Blog

  • Traffic Arrangements And Road Closure For Mid-Autumn Festival 2017

    Traffic Arrangements And Road Closure For Mid-Autumn Festival 2017

    The Mid-Autumn Festival 2017 Official Opening and Light Up Ceremony will be held on Saturday, 23 September 2017.

    To facilitate the event, the following roads and lanes will be closed to vehicular traffic during the stipulated period:

    In addition, the direction of vehicular traffic along Mosque Street shall be converted into a 2-way road from 2.00 pm to 11.59 pm on Saturday, 23 September 2017.

    During the road closure, access will only be granted to police and emergency vehicles. Auxiliary Police officers will be deployed along the affected roads and junctions to assist and direct motorists.

    Parking restrictions along the peripheral roads will be strictly enforced. Vehicles found parking and causing obstruction will be towed.

    Members of the public may contact the organiser at 9067 2307 for further enquiries.

     

    Source: Singapore Police Force

  • Pergerakan Yang Membatalkan Solat Anda

    Pergerakan Yang Membatalkan Solat Anda

    Tidak semua jenis pergerakan membatalkan solat, namun yang pasti adalah mengurangkan pergerakan yang tidak berkaitan dengan solat adalah cara terbaik bagi menyempurnakannya. Pun begitu, bagaimanakah erti bergerak yang membatalkan solat di dalam mazhab Syafie? Tulisan ini menjelaskan dengan ringkas.

    Tamakninah adalah salah satu rukun dalam solat menurut beberapa mazhab dan mazhab Syafie adalah antara yang berijtihad menyatakan solat boleh batal jika bergerak besar berturut-turut melebihi tiga kali gerakan. Ini berdasarkan dalil perlunya tamakninah. Tiada dalil khusus berkenaan hal ini kecuali dalil umum iaitu keperluan untuk menyempurnakan tamakninah yang disebut oleh Nabi sallallahu ‘alaihi wasallam kpeada seorang lelaki yang disuruh ulangi solatnya kerana tidak betul:

    فَارْجِعْ فَصَلِّ فَإِنَّكَ لَمْ تُصَلِّ ……ثُمَّ ارْكَعْ حَتَّى تَطْمَئِنَّ رَاكِعًا ثُمَّ ارْفَعْ حَتَّى تَسْتَوِيَ قَائِمًا ثُمَّ اسْجُدْ حَتَّى تَطْمَئِنَّ سَاجِدًا

    Maksudnya: “ ulangi solatmu dan solatlah sessunghuhnya engkau belum menyempurnakan solatmu……kemudian hendaklah kamu rukuk dan sehingga berhenti sekejap (tamakninah) dalam keadaan rukuk itu, dan kemudian bangun dan berdiri tegak dan kemudian sujud sehingga berhenti sekejap (tamakninah) dalam keadaan sujud.”

    (Riwayat al-Bukhari)

    Tamakninah adalah rukun menurut tiga mazhab dan wajib dalam mazhab Hanafi. Hasil dari itu, penyempurnaan tamakninah dilihat tidak mampu disempurnakan kecuali dengan menahan diri dan pergerakn besar menurut mazhab Syafie.

    Imam An-Nawawi menjelaskan penentuan sesuatu pergerakan itu ‘Besar’ atau ‘Kecil’ mempunyai empat bentuk pandangan dalam mazhab seperti berikut:-

    1. KECIL : adalah yang tidak sampai tempoh pergerakan itu satu raka’at. BESAR: Jika melebihi, pastinya itu dikira besar dan membatalkan solat.
    2. KECIL : Setiap pergerakan yang tidak memerlukan dua belah tangan, seperti mengangkat serban, menyentuh untuk lantikan imam di hadapan, memegang kepala atau telinga, itu semua dianggap kecil. BESAR: Jika pergerakan itu memerlukan dua belah tangan seperti mengikat serban, memakai seluar atau kain, itu semua dikira besar.
    3. KECIL : pergerakan yang tidak membuat orang yang melihat bersangka si pelakunya di luar solat. BESAR : pergerakan yang menyebabkan orang melihat bersangka pelakunya di luar solat.
    4. KECIL : kembali kepada penentuan adat dan uruf setempat yang pada adatnya masyarakat anggapnya kecil. BESAR : juga berdasarkan adat. Imam An-Nawawi menyebut pandangan yang keempat ini yang paling sahih dan pandangan ulama Syafie yang teramai. Kata beliau

    وهو الأصح وقول الأكثرين

    Ertinya : ini yang paling sahih dan merupakan pendapat teramai.[1]

    Kemudian, Imam An-Nawawi jug menyimpulkan jika dua kali pergerakan besar ia masih tidak membatalkan solat, jika tidak berturut-turut, itu juga tidak membatalkan solat.

    KESIMPULAN

    Kesimpulannya, saya cenderung kepada menyarankan agar memastikan tidak bergerak banyak sama ada besar atau kecil adalah sifat solat sempurna. Namun jika pergerakan kerana dharurat yang diterima oleh Islam seperti mengelak bahaya, mengelak api dan sepertinya ia tidak membatalkan solat. Majoriti mazhab lain seperti Hanbali dan Hanafi tidak ada kaedah yang menyatakan pergerakan banyak akan membatalkan solat dan fatwa dan ijtihad mereka tentunya tidak boleh diketepikan begitu sahaja, hasilnya saya suka menasihatkan agar mengelakkan khilaf, dan jika berlaku pegerakan yang banyak berturut-turut dan masih ada waktu untuk mengulangi solat, sebaiknya solat dianggap batal dan diulangi.

    Sekian.

     

    Source: Islam Itu Indah

  • Commentary: Tharman’s Six Principles Of Political Communication That’s So Sigh Pie

    Commentary: Tharman’s Six Principles Of Political Communication That’s So Sigh Pie

    Off the top of my head, Tharman’s six principles of political communication:

    1. Timing: Wait till the worst of the storm of public dissatisfaction blows over. Don’t go into the thick of it. Wait for heads to cool.

    2. Deflate the elephant: Point to the elephant in the room, acknowledge it, and everyone goes “finally!”. Tension is released. Elephant gets smaller, people can breathe easier.

    3. I am one of you: Acknowledge and even agree with the sentiments on the ground, then reframe to “in spite of this… must recognise reality… and so must do that”. Classic rhetorical technique. Throw in own background of activist etc. for added legitimacy.

    4. Be general: He said he doesn’t agree with every tactic of everyone of his colleague. Broad obvious statement. In a large org like PAP that’s bound to happen.

    But this allows people to fill in what they *think* he means. Or what they *want to believe* cos he’s likeable. Still, people may not be wrong, but it gives wiggle room should the need ever arise in another context.

    5. Provide hope: Things are better now than before. We will continue to be better. Let’s work towards that.

    6. Be likeable: People listen to you cos they like you. This factor anchors all the above.

    Also, he didn’t comment on the process, and the legitimacy of a president who came into office with so much controversy on the ground. Does the President really have a mandate then? Maybe no one asked. And why should he bring it up of his own accord?

    Skilfully done. All the more’s the reason I think he should be the next PM. (#TharmanForPM!) But oh well’s, we’re not ready for a non-Chinese PM and he has ruled himself out. Sigh pie.

     

    Source: Md Suhaile

  • Chee Soon Juan: By All Means, Let’s Continue To Humiliate Our Minority Citizens

    Chee Soon Juan: By All Means, Let’s Continue To Humiliate Our Minority Citizens

    THE SAGA OVER the Elected Presidency (EP) has again, thanks to the Prime Minister, dredged up the hideous truth that our political system is indefensibly undergirded by racialist and racist thinking.

    The official line of the EP rhapsodised about the need for racial harmony and the safeguarding of multiculturalism. The truth, as everyone else who is not a party apparatchik knows, was about ensuring that only the most PAP-aligned of souls helmed the presidency.

    In a similar vein, the creation of the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) system was never about ensuring adequate ethnic minority representation in Parliament but rather to further stack the system against the opposition.

    An outgrowth of the reserved presidency and the GRC policies require our Malay, Indian and “Other” friends to obtain certification of their race. I find such a practice absolutely abominable. We certify skills, training experience and even livestock. But human beings?

    I cringe whenever my party colleagues of minority ethnic descent undergo this degrading process during elections. They have to submit an application asking for recognition of their bloodline and/or racial identity. In return, they get a document certifying who – or more accurately what – they are.

    (And they have to do this at every election. Perhaps our bureaucrats think that some strange morphological transformation may occur undetected in between elections.)

    This policy is mandated by a majority Chinese-dominated political structure. It is the ultimate humiliation that one ethnic group can impose on another, a practice which I daresay would be unequivocally denounced in civilised societies, societies with a modicum of human decency.

    It is a practice that cheapens the individual and brutalises the soul of this nation. It makes us all lesser humans.

    But what is even more mystifying is why the Halimahs and Tharmans and Yacobs in the party agree to subject themselves to such abasement. Is there no intellectual spine in these people? Surely they understand that genuine equitable political representation goes beyond the tokenism of reserved presidencies and parliamentary seats.

    The reality is that these folks are, first and foremost, politicians and like most politicians, their instinct is to protect their power. The aforementioned schemes allow them to do just that. The wretched practice of certification of minority candidates can be rationalised away or, if not, compartmentalised and placed back in the far recesses of one’s conscience.

    But at what point does one draw the line between political fealty and personal dignity? What price does one have to pay and how much of one’s soul does one have to trade to retain that power? What happens when Mephistopheles comes a-knocking to collect what he is owed?

    If our race-conscious friends at the PAP are genuinely concerned about fissures that cause ethnic division in our society, they need look no further than their own policies. Policies like our education system where top schools are deliberately moved to affluent districts where the overwhelming majority of Malays do not reside. Or policies that widen income inequality in an economy where a disproportionate number of the Malay community are stuck in low-income jobs without minimum wage. Or policies that stipulate a quota of ethnic minority residents who are permitted to live in any one HDB estate (and thereby constricting the market for them should they want to sell their flats).

    Read also A Singapore For All Singaporeans

    It should not be hard to recall that America elected a black man as its president, Londoners picked a Muslim of Pakistani descent as their mayor and the Irish chose a son of Indian immigrants to be their prime minister. Are we Singaporeans somehow less enlightened and colour blind?

    Or is the PAP employing the age-old divide-and-conquer stratagem from its Singapore-is-not-ready-for-a-minority-PM playbook and then mollifying its critics by placing minority politicians here and there?

    Singapore needs a leader whose vision of politics looks beyond the pigmentation of our skin. We need someone who calls to us as a race – the human race, who appeals to the noblest spirit of our being, and who inspires the loftiest ideals that we, as a society, possess.

    May we find that leader – and soon.

     

    Source: http://www.cheesoonjuan.com

  • Facebook Bans Posts On Rohingya Militant Group ARSA; Group Placed On ‘Dangerous Organisation’ List

    Facebook Bans Posts On Rohingya Militant Group ARSA; Group Placed On ‘Dangerous Organisation’ List

    Facebook has confirmed that the Myanmar militant outfit the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) has been placed on its “dangerous organisation” list, The Guardian reported on Wednesday (Sep 20).

    The social media giant, according to the report, has asked its moderators to remove any content “by or praising” the group.

    Facebook’s rules and community standards ban posts by organisations which it deems as groups engaged in terrorist activities, crime, mass murder and organised hate.

    Attacks by ARSA militants on police posts and an army base in Rakhine on Aug 25 prompted a counter-offensive by the Myanmar military, as the Rohingya exodus to Bangladesh continues amid the ongoing crisis in western Myanmar.

    ARSA has been declared a terrorist organisation by the Myanmar government, which rebuffed the group’s ceasefire declaration on Sep 10. “We have no policy to negotiate with terrorists,” said State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi on Twitter.

    ARSA first emerged in October 2016 after it attacked three police outposts in the Maungdaw and Rathedaung districts of Myanmar, killing nine policemen.

     

    Source: http://www.channelnewsasia.com

deneme bonusu