Blog

  • Al Qaeda Claim Of Responsibility In Charlie Hebdo Attack Serves As Reminder Of Danger It Still Poses

    Al Qaeda Claim Of Responsibility In Charlie Hebdo Attack Serves As Reminder Of Danger It Still Poses

    WASHINGTON — The younger of the two brothers who killed 12 people in Paris last week most likely used his older brother’s passport in 2011 to travel to Yemen, where he received training and US$20,000 (S$26,600) from Al Qaeda’s affiliate there, presumably to finance attacks when he returned home to France.

    American counterterrorism officials said on Wednesday that they now believed Cherif Kouachi was the aggressor in the attacks — not his elder brother Said Kouachi, as they had first thought — but that Said might also have travelled to Yemen, as the American and French authorities have said.

    A fuller portrait of the brothers has emerged as an international effort is focused on determining who might have been behind the attack on the French newspaper Charlie Hebdo, and what direct role, if any, that Al Qaeda, its affiliates or their bitter rival, the Islamic State, had in planning and ordering the assault.

    In a video and written statement, the Al Qaeda branch in Yemen on Wednesday formally claimed responsibility for the deadly assault. It said the target had been chosen by the Al Qaeda leadership, but did not specify which leaders.

    If the claim of direct responsibility holds up, it would make the attacks in France the deadliest planned and financed by Al Qaeda on Western soil since the transit bombings in London in 2005 that killed 52 people. It would also serve as a reminder of the continued danger from the group at a time when much of the attention of Europe and the United States has shifted to the Islamic State, the militant organisation that controls large swathes of Syria and Iraq and has become notorious for beheading hostages.

    The new information about the Kouachi brothers could help explain what Cherif Kouachi had told a French television station before his death last week; that he had gone to Yemen in 2011, probably through Oman, and was financed by Anwar Awlaki, the American-born cleric who oversaw attacks against the West by Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, also known as AQAP.

    The American authorities now believe Cherif most likely had contact with Awlaki in Yemen, possibly in person.

    But it is still unclear what specific guidance the Al Qaeda branch gave the Kouachis about carrying out an attack, though it is believed that the satirical magazine was one of the targets discussed, an American counterterrorism official said.

    “I suspect that Cherif Kouachi did engage AQAP members in Yemen, but that he was not fully brought into the organisation,” said Mr Brian Fishman, a counterterrorism researcher at the New America Foundation in Washington. “Perhaps concerned about infiltration by Western agents, AQAP might have offered minimal training, directed the group towards publicly-announced target lists and sent him on his way.”

    Mr Fisher added that if that had happened, “AQAP did not exactly direct the attack, but it had some knowledge of the Kouachis and could plausibly try to claim credit”.

    The statement by the Al Qaeda branch in Yemen called the Kouachi brothers, who were killed by the police last Friday, “two heroes of Islam”.

    But it referred to the actions of Amedy Coulibaly, who attacked a police officer and was killed by the police after holding hostages in a kosher supermarket, as a coincidence and did not take responsibility for them.

    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence in the US said it had determined that the video clip claiming responsibility was genuine, but that it had not reached a conclusion on whether or not the claims being made in the video were valid.

    “The big question that investigators need to look at is, how much of a role did AQAP play in the actual planning in the final stages of this process?” said Mr J M Berger, a fellow at the Brookings Institution. “They could have given these guys money and training three or four years ago, but when they executed it, it could have been done with money (from other sources).”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • How Would Prophet Muhammad Have Reacted To Charlie Hebdo Caricatures?

    How Would Prophet Muhammad Have Reacted To Charlie Hebdo Caricatures?

    The level of freedom of expression in the early centuries of Islam would put much of the current Muslim world to shame.

    After the brutal assassination of two visitors and eight of its staff members, the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo has vowed to continue its trademark irreverence and secular iconoclasm, which critics have accused of being Islamophobic, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian.

    Its first issue since the tragic massacre features a cartoon of a tearful Prophet Muhammad holding a sign showing the famous twitter hashtag “Je Suis Charlie.” The turbaned figure stands under the slogan “All is forgiven.”

    As a staunch advocate of freedom of expression, I believe the publication has every right to run such a cartoon, even if their decision would upset the religious sensibilities of some Muslims such as Egypt’s grand mufti, Shawqi Allam, who blasted the cartoon as racist.

    The caricature drove me to consider some hypothetical questions: What would Muhammad make of this? Would the prophet forgive Charlie Hebdo’s lampooning of him and his religion? If he were alive today, would he tweet his solidarity with the slain cartoonists?

    My own reading of Muhammad’s life and history leads me to conclude that although the prophet may not have tweeted “#JeSuisCharlie,” he would have condemned these savage murders and even forgiven French satirists no matter what insult was directed his way.

    While some might find my assertion hard to believe, it is backed up by Muhammad’s own actions and convictions. Although the prophet’s contemporary self-appointed defenders take offence on his behalf and believe they are doing his will by protesting perceived insults or punishing those who commit them, their actions could not be further from the truth.

    During the vulnerable early years of Islam, the Islamic prophet endured and tolerated mockery and disdain. Even in victory, Muhammad wisely advised to exercise tolerance. Upon his triumphant return to Mecca, he forgave the inhabitants of the city which had been home to his fiercest enemies. He even pardoned a member of his inner circle, Abdullah Ibn Saad, who denounced the prophet as a charlatan.

    More importantly, the Islam Muhammad preached recognised the pluralistic nature of society and guaranteed freedom of belief. Surat al-Baqara of the Quran reminds Muslims: “There shall be no compulsion in religion.”

    Significantly, the constitution Muhammad drew up in Medina included in its definition of the “umma” all the oasis’ inhabitants, not just its Muslims. These included both the “people of the book”, ie: Christians and Jews, but also, perhaps surprisingly, pagans – all of whom were granted equal political, cultural and religious rights as Muslims.

    There was so much freedom of thought and expression in the early centuries of Islam that it would put much of the current Muslim world to shame. Although many contemporary Muslims are convinced that ridiculing Islam and rejecting religion are western innovations, this is closer to wishful thinking than historical fact.

    In Christendom, Muhammad and Islam was derided from a rival religious vantage point; that the prophet of Islam was believed to be the false prophet of a fake religion. He was even condemned to the ninth circle of Dante’s inferno where he supposedly stands “rent from the chin to where one breaketh wind”.

    Within the Islamic world itself, Muhammad and Islam were criticised and mocked from a secular, rationalist, anti-religious perspective.

    One example is the religious sceptic and scholar Ibn al-Rawandi (827-911) who, despite his rejection of religion and Islam, lived a long life in the 8th-9th centuries.

    Rawandi, who spent a significant part of his life in Baghdad, believed that intellect and science supersede all else, that prophets were unnecessary, that religion was irrational, that Islamic tradition was illogical and that miracles were a hoax.

    In neighbouring Syria, a few decades later, the Richard Dawkins of the Abbasid era was born. Abu al-Ala’ al-Maarri (973-1058) was so contemptuous of religion that he divided the world into two types of people: “Those with brains, but no religion, and those with religion, but no brains.”

    Maarri also lived to a ripe age. Rather than being visited by assassins, he attracted many students and engaged with scholars of various persuasions, even when he decided to return to his hometown of Maarra to live ascetically in seclusion.

    Although this tradition of free thought and scepticism has shrunk over the centuries, it still exists. It even witnessed resurgence in the 20th century – and included the “Dean of Arab Literature”, Taha Hussein – until the conservative Islamist current started to block it in the late 1970s/1980s.

    The years since the revolutionary wave in 2011 have seen secularists, sceptics and atheists mounting a comeback. But with some countries equating non-belief to terrorism and arresting atheists, theirs is a risky venture.

    But these efforts are essential. Freedom of thought and expression were vital components of Islam’s golden age and lifting Arab and Muslim countries out of their current plight will require a return to that era of free inquiry.

    Khaled Diab is an award-winning Egyptian-Belgian journalist, writer and blogger. He is the author of Intimate Enemies: Living with Israelis and Palestinians in the Holy Land. He blogs at www.chronikler.com

     

    Source: www.aljazeera.com

  • Non-Malay Student Told To Go Home After Wearing Baju Kurung To School

    Non-Malay Student Told To Go Home After Wearing Baju Kurung To School

    KUALA LUMPUR: A Form 3 student was left confused and traumatised when school authorities in SMK Seri Mutiara in Cheras insisted she leave the premises at once because she was wearing a “baju kurung”, formal school attire reserved strictly for Malay students.

    Speaking to the Malay Mail yesterday, Britney Nicole said, “I was wearing ‘baju kurung’ in my previous school, so I don’t know what is wrong.”

    Saying that even her new friends at the school were concerned about this matter, she explained, “I was told by the teacher that I was being given a final warning and that I won’t be allowed to enter class unless I wore a pinafore. Now, I feel scared to go to school.”

    Britney, who is ethnically Lun Bawang, explained that on her first day at school, the senior assistant asked her whether she was Malay or Chinese, to which she replied she was Sarawakian.

    Her aunt, Agnes Padan, 35, who was with her at the time, said they were then told Britney would have to wear a pinafore to school the next time.

    However since Britney showed up to school again wearing a “baju kurung”, school authorities barred her from entering, and insisted she wait outside the school’s premises until someone could come pick her up to go home.

    As it turned out, Britney waited from 7am to 10am when her aunt’s husband, Lawrence Jayaraj, 45, could pick her up.

    Speaking to the Malay Mail, her aunt said Britney was told that the school was particular about their dress code and that only Malay girls could wear “baju kurung” while non-Malays were required to wear pinafores.

    “I don’t understand how is this an issue. She looks well dressed in her baju kurung and it was not a problem in her previous school.

    “She has been wearing baju kurung since she was in Form One. She has worn pinafores before but this year, we only bought baju kurung,” Agnes explained.

    Britney’s uncle meanwhile found out that other parents in the school were equally unhappy with the dress code and felt they were being bullied to follow it.

    When contacted about this issue, Deputy Education Minister II P Kamalanathan said, “In the first place, this should not have happened.

    “The ministry is investigating. If it is indeed true, action will be taken.”

    He also said the school had no right to impose the rule for “baju kurung” to be exclusively worn by Muslim students.

    School authorities were not available for comment.

     

    Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com

  • Mankelo Fishery Sediakan Khidmat Penghantaran Ke Rumah

    Mankelo Fishery Sediakan Khidmat Penghantaran Ke Rumah

    ENCIK Razman Abdul Ghani mulanya ragu dengan saranan agar beliau mengembangkan perniagaan jual ikan dengan menyediakan khidmat penghantaran ke rumah.

    Namun, saranan anaknya itu dicubanya juga dan ternyata ia mendapat sambutan menggalakkan.

    Perniagaan syarikatnya, Mankelo Fishery, melonjak 40-50 peratus sejak dua bulan lalu.

    Encik Razman, yang sudah 16 tahun berniaga ikan di pasar Bukit Gombak, menyangka pelanggan lebih gemar ke pasar kerana mahu melihat sendiri ikan-ikan segar sebelum membelinya.

    “Yalah, selama berniaga, pelanggan saya lebih suka melihat dan memegang sendiri ikan-ikan dan melihat warna insang ikan untuk mengetahui kesegarannya.

    “Jadi, saya agak terkejut apabila sambutan penghantaran ke rumah begitu menggalakkan,” ujarnya ketika ditemui di gerainya di Blok 372, Bukit Batok Street 31.

    Encik Razman, yang dikenali dengan nama ‘Mankelo’ sejak tinggal di kampung di Pulau Merlimau, menamakan syarikatnya Mankelo Fishery agar mudah diingati.

