Blog

  • The Lee Kuan Yew Steamboat Battelship

    The Lee Kuan Yew Steamboat Battelship

    The day was Sep 26, 1958. The late Mdm Kwa Geok Choo, wife of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, received a puzzling telegram from her husband. It read: “ARRIVING TODAY BATTLESHIP = LEEKUANYEW”.

    It was sent from Sibu in Sarawak, when the late Mr Lee was practising as a lawyer in Lee & Lee, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong wrote on Facebook on Monday (Apr 6).

    “My mother did not understand the message. Was my father coming home on a battleship? The Lee & Lee secretary called the British Naval Base at Sembawang to check if any battleship was arriving from Sarawak, but they knew nothing about it,” Prime Minister Lee recounted.

    Turns out, it was a dinner request.

    “My father did arrive home that day, but not by battleship. He explained that he wanted steam boat for dinner, but as “steam boat” was two words, and telegrams were charged by the word, he wrote “battleship” instead, to save words and money!”

    Mr Lee shared the childhood memory, after discovering the telegram while sorting through his father’s belongings at home.

    “Sadly, since we had not understood the message, we did not have steam boat for dinner that night,” he said.

    The Prime Minister’s anecdote drew hundreds of amused comments on Facebook. Many quipped that from now on, Singaporeans should refer to steam boat as “battleship”, as a nod to Mr Lee.

    Was amazed to find this old telegram when sorting through my father’s things at home. My parents had kept it all these…

    Posted by Lee Hsien Loong on Sunday, 5 April 2015

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew’s Legacy On Islam And Discrimination Of Malays Should Not Be allowed To Perpetuate

    Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew’s Legacy On Islam And Discrimination Of Malays Should Not Be allowed To Perpetuate

    Alhamdulillah, most of my friends are those who have not been indoctrinated.

    There are Muslims who have good intentions but lack political understanding. They assume that with his death, LKY does not have any further effect on Muslims. We should then move forward and not discuss him anymore.

    But that is the problem when someone lack appreciation of political narratives and try to make a claim on political effects. Let me make this simple to understand. An institution is made up of 3 primary components: routines, expected behaviour and shared goals. The government is an institution through the existence of the 3 characteristics.

    The shared goals (or shared reality) is a set of ideas, values, philosophies that are developed through the institution. In the PAP and government, how Muslims are engaged and treated owes a lot to Lee Kuan Yew’s views of reducing Islam to its bare minimum

    His demands for rejection of various aspects of Islam were not adopted through any objective measure. Rather, they were granted legitimacy simply through the force of his demands.

    Ideas do not die with the death of its advocates. They live on. The way Lee Kuan Yew discriminates the Muslims, lives beyond his natural life.

    Thus, the only way to challenge the ideas and halt its promotion is to challenge the narrative surrounding Lee Kuan Yew. Delegitimise his interaction and management of the community and his ideas of how the Muslims should be discriminated (while pretending to support) loses currency.

    So for those who want to keep quiet and accept his legacy, that is your right. Do that. Those who want to promote him as the spirit of Singapore’s development, you can do that too.

    The rest of us will tear down the fiction of Lee Kuan Yew’s history. Not because we want to discuss the man.

    But because his ideas on how the community should be discriminated and how Islam should be rejected cannot be allowed to live on.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • The Lee Kuan Yew Foundation

    The Lee Kuan Yew Foundation

    Lee Kuan Yew was a giant revered for his brilliant mind, shrewd political instinct, and fearless candor. In the week since his passing, we’ve reminisced about his life – beginning the debate over his legacy and how we will remember him.

    Singaporeans from all walks of life have shared how Lee Kuan Yew touched them, whether through small gestures of warmth or the grand gesture of stewarding us into the nation we are. The story of how he took the CIA to task about an allegedbribery scandal in 1960 lit up social media, with Singaporeans taking pride in the maverick that Lee Kuan Yew was. Leaders from every corner of the globe have taken turns to shower acclaim on his life, his success and his counsel. For their part, his detractors have cautioned against an overly effusive telling of the Lee Kuan Yew story, pointing to his social engineering, lawsuits against the press, and treatment of political opponents.

    Whoever is right, it is indisputable that Lee Kuan Yew’s legacy towers over Singapore like the skyscrapers that dominate the new Marina Bay skyline. Never ornate, their clean lines exemplify the future orientation and simplicity that Lee Kuan Yew adopted in tackling Singapore’s challenges. They can be seen from miles away, commanding an undeniable presence.

    But as with the skyscrapers, it is easy to forget that Lee Kuan Yew’s accomplishments rest on a foundation of unconventional thinking.

    The People’s Action Party was founded in response to his belief that the status quo, Singapore under the British, was no longer right for the country – he fought forMerdeka. He maintained a fearlessness to “defy conventional wisdom” and in the process transformed a society “from where it is to where it has never been – indeed, where it as yet cannot imagine being”. This, in Henry Kissinger’s words, is what makes him a “great leader” and is the same boldness of mind that led to many of Singapore’s audacious projects, including the Marina Bay land reclamation project in the 1970s that literally laid the ground for the pillars that rise from it today.

