Category: Sosial

  • Egotistic Former Bank Employee Would Rather Eat Instant Noodles Than Let Go Of His BMW

    Egotistic Former Bank Employee Would Rather Eat Instant Noodles Than Let Go Of His BMW

    We’ve often received stories about people (or friends of people) that sank into a snowball of debts after overbuying with their credit cards or their payslips. However, this single story stood out, because he isn’t bankrupt, and he looked perfectly successful in front of others, but deep inside him, he’s struggling just because of a car.

    Johnny (may or may not be his real name) worked in a local bank when he graduated from university, and admitted that he had a few job offers even before he graduated. His starting pay was relatively high: at more than $4,500, he earned more than his peers and was set for a debt-free life.

    In the first few months of his work, he had some sort of “culture shock”: when he was schooling, he gave private tuition and was earning about $600 a month. All of a sudden, that ballooned to $3,600 (after his CPF deduction)—that’s way too much for him to handle all of a sudden!

    He applied for almost all the credit cards that promoters in MRT stations offered to him—one by one, he received tens of credit cards and was feeling “rich” from the credit limit given to him. In fact, he thought he had become “$100,000 richer” simply because everyone was so willing to loan him money.

    But the trouble didn’t start from those plastic cards. It started when he decided to buy a car.

    During that time, it was still possible to buy a car with $0—all they needed was his payslip and ta-da: he could walk away with a brand new car, having only to fulfil the monthly instalment. But here’s the thing: the monthly instalment must be fulfilled, because failing which, he would lose a reasonable amount of money.

    Johnny got a BMW (he didn’t specify which model) and paid $1,000++ every month for the monthly instalment. All was good (not very, but to him, it was)—with him earning $3,600, he could still survive on a $1,000++ monthly expenses.

    But a few years later, he lost his job.

    We’re not sure whether he was retrenched or fired, but even when he lost his job, he couldn’t let go of his car. He claimed that the monthly instalment must still be fulfilled, or he’ll lose “tens of thousands of dollars”.

    The first thing he did was to find a job—fast. He got one as an executive in a financial institution, but the take-home pay of about $2,000 was just enough to pay for his instalment, petrol and maintenance.

    Then he admitted something: he could have let go of his car and pay his debts slowly. But he didn’t want to—because his friends, family members and everyone around him knew him as the successful banker who drove a BMW. He would rather eat instant noodles and bread than to lose his only status symbol that was “keeping him alive”.

    It has been a few years now, and with him drawing only $2,000++ and paying $2,000 for his car monthly, his concern now is what would happen next year (2017), when the COE of his car expires. He won’t have enough to renew the COE or buy a new car.

    Well, when he posed the question in his email, he replied to it himself: “What were I thinking?’

    Seriously…Johnny, all we can say is that you’re not alone, and thank you for sharing your story, because it really showed us that the latest policies about car ownership have helped people and not harm others.

    After all, the moral of the story is simple: don’t buy a big hat if you’ve got a small head.

     

    Source: www.goodyfeed.com

  • Employee Of Gadget Terminal At Sim Lim Square Jailed 28 Weeks For Cheating

    Employee Of Gadget Terminal At Sim Lim Square Jailed 28 Weeks For Cheating

    A former employee of the now-defunct Sim Lim Square electronics shop Gadget Terminal was sentenced to 28 weeks’ jail on Tuesday (Jan 5) for cheating two customers in September and October 2014.

    Justin Chew Chee Kin, 36, admitted to conspiring with the boss of Gadget Terminal, Gavin Chung Choon Cheik, 33, to cheat the shop’s customers. Chew was employed as a sales executive and earned S$1,800 a month, plus a commission on profits made by Gadget Terminal.

    Chung Choong Cheik, former general manager at Gadget Terminal. (Photo: Ngau Kai Yan) 

    Chew worked under Chung’s instructions to offer mobile devices to customers at an attractive price, before confronting them with various sales tactics after the customer made payment.

    On Sep 30, 2014, customer service officer Zhang Zhengqiang called the police after Chew demanded an additional S$480, on top of the S$300 that Chew had already collected from Mr Zhang for an iPhone 4S. When Mr Zhang refused to hand over more money, Chew threatened to complain to Mr Zhang’s employer. Despite the police’s involvement, Chew returned Mr Zhang just S$12, citing a “cancellation fee”.

    Chew cheated a second victim, student Gao Erxu, about one month later on Oct 20, 2014. Mr Gao’s girlfriend called the police after the couple paid Chew with a S$1,000 note and he refused to return them S$620 in change. Again, despite the police’s involvement, Mr Gao lost S$215 in “cancellation fees”.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhammad Faizal Nooraznan pointed to the vulnerability of the two victims as an aggravating factor in the case. Both Mr Zhang and Mr Gao are Chinese nationals, and Mr Zhang has “limited English proficiency”, the court heard. The victims were “exploited and cheated” and Chew “unmoved by police presence”, said the DPP.

    As Chew presented the matter to police as a “contractual dispute”, it was difficult for police to know that any illegality was involved, the DPP said.

