Blog

  • Asia-Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Trains Beer Promoters To Sell Alcohol Responsibly

    Asia-Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Trains Beer Promoters To Sell Alcohol Responsibly

    As talks continue between industry players and the authorities over the conditions under which the retail hours of takeaway liquor may be extended, Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) said it has trained most of its beer promoters how to sell alcohol responsibly.

    It yesterday called for a press conference to announce this, after the company and other major alcohol suppliers had responded to the Government’s plan to impose curbs on alcohol sale and consumption in order to deal with alcohol-induced public disamenities, with the argument that such trouble is typically caused by only a minority of irresponsible drinkers.

    Yesterday, APB, which owns and brews for a number of brands, including Tiger Beer, Heineken and Anchor, said more than eight in 10 of its 580 brand promoters, who work in over 500 coffee shops and hawker centres islandwide, are now better equipped to recognise drunk customers and underage drinkers, as well as handle alcohol-related situations, after they attended a three-hour session that included role playing.

    Training began in January, and APB said it would train all its promoters by next month.

    APB’s initiative does not directly relate to the liquor consumption and retail curbs that kicked in this month under new laws, though its head of corporate relations, Ms Shannen Fong, said: “What we’re trying to do and demonstrate to the government is that operators, largely, are responsible. We want to be able to sell, and we often do sell responsibly.” She added that when this does not happen, it is usually due to knowledge gaps.

    Under the Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Act, public liquor consumption and sale of takeaway alcohol are no longer allowed from 10.30pm to 7am daily. Stricter rules apply in Geylang and Little India, which have been designated Liquor Control Zones.

    Ms Fong said that while many promoters already have strategies to help them handle potentially troublesome clients, the training has added to their tool kits and given assurance to those who are using the right approach when dealing with such customers.

    Turning away intoxicated customers at coffee shops is better in the long run, as liquor licences could be affected if alcohol is sold irresponsibly, she added.

    She said the most common types of drinkers encountered by beer promoters are those who are noisy, those who are drunk but want to order more and those who get emotional after drinking.

    Beer promoter Bang Yun, 26, who has worked three years at Lau Pa Sat, said promoters would try to distract tipsy drinkers and get them to eat something or drink water.

    Promoters would tell drinkers that safety is paramount or ask the drinkers’ friends to persuade them to stop drinking, said Ms Ann Koh, 50, who also works at Lau Pa Sat.

    Outlet managers and supervisors of three companies, Kopitiam Investment, S-11 F&B Holdings and another that did not want to be named, have joined the training programme, but APB is trying to get more coffee shops and hawker centres to come on board.

    Mr Vincent Cheong, Kopitiam’s corporate communications manager, said the training benefits the company’s staff and customers. Patrons who do not drink can enjoy a more conducive dining environment without disturbance from unruly drinkers, he said.

    The Ministry of Home Affairs welcomed APB’s initiative and said the programme would help address public disorder and disamenities that arise from excessive drinking. “Liquor suppliers and retailers are encouraged to adopt measures towards responsible liquor sale, in accordance with the Liquor Control (Supply and Consumption) Act,” said a spokesperson.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Registration Of Kings International Business School Cancelled, Awarded Diplomas Without Requiring Class Attendance Or Assessment

    Registration Of Kings International Business School Cancelled, Awarded Diplomas Without Requiring Class Attendance Or Assessment

    Kings International Business School (KIBS) will have its registration cancelled for contravening the Private Education Act, the Council for Private Education (CPE) announced on Monday (Apr 20).

    In a news release, CPE said it investigated and found evidence that the private business school had “offered and awarded some students with diplomas in maritime studies without requiring class attendance or assessment”.

    This is the first time a private education institution (PEI) will have its registration cancelled for issuing diplomas without ensuring that students had received proper instruction and assessment, since the establishment of CPE in December 2009, the Council said.

    The business school, located in Bukit Merah Central, offers diplomas not just in maritime studies, but in business management as well.

    Speaking to Channel NewsAsia, the school maintained that the quality of its education is high, and said it was surprised by the sudden notice of cancellation.

    It added that last year, it had received a four-year extension to the Enhanced Registration Framework – a document which is needed to show it meets mandatory requirements as well as legislative obligations. It said that most institutions its size receive yearly extensions.

    The school claimed the cohort in question attended maritime diploma courses between 2013 and 2014.

    Ms Denise Pek, director at KIBS, said: “The majority of maritime cohorts are shift workers. They support their families and work round-the-clock. When they cannot attend, they will inform the school and we will provide them with make-up lessons – and all this is out of goodwill from the school with no charges at all. The students accommodate their timings to meet with us so they can pass their assessments.”

    She also said that the school provided attendance sheet logs to the CPE for its investigations, which it said started in October last year.

    The school has about 20 part-time lecturers and five full-time staff, and the decision will also impact about 40 local students, most of whom are from the maritime industry.

    CPE said KIBS will have its registration cancelled from May 5 but it will not be allowed to offer and conduct private education courses with immediate effect. However, KIBS said it will be speaking to students on this matter to reach a consensus and it will continue conducting classes this week, as the notice it received from CPE did not say so.

    CPE said it has directed KIBS to give refunds to its students, or to help arrange for them to continue their course at another suitable private education institution. Based on available records, there are 10 existing students taking diploma courses as KIBS as of Feb 11, CPE said.

    “While the vast majority of PEIs are bona fide education providers, we must continue to be vigilant to guard against such egregious players as what they do casts doubt on the integrity of the qualifications of PEI graduates,” said CPE Chief Executive Brandon Lee.

    “It also is unfortunate that some of the students chose to take up KIBS’ offer, instead of reporting them to CPE, implicating genuine students who took lessons in the process.”

    CPE advises members of the public to be cautious of offers for certification without having to attend classes, or take examinations or tests. They can also report such activities to CPE at 65 6592 2108 or via email at [email protected].

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Shafiqah Othman Hamzah: Why I Am Against Institutionalised Religion

    Shafiqah Othman Hamzah: Why I Am Against Institutionalised Religion

    I think I have, on many occasions, explained that I do not like using the term “religion” all that much. I prefer to substitute it with “spirituality” for very personal reasons. But today, I’d like to explain some of the many reasons why the word “religion” plays little to no role in my life, and why I feel like it is irrelevant.

    I can already hear people calling me blasphemous.

    Please do not get me wrong, for what I am truly against is not religion, like Islam, Christianity, Buddhism etc. but in fact, “institutionalised religion.” And that does not mean that I am against institutions as well. I do believe that we need some systems of operations and governing in our lives in order to avoid chaos, but I feel like governance in religion is something that should not exist. Isn’t religion supposed to be personal?

    All around me, I see people arguing who is right and who is wrong, who will go to Heaven and who will go to Hell. There are Muslims vs. Christians, and to make things worse, even Muslims against other Muslims as well. The situation in Malaysia speaks for itself. The demonising of other religions, including other sects of Islam that is not Ahl Sunnah Wal Jamaah, or even Sunni Syafie for that matter, goes to show that our government is trying to dictate how we practise our religion.

    There are far too many people in Malaysia (let alone the world) for us to try to advance one particular theology. Not only is this an offence to the diversity that God has bestowed upon us, but it creates a great divide between our citizens. The world wouldn’t be in peace if we all believed in the same thing; we would be in peace if we had a mutual understanding of our differences.

    Which brings me to my next point. The moment someone thinks that their theology is the one and only infallible truth, they immediately hold a monopoly on God. This can be seen when Malaysia banned the use of “Allah” in the Bahasa Malaysia translated version of the Bibles. Yes, they banned it for theological reasons, but as you can see, this is where the problem comes in.

    No matter how differently your theology or understanding of something may be, at the end of the day, we are all parts of the same whole. No one owns God. This is against the idea of a universalistic God. Islam does not own Allah, but Allah owns everything. And if the reason behind the ban is to prevent Muslims from getting confused, than you have to question the faith of your own followers instead of putting them in a bubble. You’re not protecting them, but rather, placing them in deeper ignorance.

    Institutionalised religion also promotes blind belief through coercion and fear. You have to think a certain way because someone above you says so. You have to do a certain thing because someone above you says so. But you don’t really understand why you’re doing it. You were raised to not question, but to just follow. And out of fear of the consequences that may come, you blindly agree with everything that is being spoon-fed to you because you were taught to believe that questioning is a sin.

    The most heart-breaking thing about institutionalised religion for me is that it also teaches us to judge a man not based on his character and how he treats others, but by the way he dresses. Spirituality has been taken over by superficiality. Institutionalised religion insists on playing God.

    Religion is the act of believing in God, and institutions establish a systematic way of doing things. Institutionalising religion then ultimately means establishing a system of how to believe in God. How can this be possible when there are over 6 billion people on Earth? And how could anyone ever think that we are authorised to dictate the spirituality of Man as though we’re God Himself?

    It should not come as a surprise to anyone at all that our world is filled with such diverse views. No two people think the same way and whoever thought that it was best to turn us into a monolith should understand that all their attempts are futile.

    Why is it so hard for people to agree to disagree with each other without inflicting pain or harm towards the other? Are we that conceited and full of ourselves to think that our opinions and upbringing is the one and only infallible truth? To me, one of the best things to do to honour God is by honouring and respecting the diversity that He has given us on this Earth. We are, after all, a part of His creation.

    It’s one thing to be against another religion for holding a different view, but institutionalised religion can cause even adherers from the same religion to go against each other. At the current rate of increasing Islamophobia that is happening across the globe, we need Muslims to unite more than ever now instead of merely denouncing each other for different opinions.

    There is no systematic way to live, let alone believe in God. Personal matters of the heart aren’t something Man should meddle with. It is none of our business, and definitely not in our place to judge. This is the reason why it is so important for us to be kind to each other, because we don’t know each other’s stories.

    We are all equal before the eyes of God. Just because I don’t think or dress like you, it does not make me more or less of a Muslim.

    * This is the personal opinion of the columnist.

    Shafiqah Othman Hamzah

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

  • Uproar Over Church In Selangor Increases Pressure On Malaysian PM Najib Razak

    Uproar Over Church In Selangor Increases Pressure On Malaysian PM Najib Razak

    An uproar over a protest on Sunday by a group of Muslims in Selangor demanding the removal of the cross of a church has put more pressure on embattled Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak.

    Netizens, politicians and lawyers condemned the protest in a Malay-Muslim majority residential area in Petaling Jaya, and pressed the government to take action against the protesters and protect minority rights.

    Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi yesterday called the protest seditious and vowed that action would be taken against the offenders, contradicting an earlier assertion by the country’s police chief that the protesters’ actions were not seditious.

    “Of course action is to be taken. I am very colour-blind. The police are very colour-blind. Action has to be taken or will be taken against them (the protesters),” Mr Zahid, told the media yesterday.

    About 50 people had gathered outside the new church on Sunday, demanding the removal of the cross affixed to the house of worship on the grounds that it was challenging Islam and could sway the faith of young Muslims. Among those present at the protest was Mr Abdullah Abu Bakar, the older brother of police chief Khalid Abu Bakar, along with several other members of the ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) party.

    The cross was taken down by church leaders a few hours after the protest.

    At a news conference yesterday, Mr Khalid dismissed any suggestions that the protest was seditious. “We do not see it as seditious as it did not touch on Christianity but only on the location of the church,” he said, adding that his brother was present only to help manage the situation.

    Mr Abdullah, an UMNO branch chief, also said in a statement that the UMNO members were present to mediate, adding that they managed to stop some of the more radical residents who had threatened to remove the cross had the church not done so itself.

    This was not the first time a protest has been held against a church.

    In November last year, a Muslim group also organised a demonstration to protest the construction of the four-storey church in Petaling Jaya.

    Ms Haniza Mohamed Talha, an opposition lawmaker of the district where the protest took place, criticised the behaviour of the protesters. “(The protesters) assume that the faith of Muslims is so fragile that just by looking at a cross, they will be driven away from Islam,” she said. The Council of Churches Malaysia claimed the protest was politically-motivated to stir up religious tensions in Selangor.

    In condemning the protest, the council’s general-secretary Dr Hermen Shastri said it was not surprised that such an incident had taken place yet again in the state, which is ruled by the federal opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat. “It is obvious that there is a political agenda behind such acts from certain quarters, who are out to instigate and increase inter-religious tensions in the state,” he said. He urged the authorities to “take firm measures against anyone who seeks to disrupt the worship of others, and who seeks to act above the law by imposing their religious views upon people of other faiths, by show of mob force”.

    Mr Tony Pua, a lawmaker from the Democratic Action Party, called on UMNO lawmakers who recently voted in support of the amendments to the Sedition Act to make their stand known to the protesters. “Will the above case only go to show how the Act was constructed strictly targeted against non-Muslims while Muslims who infringed on the rights of others will get away scot-free?” he said.

    Malaysia strengthened its controversial sedition law earlier this month, imposing a minimum jail term of three years and allowing the government to block online media deemed to be seditious. The toughening of the Sedition Act comes after a crackdown in which scores of people have been detained under the law in recent weeks.

    Mr Najib has come increasing pressure in recent months over a series of controversies, including the state investment vehicle 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB), which has amassed a RM42 billion (S$15.6 billion) debt.

    Sunday’s protest poses another headache for Mr Najib, following several recent cases that have heightened religious tensions with Malaysia’s Christian minority population. Last week, 320 Malay-language bibles were seized because they used the word “Allah” to refer to God. Earlier this year, Catholic newsweekly Herald was also banned from using the word “Allah” in its publications.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Petaling Jaya Residents Protest Outside Church Building, Say Cross Challenging Islam

    Petaling Jaya Residents Protest Outside Church Building, Say Cross Challenging Islam

    About 50 residents gathered outside a new church in Taman Medan, Petaling Jaya today to demand that the cross affixed to the house of worship be removed as it was “challenging Islam”, The Star Online reported today.

    According to the news portal, the locals demonstrated peacefully during the church service at 10am for the cross to be taken down.

    The protesters said the presence of a cross in a Muslim-majority area posed a challenge to the religion and could sway the faith of the youth, The Star Online reported.

    The news portal reported a village leader later pacified the group and spoke with the church’s priest on their behalf.

    “After meeting with the priest, the church agreed to take down the cross by next Sunday. If they have the authority to run, we cannot stop it,” the group’s leader, Datuk Abdullah Abu Bakar, was quoted as saying.

    “But we ask out of concern, being a Malay area, that they take down the cross.”

    Police reportedly arrived on the scene at 10.30am to manage the crowd, just as the Sunday service was ending.

    The Star Online reported that the cross was taken down by church leaders a few hours after the protest.

    This was not the first time a protest was held against a church.

    On November 2, 2014, Muslim NGO, Pertubuhan Sahabat organised a demonstration to protest the construction of the four-storey Praise Emmanuel Assembly church in Petaling Jaya.

    The NGO said there were already three churches in the vicinity, adding it was not appropriate in a neighbourhood that counted 70% of its residents as Muslim.

    The group had demonstrated at the church building site at Jalan PJS 8/9, saying that building a four-storey church in the area would be an insult to the Muslims living there.

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

deneme bonusu