Blog

  • Crane Toppled At Construction Site Near Potong Pasir MRT

    Crane Toppled At Construction Site Near Potong Pasir MRT

    The accident happened at the worksite of the upcoming Sant Ritz condominium in Potong Pasir. No one was injured, says SCDF.

    A large crane toppled at a construction site along Tai Thong Crescent on Tuesday afternoon (Feb 24) and ended up in the front porch of a house opposite.

    The accident happened at the worksite of the upcoming Sant Ritz Condominium near Potong Pasir MRT station.

    Construction workers told Channel NewsAsia the crane went down at about 4.30pm and the boom of the crane hit the gate of a semi-detached house opposite. It was seen lying across the road, when Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) arrived.

    No one was in the crane at the time of the accident, workers said. SCDF said no one was injured.

    A resident from a neighbouring semi-detached unit who identified herself as Ms Huang said: “I was on the phone when I heard a very loud sound – like glass shattered. I came out and I saw the crane toppled next door.”

    Toppled Crane 3 Toppled Crane 1 Toppled Crane 2

    Ms Huang, who is in her 80s, added that no one has been living in that house for a while, but said the owners had visited it recently.

    Two police cars were present when Channel NewsAsia visited the scene at about 6pm. Police said investigations are ongoing.

    A representative from Santarli Construction which is in charge of the Sant Ritz development said an architect has issued a directive for a safety officer to investigate the incident.

    The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) said Santarli Construction has been instructed to stop work at the site.

    “SCDF informed the Ministry of Manpower on Feb 24 about an accident that took place at Santarli Construction’s workplace along Pheng Geck Avenue on the same day,” said an MOM spokesperson. “Officers from MOM’s Occupational Safety and Health Division commenced investigations immediately.”

    Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin also visited the accident site late Tuesday night, and in a Facebook post said that it was “fortunate no injuries occurred”. He added that contractors will be dismantling the crane, and will need to bring in a heavier one to lift the collapsed crane.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

     

     

  • What Will It Take For Singaporeans To Give Up Cars

    What Will It Take For Singaporeans To Give Up Cars

    Many foreigners are baffled as to why a Singaporean would want to buy a car, paying several times the price of a car in their own home countries. After all, they insist, the MRT system is fantastic and so much better than the subway in New York or the Tube in London. Others argue that car ownership takes on an aspirational veneer in Singapore, and people are willing to pay a lot of money to realise the dream.

    However, as any Singaporean knows, public transport can only get you so far if you don’t live near an MRT station and don’t go out after midnight. In order to really change Singaporeans’ attitude to car ownership, some changes need to happen first, like the following.

    Increased accessibility to public transport

    The occasional breakdown and daily shoving matches not withstanding, the MRT is fairly efficient. While it pales in comparison to its counterparts in Hong Kong, Tokyo and Taipei, it does offer the quickest way to get from Jurong East MRT station to Bugis MRT station, especially considering the jams on the road.

    But the problem is that most Singaporeans live in suburban areas quite a distance from the central zone, and unless you actually live within wallking distance of Jurong East MRT in the above example, getting to the station can be a big headache in itself. I can’t pretend I’m not just a little bitter about this, as I live in an area with only one bus, which has taken up to 1 hour to arrive in the past.

    When you think about all that lost time spent waiting for the bus in order to get to the MRT station, it’s not hard to see why many Singaporeans don’t mind shelling out the cash to buy a car. Either driving to work or using the park and ride scheme to get to an MRT station can save you more than an hour each day—a life saver if you have to work long hours.

    Cheaper late night transport options

    While raising the prices of cars can deter people from buying them, those who routinely travel after midnight save much less, which then increases the attractiveness of having your own transport. Taxi fares in Singapore have risen quite a bit over the last ten years, and taking a 30 minute cab ride after midnight can easily cost you more than $25.

    If you go out for late night suppers a lot, get the urge to shop at Mustafa at 3am or work the graveyard shift but have a meagre transport allowance, getting a car makes a lot of sense. While we do have NightRider and Night Owl bus services, these are limited and operate only only Fridays and Saturdays and the eve of public holidays, presumably to cater to partygoers.

    I personally think the NightRider services are great, and if they could be extended to the other days of the week and serve a wider range of areas, going out at night would be a lot more affordable, considering the cost of two beers and a cab ride home with midnight surcharge could easily set you back $50.

