Blog

  • Lee Kuan Yew: Judge Him By The Prosperity We Enjoy

    Lee Kuan Yew: Judge Him By The Prosperity We Enjoy

    Probably no Singaporean besides Lee Kuan Yew has ever been loved, and hated to such a degree.

    For every comment we’ve seen praising Old Lee, there’s bound to be another wishing he’d burn in hell.

    We’ve heard of how Old Lee crafted Singapore into the nation it is today, building a propsrous city despite the odds stacked against us ever making it.

    We’ve also heard tales of his ruthless streak, and alleged human rights abuses such as the unfair detention of supposed dissidents using the Internal Security Act as a guise.

    The biggest question when looking back at the life of this man and his contributions remains: Would Singapore be better without Lee Kuan Yew at the helm?

    We can speculate, but we’ll never know for sure.

    What we can answer is this: “Has Singapore prospered under its first ever Prime Minister?”

     

    (1) Housing

    redwire-singapore-lee-kuan-yew-legacy-2
    As Prime Minister, Lee Kuan Yew assembled a great team of leaders in their own right, people with brilliant ideas.

    He gave them the rein to develop those ideas, so long as they were practical, and stood up to reason and feasibility.

    One of those that changed our landscape forever – HDB flats.

    redwire singapore hdb flats 1960s
    Despite the West criticising how such high-rise monsters would stain our landscape, the issue at hand was, “how can the government house the expected boom in Singapore’s population, affordably?”

    Deputy Prime Minister Goh Keng Swee spearheaded this development.

    Against all opposition, especially the poor sould who had to be evicted for flats to be built, it was done.

    Generations of Singaporeans 40 years down the road have a place to call their own.

    (2) Transport

    redwire-singapore-lee-kuan-yew-legacy-5
    Planning started in 1967, and took place throughout the 1960s.

    Foreign specialists were brought in to assist state boards in the planning of what would be the most ambitious transport project in Singapore’s history.

    The first train line was launched in 1987.

    redwire singapore first mrt
    In 28 years, we’ve a public transport network that can rival the best in the world.

    We can sneer at Singapore’s MRT network, compared to say, the London subway.

    The tube opened in 1890.

    This was Singapore in 1890.

    redwire singapore victoria dock
    The MRT is still a work in development, as we can see from the many breakdowns it continues to suffer.

    But we can take pride in how quickly work progressed.

    Guess who started the ball rolling.

    (3) Education

    redwire-singapore-lee-kuan-yew-legacy-3
    In 1966, Lee mandated that all students learn a “mother tongue” – the language associated with their ethnicity.

    This, besides the English language.

    This came at a time when most former colonies were trying to strengthen their own national identity by falling back on their ethnicity.

    “If we were monolingual in our mother tongues, we would not make a living. Becoming monolingual in English would have been a setback,” he wrote in his memoirs. “We would have lost our cultural identity, that quiet confidence about ourselves and our place in the world.”

    Today, we can deal with the West, our most prominent neighbours, Malaysia and Indonesia, and the rising global power – China.

    At that time, Lee Kuan Yew spoke English and Malay.

    He would go on to learn Mandarin and other dialects well into his thirties just so he could communicate when the time came for it.

    The man lived as an example of adaptibility, and forced us to be versatile as well – for our own benefit down the road.

    (4) Society

    redwire-singapore-lee-kuan-yew-legacy-6
    The greatest criticism of Lee Kuan Yew has to be his iron-fisted rule, and his ruthlessness when it came to clamping down on people who opposed his policies.

    As theories go – Lee played the Malaysia card to get Singapore out of British rule, then he antagonised the Malaysians so Singapore would get the boot and forced to become independent, giving him a free rein to sculpt this nation according to his vision.

    That’s pretty damn well-played!

    1950s Singapore was marked by the Maria Hertogh riots, Hock Lee bus riots, and the Chinese Middle School riots.

    The 1960s – the Prophet Muhammad Birthday riots and Konfrontasi, which was essentially an Indonesia-Malaysia issue, which led to insugencies spilling over to Singapore.