    These were the building blocks of Lee Kuan Yew’s power as a transformative figure: an enterprising instinct, unconstrained by existing authority or the way things had been; an unmitigated pragmatism that called things as they were – so as to fix them; an ambitious vision, buoyed by compassion. It was unencumbered brilliance that, in his own words, was about trying to be “correct, not politically correct”.

    If Lee Kuan Yew had bowed to his critics, we might still be raw ingredients, separated by race, language or religion. He and his team provided the sweet sauce to bring the rojak together – even if it meant limiting our right to choose what language to study, where to live, or whom to live among.

    Today, new divisions are developing in Singaporean society. We need the same innovativeness – not simply the same policies – to face these new challenges. In a speech to the Singapore Press Club in 1996, he said: “Thirty years ago, my colleagues, younger and more dreamy eyed, settled the words of our pledge. We did not focus our minds on our navels or we would have missed the rainbow in the sky. We pursued that rainbow and that was how we came to build today’s Singapore.”

    His eyes were always fixed on making Singapore better, scanning the horizon without the glare of the past. It is our turn to do the same.

    Like Lee Kuan Yew who stood on the foundation of his British education to build a stronger Singapore without the British, we too must stand on the foundation of his legacy to build a stronger Singapore than we already have, now that we have lost him. And like him, we must fight for it, regardless of the powers that be.

    But we cannot allow his legacy to be constrained by his policies, his past successes, or his party. As important as they are, they are temporal, as was he. Buildings get torn down, political parties gain and lose dominance, ideas lose currency – the world will change, and we must adapt along with it.

    Lee Kuan Yew knew this. In his latest memoir, he wrote, “because of my house, neighbouring houses cannot be built high. (…) Demolish my house, change the planning rules, and the land value will go up. I don’t think my daughter or my wife or I, who lived in it, or my sons who grew up in it, will bemoan its loss.” In the same vein, we mustn’t overly sentimentalize the structures that Lee Kuan Yew built; his legacy must not become the convention he so often combated against.

    He is the father of modern day Singapore not because he leaves us with towering skyscrapers where there once was water, nor because he’s lifted us to a standard of living unimaginable fifty years ago. It is because he leaves behind a people inspired by his bold vision of a stronger Singapore and a blueprint for how to make it possible through his example: his independence and pioneering spirit; his fearlessness in the face of stark odds; his pragmatism, compassion and passion for the cause of Singapore.

    These are the characteristics that made him the man he was and is the enduring legacy that we must be thankful for and live up to.

    It is perhaps fitting that, like Lee Kuan Yew who wept at the shattering of a union he so fervently believed in, Singaporeans today mourn the end of a union that has been at our very heart. In Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s words, “Lee Kuan Yew was Singapore”. His values are the true inheritance a father has bequeathed to his nation – values we must remember, keep safe, and do proud.

    Thank you, Mr Lee.

     

    Source: http://singaporepolicyjournal.com

  • Fiona Bartholomeusz: 15 Lessons From 15 Years Of Running An Agency In Singapore

    Fiona Bartholomeusz: 15 Lessons From 15 Years Of Running An Agency In Singapore

    Fiona Bartholomeusz has just celebrated her 15th year since founding Singapore independent creative agency Formul8, which also has an office in Dubai.In this guest post, Bartholomeusz offers 15 lessons from her 15 years running an agency in Singapore, from getting over rejection and the lack of loyalty in advertising, to dealing with sexism and cost-conscious clients.

    #15. It’s a business first. It doesn’t matter how creative you are or how you’re going to revolutionise the ad world if you can’t run a proper business first. I get a kick out of reading about the next person who wants to create the next award-winning/multinational/experiential/mega network in Asia when they can’t even get it right in their own backyard first.
    There’s no harm in dreaming big, but walk the talk first.

    #14. There is no loyalty in this business. Get used to it and get over it. Clients and staff rarely remember what you’ve done for them, but for the rare ones who do, keep them close and well fed!

    #13. This is a rejection-based business. Losing is tough but there will always be another client to be won, but do learn and grow stronger from it. I try never to enter a pitch half-arsed, so if we lose one, I tell my team, it’s the client’s loss not ours. If you don’t believe in your own product, then half the battle is already lost before you’ve even begun.

    #12. Learn how to drink well, this applies to any gender in the business. Alcohol and client entertainment mixed with the inability to hold down your liquor is sheer disaster!

    #11. It’s not always about work. I’ve made amazing friends out of some clients, and these are things you can’t put a price on.

    #10. If you care more about money than the work, go do something else. You will pull in more hours and make less than what your peers in banking/law/medicine get paid so you’ll need to have an innate love for what advertising is. People who work solely to chase money or an acquisition, have lost the plot in my opinion.

    #9. Hire people with integrity, not just those with talent. People with heart and a good head on their shoulders can be taught to be great at what they do. Talent often comes with a colossal ego that obstructs the ability to see or think straight. Seen too many in this business alas.