    More independence and free time for kids

    Many Singaporeans I’ve spoken to seem to be of the opinion that a car becomes a necessity when you have kids. However, unless you ferry your kids around every single day, the odd taxi ride to the zoo or the clinic would probably still cost much less than a car.

    The problem is that many Singaporeans actually do ferry their kids around every single day. I live just outside a primary school, and every morning and afternoon the road gets jameed by an insane number of parental cars just waiting to drop their offspring off at the school gates. Many parents prefer to get stuck in a neverending queue of parents’ cars than to drop their kids off a 5 minute walk away.

    Singapore is one of the safest countries in the world and actually the perfect place for kids to learn how to use public transport on their own, since there’s little fear of their being kidnapped and sold as slaves.

    On the other hand, very often it’s not that kids aren’t able to take public transport on their own—but rather that they have too many after school activities. Parents need cars so they can drive frantically from tuition centres to piano lessons to Young Genius seminars.

    If kids are allowed to be independent and free up enough time in their schedule to remove the need for parents to become chauffeurs, more people might realise that it is indeed possible to parent without a car.

    Greater comfort on public transport

    If you’ve ever had a migraine, been pregnant or just damned tired after another 12 hour work day, you’ve probably sworn that you would either quit your job or buy a car. For many people, their biggest bugbear about having to rely on public transport isn’t commuting time—it’s comfort level.

    To be fair, the MRT and buses in Singapore are actually quite comfortable on their own. Nobody’s asking for velvet cushions or free foot massages during their commute. But when the trains and buses are packed to bursting point, you have to stand throughout an hour-long commute and you’ve got armpits in your face and heels stabbing at your feet, a car looks that much more appealing.

    Unfortunately, even if SMRT started being more generous about the air con on the trains and hiring smiling greeters to wish passengers a pleasant commute, the crux of the matter is that for those with a long commute, standing for an hour or more causes enough discomfort to send them running to car dealers. When you’re already exhausted from work, trying to balance on the steps of an overcrowded bus or having to grab for the poles as the driver makes yet another emergency stop can take its toll.

    With office decentralisation already starting to happen and the government making efforts to improve the capacity of the public transport infrastructure, let’s hope this problem gets solved someday.

    Do you have a car and why did you buy one despite the high cost? Share your reasons in the comments!

    Source:http://blog.moneysmart.sg

  • Standard & Poor Provides Singapore Unsolicited AAA Rating

    Standard & Poor Provides Singapore Unsolicited AAA Rating

    Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services said today that Singapore’s 2015 budget continues to show the strength of the government’s institutional and governance effectiveness. This factor is a key support for their sovereign credit rating on Singapore (unsolicited ratings AAA/Stable/A-1+; axAAA/axA-1+).

    “The Singapore budget focuses on longer-term fiscal challenges even as it addresses the immediate capacity constraints in transport and health services, areas that will see significant increases in spending,” said Standard & Poor’s credit analyst Yee Farn Phua.

    Policies announced in the Singapore dollar S$68.2 billion budget aim to boost the country’s economic growth potential, retrain Singaporean workers, and ensure increased funding to meet the needs of Singapore’s aging population. Investments in these areas significantly outsize the S$705 million transfers to households. These measures should help maintain Singapore’s credit strengths even as the population ages at one of the fastest rates in Asia.

    After accounting for revenue not reported as part of the Singapore budget, S&P estimates that the general government account will remain in surplus over the fiscal years ending March 2015 and March 2016. The government projects a budget deficit of S$6.7 billion (1.7 per cent of GDP) in the fiscal year ending March 2016 after a nearly balanced budget in the current fiscal year.

     

    Source: www.businesstimes.com.sg

  • CASE: Petrol Companies Profiteering From Petrol Tax Implementation

    CASE: Petrol Companies Profiteering From Petrol Tax Implementation

    The consumer watchdog here has accused some petrol companies of profiteering, after petrol prices across the island were raised yesterday by up to S$0.25 for a litre of 98-octane grade petrol and as much as S$0.18 for 95-octane grade petrol — a day after it was announced in the Budget statement that petrol duty rates would be increased with immediate effect.

    Noting that some of the petrol prices were raised beyond the levels of the duty hike, Mr Seah Seng Choon, executive director of the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), said it was understandable for the petrol companies to increase prices following the levy hike. But he pointed out: “They should not increase more than what the tax requires them to and if they do that, they are profiteering from the situation.”