    That culminated in the MacDonald House bombing

    redwire singapore macdonald house bombing
    This was the climate in which Lee Kuan Yew had to forge a nation.

    Would anything besides an iron-fisted approach work?

    A united China came about only because of a ruthless Qin ruler.

    The next united China was built on the back of another single-minded leader, Mao Zedong.

    These legendary men brought China out of civil war, forged stability out of destruction, and enabled China to prosper today.

    The same goes for Singapore, albeit on a less dramatic scale.

    Leadership must adapt to the times, and Singapore in its infant phase as a nation demanded stability and unity.

    Lee Kuan Yew got that done.

    In Sum

    redwire-singapore-lee-kuan-yew-legacy-1
    Look around you.

    50 years – that’s what it took to build all this.

    Some overseas might still mistake Singapore for a part of China, but on the whole, our nation is globally recognised and respected.

    We have prospered – on the domestic front, and on the foreign front.

    That was what Lee Kuan Yew wanted, that is what he set out to build, and that’s what we enjoy now.

    50 years.

    Times have changed, and Lee’s methods might not work today.

    But they did then.

    It’s time to push forward, to adapt to a new world order, and to better Singapore.

    All this, while respecting the band of men who brought us this far.

    Lee was the leader of that band.

     

    Source: http://redwiretimes.com

  • PKR To Mediate In Hudud Disagreement Between DAP And PAS

    PKR To Mediate In Hudud Disagreement Between DAP And PAS

    PKR said today that it would play the role of mediator between PAS and DAP to ensure that Pakatan Rakyat does not split up, following the latter’s decision to end ties with the Islamist party’s president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang over the hudud issue.

    PKR secretary-general Rafizi Ramli said the party’s political bureau had held a meeting last night at which it was decided that PKR would meet separately with the warring PAS and DAP leaders to discuss the issues threatening to split the seven-year coalition.

    “We want to sit down with PAS and DAP leadership. At the end of the day, even the most difficult issues have been resolved by sitting down and discussing,” he said at a press conference at the Parliament lobby today.

    “Pakatan is like a tripod. We cannot survive without one leg. In spite of the miscommunication and internal problems, we have our common interests and we will move along the same direction.”

    DAP said yesterday that although it would remain in PR, it was ending all ties with Hadi following the latter’s decision to go against the coalition in tabling a Private Member’s Bill on his own without discussing it with the rest of the leadership.

    “DAP is unable to work with a PAS president like Hadi Awang who persists in such dishonest and dishonourable acts,” secretary-general Lim Guan Eng said.

    “As Hadi is the PAS leader in PR, DAP’s decision to end all ties with Hadi will effectively put the PR leadership council in limbo. DAP will meet the PKR leadership to discuss the future course of PR.”

    Lim later told reporters that Hadi should leave the opposition coalition if he insisted on implementing hudud in Kelantan.

    Hadi had come under severe criticism after failing to agree to the decision made at the PR leadership council meeting on February 8, where it was agreed that Kelantan PAS’s hudud bill to amend the state’s Shariah Criminal Code Enactment II (1993) would first be discussed by all three PR party leaders, before it was tabled in the legislative assembly.

    The frictions between both parties came to a head after Hadi had gone ahead to submit a private member’s bill on March 18 to Parliament without presenting it first to the PAS central committee and to the PR leadership council.

    Rafizi said today that although the matter cannot be swept under the carpet, the hudud issue is not big enough to put the coalition at a breaking point.

    “We had also discussed our differences about the hudud in 2011 and resolved it. In the end, the commom interest of the coalition is to bring up pressing issues concerning the rakyat.

    “There will be some skirmishes, problems between two parties and the other one tries to bring back peace. There have been problems between PAS and PKR.

    “When we were preparing the shadow budget and manifesto, there were a lot of shouting, walk-outs and yet we managed to come together and present our budget and common policy framework,” he added.

    “By making that stand, we have declared that it is very hard for us to work with Hadi now,” he said.

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

  • Najib Razak Defends Use Of Sedition Act To Prevent Acts Of Terrorism

    Najib Razak Defends Use Of Sedition Act To Prevent Acts Of Terrorism

    The police are justified in making arrests under the colonial-era Sedition Act 1948 to prevent acts of terrorism in the country, Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today.

    The prime minister said use of the Act was a preventive measure and if not used, more people could become victims to acts of terror.

    The controversial law, criticised by many here and abroad for quelling legitimate dissent, was useful in preserving ethnic relations, he added.

    “We also place importance on ethnic and religious relations and that is why we are strengthening the Sedition Act. All this is meant to forestall something bad from happening to our country.

    “As the saying goes in English, ‘prevention is better than cure’. I believe that it is better for us to have preventive detention laws than having someone commit an act of terror.

    “If terrorism were to happen, many lives may be sacrificed,” Najib said in a speech to the police force at the 208th Police Day anniversary in Kuala Lumpur today.

    Najib said there was no reason for the government to apologise for using the Sedition Act, despite international criticism against the colonial-era law.‎

    “We should not be apologetic. Some may say this is not democratic, this ‎(violates) rights to freedom, and more.

    “But I want to say that there is no absolute freedom. There is no place for absolute freedom without responsibility in this country,” said Najib.

    He also gave his assurance that the Prevention of Terrorism Act, which will be tabled in Parliament soon, would not be used for political purposes.

    Najib added that the executive arm of the government would have no say in whether to detain an individual under the new act.

    “The government has no intention of using the new act for political purposes. That is why the power to detain is not placed under members of the administration.

    “We will place it under a credible body so that only those truly involved in terrorism can be detained under the new act. That way, we can guarantee Malaysia will continue to be safe,” said Najib.

    He also reminded Malaysians not to belittle the efforts of the police force in ensuring public safety.‎

    “We should not disrespect the police and look down on them by using words and insults that are unsuitable, as if the police act ‎freely as they like.

    “The groups that insult the police’s honour are completely irresponsible,” said Najib.

    The police have come under heavy criticism after nearly 90 anti-goods and services tax (GST) protesters were arrested on Monday as they were demonstrating at the Customs Department headquarters in Kelana Jaya.

    Opposition politicians have also accused Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim of taking selective action and targeting opponents of Barisan Nasional (BN).

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

  • Evidence Showed One Pilot Left Cockpit Before Plane’s Descent

    Evidence Showed One Pilot Left Cockpit Before Plane’s Descent

    PARIS — As officials struggled Wednesday to explain why a jet with 150 people on board crashed in relatively clear skies, an investigator said evidence from a cockpit voice recorder indicated one pilot left the cockpit before the plane’s descent and was unable to get back in.

    A senior military official involved in the investigation described “very smooth, very cool” conversation between the pilots during the early part of the flight from Barcelona to Düsseldorf. Then the audio indicated that one of the pilots left the cockpit and could not re-enter.

    “The guy outside is knocking lightly on the door and there is no answer,” the investigator said. “And then he hits the door stronger and no answer. There is never an answer.”

    He said, “You can hear he is trying to smash the door down.”

    While the audio seemed to give some insight into the circumstances leading up to the Germanwings crash on Tuesday morning, it also left many questions unanswered.

    “We don’t know yet the reason why one of the guys went out,” said the official, who requested anonymity because the investigation is continuing. “But what is sure is that at the very end of the flight, the other pilot is alone and does not open the door.”

    The data from the voice recorder seems only to deepen the mystery surrounding the crash and provides no indication of the condition or activity of the pilot who remained in the cockpit. The descent from 38,000 feet over about 10 minutes was alarming but still gradual enough to indicate that the twin-engine Airbus A320 had not been damaged catastrophically. At no point during the descent was there any communication from the cockpit to air traffic controllers or any other signal of an emergency.

    When the plane plowed into craggy mountains northeast of Nice, it was traveling with enough speed that it was all but pulverized, killing the 144 passengers and crew of six and leaving few clues.

