Blog

  • Bernd Stange Will Be Offered A New Contract By FAS

    Bernd Stange Will Be Offered A New Contract By FAS

    The future of Singapore national coach Bernd Stange has been the subject of much speculation after Singapore’s unsuccessful defence of their ASEAN Football Federation (AFF) Suzuki Cup title on home soil last November.

    But in the biggest indication yet that the German will be offered a new contract, Football Association of Singapore (FAS) President Zainudin Nordin said Stange’s work has been positive for the local game since he was recruited in May 2013. More specifically, he has injected new life into the Lions with younger players, upping their technical skills and guided younger coaches.

    Zainudin was speaking to TODAY after the launch of PlayPal yesterday, a local app that helps football enthusiasts search for players and locate places they can get together for kickabouts.

    After Singapore failed to reach their semi-final target in the AFF Suzuki Cup, the FAS announced on Dec 29 that Stange’s two-year contract, which was to have originally expired in May, had been extended until after the SEA Games.

    This is to allow the 67-year-old to guide national under-23 coach Aide Iskandar at the biennial event, which Singapore will host from Jun 5 to 16. TODAY understands the FAS is likely to enter talks with him on a two-year extension to his existing deal.

    Pointing to the target the FAS gave Stange when hiring him in 2013, Zainudin said: “The KPI (key performance indicators) we set for Bernd is very simple: Focus on revitalising the team, which he has done and a lot of players have been brought into the team, improving technical expertise and guiding young coaches such as Fandi, Aide and Richard Bok.

    “If you ask me, I am very clear that the objectives and the work he has done have been very positive for Singapore football and we need to look at this from a more holistic perspective in moving on subsequently.”

    NO “KNEE-JERK” REACTION FOR “RESPONSIBLE” FAS

    Last year’s AFF Suzuki Cup was the first major senior international tournament for Stange as Singapore coach, but the Lions did not get past the group stage after losses to Thailand and Malaysia. There were calls for Stange to step down, while the FAS also came under fire in the aftermath of the exit.

    But Zainudin stressed that as a “responsible organisation”, the FAS could not resort to a “knee-jerk” reaction.

    “People were also asking for Raddy’s (former national coach Radojko Avramovic) head in 2010, after Singapore also failed to get past the AFF group stage,” he said. “This is not our style; we don’t hire and fire people for one tournament because we have a role for Bernd to play and there are KPIs for him to meet and I think this is how we should handle human resource.”

    Since the tournament, Stange has kept a low profile, but even if the FAS is extending its hand for a new deal, it needs his nod to continue their partnership.

    “That is his choice, but we believe we need to sit down subsequently to see what more can be done,” said Zainudin.

    “Now, he has a duty to carry on until after the SEA Games is over and we have to make sure we respect this. Bernd is still with us and it is important to give him the stability and ensure he is able to do his job well.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Masagos Zulkifli: Singapore Ready To Share Development Experiences With Egypt

    Masagos Zulkifli: Singapore Ready To Share Development Experiences With Egypt

    Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Masagos Zulkifli said that Singapore is prepared to share its development experiences with Egypt as it works towards revitalising its economy.

    Speaking at the Egypt Economic Development Conference on Friday (Mar 13), Mr Masagos said Egyptian officials can tap Singapore’s enhanced Technical Assistance Package which covers training in eight different areas, including customised in-country training courses on technical and vocational education.

    Mr Masagos, who is also Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs, was at a two-day conference in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt which ended on Sunday.

    In his statement, he also touched on potential areas of bilateral cooperation including port development. Mr Masagos said that Singapore welcomes greater collaboration with the Suez Canal Authority (SCA) and other government agencies on the Suez Canal Regional Development Project.

    During his visit, Mr Masagos also called on Egypt’s Prime Minister Ibrahim Mahlab, during which they reaffirmed the warm and longstanding relations between both countries and discussed ways to further strengthen ties.

