Blog

  • Private Schools Need MOE Permission To Admit Singaporean Children

    Private Schools Need MOE Permission To Admit Singaporean Children

    The Ministry of Education (MOE) is keeping a closer watch on children who are not part of the mainstream school system.

    Previously, permission from MOE was needed only for Singaporean children who wished to be homeschooled or attend Foreign System Schools such as the Singapore American School.

    But smaller, full-time private schools, some of which base their programmes on overseas education models, will also now need to get permission from MOE if they wish to admit Singapore citizens at the primary and secondary levels.

    The Sunday Times understands that at least six private schools here are affected by the new rule.

    These include Victory Life Christian School (VLCS), Heritage Academy and TLS Academy, all private schools offering the Accelerated Christian Education (ACE) curriculum widely adopted in the US. All are registered with the Council for Private Education, and admit a mix of local and foreign students.

    Asked about the new rule, MOE would say only that it “would like all Singaporean children to attend our mainstream schools to acquire a common set of core values, knowledge and skills”.

    Mrs Jan Boey, 62, VLCS’ founder, said she worried about the new rule at first but now welcomes it after seeing that Singapore students who do not fit the mainstream can still be admitted to the school.

    “MOE wants national education for all Singapore citizens. It is good for the ministry to know which are the students who pull out from the mainstream, and that there is a place where students who cannot fit into the system can turn to,” she said.

    Under the Compulsory Education Act, a child must attend a national primary school. Only those with special needs or attending designated religious schools – the six madrasahs for primary school-going children and San Yu Adventist School – may be exempted.

    The period of compulsory education is limited to Primary 6. On average, there have been about 50 homeschooled children per cohort in the past five years, the MOE said.

    VLCS, located in Balestier Point, has grown from having only 17 students in 2002 to about 130 now. There are currently 42 Singaporean students enrolled in grades seven to 12. They earn an American high school diploma based on their school credits and can take the Scholastic Aptitude Test.

    Mrs Boey said: “Some parents feel that their children need a safer environment that teaches values alongside religious education.

    “Other children were bullied in school, and did not like going to school, and their parents had to look for an alternative.”

    Last month, three Singaporean siblings who relocated here after growing up in Japan were given the nod by the MOE to join VLCS.

    Mrs Candy Yim, a missionary in her 40s, said she decided to send her three children, aged 12 to 15, to VLCS even though they had considered public schools.

    “The standards of English in Singapore are very high, compared to Japan, and my son would have entered the Normal (Technical) stream if he joined a public school.

    “Under the ACE curriculum, the students can get school credit for Japanese, and the Christian environment is also good for them.”

    Heritage Academy in Yishun will welcome its first students soon. Most students are foreigners from regional countries, though a few Singaporean parents have asked about its secondary curriculum.

    Said education policy expert Jason Tan of the National Institute of Education: “Mainstream education is seen as a prime means of socialising young people and preparing them for adulthood. The authorities want to regularly monitor students who are not part of the mainstream system. Even one child who slips through the cracks could be one child too many.”

     

    Source: The Straits Times

  • New Law Meant To Deter Public From Expressing Views, Says WP

    New Law Meant To Deter Public From Expressing Views, Says WP

    The Workers’ Party (WP) slammed the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill in Parliament yesterday as its members unanimously voted against it, with party chief Low Thia Khiang accusing the Government of “double standards” when it comes to fair comment on cases before the courts.

    Speaking in Mandarin, Mr Low said the real purpose of the new law — which was eventually passed with 72 votes for the Bill and nine against — was not to protect the fairness of judicial proceedings, but to “deter members of (the) public from voicing their views, although they may be reasonable and legal”.

    The new law, he said, would effectively give the Government or minister “unlimited rights”, such that “whatever statement which a member of the public makes can be considered as contempt of court”.

    “Yet, when it (comes) from the mouth of the minister, it becomes completely legal, so long as the Government can say that this is in public interest,” Mr Low said, referring to a provision under the new law that would allow the Government to make a statement on a case if it is deemed necessary for public interest.

    “The question is: What is in public interest? There’s no clear indication in this Bill, so who decides? Of course the Government decides,” he said.

    He added: “This is double standards, giving the Government all the rights but not the people … The court has become the Government’s tool to suppress freedom of speech and to deal with the people opposing the Government.”

    The newly passed Administration of Justice Act consolidates key elements of the law of contempt into statute.

    Until now, contempt was based on case law, and was not a criminal offence.

    Under the new law, the main types of contempt are disobeying court orders, publishing material that interferes with ongoing proceedings, sub judice and scandalising the court, such as by accusing a judge of bias without basis.

    Ms Sylvia Lim (Aljunied GRC), who is chairman of the party, said the existing contempt of court law “already protects the due administration of justice”.

    “The law is to be found in case law, and has worked well thus far. I have seen no evidence of law inadequacy,” said Ms Lim, adding that she has not come across courts recommending the need for more protection in this regard.

    Asking if the Ministry of Law was “chasing shadows”, Ms Lim pointed out that Law Society’s president Thio Shen Yi was “strongly criticised” by Law Minister K Shanmugam for commenting on the Benjamin Lim case, but public officials such as Mr Shanmugam “could make statements”. Benjamin, 14, was found dead shortly after returning home from a police interview over an alleged molest case, and his case sparked much public discussion.

    “Has he (Mr Shanmugam) been facing accusations that he acted in contempt of court, and wants a blanket licence to say what he likes?” charged Ms Lim.

    The WP parliamentarians were also concerned that there was insufficient public consultation before the Bill was introduced in Parliament on July 11. Ms Lim pointed out that the Bill was put on the Reach website — where the public can provide feedback — a day after it was tabled.

    Non-Constituency MP Daniel Goh felt the new law would undermine people’s trust in the Government. Pointing out that trust is a “two-way street”, he said he would like to be able to “express fair criticism and fair comment on events of public interest” that concern him.

    Responding, Mr Shanmugam dismissed the argument that the new law clamps down on free speech. “It doesn’t really affect what (people) can do or what they have been doing. Unless they want to think in terms of going public and attacking witnesses and judges, and trying to get certain results from the court,” he said.

    He reiterated that the sanctity of the judiciary had to be weighed against “some people’s desire to launch personal attacks against judges”.

    “Remember, those who attack the judges fall within a wide spectrum — from the idealistic, to those who are constitutionally sour, to those who are outright dishonest,” he said.

    Responding to NCMP Leon Perera’s suggestion that the Government was trying to rush the new law through, Mr Shanmugam said: “I didn’t know you’ll consider six years a rush to legislate. It is slow by the Government’s standards.”

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • Mohamad Jonit Adnan Dituduh Bunuh Bekas Isteri Di Yishun Ring Road

    Mohamad Jonit Adnan Dituduh Bunuh Bekas Isteri Di Yishun Ring Road

    Seorang lelaki berusia 37 tahun didakwa dengan tuduhan membunuh pada Isnin (15 Ogos), setelah seorang mangsa berusia 29 tahun meninggal dunia di hospital semalam (14 Ogos).

    Mohamad Jonit Adnan didakwa membunuh Sri Idayu Ghazali di sebuah flat di tingkat tiga Blok 342B Yishun Ring Road pada Sabtu (13 Ogos) sekitar pukul 9.00 malam.

    Mediacorp difahamkan, pasangan itu sedang dalam proses untuk bercerai.

    Cik Sri Idayu dijumpai cedera di rumah tersebut dan dikejarkan ke Hospital Khoo Teck Puat, menurut polis.

    Bagaimanapun, beliau meninggal dunia beberapa jam kemudian sekitar pukul 4.30 pagi semalam.

    Mediacorp juga difahamkan, saudara perempuan Cik Sri Idayu, yang juga merupakan jiran sebelah rumah beliau, menghubungi ambulans dan polis.

    Di mahkamah pagi tadi, Jonit tidak menunjukkan sebarang emosi apabila pertuduhan terhadapnya dibacakan.

    Pendakwa raya polis meminta supaya dia ditahan reman untuk membantu siasatan.

    Kes Jonit akan dibicarakan lagi pada 22 Ogos.

    Jika sabit kesalahan, Jonit boleh dijatuhi hukuman mati.

    Source: Berita MediaCorp

  • What Did Singapore Airlines Really Give Schooling?

    What Did Singapore Airlines Really Give Schooling?

    Singapore’s Olympic hero, Joseph Schooling, returned home with the country’s first ever gold medal.

    Before his flight back from Brazil, Singapore Airlines gave the 21-year-old 1 million Krisflyer miles along with a KrisFlyer Gold Card.

    Frequent flyer miles are usually accumulated based on the distance you fly or the amount of money spent. These miles can later be used to buy flight tickets or upgrade from economy class to business or first class*.

    A million miles may sound like a lot of free travel, but what does it really translate to? And how far can Schooling go with these free miles?

    1. Some websites estimate that 1 million miles translate to $16,000.

    However, miles can vary in value as it depends on the location a traveller is going to and so on.

    For example, a traveller would need to redeem more miles per km to fly from Singapore to New York than if they were to exchange for shorter flights to say Hong Kong or Bangkok.

    The average monetary value can vary from 0.57 cents per mile to 1.11 cents per mile.

    2. Schooling is based in Texas, where he attends university and where his training base is.

    With the 1 million miles, he can take five return trips on first class, or, if his broad shoulders can fit into economy seats, then 15 return trips in economy.

    3. Schooling could also use his free miles to fly to London to watch his favourite soccer team, Chelsea. The miles will allow him 16 economy class trips or five first-class tickets.

    4. Alternatively, if Schooling wanted to take a trip every year to Hong Kong, he could use his free miles for 40 years (flying economy) or 21 years (on business).

    5. If sushi and ramen are more to his taste buds, Schooling could take annual trips to Tokyo and finish his miles only in 26 years (on economy) or 10 years (if flying first class).

    MILLION MILE AWARDS: 

    Schooling is not the only person to be awarded lots of air miles. Here are some others:

    Aug 9, 2016: A 19-year-old Dutch youth Olivier Beg was given 1 million miles from United Airlines for discovering security flaws in its online system.

    Aug 9, 2016: Djaballah Mohamed Taher, a 23-year-old hacker, was awarded 1.7 million miles from United Airlines for discovering three security problems under the airline’s bug bounty programme.

    July 10, 2015: Jordan Weins earned 1 million miles from United for finding a bug that allows people to seize control of one of the airline websites.

     

    Source: The New Paper

  • I Had ‘Goosebumps’ In Parliament: Joseph Schooling

    I Had ‘Goosebumps’ In Parliament: Joseph Schooling

    After a week competing at the Rio Olympics, Joseph Schooling really just wants to sleep.

    The 21-year-old touched down at 530am on Monday (15 August) after an almost 25 hour flight home from Rio de Janeiro, then spent about two hours obliging hundreds of autograph and selfie hunters at Changi Airport. After a brief stop at home, it was time to head to Parliament.

    “It’s been kind of non-stop really, today,” admitted Schooling. “I kind of just wanted to be by myself (to) digest my thoughts. I also want to catch some Zs tonight.”

    He added, “Emotionally and physically, it’s pretty draining but I’m just going along for the ride. I’m enjoying every moment.”

    Schooling was addressing reporters at Parliament after being feted in the House together with his parents Colin and May.

    Schooling became Singapore’s most high profile athlete overnight when he beat Michael Phelps – one of the greatest Olympians – to gold on Saturday (13 August) in the 100m butterfly.

    It was the trio’s first time in Parliament, and they were treated to a standing ovation, a “pretty cool” experience which gave Schooling “goosebumps”.

    The visibly tired Olympic record holder remained composed and savvy, promising to address questions about his renewed National Service deferment at a press conference on Tuesday (16 August). Defense Minister Ng Eng Hen announced on Monday that Schooling has been deferred from National Service again, till after the 2020 Olympics.

    He also revealed that although he was initially slated to stay only four days in Singapore, he was seeking permission from his school, the University of Texas at Austin, to attend the National Day Rally on Sunday (21 August).

    Asked if all the attention has been overwhelming, he credited his parents and other advisors for not letting things get out of hand. “I’ve got a good support staff behind me. If I had to do all this by myself, then I would be overwhelmed, for sure.”

    Source: Yahoo News

deneme bonusu