    DPP Muhammad Faizal cited the prevalence of this kind of offences in recent times as well. Over the past three years, the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) received 2,000 complaints against retailers in Sim Lim Square, Lucky Plaza and People’s Park Centre.

    The DPP also referred to past cases of cheating salesmen at Sim Lim Square. Jover Chew, the former boss of the now-defunct Mobile Air, and four employees were sentenced to jail last year for employing a similar modus operandi to cheat several customers of thousands of dollars.

    Chung and three other former salesmen have also been charged with cheating offences. Their cases are still before the courts.

    For each charge of cheating, Chew could have faced up to 10 years’ jail and a fine.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • LTA Amends Tamil Names Of Four Downtown Line Stations

    LTA Amends Tamil Names Of Four Downtown Line Stations

    The Land Transport Authority (LTA) has amended the Tamil names of four more Downtown Line stations after it was discovered that one of them was wrong, The Straits Times has learnt.

    Changes have been made to the translations for Promenade, Downtown, Telok Ayer and Cashew for “better clarity and more accurate pronunciations”, an LTA spokesman said.

    The station signs were changed before the second stage of the Downtown Line, the DTL2, opened on Dec 27.

    Cashew is a new station on the DTL2, while Promenade, Downtown and Telok Ayer opened three years ago as part of the Downtown Line 1.

    During the open house for the DTL2 on Dec 5, a commuter noticed that one of the 12 new stations, Tan Kah Kee, had an inaccurate Tamil translation as “paan kah kee”.

    The LTA apologised for the error and has since rectified it.

    Following the incident, the LTA said it reviewed the Tamil names for all Downtown Line stations.

    Asked about the four new names, Dr A Ra Sivakumaran, a language specialist, said: “The enunciation is clearer and sounds more like how it is pronounced in English.”

    For example, the previous Tamil name for Promenade was pronounced as “pro-ma-net”, but the new one reads better as “pro-ma- nat”, said Dr Sivakumaran.

    The original Tamil name for Downtown was “down-tavun” but the new one is “down-town”.

    Mr J S Sasikumar, a member of the National University of Singapore’s Tamil Language Society, said the old name Telok Ayer sounds like “teh-luk-aayaer”, but is more accurate as “teh-luk-aayer”.

    “They sound more natural. In the Tamil language, a change in a single letter can alter the sounding of the entire word drastically,” said the 23-year-old undergraduate. “So it’s essential that the Tamil letters are selected carefully, as they’ve done so here.”

    Dr K Shanmugam, head of the Tamil Programme at SIM University, said that because many names of MRT stations are proper nouns, there is no way one can translate the literal meaning. He added: “The name would have to be translated using transliteration, which is something like writing the words phonetically in another language.”

    Commuter Shervani Nair, 32, an education trainer, said the new names sound phonetically closer to the English ones.

    “For example, Cashew in the old sign had been translated as ‘kay-shee-you’, but in the new sign it is translated as ‘kay-sh-u’, which is much closer,” she said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

     

  • Lion Dance At Malay Wedding – Racial Harmony Gone To Far?

    Lion Dance At Malay Wedding – Racial Harmony Gone To Far?

    Stomper Mi Mi was on the way to her car near Block 141, Bishan Street 21 on Jan 1 when she heard the sounds of a lion dance.

    She then realised that it was a lion dance performance at a Malay wedding.

    Lion Dance AT Malay Wedding

    Said the Stomper:

    “I was on my way to my car when a lion dance drumming reverberated in the air.

    “Upon closer look, it was a Malay wedding at the void deck. The couple and the guests were watching the lion dance performance.

    “I suppose they too believe that during auspicious occasions such as weddings is to bring good fortune, wealth and happiness to the couple.

    “Singapore is indeed a multi-racial and multi-cultural country.”

     

    Source: http://singaporeseen.stomp.com.sg

  • Malay Gay Couple Show Public Display Of Affection On Train

    Malay Gay Couple Show Public Display Of Affection On Train

    Lately on my way back home in the train, from Orchard to the northern side of singapore, ive been seeing this very open gay couple.

    2 young malay guys, very slim and pretty tanned. U guys hold hands and hug each other in the train. Acting like how any other hetrosexual couple.

    I applaud for both your braveness to be very open. This is what every other gay couple are looking forward to. Making it more like a norm.

    On Monday, you guys were quarrelling with each other. I find that pretty cute. Its not like everyday u get to see gay couple on the street and what more arguing with each other. Im not saying that u guys are a nuisance and should quarrel more but it makes me happy seeing u guys together.

    im like aww… look at them.. gay couple.. arguing.. soo cute…

    There was a lady beside me with her boyfriend. The boyfriend was looking at you guys and giving that kinda disgusted look but the lady was saying ‘they are quarrelling but that makes them a stronger couple’. Zero homosexual comment. She even jokingly said to her boyfriend, ‘stop staring at them with that look or else im not gonna talk to you!’

    It warms my heart to hear that. Just sharing some stuff… Cheers!

     

    Source: GLBT Voices Singapore