    As of last night, a litre of 98-octane-grade petrol at Shell cost S$2.28 — S$0.25 more than on Monday. Other brands also adjusted their prices, with Caltex, Esso and Singapore Petroleum Company (SPC) charging S$2.25, S$2.23 and S$2.20, respectively. The increment ranged between S$0.17 and S$0.21 for the three brands.

    For 95-octane-grade petrol, which is most popular with drivers, Shell raised the price by S$0.18 to S$2.04 per litre. The other three brands raised their prices to S$2.01 or S$2.02 — with the increases ranging between S$0.12 and S$0.16.

    “(The) pump price adjustments reflect the increase in petrol duties as announced in the 2015 Budget,” said a spokesperson from Chevron, which owns the Caltex brand. The other brands could not be reached for comment by press time.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced on Monday that petrol duty rates would increase by S$0.20 to S$0.64 per litre for the premium grade and by S$0.15 to S$0.56 per litre for the intermediate grade. To cushion the impact of the hike, motorists would be given a one-off road tax rebate for a year. Mr Tharman noted that with falling oil prices, pump prices after the duty hikes would remain lower than the levels in the past two-and-a-half years.

    Salesman Andrew Koh, 58, welcomed the road tax rebate, but felt it was not enough to mitigate the higher petrol prices. “I was happy when crude oil prices started falling … But now, all the drivers are going to suffer from the increase in levy and petrol prices,” he said.

    Yesterday, Mr Tharman said the taxes related to vehicle ownership and usage would have to be adjusted from time to time, to create a greener environment. Adding that the previous adjustment to petrol levies was done a dozen years ago, he said it was better to raise duties when oil prices are falling, compared with the opposite situation. It was also unlikely the duty hikes would filter down to overall consumer prices as commercial vehicles use diesel, he said. As for middle-income families who own cars, Mr Tharman said other measures in the Budget could alleviate the cost of living.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Japan’s Crown Prince Warns On ‘Correct’ History

    Japan’s Crown Prince Warns On ‘Correct’ History

    Japan’s crown prince has warned of the need to remember World War II “correctly”, in a rare foray into an ideological debate as nationalist politicians seek to downplay the country’s historic crimes.

    In an unusual intervention in the discussion, Naruhito’s mild-mannered broadside was being interpreted in some circles as a rebuke to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, a key figure in the right-wing drive to minimise the institutionalised system of wartime sex slavery.

    “Today when memories of war are set to fade, I reckon it is important to look back our past with modesty and pass down correctly the miserable experience and the historic path Japan took from the generation who know the war to the generation who don’t,” Naruhito said.

    The comments, released Monday on the prince’s 55th birthday come as Abe’s controversial views on history roil relations with China and South Korea, and cause unease in Washington.

    Abe has openly said he wants a more sympathetic telling of the history of the first half of the 20th century, a period marked by brutal expansionism in Asia and warring with China and the West.

    The prime minister last week appointed a 16-member panel to advise him on a statement he is set to make later this year to mark the 70th anniversary of Japan’s surrender.

    Abe has said he will largely stand by Tokyo’s previous apologies, but amid growing anger in China and South Korea over the “comfort women” system, speculation is mounting that he will seek to downplay the issue.

    Mainstream historians agree that up to 200,000 women, predominantly from Korea, were forced into sexual slavery during WWII.

    Right wing Japanese insist there is no documentary proof that the Japanese state or its military were involved in the system on the Korean peninsula and reject official guilt. That position, which is hardening, angers South Korea and China.

    Both countries will be carefully watching any official pronouncement on the war.

    While Japan’s newspapers remained staid in their coverage of Naruhito’s comments, social media users leapt on them.

    “This definitely contains a warning against Shinzo Abe, doesn’t it?” tweeted @Kirokuro.

    “It is a regular recognition (of history), but these comments by the crown prince stand out because Prime Minister Abe’s views on the constitution and history are outrageous,” said @kazu_w50

    Asked about his views on war and peace, Naruhito told reporters: “It was very painful that many precious lives were lost, many people suffered and felt deep sorrow in the world including in Japan.”

    “It is important that we never forget people who died in the war… (and we must) deepen our appreciation for our past so as not to repeat the horrors of war and to foster a love of peace,” he said.

     

    Source: http://news.yahoo.com

deneme bonusu