young children, was also arrested at the scene for drug-related offences.

    The 17-hour stand-off is believed to be one of the longest in which the police’s Crisis Negotiation Unit (CNU) has been involved.

    This is how the drama unfolded:

    THE SPARK

    After the couple moved into the one-room rental flat about a year ago, neighbours often heard them quarrelling, mostly over money and his accusations of her infidelity. (See report, far right.)

    She, on the other hand, was upset over his possessiveness and attempts to control her every move.

    On Tuesday afternoon, he asked her to run an errand, and she left her two-year-old son alone at home with him.

    She took the opportunity to complain to her mother about her problems with him.

    Mother and daughter returned to the flat at Block 462, Sembawang Drive, where the mother confronted the man.

    They had a tearful and furious argument, which sparked the situation that turned into the 17-hour stand-off.

    The man refused to open the door and challenged them to call the police.

    A 36-year-old housewife told The New Paper that her 57-year-old mother, who lives a few doors away from the couple, witnessed the incident.

    The woman, who wanted to be known only as Ms Rosli, said: “My mum heard a row between the man and the two women at about 5pm. The women were outside the flat, and he was shouting at them to go away.

    “My mother heard one of the women shouting at the man to let the boy go because ‘he’s not yours’.”

    THE PHONE CALL

    Mr Iskandar Mariano, 32, an event coordinator who lives down the corridor, heard the couple quarrelling and a child screaming at around 5pm.

    A woman, whom he recognised as the widow, came over, looking distressed, and asked to use his home phone.

    “She looked like she was under a lot of pressure and in need of help,” he told TNP.

    “She looked blank and confused, as if she was in a dilemma about who to call. She even forgot the number she wanted to call.”

    Not wanting to intrude, Mr Iskandar walked away and did not overhear her phone conversation.

    “Afterwards, she went back to (stand outside) her unit, and continued to quarrel with the man.”

    The police received a call about the incident at 6.44pm.

    When officers from Ang Mo Kio Police Division arrived, the man refused to open the metal gate to let them in.

    Mr Iskandar said: “I heard the man was taking drugs with the door open when the police arrived.”

    THE STAND-OFF

    The CNU was activated to negotiate the safe release of the boy, and the Special Operations Command (SOC) team was deployed in case there was a need for forced entry.

    TNP observed the man, dressed in a white shirt, pacing around the flat as the night went on.

    He appeared calm and was not armed.

    Several SOC officers were seen standing outside the flat at about 10pm as the negotiations continued.

    The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) sent a fire engine, a Red Rhino, two fire bikes, an ambulance and three support vehicles.

    As a precaution, a safety life air pack was deployed at the foot of the block and the Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team was on standby.

    TNP understands that more than 100 officers from SCDF and the police were deployed.

    At 4.15am, the man appeared at the gate and spoke to negotiators for about five minutes.

    The child was unharmed and had access to food and water while he was confined in the flat, said Dr Lim Wee Kiak, the MP for Sembawang, yesterday morning.

    Around noon yesterday, the police saw an opportunity to take action.

    THE RESCUE

    SOC officers broke into the flat through the windows to rescue the boy, while the front gate was cut for other officers to enter and arrest the man, said the police in a statement yesterday.

    During the operation, the sound of breaking glass could be heard and sparks could be seen as the gate’s lock was cut.

    The man was taken out in handcuffs, with a blanket draped over his shoulders, and put inside a police car.

    The boy was later assessed by para­medics, but was not taken to hospital.

    He was physically unharmed throughout the operation, and the police are working with the Ministry of Social and Family Development on his well-being.

    Police investigations are ongoing.

    Assistant Commissioner of Police Lian Ghim Hua, who was in charge of the operation, said: “It was a challenging operation as the safety of a two-year-old child was involved, and the negotiations were also protracted, running to some 17 hours.

    “Securing the safe release of the child was my top priority. I am glad the operation turned out well with the child safely secured through a coordinated operation involving officers from various police units and SCDF.”

    THE AFTERMATH

    The media were later allowed to gather outside the unit where the hostage situation took place.

    The metal gate was burned where the police had cut through the lock, and there was debris on the floor. Glass shards from shattered window panels were scattered all over the corridor. The one-room flat was furnished simply with a queen size bed, television and fan.