    He also met Minister of Foreign Affairs Sameh Shoukry who briefied him on the latest developments in the region, including the threat posed by terrorism.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • The Big Tent Approach To Ensuring Singapore’s Survival

    The Big Tent Approach To Ensuring Singapore’s Survival

    Let me suggest three concrete ways in which Singapore can increase its chances of survival.

    First, Singapore can take the “Big Tent” approach that its founding fathers adopted. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Dr Goh Keng Swee and Mr S. Rajaratnam were the pioneers of this approach. As Singapore is small, its pool of top talent is naturally also small. Hence, our founding fathers knew that they must be prepared to work with all Singaporeans, even those who had been critical of the PAP and its leaders.

    As an undergraduate at the National University of Singapore, I myself had written several articles criticising the Government and its leaders. These included a very strongly worded piece which warned that Mr Lee could be on a “slippery slide to dictatorship”. (Those who are interested in witnessing this youthful indiscretion can read this article in Can Singapore Survive?) Even so, Dr Goh offered me a place in the Defence Ministry (which I turned down in another act of folly).

    Professor Tommy Koh, my predecessor as Singapore’s ambassador to the United Nations, and Professor Chan Heng Chee, my successor, also wrote articles criticising the Government in their youth. Prof Koh challenged the PAP’s claim that a political union with Malaysia was necessary for Singapore’s survival. He also advocated that an ombudsman be set up in Singapore “because in Singapore, the exercise of discretionary power by the Government is not subject to judicial review”, and spoke out in defence of The Necessary Stage in the wake of Josef Ng’s arrest. Meanwhile, Prof Chan’s first book was seen as an attempt to discredit Mr Lee. Her second book criticised the PAP for weakening democracy in Singapore in order to consolidate its own power.

    Many other critics of the PAP and its policies have been invited to join the “Big Tent” over the years. These include Mr David Marshall, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan and Mr Raymond Lim. I firmly believe that we must continue with this “Big Tent” approach to politics. If not, Singapore society is likely to become more politically fractious and divided in the coming decades.

    Second, the survivability of Singapore can be enhanced if we become the biggest cheerleader of Asean. It is truly sad that so few Singaporeans are aware that one reason Singapore remains so peaceful and safe today is because a giant political umbrella called Asean has been erected over South-east Asia, including Singapore. South-east Asia is incredibly diverse. In a relatively small geographical space, we can find Muslims, Christians, Hinayana Buddhists, Mahayana Buddhists and Hindus. This range of religious diversity is remarkable.

    Given this diversity, wars of separation should have emerged as a natural consequence in South-east Asia. As the Balkans of Asia, it should have been the natural epicentre of separatism and conflict. Instead, over the past five decades, it has emerged as one of the global epicentres of peaceful resolution of conflicts. Any objective audit of Asean and its contribution to South-east Asia would show that Singapore is probably the biggest beneficiary from Asean’s success.

    As a small state, Singapore has benefited the most from the culture of peace Asean has introduced into the region.

    On the economic front, Singapore may have also benefited the most from the gradual opening up and liberalisation of the Asean economies. Singapore’s trade with the nine other Asean member states is larger than that of any other Asean country. Therefore, given the huge political and economic benefits that Singapore gets from Asean, Singapore should become the chief cheerleader and champion of Asean.

    The third thing that Singapore can do to enhance its long-term survival is to go back to its roots, follow the examples of its founding fathers and go for bold, even risky, public policies. Our founding fathers were prepared to take big risks because they knew Singapore had no choice. Instead of being paralysed with fear, they displayed extraordinary courage. As a result of their courage, we have succeeded. Success, in turn, has led to a natural result of success: a culture of risk aversion. Indeed, this culture of risk aversion is one of Singapore’s biggest challenges in the coming years.

    The best way to change this culture of risk aversion is to launch bold, iconic and heterodox policies that will catch the attention of our entire planet.

    This is one reason I have advocated in my Big Ideas series that Singapore should strive to be the first city in the world to move towards a zero-car ownership city. This world of zero-car ownership is already on the way.

    Well-known futurist Paul Saffo said in the National Geographic that within just five to 10 years, “Driverless cars will share roadways with conventional cars. This will happen in urban areas first and will take a decade to fully diffuse. In the long run, people will not own cars at all. When you need to go somewhere, you will have a subscription to an auto service, and it will show up at your door”.