    The French aviation authorities have made public very little, officially, about the nature of the information that has been recovered from the audio recording, and it was not clear whether it was partial or complete. France’s Bureau of Investigations and Analyses confirmed only that human voices and other cockpit sounds had been detected and would be subjected to detailed analysis.

    Asked about the new evidence revealed in the cockpit recordings, Martine del Bono, a bureau spokeswoman, declined to comment. “Our teams continue to work on analyzing the CVR,” she said, referring to the cockpit voice recorder. “As soon as we have accurate information we intend to hold a press conference.”

    Meanwhile, prosecutors in Marseille, who have been tasked with a separate criminal inquiry into the crash, could not immediately be reached for comment. Brice Robin, the Marseille prosecutor, was due to meet Thursday morning with the families of the crash victims.

    At the crash site, a senior official working on the investigation said, workers found the casing of the plane’s other black box, the flight data recorder, but the memory card containing data on the plane’s altitude, speed, location and condition was not inside, apparently having been thrown loose or destroyed by the impact.

    Rémi Jouty, the director of the French Bureau of Investigations and Analyses, said at a news conference that the plane took off at around 10 a.m. local time from Barcelona and that the last message sent from the pilot to air traffic controllers had been at 10:30 a.m., which indicated that the plane was proceeding on course.

    But minutes later, the plane inexplicably began to descend, Mr. Jouty said. At 10:40 and 47 seconds, the plane reported its last radar position, at an altitude of 6,175 feet. “The radar could follow the plane until the point of impact,” he said.

    Mr. Jouty said the plane slammed into a mountainside and disintegrated, scattering debris over a wide area, and making it difficult to analyze what had happened.

    It often takes months or even years to determine the causes of plane crashes, but a little more than a year after the disappearance of a Malaysian airlines jetliner that has never been found, the loss of the Germanwings flight is shaping up to be particularly perplexing to investigators.

    One of the main questions outstanding is why the pilots did not communicate with air traffic controllers as the plane began its unusual descent, suggesting that either the pilots or the plane’s automated systems may have been trying to maintain control of the aircraft as it lost altitude.

    Among the theories that have been put forward by air safety analysts not involved in the investigation is the possibility that a pilot could have been incapacitated by a sudden event such as a fire or a drop in cabin pressure.

    A senior French official involved in the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that the lack of communication from the pilots during the plane’s descent was disturbing, and that the possibility that their silence was deliberate could not be ruled out.

    “I don’t like it,” said the French official, who cautioned that his initial analysis was based on the very limited information currently available. “To me, it seems very weird: this very long descent at normal speed without any communications, though the weather was absolutely clear.”

    “So far, we don’t have any evidence that points clearly to a technical explanation,” the official said. “So we have to consider the possibility of deliberate human responsibility.”

    Mr. Jouty said it was far too early in the investigation to speculate about possible causes.

    “At this moment I have no beginning of a scenario,” Mr. Jouty said. However, he said there was not yet any evidence available that would support either a theory of a depressurization or of a midair explosion.

    Speaking on the French radio station RTL, Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said on Wednesday morning that terrorism was not a likely “hypothesis at the moment,” but that no theories had been definitively excluded. He said the size of the area over which debris was scattered suggested that the aircraft had not exploded in the air but rather had disintegrated on impact.

    Lufthansa, the parent company of Germanwings, has characterized the crash as an accident. The airline has not disclosed the identities of the pilots, except to say that the captain was a 10-year veteran with more than 6,000 hours of flying time in A320s.

    The French Bureau of Investigations and Analyses, which is leading the technical inquiry into the crash, sent seven investigators to the crash site on Tuesday. They have been joined by their counterparts from Germany, as well as by technical advisers from Airbus and CFM International, the manufacturer of the plane’s engines.

    Speaking on Europe 1 radio, Jean-Paul Troadec, a former director of the French air accident investigation bureau, said one of the big challenges for investigators would be to protect the debris at the crash site from any inadvertent damage.

    “We need to ensure that all the evidence is well preserved,” Mr. Troadec said, referring both to the pieces of the plane littered across the steep slopes as well as to the remains of the victims. The identification of the victims will most likely require matching DNA from the remains with samples from relatives.

    The recovery effort will be a laborious task, given the state of the wreckage, the difficult terrain and the fact that the crash site is so remote that it could be reached only by helicopter.

    Cabin depressurization, one of the possibilities speculated about on Wednesday, has occurred before, perhaps most notably in the crash of a Cypriot passenger plane in 2005 that killed all 121 people on board as it approached Athens. In that case, Helios Airways Flight 522, a slow loss of pressure rendered both pilots and all the passengers on the Boeing 737 jet unconscious for more than three-quarters of an hour before the aircraft ran out of fuel and slammed into a wooded gorge near the Greek capital.

    Investigators eventually determined that the primary cause of that crash was a series of human errors, including deficient maintenance checks on the ground and a failure by the pilots to heed emergency warning signals.

    Source: www.nytimes.com

  • Lee Kuan Yew – A Life Less Ordinary

    Lee Kuan Yew – A Life Less Ordinary

    Every once in your lifetime someone moves you in a way that you find difficult to understand , let alone express . I write this in the hope that my children will catch a glimpse into the man they never knew.

    Separate the man from his politics , the motives with the methods , the means with the passion .

    I want to remember him for his intellect , his searing passion and his steely determination to reach the end line . And I want to ponder his uncanny vision that was never of his time but always of a minimum 20 years into the future .

    He has lived his life without apologies . Many question his need to still have a siege mentality fighting the communists in his mind 50 years on. Many challenge the need to always be on the lookout for the shadows of disorder and anything that would destroy our heritage and all that he has built. I fully understand that . But for now , as he lies there, I just want to celebrate his passion for the nation that he loves, as a father who would fight to the end for the child that he has brought into this world and nurtured .

    I want to remember the things he did which no one understood or appreciated when he did it 50 years ago so that we could see it today.

    How many of us could understand why he would plant thousands of trees when he came into power ? He wanted the world to come here one day and see the blanket of trees in our garden city. And perhaps he foresaw that we will be successful and inevitably be transformed into a cold steel and concrete jungle today. So he planted .Trees takes time to grow.

    How many appreciated his incessant insistence on building wide roads and intricate infrastructure that we didn’t think we needed that badly in our fathers time . Think of when he introduced what we thought was excessive grandeur at the time – our MRTs which is a lifeline today in the way we live . All the successful major cities in Asia today are plagued with gridlock and there is not much they can do about it because they planned those roads 50 years ago to fit those times only . And today they are starting to dig . We built wide roads and started digging more than 20 years ago because of him. He put us 20 years ahead of everybody else . We never knew that.

    We questioned what we thought was his all too pious morality in refusing the citizens access to casinos . He held it off as long as he could but today we have two because it was all about economic survival . We wanted a choice and was annoyed to find one man deciding for us . But talk to the families today who are destroyed by those casinos and perhaps we will begin to understand him.

    What is our biggest ill today that is plaguing us as a nation ? What has caused us to change the way we live , to change our neighbors and even change the person you may marry ? And which will threaten our economic survival . It is our falling birth rate . Who would have thought ? He mentioned this when I was a schoolboy . He saw this . We were outraged when he wanted to introduce radical policies like the graduate mother scheme. And to the best of my memory he never withdrew anything he started but he withdrew that . And we are where we are today with a problem that no one can solve in a hurry, but which threatens our very existence . Babies take time too.

    I want to take time to think about his humanity and the only glimpse he allowed us to see of a chink in his strong amour . It is the woman he loves . Go read his books and his chapters of her . It is all there . And when she passed I thought of the albatross that has only one mate and who will not last the next winter once his soulmate is gone .

    We will never produce another person like him. I hope we remember him for the next 50 years . And celebrate his life in ours.

    Source: Andrew Ong

deneme bonusu