Rilek1Corner

Blog

  • Commentary: Trend Melancong Bersama Bukan Trend, Tapi Biasa

    Commentary: Trend Melancong Bersama Bukan Trend, Tapi Biasa

    Saya sebenarnya tidak rase yang hal couple pergi holiday same-same ini boleh dikatakan “trending”. Mungkin sebab dalam zaman saya ini kelakuan seperti ini memang common sangat. ramai kawan-kawan yang pergi melancong bersama, ataupon ajak lagi kawan lain yang couple jugak. mereka semue belum kahwin lagi, ade yang dah tunang ade yang stakat dating aje.

    Actually nak cakap pasal travelling dengan pasangan ni kalau ikut segi ugama memang salah. tapi saya berpendapat yang ade jugak bende positive yang boleh kami belajar dari ini.

    Cuba fikir kalau kita pergi holiday dengan gf atau bf kite, kami semue dapat pergi explore dunia bersama. Experience bende baru bersama, mungkin bende-bende yang tidak boleh kami buat di Singapura. Dapat jugak melihat pasangan kita, perangai dia, suka tak suka dia. Bonding katakan.

    Lagi satu, sebagai couple yang masih membesar atau tengah sibuk kerje, mungkin kite susah nak dapatkan mase untuk spend time bersama. Atau ibubapa tidak suka kite kluar ngan pasangan selalu sangat. Dan macam-macam alasan lain aje lah. Jadi, holiday inilah satu jawabnya untuk spend quality time together. kalau satu minggu jumpa sekali, atau satu bulan jumpa setakat brapa jam aja. This is the chance. This the only way dapat escape bersama buat sementara.

    Lagipon kalau nak ikut batasan pon boleh dengan tidur berasing. Memang impossible jugak kalau dua orang melancong tapi nak spend duit sewa dua bilik, tak masuk akal. kalau betul nak boleh lah order single bed, dah macam lain. tido kat couch pon boleh biar perempuan tido kat katil. Ikut hati masing-masing juga.

    Last, kalau kita pergi mcm gini bersendirian tidak lah lain sangat dengan kalau pergi holiday dengan pasangan dan family dia. Ok memang ada parents control sebab parents ada, tapi niat kalau bukan jahat then tetap ok kan?

     

    Salam,

    T

    Readers’ Contribution

  • Imam Visits Synagogue To Apologise For Offensive Remarks

    Imam Visits Synagogue To Apologise For Offensive Remarks

    Imam Nalla Mohamed Abdul Jameel, 47, extended his unconditional apology for his offensive remarks and acknowledged that he must bear full responsibility for his actions.

    The visit came two days after he apologised at a gathering of leaders of various faiths.

    Yesterday, the imam also presented Rabbi Mordechai Abergel with a copy of the open statement of apology that he had delivered last Friday at the Harmony in Diversity Gallery in Maxwell Road.

    On behalf of the Jewish community here, Rabbi Abergel accepted the imam’s apology at the Maghain Aboth Synagogue.

    The rabbi said the Jewish and Muslim communities here have a “very harmonious” relationship, with strong bonds of friendship.

    “This sends a message that these bonds are not affected, and we share so much more than what divides us,” he added.

    In February, a video of the imam reciting a prayer in Arabic that said “God help us against Jews and Christians”, among other things, was circulated online.

    The imam clarified last Friday that the additional supplication he read was not from the Quran, but an old Arabic text originating from his village in India.

    Yesterday, Buddhist and Sikh leaders also joined in the synagogue visit.

    At a separate community event in Marsiling yesterday, Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob said the imam’s apology is a “positive move” that should be taken into consideration.

    “He apologised, he gathered together all the people from different faiths, and it was a great initiative on his part,” she said.

    REMORSE

    Last Friday’s meeting, where the imam apologised before leaders of various faiths, including Christian leaders, was organised at his request.

    He said he was “filled with great remorse for the inconvenience, tension and trauma that I have caused to this peaceful country”.

    After the controversial remarks surfaced, Home Affairs and Law Minister K. Shanmugam said the Government will not tolerate preaching that encourages violence or seeks to pit one religion against another.

    On Saturday, Mr Shanmugam said the police have completed their investigations on the matter and submitted a report to the Attorney-General’s Chambers, adding that a decision is expected within a few days.

    The imam’s apology was welcomed by the Muslim community and leaders of other faiths, Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs Yaacob Ibrahim noted on Saturday.

    Yesterday, Madam Halimah said of the imam’s apology: “He realised what he did was a mistake.

    “He also realised that what he had lifted from his home town in India may not be so applicable here. Probably, he didn’t know, or quite understand, the context of Singapore society.”

    She added: “We are multiracial, multi-religious, and you need to understand that is important.”

     

    Source: TNP

  • Perkasa: Singapore Minister’s Remark An Insult To King, Government

    Perkasa: Singapore Minister’s Remark An Insult To King, Government

    Malay right-wing group Perkasa wants Wisma Putra to send a letter of protest to Singapore for comments attributed to a senior minister comparing Singapore Malays with Malaysian Malays.

    Singapore Home Affairs Minister K Shanmugam had been reported as saying that Singapore Malays are better off in terms of education standing, skills and wealth than those of similar ethicnicity in Malaysia or Indonesia.

    Perkasa deputy chairman Sirajuddin Salleh said the statement made by Shanmugam was uncalled for.

    “I am concerned about the statement. It is not diplomatic and is an insult to the King and the government of Malaysia,” he told FMT when asked to comment on Shanmugam’s statement.

    Sirajuddin said Malaysia and Singapore were close neighbours and there should be greater diplomacy between both countries.

    “I hope Wisma Putra will issue a strong protest letter. To me, the remark is not good. I will not touch on the content because it is very subjective.

    “It is just like if he comes to my house and says something that is not nice. Whether he is right or not, that is subjective, but in this case, it is not very nice,” Sirajuddin said.

    Earlier Channel News Asia quoted Shanmugam as saying that “with a stable, strong political system, with a strong government, with a guarantee for the minorities … with this framework, we can become the community that Muslim societies in other countries look towards and say, this is the example.”

    Shanmugam had also suggested that Malay, Indian and Chinese PMETs (professionals, managers, executives and technicians) from Singapore were better off than those of the same race, respectively, in Malaysia.

    However, the minister had cautioned that while Singapore was doing better compared with many parts of the world, “within Singapore there is still a gap” and they were no longer just competing with Malaysia or Indonesia, but instead competing with the world.

    He said the proportion of Malay Primary 1 students who go on to post-secondary education had doubled from 45% in 1995 to 93% in 2015. Those who eventually receive polytechnic diplomas, professional qualifications or university degrees have “gone up over a five-year period to 21%.”

    Shanmugam added that the proportion of Malays working as PMETs increased to 28% in 2010 and their median real monthly income per capita had doubled since 1990.

    Nearly 90% of Malay households in Singapore own their own homes, according to Shanmugam.

    However, he singled out three challenges facing the Malay-Muslim community in the country – radicalisation, loss of jobs and the over-representation of Malays being caught for crimes and drug abuse.

    Citing a Pew Research Centre study which showed that 10% of Malaysian Malays had a favourable opinion of Islamic State (IS), and that nearly one-quarter were not prepared to come out and say that IS is wrong, Shanmugam said that Singapore Malays must not get to that level.

    “A key part of that depends on you, the leaders of the Malay community, and whether you can make sure that the right religious values are put forth. We have to work hard at this because the influences are on the internet,” Shanmugam reportedly told a seminar organised by the Association of Muslim Professionals in Singapore.

    On drug abuse, Shanmugam had said 53% of those arrested for drug abuse last year were Malays. This is an increase from 10 years ago when the proportion of Malays arrested for the same was 32%.

     

    Source: freemalaysiatoday

  • SG Malay-Muslim Community Can Be The “Beacon For The Rest Of The World”

    SG Malay-Muslim Community Can Be The “Beacon For The Rest Of The World”

    The Malay-Muslim community in Singapore has made concrete progress in the areas of education, jobs and wealth, said Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam yesterday.

    However, it also has to take a hard look at three challenges facing the community – radicalisation, more professionals losing their jobs and a significant over-representation of Malays in crime and drug statistics as well as the prison population.

    He called on Malay-Muslim organisations such as self-help group Mendaki, the Association of Muslim Professionals (AMP) and the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore to step forward and help tackle these issues. The roles that such groups can play include counselling former offenders and supporting their families, as well as turning those who are at risk away from crime and drug abuse, said Mr Shanmugam, who is also Law Minister.

    He was addressing about 140 community leaders and volunteers at an annual seminar organised by the AMP. In his speech, he highlighted the significant social and economic progress made by the Malay- Muslim community over the years.

    For instance, the proportion of Malay Primary 1 pupils who go on to post-secondary education has doubled from 45 per cent in 1995 to 93 per cent in 2015. One out of every five Malay pupils who enters the education system will eventually obtain a degree or diploma, he said.

    And while the proportion of Malays who are professionals, managers, executives and technicians (PMETs) was 28 per cent in 2010, “I am sure it has gone up more by now”, he noted. On housing, he said nearly 90 per cent of Malay households own their own homes, with 70 per cent of them living in four-room Housing Board flats or bigger.

    “A Singapore Malay today in educational standing, in terms of skills and wealth, is better off than a Malaysian Malay or an Indonesian Malay,” he said. “The same goes for the Indians, and for the Chinese, in Singapore.”

    The Government will continue to provide support to all Singaporeans, with additional help given to Malay-Muslims, he noted. The support includes financial help when infants are born, subsidising childcare and school fees, cash grants to buy HDB flats and healthcare subsidies.

    But while the progress made by the community is encouraging, he warned of dangers posed by radicalisation and exclusivism. He cited a study by US-based Pew Research Centre on Malaysia, which showed 10 per cent of Malaysian Malays had a favourable opinion of terror group Islamic State in Iraq and Syria and nearly a quarter were not prepared to denounce it. “We have to make sure that we do not get there,” he said.

    On the jobs front, a committee led by parliamentary secretaries Amrin Amin and Faishal Ibrahim is being set up to help Malay-Muslim PMETs hit by job losses, he said.

    In addition, Malay-Muslim groups can work with the Government to tackle the problem of “significant over-representation” of Malays in crime, drug and prison statistics, the minister noted.

    He is optimistic that the Malay- Muslim community can overcome the challenges it faces, and be a “beacon for the rest of the world” – one that is confident, modern, vibrant and integrated.

    AMP chairman Abdul Hamid Abdullah said the association can work with the Government to reach out to more families. “Community groups are in a better position to reach out to Malay families because we are on the ground,” he noted.

    On the Malay community becoming an example for other countries, he said: “This is motivating. We can be an example of how a minority community can thrive in a multi-racial country.”

     

    Source: ST

  • Dr Tan Cheng Bock: Open Election First, If No Minority Malay President Wins In 2017 Then Reserved Election For 2023

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock: Open Election First, If No Minority Malay President Wins In 2017 Then Reserved Election For 2023

    The Government brushes off my press conference.
    MCI has missed my point totally.

    I do not dispute the Constitutional Commission’s report or the White Paper. However, I disagree with the way the Government has triggered the reserved election.

    I am simply asking if the government’s counting from President Wee Kim Wee FOLLOWED the SPIRIT AND PURPOSE that was proposed by the Constitutional Commission. The Constitutional Commission has said that a reserved election will be triggered if 5 open elections produce no minority President. So far we have 4 open elections with no minority Malay President. So 2017 must remain an open election and if no minority Malay President wins in 2017, than a reserved election will be triggered in 2023.

    The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) used a different format .
    AGC advised the Government to count the 5 year hiatus using “ 5 consecutive terms of Presidents who exercised elected powers” to include 1 nominated President and 4 openly elected Presidents. This is not in line with the spirit and purpose of the Constitutional Commission’s Report of 5 open elections.

    I’ve given my reasons why we should rightly count from our 1st openly elected President Ong Teng Cheong. It’s the government’s turn to give their reasons why they choose to count differently, having accepted the report. Why change the format?

    When asked in Parliament by an MP as recently as February 2017, it was brushed off with challenges to go to court and no debate.
    Singaporeans need to know the truth on such an important Constitutional matter.
    This is a chance for the Government to explain.
    They should not brushed it off again.

     

    Source: Dr Tan Cheng Bock