Rilek1Corner

Blog

  • Help Mohd Shamsul: Family Pleads For $80,000 To Pay For Surgeries, Hospitalisation And Step-Down Car

    Help Mohd Shamsul: Family Pleads For $80,000 To Pay For Surgeries, Hospitalisation And Step-Down Car

    Peace and blessings be upon you.

    My name is Watee, sister of Mohd Shamsul and I am trying to raise funds for my brother’s treatment costs and aftercare.

    When my brother, Mohd Shamsul, had a terrible fall from a bunk bed as a child. The result was a blood clot in his brain which could not be removed due to the risks involved in the procedure. Over the years, the blood clot has caused my brother to deteriorate. He eventually became disabled; he’s since suffered from weakness in all his right limbs, and eventually became limp. Despite this, he was known to be a very positive person with no lack of smiles. An active volunteer, he would work with various mosques, orphanages and organisations.  Strongly-spirited with excellent sportsmanship, he was especially talented in bowling.

    From 11 April 2017 onwards, our family experienced a very life changing moment when Shamsul was found unconscious on the floors of our washroom. Just moments ago, he was still having dinner with us. Our poor mother was thrown into hysterics because her greatest fear happened – the blood vessel near his blood clot burst, just like his old doctors used to warn. He was immediately warded in the hospital’s Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

    The doctors told us he had a brain aneurysm, which then led to Brain aneurysms develop as a result of thinning arterial walls. A brain aneurysm that has not ruptured is usually unnoticed because of a lack of symptoms. However, in rare cases, the aneurysm will burst and bleed in the skull (cerebral haemorrhaging). His brain cells died from a lack of oxygen.

    His condition later led to Arteriovenous Malformation (AVM), which is a tangle of blood vessels in the brain or on its surface bypasses normal brain tissue and directly diverts blood from the arteries to the veins. Our dear brother was into comatose.

    The doctors decided to proceed with the highly risky operation, external ventricular drain (EVD), on the very same day to stop the bleeding in his brain. He condition became critical after the op.

    Unfortunately, after the procedure, his brain pressure skyrocketed and the swelling worsened. He was put to sedation and now, he’s paralysed.

    On 27 April 2017, a second external ventricular drain (EVD) revision was performed.

    After the operation, his condition improved tremendously. Since he was more responsive to his surroundings, her was transferred to the Acute Care Unit (ACA), and subsequently, to the General Ward. To my family, this was a huge relief and we could finally feel hope again.

    From 30th May up till today, Shamsul is in a step-down care for a rehab stay.

    Our Goal

    Though we feel lucky to pull through the most trying time of our lives with our brother still with us, there is another hurdle we now have to face: the medical bills.

    Not including the stay in the ACA and General Ward, the bills for the ICU ward and two surgeries were above SGD$50,000. His current stay at the step-down care hospital is projected to be minimally 28 days and will amount to at least SGD$7000. This would cost more if he stays there longer. On top of this, my family and I will now have to make special modifications to our home to accommodate my brother’s needs. These accommodations will include installation of hand rails, etc. A mobile commode, motorised wheelchair and a lifetime worth of medical supplies will also be needed.

    Our family has made efforts to handle the financial situation within ourselves but the costs are just insurmountable. All our resources and our savings were exhausted and dried up during this time. Crowdfunding GiveAsia for donations is a final resort.

    Hence, we are appealing for $80,000. But our priority is to cover the cost of the surgeries and hospitalisation stay first.

    Help in any other shape or form is would be greatly appreciated too. If there are any organisations and welfare centres that we can approach, please let us know. A donation of a used working commode or wheelchair can help bring down our expenses. Prayers and well wishes for my brother mean a lot to us too.

    Do share this campaign with your friends and family. May God bless you and your family for your kind deeds.

    Family of Mohd Shamsul

     

    Source: https://give.asia

  • 4AM Not Too Early (Or Late) To Convey Donations To Baby Raffique

    4AM Not Too Early (Or Late) To Convey Donations To Baby Raffique

    Thank you to Alfaiz Ishak who collected on behalf of baby raffique from his rolls royce collegues.

    Despite being tired, finishing his shift late, he came to meet me in Jurong to pass donation at 4am!

    May allah murahkan your rezeki and always take good care of you whenever you are riding broo.

     

    Source: Hermie Malek

     

  • Faris Abdat: Exclusivism Is Not Taught In Islam, Ignorance Is Cause For Misunderstanding

    Faris Abdat: Exclusivism Is Not Taught In Islam, Ignorance Is Cause For Misunderstanding

    Nicholas Fang is the the executive director of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs.

    Yet when he speaks about the causes of terrorism and linking it with what he says is exclusivism in Islam, it shows that he is not in a position to speak about Islam or terrorism.

    At all.

    Exclusivism as understood by Mr Fang is never taught by Islam. Islam teaches Muslims to be tolerant and at the same time to be principled.

    While Islam says that it is the only true religion, Islam also says that non-believers have every right to believe in what they believe to be true and to practice those beliefs.

    The Quran says explicitly –

    1. ” There is no compulsion in religion. Truth is clear from error ” ( The Quran 2:256)

    2. ” If it had been the Will of your Lord, they would all have believed – all who are on earth ! Will you then compel mankind, against their will, to believe ? (The Quran 10:99)

    3. “If then they turn away, We have not sent you as a guard over them. Your duty is only to convey (the Message).” ( The Quran 42: 48)

    4. ” Clear proofs have indeed come to you; from your Lord; so whoever sees, it is for his own good; and whoever is blind [ to the Truth ] it is to his own harm. And I am not a keeper over you.” ( The Quran 6:105 )

    By insisting therefore that non-Muslims have the right to believe in what their hearts believe to be true, Islam has laid a solid foundation in the relationship between the Muslim and non-Muslim. Indeed, Islam emphasizes that the non-Muslim is not to be injured, harmed, embarrassed or distressed on the account of his faith.

    In the Charter of Privileges sent by the Prophet Muhammad to the Christians of Najran, we read –

    5. ” This is a message from [Prophet] Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them. Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by Allah! I hold out against anything that displeases them. No compulsion [in religion] is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries.

    No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims’ houses. Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God’s covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate. No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them.

    If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their Churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants. No one of the nation (of Muslims) is to disobey this covenant till the Last Day (end of the world). ”

    Not only that, Islam explicitly advocates peaceful dialogues and co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims. The Quran is explicit in how Muslims should behave when calling others to Islam for example by employing tact, logic and politeness ; that Muslims have to respect the religious choices of non-Muslims without being judgmental or hurtful and that Muslims must behave with kindness and fairness towards those non-Muslims who desire peaceful co-existence, where the Quran clearly equates that kindness and fairness with Allah’s love.

    In this regard, the Quran says –

    6 ” Invite all to the Way of your Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious. Your Lord knows best, who have strayed from His Path, and who have received guidance. ” ( The Quran 16 :125).

    7. “And argue not with the People of the Book [ Christians and Jews ] unless it be in a way that is better, save with such of them as do wrong; and say ‘ We believe in that which has been revealed to us and to you; and our God and your God is one and unto Him we submit [ in Islam] ‘ ” ( The Quran 29:46)

    8. “Say: ‘O People of the Book [ Jews and Christians ] ! Come to common terms as between us and you: That we worship none but Allah; that we associate no partners with Him; that we erect not, from among ourselves, Lords and patrons other than Allah.’ If then they turn back, say you: ‘Bear witness that we (at least) are Muslims (bowing to Allah’s Will).’ ( The Quran, 3 : 64)

    Indeed Islam expressedly instructs Muslims to be kind, compassionate, just and fair to non-Muslims as the norm.

    9. “Allah does not forbid you, with regard to those who do not fight against you for your faith nor drive you out of your homes, from dealing kindly and justly with them: for Allah love those who are just.” (The Quran 60: 8).

    Mr Fang claimed that ” Much of the rationale and motivation for recent terror attacks stem from interpretations of religious texts and teachings that emphasise exclusivism “.

    If his claim is indeed true, then it does not prove that exclusivism is the culprit. Rather it proves that ignorance equal misunderstanding.

    Islam does says it is the only true religion and we Muslims believe that Islam offers the only way to salvation both in this life and the next but that belief can never be justified to killing non-Muslims.

    Anyone who believes that Islam teaches exclusivism as Mr Fang understands it which justifies killing innocent people is obviously ignorant of what Islam actually teaches.

    In this both Mr Fang and the terrorists have something in common

     

    Source: Faris Abdat

  • Nicholas Fang: Tackling Exclusivism Imperative In Dealing With Terror Threat Here

    Nicholas Fang: Tackling Exclusivism Imperative In Dealing With Terror Threat Here

    The refrain of the possible inevitability of a terror attack here has become almost as ubiquitous as the description of Singapore as a multiracial and multicultural society, where inclusivity and tolerance are key watchwords for social stability and harmony.

    Inclusivity can act as a necessary ballast against divisive ideologies that prey on a particular group or individual’s sense of alienation, marginalisation and oppression.

    Such ideologies aim to lend credence to the idea that they have to be different from others in all aspects of life and that there cannot be common ground with other faiths.

    The measures to address these and other threats like cyberattacks and the vulnerability of the youth especially to digital propaganda and online recruitment by terror groups, have ranged from hard physical measures such as strengthening protective infrastructure and response forces, to online countermeasures and psychological operations.

    These are no doubt important efforts and should continue. But there also needs to be work done to address the root philosophical and psychological causes of the terror phenomena, besides dealing with the physical manifestations and symptoms.

    Much of the rationale and motivation for recent terror attacks stem from interpretations of religious texts and teachings that emphasise exclusivism.

    Exclusivism is the practice of being exclusive by disregarding opinions and ideas other than one’s own, or by organising entities into groups by excluding those which possess certain traits.

    Religious exclusivism asserts that one religion is true and all others are in error. Such values are often, if not always, antagonistic and they denigrate the beliefs held by other faiths while asserting absolute superiority of their worldview.

    Exclusivism based on belief systems is not a new phenomenon, with examples dating back to Ancient Greece. Modern day examples have taken on a more violent streak, with death to non-believers, even those from within the same religion but whose practices are different, becoming a goal or requirement for true believers.

    It should be pointed out that religious leaders across virtually all faiths have highlighted that such violently exclusivist beliefs are not actually part of the teachings of any true religion.

    But thanks to the rise of social media and technology, growing sophistication among extremist groups, and disenchanted and disaffected youth around the world offering fertile recruitment grounds for perpetrators of terror, exclusivist tendencies have been spreading around the world.

    With so-called “lone wolf” attackers being encouraged to commit atrocities on social media or in the dark spaces of the Internet, the potential for more future attacks anywhere in the world, with little or no warning, is immense.

    Tackling exclusivist sentiments would seem like the logical starting point for dealing with the issue. But for a country like Singapore, it is an imperative.

    Singapore is widely recognised as being among the most religiously diverse nations in the world. Our history and societal make-up have seen the embracing of a tolerant and respectful attitude towards religious and cultural diversity, with the government playing a key role in promulgating and encouraging such an approach at all levels of society.

    A cornerstone of this approach has not been to encourage uniformity, but to foster appreciation of the inherently diverse nature of our country, and recognising the benefits therein.

    We should continue to uphold progressive religious values that encourage awareness and respect for cultural diversity and equality, while establishing common ground to forge harmonious relationships.

    It’s not hard to see why a country whose citizens understand, respect and appreciate each others different beliefs and attitudes, will enjoy peace and hence stability.

    But in an increasingly volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous world, this stability may become essential to ensuring the survivability and success of any nation in the future. Inclusive values will also ensure solidarity, cohesiveness and resilience for the “day after” scenario, given the inevitability of an attack.

    Singapore’s Minister for Culture, Community and Youth, Ms Grace Fu, said in the wake of the latest announcement of the country’s first female detainee for radicalism, that all Singaporeans should stand united and not allow our society to fracture, as this would mean a victory for terrorists.

    The Islamic Religious Council of Singapore also said it would work with its partners to safeguard against exclusivist and extremist ideas from taking root in the community.

    The concepts of understanding and tolerance should not be required of any single religious group, but should be embraced by all religions and communities throughout society.

    Only then can we truly begin to tackle the terror threat in a comprehensive and systematic fashion which will hopefully produce long-term success.

     

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR:

    Nicholas Fang is the executive director of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs and oversees the institute’s Global Citizenship Singapore programme, which aims to broaden awareness of key international issues amongst young professionals and the public.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • PRC Academics Ridicule Singapore Government In The Midst Of Lee Family Feud

    PRC Academics Ridicule Singapore Government In The Midst Of Lee Family Feud

    Academics from prominent state-linked universities in China have weighed in on the Lee Family Feud over 38 Oxley Road, the home of the late former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew.

    The dispute between current Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, his younger sister Dr Lee Wei Ling and younger brother Lee Hsien Loong, has become a topic of public interest in China, particularly among government officials. This comes after shocking revelations released on a nearly daily basis from the prime minister’s younger siblings.

    The key criticism of Singapore’s model of governance comes from a Confucian point of view.

    One academic who specializes in Southeast Asia, Ju Hailong, expressed doubts on the ability of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to continue ruling Singapore: “This will definitely affect his political base, as ethnic Chinese hold the value that if a person cannot handle his family well then he loses the ability to run a country.”

    Another academic, Zhang Mingliang from Jinan University also spoke on the Confucian concept of family harmony, stating that Lee’s image has been undermined after he could not maintain his own family’s harmony.

    Even the State Council Information Office has criticized Lee for failing to uphold the Singaporean principles of integrity and meritocracy, values built up painstakingly by his father, pointing out that “even his closest family members distrust and openly accuse him.”

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com