Blog

  • Mat Jailed For Having Sex With Underage Girlfriend Even When She Was 7 Months Pregnant

    Mat Jailed For Having Sex With Underage Girlfriend Even When She Was 7 Months Pregnant

    Despite being told by his 15-year-old girlfriend that she was pregnant, Muhammad Nur Shafiq Mohamed Noor, 22, dismissed her fears and continued to have sex with her, a district court heard.

    This went on even when she was about seven months pregnant.

    On Thursday (May 11), Nur Shafiq was jailed for 18 months after he pleaded guilty to three of 13 charges of sexual penetration of a minor between November 2015 and May last year.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Kavita Uthrapathy said the victim and Nur Shafiq became acquainted through mutual friends towards the end of October 2015. They subsequently became a couple.

    On Nov 4 and 5 that year, he said he wanted to have sex with her but she rejected him. She had told him she was 15.

    But he persisted and she gave in when they met again on Nov 10. He took her to an HDB block in New Upper Changi Road where he had unprotected sex with her at a staircase landing. They had sex again the next day at the same place.

    Sometime during end-January 2016, she missed her period and suspected she was pregnant. She told Nur Shafiq but he said she was just “late”, and continued to have unprotected sex with her.

    Feeling unsettled, she did a urine test in early February which confirmed her pregnancy.

    Nur Shafiq did not believe she was pregnant even when she showed him the pregnancy test stick.

    Although she did another test with the same result, he still refused to believe her and continued to have sex with her.

    On March 28, the teen met him and his mother at a clinic where her pregnancy was confirmed. Although she agreed with Nur Shafiq’s mother to have an abortion, the doctor at the clinic said she had to go to KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital (KKH) as she was in an advanced stage of pregnancy.

    She was admitted to KKH on April 8 where it was confirmed that she was about 24 weeks pregnant.

    About a month later, Nur Shafiq again asked to have sex with the girl while walking around Novena Square. She was then about seven months pregnant.

    He took her to the basement carpark of the nearby Mount Elizabeth Hospital and had unprotected sex with her.

    Two months later, the victim gave birth to a girl, who has been placed on foster care as the teen is unable to care for her child.

    DPP Kavita had sought 10 months’ jail on each of the charges in view of the aggravating factors.

    District Judge Wong Li Tein sentenced him to nine months’ jail on each charge, and ordered two sentences to run consecutively. She said the only mitigating factor was that he was young.

    The maximum penalty for sexual penetration of a person under 16 years old is 10 years’ jail and a fine.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Local Football Fan: FAS Please Save Our S-League,  Stop Farcical Banner-Size Limitation

    Local Football Fan: FAS Please Save Our S-League, Stop Farcical Banner-Size Limitation

    Warning: Long and sad post ahead, read at own peril

    Glad I made the impromptu decision to go down to Choa Chu Kang Stadium to watch Warriors FC take on Hougang United this evening. I have always been very envious of the unwavering and fervent support shown by the Hougang United fans (Hougang United FC Supporters’ Club, affectionately known as the “Hougang Hools”) towards their players, and even ex-players.

    Tonight was no different – from start to end, the singing, the chanting, the beating of the drums never stopped. “Satu hati, satu Hougang” was the cry – “One heart, One Hougang”, in Bahasa Melayu. “COME ON HOUGANG, COME ON HOUGANG!”

    I didn’t join in. After all, I am a Home United fan, and it would be weird to cheer Hougang on so enthusiastically and chant with the Hools.

    Look at the picture featured in this post. You will see a bunch of banners belonging to the Hougang Hools, who had made their way to the game a couple of hours before kick-off, and painstakingly hung them up by one by one. You will also notice that none of the posters are obstructing the view of the fans, given that they were hung over a ledge.

    So there the Hools were, chanting their lungs out, having a good time, especially after Fumiya Kogure had scrambled the ball home from a few metres out for a precious 1-0 lead against the much-fancied Warriors, who had ex-Dutch and Greek League player Joel Tshibamba in attack.

    Enter CCK Stadium security personnel. Two men came down and spoke to one of the Hougang Hools, telling him to remove the banners. They cited stadium rules and FAS regulations, and said that the maximum size of flags and banners allowed to be brought in was 1m x 1m. To say the Hougang supporters were annoyed is an understatement.

    They felt that there was no reasonable basis for such a rule, given that these banners had been brought all over Singapore to other S-League grounds, without incident. In fact, stadium personnel at Jalan Besar Stadium, right where the FAS Headquarters are located, had no similar objections to such banners. They also repeatedly asked security personnel whose view they were obstructing. The security personnel had no response to this rather valid question.

    Things were getting heated, so I decided to step in and break up what I perceived as increasing hostility between parties. I immediately told the security personnel that I was not a Hougang supporter, and that I was only trying to help. I asked them to show me where they got the rule of 1m x 1m from – they could not answer. So there was this farcical moment where all of us whipped out our mobile phones and tried to verify if this was indeed an FAS regulation.

    “You see the FAS website, it’s there.” It wasn’t. The FAS website is by no means a great source of current information, but that’s another complaint for another day.

    I told the security personnel I understood that their hands were tied, but asked if they could “close one eye” just for today, and then both parties could write in to clarify if the rule applied to banners from supporters’ clubs that did not obstruct anyone’s view. They said they would have to escalate it, but they understood the point I was trying to make.

    I returned to my seat and thought that was the end of it. 10 minutes later, a club official by the name of Eugene, came down and asked to talk to me. Eugene was exceedingly polite, and I think this situation could have been so much worse if Eugene had been more abrasive in his interactions with the Hougang supporters. Eugene explained to me and some of the Hougang Hools that rules are rules, and that this came from an FAS directive at the start of the season, which FAS came up with in consultation with the Singapore Police Force.

    After much debate and some angst, a compromise was reached – Eugene promised he would raise this issue in the post-match report, and seek clarification. For this match, since it was coming to an end, he wouldn’t ask for the banners to be removed. A happy ending of sorts.

    Given that I took on the role of a pseudo-mediator in this dispute, I had to try to maintain some neutrality when I was there. While I pushed for proof that such a rule existed, and asked for its rationale, I also ensured that I re-directed some of the angst away from the security personnel, because at the end of the day, they were just doing their jobs. In my mind, I felt they could have been more flexible, but they were not doing anything wrong. I didn’t want things to get ugly.

    Now that I am at home though, I would just like to say that I think this is farcical, and puts our league in a terrible light.

    1m x 1m. The maximum size of a flag or banner printed to support your team.

    To offer some perspective, that means if you were at a stadium to watch an international game between Singapore and say, Japan, in a crucial World Cup / Asian Cup qualifier, you would not be allowed to bring your Singapore flag along.

    Let that sink in for a bit.

    Now, look at the picture again. The banners were draped over a ledge. The supporters would be seated in the blue area you see in the picture. Exactly who is being blocked by the banners / flags? With respect, I cannot think of a reason for limiting the size of such banners. Perhaps, the original intention of the rule was to prevent fans from making huge banners and then lifting them up while in the stands, obstructing the view of others. If so, then perhaps some clarification from FAS, or some flexibility from security personnel, or club officials is necessary.

    This has been a very long post, so let me just end by saying this: I think it is sad, that in a dying domestic league suffering from a dwindling number of supporters, supporters (who are not paid for this, mind you) are not allowed to express themselves fully, and add to the colour of the league.

    I think it is sad, that in a dying domestic league suffering from a complete lack of atmosphere in certain games, you have a band of fans who are easily the most committed and the loudest in the league, and officials try to dampen their spirits.

    And I think it is incredibly sad, that when I assured the Hools that I would write in to FAS to seek clarification, and also to ask that such banners be allowed, some of them told me not to waste my time. Is that borne out of a lack of faith that even after the elections, nothing is going to change, and our league is gonna die a gradual death?

    I hope not, and I will do everything in my power to ensure it doesn’t happen. But I am only one man, so I urge everyone reading this (if you’re still reading this, haha) to come down and watch an S-League game sometime. Noone to go with? Just give me a shout and I’ll gladly accompany you if I have the time. Eddy not free? Just go down and make new friends!

    So, Football Association of Singapore, please do something. I have faith in the new administration. Come together with the supporters. Let’s save our S-League.

     

    Source: Eddy Hirono

  • Former Malaysia Minister: No Surprise People In ‘Taliban State’ Seek Maria Ozawa

    Former Malaysia Minister: No Surprise People In ‘Taliban State’ Seek Maria Ozawa

    PETALING JAYA: Former minister Zaid Ibrahim has mocked PAS over its efforts to suppress human urges and project an ultra-conservative front in Kelantan, saying such ‘Talibanism” has backfired on them.

    He was commenting on an article in The Star yesterday which said that data from Google showed Kelantan had the highest number of searches for Japanese porn star Maria Ozawa, over the past few days, after reports she was in Malaysia had surfaced on Sunday.

    Terengganu, another state with a strong support base for the Islamist party, ranked number two among all states.

    “It comes as no surprise that citizens in Kelantan and Terengganu would be interested in a former porn star visiting the country.

    “Kelantan and Terengganu and all these Taliban-like areas always try to suppress human urges and feelings, because suppression is core to the way they operate,” said Zaid, who is a Kelantan native and a former Kota Bharu MP (2004-2008).

    Terengganu had previously been under a PAS-led government, between 1999 and 2004, with current PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang as the menteri besar.

    Zaid, who joined DAP earlier this year, said it was only natural for people who were suppressed to find a form of release.

    “That’s the outcome when you have a Taliban culture. That’s why there is a lot of illicit sex (in these states).

    “These (suppressed people) are the kinds of people who are attracted to these porn sites and attracted to people like Maria Ozawa,” he said.

    At the other end of the scale, Google also found that Penang, Selangor and Putrajaya were the least interested in Ozawa, with data showing the least number of searches from these territories.

    Ozawa, who started her career in porn movies in 2005, has now also acted in mainstream movies across Asia. These include an Indonesian comedy “Menculik Miyabi”, horror film “Hantu Tanah Kusir” and “Nilalang”, which was made in the Philippines.

     

    Source: www.freemalaysiatoday.com

  • Would You Pay $12.80 For This Nasi Lemak?

    Would You Pay $12.80 For This Nasi Lemak?

    What? $12.80 for a plate of nasi lemak! That’s crazy!”

    That is a common response you’d get about this popular coconut rice meal, usually served with sambal.

    Chef Lee Eng Su, who worked in chic French restaurants around the world before opening The Coconut Club here, found inspiration from the Kuala Lumpur-style nasi lemak in Village Park Restaurant in Damansara.

    The place was said to be frequented by former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad.

    Chef Lee found a recipe online, tweaked it, and that was the start of his success story.

    Six months after The Coconut Club’s opening late last year, queues can still be seen every day.

    I visited The Coconut Club an hour before closing on a Saturday afternoon, and there was still a queue at the door.

    Apart from the crispy chicken, Chef Lee’s sambal was also outstanding. There was a kick to it despite its sweet undertone at first taste. The chilli-sting crept up on me and lingered for a while.

    The rice was fluffy, loose and did not have too much lemak as it was meant to be enjoyed with roasted peanuts, crispy ikan bilis, fried chicken (ayam goreng berempah), fried sunny side up egg and a few slices of Thai cucumber.

    Sides are available, and I was told some were off-menu, so you just have to ask for the daily specials.

    The Coconut Club is an appealing addition to the growing hipster cafe scene in Singapore.

    The place has a kopitiam-style kopi bar, and a raised centrepiece community table in the middle that lends an undulating multi-level look to the organised hipster chaos.

    Chef Lee (below) said he “spent a bomb on renovations”, and though the place looks good, The Coconut Club is jam-packed because of the nasi lemak and the honest, frank service, and nothing else.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Choa Chu Kang Fire – Washing Machine Running Laundry When It Caught Fire

    Choa Chu Kang Fire – Washing Machine Running Laundry When It Caught Fire

    Stomper James was shocked when he awoke to his washing machine on fire this morning (May 11) at around 9.30am.

    The incident happened at his home in Block 455, Choa Chu Kang Avenue 4, while he was still asleep in his room, and his mother was in the living room.

    According to James, his mother was watching television in the living room when she noticed thick smoke coming from the balcony where the washing machine was placed.

    After that, a power trip followed.

    She woke James up, who went to investigate the source of the smoke, discovering that their washing machine had caught fire, with smoke being emitted.

    He quickly ran to the bathroom and grabbed a pail of water, dousing the machine in water.

    After his second pail, the fire was extinguished at around 9.40am, and he quickly informed his siblings about the incident.

    Said James:

    “The washing machine was purchased in 2010.

    “I’m worried now as I have many appliances at home that are from the same company.

    “I’ve posted the incident on Facebook and brought the matter up to the company, but have received no replies so far.

    “Luckily, no one was hurt.

    “But I work in the afternoons, and during that time, my elderly parents are home by themselves.”

     

    Source: www.stomp.com.sg