Category: Sosial

  • Lagun Sari Employee, Sunato Zaidi, Ran Away With Our Money, More Than 100 Couples Affected

    Lagun Sari Employee, Sunato Zaidi, Ran Away With Our Money, More Than 100 Couples Affected

    Eventually my heart broken into thousand of pieces when my dad show me this articles on Berita Harian on Saturday morning, 20th Aug … I immediately called Lagun Sari to set an appointment with the person incharge who took over Sunato’s clients… So on my way to Lagun Sari with fiance, my heart pumping fast and hoping Sunato left with a clear clean resignation… To our shocked, he did not… He took most of our deposit money for his own personal use and gave us a fake receipt…

    And not only us, there’s more den 100 couples affected… Imagine that!

    To cut it short, we went to lodge a police report as advised from Lagun Sari…

    So before proceed to the police station, we went to Teh Tarik at Tampines where we meet my fiance’s cousin and his fren which also affected… As we having our lunch and explained to them what did Lagun Sari said… Dengan izin allah, this Sunato walking across the road right at where we are… My fiance, his cousin and his fren stop eating and chase him for an explaination… So I waited there, but i dont feel right, so i followed them… This is what they manage to video him… Thanks to Nur Ahmad for the video…

    Look at what he’s holding on his hand… He promise to come over on tuesday 23 Aug at 10am to make an explaination… But as we expect, he did not turn up…

     

    So, to the rest who’s affected, pls pm me so we could do it together a file against Lagun Sari…

    Im making this PUBLIC, do share around ya! Thnks…

     

    Source: De La AsLam

     

     

  • A Thank You To PAP Supporters For Forcing PAP To Be Creative With Our Lives

    A Thank You To PAP Supporters For Forcing PAP To Be Creative With Our Lives

    I must admit, I never like PAP supporters. I’m actually jealous of them. When i look at them i always ask myself how can someone be so skillful in angkat buah? Like it is a full tull time job for them right until they are so well-versed.

    But now i have a new-found appreciation for them.

    It is not the opposition parties that keep PAP on their toes. It is actually their supporters right? Every single time PAP lose support from their own supporter base, they always become extra creative. Somehow after that, PAP will come up with some schemes to retain their supporters and to increase their vote share. This PAP creativity means that the Constitution is always updated. Don’t you feel thankful for that?

    You ask yourselves, why was the NCMP (Non-Constituency MP) created? Why was the GRC scheme created? Why did they change the powers of the Elected Presidency back in 1994?

    Now they want to make further constitutional changes to the Elected Presidency, to ensure minority representation even though for many years PAP keep harping on meritocracy. You know how stubborn they have been on their meritocracy but now suddenly, it is fine if we don’t hold on to this ‘meritocracy” too tightly. Wah the minorities must be very grateful for this.

    How did that happen? of course because of PAP supporters lah.

    So thank you PAP supporters for carrying their balls and squeezing their balls and forcing to be creative with the live of Singaporeans.

     

    Tak Kuat Angkat Buah

    <Reader Contribution>

  • Chee Soon Juan: PAP Running Scared, Doesn’t Want Genuine Political Contest

    Chee Soon Juan: PAP Running Scared, Doesn’t Want Genuine Political Contest

    I have often pointed out that the PAP is never sincere in ensuring that there is genuine political contestation, it always raises the bar just when its opponents come close to beating it at its own game (think GRC, Cooling-off Day, Public Order Act, etc).

    The most recent example is the tweaking of the EP. Ostensibly, it is to ensure minority representation in the presidency. The reality is that alarm bells went off when Dr Tony Tan won by just 0.34%-point over Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

    As usual, the government goes through the exercise of conducting a “study” of the issue. “Expert” views are then sought to substantiate the recommendations in the study. http://www.todayonline.com/…/mixed-race-teams-presidential-…

    The process goes like this. Step 1: Frame the issue, set the parameters. Step 2: Gin up debate in the local media and through various panels (within prescribed parameters, of course). Step 3: Legislate it.

    Much time, effort and money is expended to legitimise a course of action on which the PAP has already decided. Remember the discussions about whether to have 9 or 12 NCMP seats or 3- or 6-member GRCs or which race Singaporeans prefer their presidents?

    As Noam Chomsky points out: “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.”

    What is troubling in this instance is that at a time when our country faces complex and enormous challenges – challenges where open and intelligent debate is so desperately needed – the PAP devices yet another scheme to further control the political process.

    There is a price, a steep one, to pay for all this.

     

    Source: Chee Soon Juan 徐顺全

  • 7 Things You Should Know About S R Nathan

    7 Things You Should Know About S R Nathan

    S.R. Nathan to some Singaporeans, was characterised as the unassuming man minding his own business on a park bench. Photo by Alwin Lim

    He was anything but.

    Things you should know about the late S.R. Nathan:

    1) He worked for the Japanese during the Japanese Occupation.

    So he knew first hand how much it sucked to work for bosses you think might kill you any other day. During the Japanese Occupation, Mr S.R. Nathan worked for the Japanese Civilian Police as a translator. It takes guts to go in to work everyday under those circumstances and Mr Nathan had plenty, as we will talk about next.

    2) He’s actually a hero.

    No exaggeration. We all know this by now. Not just a regular hero. He volunteered to lead the team. At the time of the ferry hijacking, he was the Director of Security and Intelligence Division. The Director. But this is S.R. Nathan we are talking about. He wasn’t going to just send a team in. The man led by example. He volunteered to go.

    3) He didn’t get to finish school before he had to start working.

    What is your excuse? Too difficult to manage work and study? S.R Nathan had to start working before he could finish school but is something like a war going to throw Mr Nathan off his tracks? No way. After the war, he completed his secondary education via distance learning with Oxford while working. Yes you read that right. Before computers were even a thing, Mr Nathan completed his secondary school education via a correspondence course. He then went on to graduate with a Diploma in Social Studies with a distinction in 1954 from the University of Malaya. So again, what’s your excuse?

    4) He made mistakes too.

    Mr. Nathan made mistakes growing up too, but they did not stop him from having an illustrious career his whole life. Sure, it may sound like your typical rags-to-riches story, but why is this story different? He didn’t care for being rich. After his father committed suicide when he was 8, Mr. Nathan went wayward for a couple of years, running away from home, getting expelled for school, even living on the streets for awhile. Eventually he would find work as an office boy and drift from job to job, working as a postman, a hawker’s assistant and even a tuition teacher. He had help along the way, and this was probably the reason why he saw how important it was to help others less fortunate. He learnt it first hand. There are many many stories of how Mr. Nathan helped his colleagues and friends to put their kids through school and find them jobs upon graduation.

    5) He started the President’s Challenge.

    In 2000, he started the President’s Challenge and in 11 years, it had raised more than S$100 million. More than 500 organizations are beneficiaries. He also co-founded SINDA.

    6) He had to be asked to be a Presidential Candidate.

    The Late Mr. Lee Kuan Yew and several others had to ask Mr. Nathan to run for office. Everyone says he only became President because he was the only candidate. We think he became President because everyone unanimously agreed he was the right man for the job.

    7) The next time you hear somebody say S.R Nathan was a useless fella, you can refer this list of accolades to them.

    Career timeline
    1940–1941: Office boy and various odd jobs
    Feb 1955–Mar 1956: Almoner, Medical Department, Singapore General Hospital
    Mar 1956–1962: Seamen’s Welfare Officer, Marine Department
    Jan 1962–Jan 1964: Assistant director, Labour Research Unit
    Jan 1964–Jan 1966: Director, Labour Research Unit
    Jan 1966–Apr 1988: Member, board of trustees, Labour Research Unit
    Feb 1966–Jan 1971: Assistant secretary; later deputy secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    Jan 1971–Aug 1971: Acting permanent secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs
    Aug 1971–Feb 1979: Director, Security and Intelligence Division, Ministry of Defence
    1973–1986: Chairman, Mitsubishi Singapore Heavy Industries (Pte) Ltd
    Feb 1979–Feb 1982: First permanent secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    1980–1988: Director, Singapore National Oil Company
    1982–1988: Director, New Nation Publishing Bhd
    1982–1988: Director, Times Publishing Bhd
    Jan 1982–May 1983: Chairman, Hindu Advisory Board
    Feb 1982– Apr 1988: Executive Chairman, Straits Times Press (1975) Ltd, and concurrently director of Singapore Press Holdings Ltd from December 1985 to April 1988
    1983–1988: Director, Times Business Publications Ltd
    1983–1988: Director, Singapore Mint Pte Ltd, London
    May 1983–Apr 1988: Chairman, Hindu Endowments Board
    1984–1988: Director, The Times of Singapore Pte Ltd
    1985–1988: Director, Marshall Cavendish Ltd
    1986–1988: Director, The Straits Times Press (London) Ltd
    1986–1988: Director, The Times Press Foundation (Singapore) Pte Ltd
    Aug 1991–Aug 1999: Founding member and term trustee of Singapore Indian Development Association
    Apr 1988–Jul 1990: High commissioner to Malaysia
    Jul 1990–Jun 1996: Ambassador to the United States
    1996–1999: Director, Singapore International Media Pte Ltd
    Jul 1996: Appointed pro-chancellor, National University of Singapore
    Jul 1996–Aug 1999: Ambassador-at-large
    Jul 1996–Aug 1999: Director, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (now known as the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies), Nanyang Technological University
    1997–1999: Member, board of governors, Civil Service College
    1 Sep 1999–31 Aug 2011: President of Singapore; concurrently chancellor, National University of Singapore

    “I’ve done the best I can. If it’s good enough for some people, fine. If it’s not good enough for some people, and there will always be noise in the environment, you can’t stop it. You don’t do it because you want to leave a legacy. You do the best you can.” – S. R. Nathan

    You did Sir. You were outstanding.

    #WeAreMajulah

     

    Source: Syabab SG

  • Osman Sulaiman: PAP Must Stop Using Malay Community As Political Pawn, Cease Affirmative Actions

    Osman Sulaiman: PAP Must Stop Using Malay Community As Political Pawn, Cease Affirmative Actions

    If the PAP thinks that a Malay president is important periodically, and has always been confident of its party’s credibility and branding, then it should support a Malay candidate to contest in the coming presidential election as how it supported Tony Tan in the last election.

    Often times, the ones who made the Malays feel that they are of sub-par quality is the PAP itself. Creating GRCs and justifying it that without GRCs, a Malay candidate cannot stand on its own worthiness.

    GRCs were introduced in 1988. It was the last election that a Malay candidate stands in an SMC under the PAP banner. Mr Abdullah Tarmugi contested in Siglap SMC and garnered 73.7% of the popular votes. One of the highest achievers among the slates of candidates being fielded by PAP. It definitely showed no signs that a non-Chinese candidate cannot stand on its own merits.

    After the 1988 general election, no other PAP Malay candidates contested in an SMC. Between then and now, the PAP continues with its narrative that a Malay candidate cannot win an election in a Chinese majority electorate.

    I remembered when Masagos was promoted to a ministerial position, the PAP highlighted that the promotion reflected the progress of the Malays. It simply meant that the promotion was given on account that the community now deserves to have a minister while previously it didn’t as we are considered second best as compared to the non-Malays.

    Today, the PAP again uses the Malay community as a pawn for its political agenda. Knowing how close the results of the last presidential election between its endorsed candidate and the independent candidate Dr Tan Cheng Bock (TCB), the PAP is playing the racial cards again by tugging at the heart strings of the Malay community.

    It seems that it now wants a Malay figurehead to counter the possibility of Dr TCB winning the presidential election. And rules have to be tweaked to accommodate this.

    I will be elated if ever we were to have a Malay president again after Yusof Ishak. But there will be no honour in winning a contest when the favours are heavily tilted for a certain individual/race to win it. And when indeed a Malay president is elected under those conditions, then it will further affirm the unfounded theory that the Malay community cannot stand on its own calibre.

    I would rather we secure the presidential role fair and square. The PAP will need to walk the talk rather than just paying lip service. If it values the contribution of the Malay community and treats everyone as equal, show it by supporting a Malay candidate without tinkering with the system. The Malay community doesn’t need charity of this kind.

    The principle that all citizens are equal, regardless of race or religion, means we have to do away with affirmative actions.

     

    Source: Khan Osman Sulaiman

deneme bonusu