    #8. Never start your job application letter with “I have an MBA from…..” – it doesn’t matter how schooled you are, that’s not a guarantee of success in this business. Street smarts, yes. School of life, hell yeah.

    #7. Just because you’re Singaporean doesn’t mean I owe you a job. You’ll have to earn it. As a Singaporean myself, I’m appalled with the sense of self-entitlement I see coming from many of the Gen Ys. I do worry about the future here if people really don’t buck up and learn to be hungry and ambitious because the rest of Asia is catching up with us. It’s really not the time to be complacent.

    #6. The industry is small. So don’t lie about what you have done, whose work it was, why you left the agency and don’t list someone as a referee if they are not going to give you a good referral. Duh…

    #5. Sexism exists. Use it to your advantage. Some clients just prefer not to deal with a woman or only want to deal with a female specifically. I don’t care as long as we get the work and clients remain professional and above board. The ones who are initially tougher on females end up being far more respectful once they realise you know your stuff and can’t be browbeaten. Trust me, I’ve worked in the UAE for seven years. There’s enough tales to fill a book I tell you…

    #4. Winning business because you’re the cheapest agency is a death knell for the agency and industry. “Free ET and proofing/three months waiver of retainer/free creative director on the account/free creative concepts” – I’ve heard it all. It’s myopic and you’re just propagating the notion that our work doesn’t have value in the communications food chain. Why aspire to be a sweatshop, there’ll always be a cheaper agency anyway.

    #3. Get out of Singapore, being comfortable isn’t good. Fly the flag high as Singapore Inc. has value overseas. Now with so many tax incentives, why not? At the worst, it can be an offshoot base for the talent you can’t seem to hire here.

    #2. Be shameless about wanting the business. Clients love the passion, energy and excitement an agency has because it’s infectious. What’s the worst that could happen? You lose the pitch because you’re just too damn happy to work on the account? Yup, that’s not going to happen anytime soon…

    #1. It should always be fun. Work with people you like as you’ll be spending more time with them than your partners/family. S**t hits the fan all the time, it’s stressful, staffing issues will always drive you nuts, the hours do not make any sense whatsoever but if you wake up wishing it was a Saturday, then do something that fuels you again. Life is too short to be spent doing something you dread. I’m lucky to work with an amazing bunch of colleagues and clients and they’re the reason why I still love what I do after all these years. That and a healthy dose of masochism…

     

    Source: www.mumbrella.asia

  • Sanjay Perera: Lee Kuan Yew’s Legacy In Our Collective Trust

    Sanjay Perera: Lee Kuan Yew’s Legacy In Our Collective Trust

    “Where does Singapore go from here?” (April 4) is an excellent piece that calls on Singaporeans to reflect on the precious legacy handed down to us from the first-generation leaders and people.

    The sense of loss from Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s passing is not only national but, for some of us, personal. A close friend’s sibling, when paying her last respects at Mr Lee’s bier, asked permission to stand there a little longer to say a prayer. She stood there for 10 minutes.

    She informed her brother that Mr Lee’s death reminded her of their father’s demise. It connected her to the memory of what their parents told them about coming to Singapore as immigrants to start a new life.

    This is understandable. I recalled the loss of my own father, a pioneer in local broadcasting who worked closely with Mr Lee and the first-generation leaders, during Mr Lee’s funeral.

    My father’s working experience was intertwined with the country’s struggle for success and the political compact that had to be forged with the populace.

    He was the television floor manager when Mr Lee cried over Singapore’s separation from Malaysia. Despite the tears and Mr Lee’s request to stop for a while, the cameras kept rolling. That iconic moment is part of the national consciousness.

    My father spent nights in discussions and going through the speeches of ministers and Mr Lee before they were broadcast. It was a time of synergy, and all the talent that could be mustered was used to enhance political stability.

    Sometimes, when my father was required to see Mr Lee at the Istana, a car was sent to fetch him from his office at Caldecott Hill.

    The reason: As my father did not drive at the time, Mr Lee did not want him to be given lifts by others who would then try to influence his thinking en route to see the Prime Minister.

    After those discussions, if it was going to rain, Mr Lee would ask a security officer to drop my father off at a bus stop or taxi stand to make his own way back. He often came home late, as Mr Lee was hard at work.

    Despite my disagreements with some of Mr Lee’s policies, my father would remind me that many may yet realise how much we are indebted to Mr Lee. The turnout at his funeral vindicates this view.

    It is indeed left to us to carry on the strengths of his legacy. We have a collective responsibility to ensure that Singapore carries on successfully and peaceably.

    Those who choose to push the country onto a path that countermands this for reasons motivated primarily by past quarrels, but cloaked in the guise of democracy, and instigate verbal violence on social media, are irresponsible.

    Political change must arrive responsibly. Those who fail to understand this undermine a legacy that has been placed in our trust.

     

    *This article by Sanjay Perera first appeared on Voices, Today, on 7 Apr 2015.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu