Blog

  • Don’t Be Fooled, Trump’s New Muslim Ban Is Still Illegal

    Don’t Be Fooled, Trump’s New Muslim Ban Is Still Illegal

    The revised order also continues to traffic in bigoted and largely false perceptions: By requiring the government to compile occurrences of “honor killings” by immigrants, it gives official recognition to an inflammatory and misleading trope of Islam that is perpetuated by anti-Muslim hate groups.

    President Trump has not been subtle in his intentions. We need look no further than his own words to figure them out. On the campaign trail, he constantly conflated the vast majority of peaceful Muslims with the small handful of violent Muslims.

    After the Paris attacks in November 2015, Mr. Trump said that “we’re going to have no choice” but to close some mosques in the United States, where “some really bad things are happening.” The next month, after the attack in San Bernardino, Calif., he called for a “complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States” and released a factually dubious statement that “large segments of the Muslim population” have “great hatred towards Americans” and favor Shariah law. Astonishingly, that statement is still posted on Mr. Trump’s website.

    In December, when a reporter asked whether he had reconsidered his stance on Islam, President-elect Trump replied: “You know my plans. All along, I’ve been proven to be right.” This dark and wholly unsubstantiated worldview about Islam and the American Muslim community is shared by several of the president’s senior aides and advisers.

    Let’s be clear: This revised order is a Muslim ban. All the countries he has excluded are more than 90 percent Muslim. Three of them — Iran, Somalia and Yemen — are more than 99 percent Muslim. Even though Mr. Trump tailored his order to survive legal challenges, as his former adviser Rudolph Giuliani conceded on national television, his objective is clearly to exclude Muslims.

    The Trump administration argues that the ban protects the country. Yet by excluding Iraq from the order, Mr. Trump has cleared travel from one of the two countries from which Islamic State terrorists operates. Moreover, the Department of Homeland Security concluded last month that “country of citizenship is unlikely to be a reliable indicator of potential terrorist activity.” Former national security officials from Democratic and Republican administrations have made clear that the January order does not make our country safer. Instead, the bigotry that Mr. Trump spews at news conferences and on Twitter have been a boon for terrorists’ recruitment efforts.

    The twisted worldview does not match reality. Muslims have been part of America for centuries, since the first slave ships arrived in the 17th century. Today, Muslims represent 1 percent of the United States population: They are our teachers, doctors, neighbors and co-workers.

    American Muslims will suffer a particular harm from this executive order: Those who have ties to the banned countries won’t be able to see their family members and close friends. American Muslims will also be deprived of the instruction from the leading Islamic scholars who are from those countries.

    Thousands of Muslim men and women serve in the armed forces; many have given their lives defending our nation and our ideals. They contribute to the diversity that has always been our nation’s pride and strength. President George W. Bush paid tribute to this in the weeks after the Sept. 11 attacks when he said, “There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion.”

    President Trump and his top advisers would be wise to listen to President Bush. The Muslim ban and President Trump’s relentless attacks on Islam are not just an assault on thousands of patriotic, innocent Americans — they violate our Constitution and our most fundamental American values and beliefs.

    Source: NYTimes

  • Petition: Harsher Sentence In Singapore For Pedophile Joshua Robinson

    Petition: Harsher Sentence In Singapore For Pedophile Joshua Robinson

    Facebook user Sarah Woon started a petition for a harsher punishment in the case of Joshua Robinson who got 4 years of jail without caning.

    She wrote:

    Is this the message our Singapore Government People’s Action Party is intending to send worldwide: “Spray paint our city or slander our government officials and you get it worse off than if you rape and sexually abuse our children”?

    Pedophiles will come from far and wide to take advantage of such an incredibly erroneous measure of justice!!

    As a parent and an early childhood educator advocating for the voiceless in our country (and children everywhere, with the fact that upon release this pedophile could be anywhere around the world, abusing his mixed martial arts trainer’s credentials) I find this unacceptable and absolutely intolerable. Unfortunately, the 6 year old in this traumatic case is a daughter of a close friend and it absolutely breaks my heart and those of all our friends and family.

    TO EVERYONE WHO READS THIS AND WISHES TO EXERCISE YOUR RIGHT TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN AS A PARENT, A GRANDPARENT, AN UNCLE OR AUNT, AN EDUCATOR … PLEASE JOIN THIS PETITION TO THE PRIME MINISTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHAMBERS AND THE MINISTER OF LAW TO SEEK A REDRESS OF THE SENTENCE FOR THIS SEXUAL PREDATOR JOSHUA ROBINSON.

    “Indifference, to me, is the epitome of evil” ~ Elie Wiesel

    I WILL NOT STAND INDIFFERENT. NO MORE. Will you?

     

    Source: Change.org

  • Law Minister Acknowledges ‘Public Disquiet’ Over Joshua Robinson Sentence

    Law Minister Acknowledges ‘Public Disquiet’ Over Joshua Robinson Sentence

    Minister for Law and Home Affairs K Shanmugam said on Monday (Mar 6) that he understands there is “public disquiet” over the four-year sentence for an MMA instructor who sexually assaulted two teenage girls. “People are naturally upset. Parents in particular,” he said on the sidelines of a fundraising event.

    However, Mr Shanmugam said it is not an appropriate time for him to comment on the case against Joshua Robinson because the matter is not concluded and the time for appeal has not ended.

    “The decisions on which charges to proceed is a matter within AGC’s (Attorney-General’s Chambers) discretion. AGC makes the decisions based on precedents, and what kind of sentence is meted out depends on previous cases.”

    “Having said that, my understanding is that AGC is looking into this,” he added.

    Robinson was sentenced to four years’ jail on Mar 2 for sexually assaulting two teenage girls and filming the assaults for his own “perverse pleasure”. Police officers had seized 5,902 obscene films, including 321 films of child pornography when they raided his apartment. The haul is believed to be the largest collection of pornography seized from an individual in Singapore.

    In July 2015, a month after he was arrested and released on bail, Robinson showed a six-year-old girl an explicit video of his girlfriend performing a sexual act on him, while the girl’s father was busy training a short distance away.

    On Sunday, an online petition calling for a harsher sentence for Robinson was posted on change.org.

    Parent and early childhood educator Sarah Woon, who started the petition, said she found the four-year sentence “unacceptable and absolutely intolerable”. As of Monday evening, the petition has collected more than 9,300 signatures.

     

    Source: CNA

  • The Singapore Muslim Community And The Imam Issue

    The Singapore Muslim Community And The Imam Issue

    By Kamaludeen Mohamed Nasir, Associate Professor of Sociology, Nanyang Technological University

    It is well-known that Singapore is a multi-religious society. The 2014 report by Pew named our city-state as the most religiously diverse among the 232 countries studied. What is assumed in this discourse is that all religions are the same and subjected to similar state-society relations.

    ranking

    2014 ranking on Religious Diversity Index by Pew Research Center

    The fact is, Islam is the most regulated religion in our tiny island and this has been the case for decades. From the appointment of a Minister-in-Charge of Muslim Affairs, to the creation of a statutory board called the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) where the Mufti is located, and to the Administration of Muslim Law Act that has regulatory powers over local mosques and madrasahs (Islamic schools), there is no doubt that Islam is given a unique attention by the state.

    A stark under-appreciation of this social reality, especially among the non-Muslims, is apparent to me in the decade or so that I have been teaching in our local universities. I have always asked my students, that if all the Churches were made to say the exact same thing for their Sunday service with a text provided by an office of a statutory board, how would the Christian community react? The students could not even begin to imagine this! Will this then breed mistrust among the Christian community? This is but just one issue besieging the Muslim populace in Singapore.

    When I had coffee with a top local social scientist of NUS a couple of weeks back, we agreed that Islam is the most hierarchical and bureaucratized religion in Singapore. Failure to understand how Islam is managed leads to a failure in understanding the reaction of its local adherents.

    This distrust of the Muslim religious elites amidst the disciplining of Islam, from prescribed texts for the weekly Friday prayer sermons, to appointed instructors to “upgrade Islam” through the Asatizah Recognition Scheme that makes it mandatory for every religious teacher to be registered (even those teaching Qur’anic reading in the local neighbourhoods), impact heavily on the religious elites. Many scholars have called this age as one characterised by a crisis of religious authority. The situation can be especially dire in our local Muslim community, given the unique structures bearing upon them.

    Distrust breeds distrust. It is not that Singaporean Muslims are predisposed towards being rude or as the Minister of Law put it, “kurang ajar”, towards the state-endorsed religious authority. It is the structures that have been put in place that create such an environment.

    The recent issue regarding the police report made against an Imam for making alleged “incendiary” supplications against Christians and Jews that are outside the MUIS-endorsed text cannot be disentangled from the issue of the autonomy of the Muslim clerics. I have engaged the local religious elites numerous times over the last few years and have rarely met a group that is more in fear. The culture of fear among the religious class is often talked about and in one of the engagements that I had with a group of religious elites, one of them candidly lamented, “We are directed and scripted.”

    It has often been mentioned that attitude reflects leadership. The angry reaction of the Muslim community in light of the Imam issue should be seen against this backdrop. The absence of the voices of the religious elites in the initial stages of the debacle created a void in the community who then went online to make sense of the matter.

    Last week, Assoc Prof Khairudin Aljunied was singled out in parliament for encouraging the “vilification” of the whistle-blower, Terence Nunis.  The fact is that hundreds of Muslims had begun pitching in their views on various platforms after Nunis’ pronouncements on Facebook. This was substantiated in a belated statement by the Minister-in-Charge of Muslim Affairs, Assoc Prof Yaacob Ibrahim, who mentioned that the video uploaded by Nunis had indeed “sparked a storm” and “generated many emotions both online and offline. Many in our community felt angry, because they believe that the postings could be used to cast aspersions on Islam and the asatizah in our Mosques”.

    It is interesting to note that both Assoc Prof Khairudin and the Mufti appropriated a satirical and poetic style respectively, as means of social critique. However, it has been well-documented that the Singaporean brand of criticism is often manifested through humour, satire and poetics as seen in Talkingcock, Mr Brown, Yawning Bread, Jack Neo’s films and the like. Indirect criticism is characteristic of societies living under soft-authoritarian rule.

    There are no differences in opinion that if the allegations against the Imam are proven to be true, his incitement has no place in our multi-religious society. But if it is not – and many among the Muslim community have come to this conclusion upon the explanations provided by numerous local religious scholars who have later gone public in discussing the meaning and context of the supplication – then sadly, the Muslim community will see this as yet another example of disciplining and an attempt to emasculate the local religious fraternity despite the state’s paradoxical pleas for Singaporean Muslims to give the local religious scholars their ears.

    It remains to be seen in the aftermath of the Imam episode if the state would choose to go down the path of imposing further restrictions to ensure that the MUIS-endorsed texts be read to the letter, curtailing any creative license of preachers and punishing any dissent towards state-appointed authority. The more enlightened way must be to empower the religious scholars in the field and to give them ownership over their areas of expertise to prevent religious discourse from being co-opted, hijacked and subjected to ad hominem attacks.

    The coming forward of a good number of religious elites, including its umbrella body, Singapore Islamic Scholars & Religious Teachers Association (PERGAS), with regard to this Imam issue is a good development that needs to be applauded. The social media provides a ready platform for this. These attempts to speak truth to power should also be captured in the mainstream media. PERGAS’ need to again clarify their position after feeling that they were misrepresented in the Malay mainstream media regarding their statement towards Assoc Prof Khairudin is not a good sign. The perception that the Malay mainstream media is not balanced and selective in their reporting has also led many to turn to the cyber-sphere to air their perspectives.

    In fostering this development of active citizenship, we need to keep an eye on encouraging diversity and not just promoting those with a certain kind of thinking that the state can easily manage. This is in line with what the PM had recently mentioned in his interview on February 24th in Today newspaper under the title, “Leaders must be able to take criticism, acknowledge mistakes”. Only then can we move forward as a nation.

     

    Source: TOC

  • Traffic Comes To A Standstill At Punggol After Accident On TPE

    Traffic Comes To A Standstill At Punggol After Accident On TPE

    Morning rush hour traffic in many parts of Punggol slowed to a crawl on Tuesday morning (March 7), following an accident on the Tampines Expressway (TPE) before the Kallang-Paya Lebar Expressway (KPE) exit near Lorong Halus.

    The accident caused a congestion up to the Sengkang exit, with motorists around Punggol Central complaining of traffic coming to a standstill. Pictures posted on Facebook showed heavy traffic around the area.

     

    According to the Land Transport Authority’s One Motoring website, the accident occurred around 6.39am. A spokesman from the Singapore Civil Defence Force said: “One ambulance was dispatched. Two persons were conveyed to Changi general hospital.”

     

    “It has been a long time since I took the TPE at peak hour, and I just experienced the worst traffic jam in my life. 1 hour from Yishun and I am still at Punggol, when I am supposed to be at Tampines 20 mins ago,” Facebook user Justin Ryuji Peng wrote.

    Another commuter, Mr Reuben Chin, wrote on Facebook that his commute from Fernvale to Punggol took him 40mins.

    TODAY understands that four vehicles – two cars and two motorcycles – were involved in the accident.

     

     

     

     

    UPDATE: Punggol Field should still be avoided. Wait times 20m more than avg #singaporetraffic https://t.co/bRWuFvTYDf pic.twitter.com/hWi35EInhO

    — Unusual Traffic SIN (@WazeTrafficSIN) March 7, 2017

    Stuck in punggol for 1 hour already! I was at punggol at 715. Now 811 and I’m STILL at Punggol. Uncle said cause there’s an accident

    — … (@sarahcsj) March 7, 2017

    Traffic is so bad omg it’s been 20mins and im still in punggol

    — rach (@rachelcruzado) March 6, 2017

     

    Source: TodayOnline

deneme bonusu