    By displaying extraordinary courage in going for such a bold new policy, Singapore will also help to ensure its long-term survivability because it would demonstrate that the culture of risk-taking was not confined just to the generation of the founding fathers of Singapore. Instead, it would demonstrate that the culture of risk-taking has been hardwired into the DNA of Singapore.

    This culture of risk-taking may well be the best way to ensure Singapore’s long-term survivability as many new challenges will come our way. We must develop the culture of courage to respond boldly to each new wave of challenges. If we do so, the final answer to the question “Can Singapore survive?” may well be “Yes, we can”.

     

    *This essay is adapted from the introduction to the latest book by Kishore Mahbubani, Can Singapore Survive? Published by Straits Times Press, Singapore Press Holdings, it retails for $25 before GST and is available at leading bookstores or from the website www.stpressbooks.com.sg. The writer is dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Helping Women Under Pressure At Home And At Work

    Helping Women Under Pressure At Home And At Work

    At a speech at last week’s The Singapore Woman Award ceremony, Minister for Foreign Affairs K Shanmugam spoke of his surprise when he found out about the low percentage of women in top corporate management here. In his speech, he also outlined some of the measures that are being taken to address the challenges women face at work and at home. Below is an excerpt.

    Most of us are aware, generally, of the difficulties women face in trying to have a successful career and of the hard choices that society forces upon them. I became more aware a few years ago when BoardAgender came to meet me. They highlighted the low level of representation of women in corporate senior management.

    It was a surprise to me at that point in time because of my own experience in my law firm. If you look at my then-partnership, two-thirds (of lawyers) were women. In law school, two-thirds (of students) were young women. From the ages of 19 to 21, you know how boys are. The women turn up nicely dressed, mature, they speak well and they are prepared. Boys come in sandals and they are monosyllabic. So if we did not do positive discrimination, the entire law school would be full of women.

    And likewise in Allen and Gledhill, where I was doing recruitment, we had to actively look out for some boys to employ. The women just outperform at interviews, at that age anyway. And if you look around, in accounting, medicine, you would normally not think of Singapore as a society where women are discriminated against. But BoardAgender showed me the figures in corporate board representation and they were sobering.

    Before I deal with these issues, let me recount an anecdote that I think touches on a fairly fundamental underlying issue. I met the Norwegian Foreign Minister; he highlighted the approach in Norway. The men are expected to take time off to look after the children when they are infants. If they do not, their bosses will ask them why not? And that will have an impact on promotion.

    New employers will look at your CV to see whether you have taken a year off to look after your children. If you have not, that would count against you. With that as a background, let me touch on four issues that affect women. One, the corporate boardroom; two, the issues women face at the workplace; three, some structural impediments that women face in the family justice system; and four, expectations placed on women at home.

    BOARDROOM AND WORKPLACE CHALLENGES

    Credit Suisse issued a report in September last year. It said female representation at the board level in Singapore companies fell from 8.6 per cent in 2012 … to 7.9 per cent in 2013. We are below the global average of 12.7 per cent, which itself is low. And if you compare among Asian countries, others in the region, we are also below them.

    There was a recent survey by Hays. It showed that only 25 per cent of management positions in Singapore were held by women. We were the second-lowest among the Asian countries surveyed, behind China, Malaysia and Hong Kong.

    Beyond fairness, there are actually good business reasons to reverse this trend. Studies suggest that female representation on boards is generally good for the firms. It usually translates to higher profit margins. Women probably temper the alpha male behaviour a little bit. An analysis of 1,500 Standard & Poor’s firms over 15 years showed that the more women they had in top management, the more market value they generated.

    On March 6, Germany passed a law. It required some of Europe’s largest companies to give 30 per cent of supervisory board positions to women. The law will come into force next year. Germany joins Norway, Spain, France, Iceland, Belgium and the Netherlands in setting quotas for women in the boardroom.