    Five of the woman’s relatives were seen entering the flat. They declined to speak to the media.

    A resident on the sixth storey, who wanted to be known only as Madam Aliyah, 55, said she felt relieved.

    “I couldn’t sleep the whole night, I even called my boss to tell him I couldn’t come to work today,” she said.

    “I was praying for the boy the whole night. I was so relieved when they rescued him.”


    Neighbours: Couple frequently argued

    The couple moved into a one-room rental flat on the fifth storey of Block 462, Sembawang Drive, about a year ago.

    The woman is a widow with four young children. The 2-year-old boy in the centre of the drama is her youngest.

    Her other children were with their grandmother in Woodlands when the incident happened, said Sembawang GRC MP Lim Wee Kiak.

    Neighbours in the rental block said they often overheard the couple arguing over money and infidelity.

    The quarrels got violent sometimes, with the neighbours hearing glass breaking, doors slamming and furniture being dragged around.

    A neighbour, who lives on the third storey and wanted to be known only as Ms Ana, said she saw the couple arguing at the void deck two weeks ago.

    “They quarrel every day, sometimes into the wee hours. I often hear the baby crying and the television turned on loudly,” she said.

    POLICE

    Ms Ana, 38, who is self-employed, added that the police were called to the unit after one argument two months ago.

    Another neighbour, Madam Masdia Gea, 33, who lives on the same floor, said: “I told my children to ignore their quarrelling.

    “They always slam the doors, and they have been fighting ever since they moved in a year ago.”

    But the housewife added that the couple were friendly, and did not cause any trouble to their neighbours.

    “They would usually just say ‘hi’ and ‘bye’ and smile when we meet in the corridor,” she said.

     

    Source: The New Paper

  • Polis Siasat Video Seks Libatkan Lelaki Berpakaian Seragam SCDF

    Polis Siasat Video Seks Libatkan Lelaki Berpakaian Seragam SCDF

    Polis sedang menyiasat satu rakaman video yang menunjukkan dua orang yang didakwa melakukan hubungan seks, salah seorang daripadanya berpakaian seragam Pasukan Pertahanan Awam Singapura (SCDF).

    Rakaman video itu menunjukkan seorang lelaki berpakaian seragam bersandar pada sebuah meja, dengan seorang lagi individu, yang tidak dapat dilihat dengan jelas, yang sedang berdiri di belakangnya.

    Klip video itu timbul beberapa kali di lelaman forum semalam (28 Sep) serta di laman web Streamable.

    Sehingga pukul 9.45 malam semalam – lapan jam setelah video itu dimuat naik – ia ditonton lebih 22,000 kali di laman Streamable.

    Sebagai respons terhadap pertanyaan media, SCDF menyatakan bahawa kesalahan itu sedang disiasat “di bawah Akta Filem”.

    “SCDF memandang serius perkara ini dan sudah membuat aduan polis,” kata seorang jurucakap SCDF.

    Di bawah Akta Filem, jika disabit kesalahan kali pertama membuat atau menghasilkan semula filem berunsur lucah, pelaku boleh dikenakan denda antara $20,000 dengan $40,000 dan dipenjara maksimum dua tahun.

    Source: Berita MediaCorp

  • Prosecutors Seek More Jail Time For Yang Yin, Whose ‘Criminal Odyssey’ Lasted Years

    Prosecutors Seek More Jail Time For Yang Yin, Whose ‘Criminal Odyssey’ Lasted Years

    Former tour guide Yang Yin’s “criminal odyssey” lasted for the five years – the entirety of his stay in Singapore – during which he committed crimes against wealthy widow Chung Khin Chun, Government agencies and multiple individuals and businesses, prosecutors said on Wednesday (Sep 28).

    Aside from the 10 to 12-year jail term they have sought for Yang’s misappropriation of S$1.1 million from Mdm Chung, prosecutors urged the court to impose another two-and-a-half to three years’ jail on Yang, following his conviction in May of 120 charges.

    These charges include 110 counts for falsifying receipts involving S$186,900 showing payments to a shell company Yang set up to gain permanent residency here, as well as four charges under the Companies Act and three each for cheating and immigration offences.

    “This is a foreign national who has spent almost his entire five years in Singapore either offending or preparing to offend,” Deputy Public Prosecutor Nicholas Tan said on Wednesday. “Instead of being productive, Yang was prolific in generating a compendium of false documentation.”

    The court heard Yang had fooled five Government agencies – including the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority, Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore, Central Provident Fund Board, Ministry of Manpower and the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority – on his way to obtaining permanent residency here.

    “(Yang) displayed extraordinary brazenness in offending”, DPP Tan said. “He had no qualms in conjuring up an entire business … (creating) an entire fiction, inventing customers, revenues and salaries from thin air.”

    Yang registered a sham business – a music and dance school – and duped MOM into granting him an Employment Pass, which he later used to shore up his permanent residency application to the ICA. He also tricked IRAS and CPF by paying small sums of income tax – which he later called “charity” and “giving back to society” – to reflect his employment at a seemingly profitable company, prosecutors said.

    “This is the character of Yang’s stay in Singapore. Although this epic tale is nearly at its conclusion, in this final chapter we still see a lack of genuine remorse … I’m hard-pressed to find even a single indication of compunction, of regret, for what he has done,” DPP Tan said.

    Defence lawyer Irving Choh urged the court to impose a shorter jail term of one to two years, citing hardship on Yang’s family. “My client has a wife, two young children and aged parents to support”, Mr Choh said, adding Yang had been the sole breadwinner of the family and that his parents are not in good health.

    Prosecutors contested this, saying Yang had voluntarily left his family behind for five years. His first child was a baby when he first came to Singapore, and his second child was born while he was here, DPP Tan said. “He has demonstrated (his willingness to leave) his young children, his elderly parents, to come to Singapore. So I think there is some hypocrisy in that argument.”

    Yang will be sentenced on Thursday morning.

    “DEEP BETRAYAL”

    Yang also faces two charges for criminal breach of trust, for which he will be sentenced separately on Friday.

    Yang pocketed S$1.1 million from Madam Chung during his stay here, in what prosecutors called a “deep betrayal” of the widow, 89, who had given Yang control over her assets – worth millions of dollars – trusting him to use the money to look after her in her golden years.

    Instead, in the years that followed, Yang nearly emptied the widow’s bank account. In early 2010, Mdm Chung had S$2.7 million in liquid assets. By August 2014, shortly before Yang’s arrest, the widow’s bank account contained less than S$10,000. She was none the wiser.

    Yang had “intentionally fostered an environment of unquestioning trust with Mdm Chung … by capitalising on her age and lack of familial support”, DPP Sanjiv Vaswani told the court at a hearing earlier this month.

    To date, the true whereabouts of the S$1.1 million remain unknown. Yang has not made any restitution. Another S$1,128,004 remains frozen in his bank account.

    According to Yang, Mdm Chung, whom he met in 2006, had convinced him to leave his wife and two children and move to Singapore to live with her in her Gerald Crescent bungalow as her “grandson”. He moved here in 2009, and by February 2010, Mdm Chung had made a will leaving all her assets to him.

    When Mdm Chung was diagnosed with dementia in 2014, her niece Hedy Mok stepped in and took Yang to court. Yang was subsequently arrested and charged.

     

    Source: ChannelNewsAsia

  • Erna Manisha, Remaja Berusia 14 Tahun Hilang; Polis Minta Maklumat

    Erna Manisha, Remaja Berusia 14 Tahun Hilang; Polis Minta Maklumat

    Pasukan Polis Singapura meminta maklumat mengenai lokasi remaja berusia 14 tahun, Erna Manisha, yang dilaporkan hilang.

    Kali terakhir Erna dilihat adalah di kolong Blok 379 Clementi Ave 5 pada 15 September 2016 sekitar 8.35 malam.

    Erna sedang memakai baju berwarna putih dan skirt berwarna coklat pada masa itu.

    BERITAMediacorp difahamkan aduan mengenai kehilangan Erna dibuat pada 18 September oleh ibu bapanya.

    Erna adalah seorang pelajar dari Sekolah Menengah Clementi Town.

    Sesiapa yang mempunyai maklumat diminta menghubungi hotline Polis di 1800-255-0000 atau memberi maklumat itu secara online di www.police.gov.sg/iwitness.

    Semua maklumat yang orang ramai hulurkan akan dirahsiakan.

    Source: Berita MediaCorp

deneme bonusu