    Idea membentuk khidmat penghantaran ke rumah dicetuskan anak keduanya, Encik Muhd Tamam Shafiq Razman, yang ingin menceburi bidang niaga selepas tamat perkhidmatan negara (NS).

    Setiap hari dari 8 hingga 9.30 pagi, Encik Shafiq memuat naik gambar pelbagai jenis ikan dan makanan laut lain yang dijual di dalam Facebook Mankelo Fishery.

    Jenis ikan yang dijual berubahubah berdasarkan hasil tangkapan.

    Pelanggan yang berminat boleh membuat tempahan sehingga 11.30 pagi melalui Facebook, Instagram, telefon atau khidmat pesanan ringkas (SMS). Tempahan akan dihantar pada hari yang sama dari 12 tengah hari hingga 4 petang.

    “Kami membuat penghantaran pada hari yang sama untuk memastikan kesegarannya.

    “Sejauh ini sambutan pelanggan, yang kebanyakannya wanita bekerja, cukup menggalakkan.

    “Biasanya mereka telefon kami di tempat kerja dan kami menghantar ikan-ikan itu ke rumah mereka.

    “Mereka cukup senang kerana kami juga menyiang dan membersihkan ikan-ikan itu,” kata Encik Shafiq, yang membantu bapanya sejak di menengah dua.

    Dua daripada tiga beradiknya, Encik Muhd Tamam Sari dan Encik Muhd Tamam Sufyan, juga membantu dalam perniagaan itu.

    Pada hujung minggu, syarikat itu pernah mendapat tempahan sehingga 40 rumah dalam satu hari.

    Secara purata, pelanggan membayar $40 hingga $70 bagi setiap kali pembelian.

    Syarikat itu mengenakan bayaran minimum $30 dan bayaran penghantaran di serata Singapura $5.

    Sejak menjalankan perniagaan penghantaran ke rumah, syarikat itu juga menerima permintaan bagi daging dan ayam, serta makanan lain seperti tempe, tauhu, mi dan sebagainya.

    Bagi memenuhi permintaan itu, Mankelo Fishery bekerjasama dengan dua pegerai di pasar Bukit Gombak.

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Paterson Road Closed Due To Oil Spillage

    Paterson Road Closed Due To Oil Spillage

    Traffic Police is looking into the cause of an oil spillage that occurred early Thursday morning along Paterson Road, police said in a statement.

    A stretch of Paterson Road outside ION Orchard, towards River Valley Road is now closed to all motorists except authorised vehicles. Paterson Road towards Scotts Road have been converted into two-way traffic to ease traffic congestion. An earlier statement from the police said the stretch of road has been closed since about 3.50am.

    The affected stretch of road is currently being resurfaced and Traffic Police officers have been deployed to manage the traffic situation. Road users are advised to avoid the following roads leading to Paterson Road: Scotts, Orchard and Tanglin roads. Traffic delays are expected on these roads.

    At about 10am, workers were seen repaving the affected stretch of road. Bus services 5, 105 and 132 which normally pass through Paterson Road are also being diverted to use Orchard Road, Orchard Boulevard before continuing on to Grange Road.

    An office worker who works at Shaw Centre told The Straits Times that the road closure has also caused a jam from Novena towards town.

    “I left home at 8.35am and took bus 54, which usually takes 30 minutes to reach Far East. Today, it took an hour,” she said.

    To facilitate road recovery works for an oil spillage, all five lanes at Paterson Road between the junction of Orchard Road and Orchard Boulevard, towards Paterson Hill are closed temporarily as this slippery stretch was not safe for use, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said in a statement. Public are advised to avoid these roads.

    The lanes will be opened to motorists progressively, LTA said. All five lanes are expected to be opened to motorists by 5pm. LTA enforcement officers and engineers are on-site to help to expedite recovery works and traffic diversion.

    Motorists who have any queries can contact the LTA hotline at 1800-CALL LTA. The public may also call the Traffic Police Information Hotline at 65470000 or stay tuned to radio and television broadcast for the latest updates concerning the road closure.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

deneme bonusu