    Here in Singapore, we have not gone for hard, legally-mandated quotas. But the Government has been trying to encourage greater women representation on boards to shape norms. Last year, the Ministry of Social and Family Development accepted 10 recommendations by the Diversity Task Force, including programmes and training to help qualified women take on senior management positions. I think we have to keep emphasising the need for change and the need to set new norms.

    Aside from the boardrooms, women have to contend with a variety of challenges in the workplace. I will only touch on one aspect, which is harassment. AWARE (Association of Women for Action and Research) did a study in 2008 that involved 500 respondents and 92 companies. AWARE found that 54 per cent of those surveyed had experienced some form of workplace harassment. 79 per cent of the victims were women, 21 per cent were men. This is sexual harassment. This harassment is unacceptable. Women need more protection.

    The Ministry of Law passed the Protection from Harassment Act in March last year. It is now in force. This will help protect women better at the workplace, from stalking and (from those) trying to embarrass women online, shame them, which happens all too frequently. This Act has a lot of teeth. You can go to court, get remedies quickly and inexpensively. We made it easy to use, we made it inexpensive. It is a tool for protection and it is a tool that we hope can help slowly change behaviour.

    Difficulties in the legal system and at home

    No one wants a marriage to end in a divorce. But when it does, we have to make it easier for women to cope. There are several difficulties. I will mention two: One is maintenance; the other is getting an HDB (Housing and Development Board) flat.

    We have now changed the laws (for divorce proceedings). We have made sure that divorce disputes will be handled quickly and led by judges. The lawyers will no longer dictate the rounds of affidavits.

    Basically, divorce proceedings are seen by parties as a way of rearguing the 10, 15 or 20 years of marriage. This is unnecessary. There are only three issues: What happens to the children, how the assets are to be divided and how much maintenance is to be paid. So we focus on that.

    We tell the judge to lead it, we prepare a short template affidavit, everybody has got to fit (their arguments) into that one-page template, you do not need 200 pages. It reduces legal costs. (We have) specialised family courts where the judges will be very knowledgeable about the issues and you will get a clear standard approach.

    So all those changes have been made; they will be rolled out and the impact will be felt on the ground from this year onwards. And women will find it much easier. (As for) maintenance, we will also make changes over the next two years to make it much easier to recover money that has been ordered to be paid.

    HDB flats post-divorce is another big issue. Eighty per cent of our population lives in public flats. And the issues are usually that after divorce, the former wife might find it difficult to get a flat because you are entitled to subsidies only twice. If she has used it up, there would be difficulties. You also do not want the system to be gamed, but the HDB now exercises flexibility in genuine cases. And we will do more in that area.

    Dr Vivienne Wee from AWARE said women face unequal expectations as compared with men; are seen as having a duty to reproduce and take on “natural responsibilities” of caring for the elderly and children.

    I think many of us realise that men do need to step up to share the domestic chores with their wives.

    Again, research shows that in families where men share the housework with their wives, the wives are happier and less depressed. Divorce rates are lower in such households. Both also live longer.

    But on that note, if I may share something else, research also shows that married men and unmarried women are the ones who live longest. So you can imagine who passes the stress to whom.

    Another study shows that if you look at daughters of fathers who helped around the house, they were more likely to have higher aspirations. They are more likely to break the mould.

    But both partners doing housework together is, of course, not always easy. There will be many cases where either the man — culturally usually the man — or the woman will have very demanding jobs.

    And sharing equally is not possible. In such cases, there has to be an agreement, some sensible arrangement. It may have to involve the in-laws to get additional support. Sometimes both may hold such demanding jobs. What can be done? I think we have to be more understanding of the pressures that women face.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Singaporean Sick And Elderly Pack Johor Nursing Homes

    Singaporean Sick And Elderly Pack Johor Nursing Homes

    In a quiet private estate within Taman Johor, a 30-minute drive from the Causeway, there is a large two-storey bungalow with high ceilings and a lush garden.

    At first glance, it looks like a typical suburban residence. But it is really a nursing home, and Singaporean Andrew Tan is one of its residents.

    The house is part of a cluster of 10 bungalows within the estate, making up the City Heart Care Nursing Home.

    “There are computers for me to check my Facebook page, my own TV to watch the news and I can even go to the coffee shop outside for noodles,” said Mr Tan, 43, who is paralysed from the chest down after a car accident 20 years ago.

    His family, who lives in Singapore, sent him there as his ageing parents no longer have the strength to care for him.

    After visiting more than 10 nursing homes in Singapore and Malaysia, the former electrical technician, who is single, chose City Heart Care as “it does not feel or smell like a hospital”.

    “I also have my own room, which means I have privacy when my diapers need changing,” he said.

    He is one of a growing number of infirm Singaporeans who have been admitted to nursing homes in Johor Baru, where prices can be as low as half those in Singapore.

    Mr Tan’s family pays $900 a month for a two-bedded private room. A similar room in Singapore would cost more than double.

    The growing influx is convincing major nursing home players to expand in Johor Baru.

    Singapore company Econ Healthcare Group, which runs eight nursing homes here, opened a 57,000 sq ft, four-storey home in Taman Perling this month. The 199-bed centre is a 30-minute drive from the Causeway.

    Spring Valley Homecare, believed to be Johor Baru’s largest nursing home operator, with 210 beds, recently bought an 8,000 sq ft piece of land in Johor Baru.

    Its Singaporean-Malaysian owners want to build a three-storey, 84-bed home by the end of the year.

    City Heart Care is also looking to buy more bungalows.

    Said Econ group executive chairman Ong Chu Poh: “There is potential in Johor Baru because of lower land and labour costs, which mean lower fees.”

    Three residents from Econ’s nursing homes in Singapore have already moved over to its new Taman Perling home.

    At Spring Valley, more than 40 per cent of its 150 residents are Singaporeans, compared with a fifth five years ago. At City Heart Care, the number of Singaporeans has doubled in the last two years to make up 20 per cent of its residents.

    Affordability is the key pull. Nursing home fees in Singapore range from $1,200 to $3,500 a month. This is before government subsidies of between 10 per cent to 75 per cent. But those with per capita household incomes of above $2,600 do not qualify for these subsidies.

    In Johor Baru, nursing home fees start from $600 a month, making them attractive to middle-class Singaporeans.

    Mr Frankie Ker, director of Spring Valley, said most of his Singaporean residents come from the “sandwiched middle class”.

    He said: “If you are poor, the Government will look after you. If you are rich, you can afford three maids to look after you 24 hours. If you’re middle-class, it’s tough.”

    Spring Valley offers basic, spacious open wards for $600 a month. Those who prefer more privacy can pay $900 for a two-bedded room in City Heart Care’s bungalows.

    “Singaporeans are very price-sensitive and will bargain for even $20 off,” said City Heart Care’s Malaysian owner, Mr Jeremy Yeo.

    Econ’s homes target those with higher spending power, charging up to $2,500.

    Besides offering single rooms with attached toilets, it has barbecue pits and outdoor exercise gardens. Still, its fees are up to a third lower than its Singapore rates.

    The space crunch in homes in Singapore is another reason more are heading across the Causeway.

    There are 10,000 beds now and the Health Ministry is pushing to increase this to 17,150 by 2020. Work on seven new nursing homes began this year.

    Operators said demand for nursing home space here will only grow, given Singapore’s ageing population, creating a spill-over effect across the Causeway.

    For some though, being in Johor can be a more lonely experience as the hassle of crossing the border deters some families from visiting, said operators.

    Retired labourer Seow Teck Beng, who has been living at Spring Valley for three years, sees his children every three months. “I miss them,” the 89-year-old said.

    Operators said that they try to encourage family visits.

    Econ’s Mr Ong said: “Singaporeans can combine the visit with weekend shopping. Johor Baru is not that far away – it’s like an MRT trip from Jurong to the airport.”

    For Mr Tan, who said he is now good friends with the Indonesian staff at City Heart Care, Johor Baru has become a long-term choice.

    He gets visits from his family several times a year, but he said: “This is my home now.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu