Blog

  • Walid J. Abdullah: Politicians Should Reflect Whether They Are Serving The Needs And Interest Of People, Not Be Blindly Loyal To Party

    Walid J. Abdullah: Politicians Should Reflect Whether They Are Serving The Needs And Interest Of People, Not Be Blindly Loyal To Party

    Whenever I had the opportunity to have dialogues with Members of Parliament (especially during undergrad days), it is not uncommon to hear one or several of them say something to the effect of: ‘i remember 20 years ago, i was as enthusiastic and idealistic as you (read: naive and unrealistic), but now that i am older or now that i have access to data, my opinions on certain issues have changed.’

    Despite the apparent condescension in the statement, this is of course a possibility. One must be humble enough to admit – especially the younger ones – without experience and full access to information, one may not be able to fully comprehend a situation.

    At the same time, there exists other possibilities. It could also be possible that being bounded by a political party’s norms and values has changed an individual’s perspectives. The individual could then reason with himself that ‘oh it’s ok for me to sacrifice my values on this small matter, because in doing so i will generate greater good for my community’, when in fact he/she is in delusion. The ‘greater good’ consideration could just ultimately be an individual’s attempt to reconcile his/her cognitive dissonance.

    Just like how ordinary people should constantly reflect on whether their opinions are fair given the specific political circumstances, politicians should consistently contemplate whether they are serving the needs and interests of the people, or whether they are just being loyal to the party – any party – at the expense of others.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • Experts Divided Over Motive For Attack, Manhunt Continues

    Experts Divided Over Motive For Attack, Manhunt Continues

    As the Thai authorities look for those responsible for Monday’s deadly blast in Bangkok, observers and security analysts were divided as to the motivation and the possible culprits behind what Thai Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha has described as the worst act of violence in the country.

    With no one claiming responsibility for the attack that has killed 22 people — including a 34-year-old Singaporean — at Erawan Shrine and left over 100 injured, Thai authorities have been careful not to point the blame in any direction.

    “We’re looking at all angles. We’re not dropping off any possibilities yet,” Dr Panitan Wattanayagorn, a prominent Thai security expert and adviser to Deputy Prime Minister Prawit Wongsuwan, told TODAY in a phone interview. “The priority is to make sure this investigation is open and very professional.”

    While Dr Panitan cautioned against any speculation on the motive, he said the attack was aimed at destabilising the country and its economy. The incident is the latest in a series of explosions that have disrupted South-east Asia’s second-largest economy since the military seized power in May last year, and it was no surprise that the experts’ initial assessment was that it was linked to Thailand’s decade-long political turmoil.

    The Thai authorities had blamed supporters of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who call themselves the “red shirts”, for recent attacks in the capital, including two pipe bomb attacks on a luxury mall in February, which injured two persons, and a grenade attack at the Criminal Court a month later, which damaged the property without causing any injuries.

    A suspect in the March incident had reportedly told the police that a network of red shirts had discussed a plot to bomb at least 100 places in Bangkok in a string of attacks against the ruling junta.

    “I think it’s pretty obvious which element is behind this,” a Thai politician who has held senior positions in government told TODAY. “It’s the same pattern … If I’m a betting man, I would place my money on hired militants linked to the red shirts.”

    However, some observers noted that Monday’s attack marked a shift from past outbreaks of political violence, as the bomb was aimed to kill and tourists were deliberately targeted along with Thais.

    “Past explosions were meant more to send a political message and not to harm,” said an editor of a major newspaper in Thailand who did not want to be named. “But this time, the bomb was planted to inflict maximum damage to civilians.”

    This lends weight to the theory that the attack could be linked to international terrorism, he added.

    Police chief Somyot Pumpanmuang said he did not rule out any motives, including Thailand’s controversial repatriation of 109 Uighur people to China recently, which sparked an attack last month on the Thai consulate in Istanbul, Turkey.

    There is also speculation of the possible involvement of insurgents from Thailand’s southern provinces, where violence linked to Malay-Muslim separatists has seen over 6,000 people killed in the past decade.

    But observers note that there does not seem to be any reason for the insurgents to stage an attack outside the southern provinces. Thai army chief, General Udomdej Sitabutr, has also said the latest blast “does not match” past attacks in southern Thailand.

    Security experts however, agree on one thing: The high number of casualties and the way improvised explosive devices were used show that those responsible for the attack had professional training not only in bomb-making, but also bomb-radius measurements, placement and detonation.

    When asked if it was easy to obtain bomb-making materials in Thailand, Dr Panitan said: “In general, we do have some problems controlling some of these materials and devices. Some can be obtained from the industry.”

    Observers said it is hard to predict whether there would be more attacks.

    “After several months of relative calm in the capital, the main impact on Thailand is that certain elements are willing to fund open protests, demonstrations and bombings to oppose policies that they believe are unfavourable,” said Associate Professor Antonio Rappa, head of UniSIM’s Management and Security Studies. “The greatest danger is that more innocent people may lose their lives.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Non-Graduate Teachers Feels New Remuneration System Is Fairer

    Non-Graduate Teachers Feels New Remuneration System Is Fairer

    In line with the move within the Public Service to recognise skills beyond paper qualifications, the Ministry of Education (MOE) will be abolishing the differences in salary structure for graduate and non-graduate educators, including allied educators.

    Also, some 30,800 educators in schools here will be getting a pay raise from October, to ensure their wages keep pace with the market.

    The merging of salary structures for teachers will kick in from October, while the same is targeted to take place next April for allied educators, who provide students with additional support such as in counselling in classrooms.

    With the latest change, non-graduate and graduate teachers may still start off at different salaries “reflecting market practice”, but both groups will progress and be remunerated along the same salary structure. The incentive for long-serving teachers will also no longer be differentiated between graduate and non-graduate teachers.

    Details of the merged structure for allied educators will be announced at a later date.

    About 30,000 teachers and school leaders will see their monthly salaries go up between 4 per cent and 9 per cent, depending on their seniority level, while some 800 allied educators will have their salaries increased by about 5 per cent.

    There are currently about 33,000 teachers and 2,300 allied educators. In response to queries, the MOE said for those who are not eligible for this round of salary adjustments, it is because “their salaries are generally in line with the market”.

    Commenting on these changes in a Facebook post today, Education Minister Heng Swee Keat said the move to create a single salary structure is “one of the most significant in recent years”.

    “We are going beyond qualifications … I am glad to see MOE taking the lead in changing mindsets about skills, and supporting the critical SkillsFuture initiative,” Mr Heng said.

    Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the launch of commemorative notes for SG50 today, Mr Heng noted there will be no change in the way educators are being assessed, which includes criteria such as classroom teaching and how they develop students.

    “Our focus continues to be on performance of teachers … At the end of it, the assessment in promotion of teachers depends on performance and contribution and what they bring to the classroom and to the education system,” Mr Heng said.

    From next month, the Public Service Division will merge career tracks for graduates and non-graduates.

    Last August, the MOE announced that non-graduate teachers with outstanding performance would be placed on the graduate salary scale without the need to obtain a degree.

    Currently, the gross starting monthly salary of graduate teachers ranges from S$3,010 to S$3,310 while that of non-graduate teachers ranges from S$1,580 to S$1,920. For allied educators, salaries range between S$1,500 to S$4,300.

    The last round of salary adjustments for educators was in September 2012. Mr Heng, when queried, debunked talk that the increments were election-related.

    Salary revisions, he said, are “periodic”.

    “It is part and parcel of how the public service operates,” he said. “In this cycle, we took almost a year to finalise many of the details to create a single (salary) scheme of service to support the efforts of SkillsFuture, in creating (an) emphasis on skills to go beyond qualifications.”

    The MOE will also be giving cash payouts of between S$500 to S$700 to teachers every September from next year to educators for learning-related expenses such as computers and magazine subscriptions, instead of staff having to file claims for them.

    Non-graduate teachers TODAY spoke to welcomed the single salary structure, calling it a long-time coming. A 36-year-old teacher who is currently studying for his degree, and has been teaching for seven years, said non-graduate teachers “are always behind in terms of remuneration even when facing the same expectations … as graduate teachers”. He did not want to be named.

    Another teacher, 28, who does not hold a degree, and has been in service for the past six years, pointed out that all teachers have the same workload regardless of their qualifications. It is “fairer” to be remunerated on the same scheme, she said, adding: “Hopefully, this will make them more motivated and give them more opportunities in their career progression.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • SCDF Encik Not Understanding Over Family Matters, NSF Commits Suicide From Stress

    SCDF Encik Not Understanding Over Family Matters, NSF Commits Suicide From Stress

    This is my best friend Shek Salmin whom passed away today because of my Encik SSG Tan Teck Beng from 1st Division SCDF. He has tried to explain himself to thisEncik multiple times that he have been going through alot of family issues and thisencik deliberately chose not to understand his situation and charged him for coming to camp late.

    Shek has always told us about how worried he was if anything happens to him and no one would be able to takecare of his grandmother. He is very old and forgetful and also has poor vision. Shek tried to explain to his encik many times that he will not be able to come camp on time due to family issues but the encik always choose to ignore everything he had to say to explain himself. Encik Tan proceeded to charge him which led him to Detention Barracks (DB) for four days just for being late to camp for 2 hours.. The encik wasn’t willing to listen to his explanation and straight away charged him.

    A week or two after he was released from DB, he was late for camp again and this very Encik still choose to not let him explain himself and charged him again. Shek was supposed to get charged today 17 August 2015. He committed suicide today morning at around 1am.

    Is this what they mean by if you have any issues you can talk to them and they will definitely try to HELP you cause everyone is equal? What is this supposed to mean? Is this everyone gonna see and let this issue slip away like that? If you have read this post till here I thank you for your time. It only take another second to share this post.

    Also remember that in the future people from your family are going to serve the nation soon. Don’t let this happen to anyone of them. My condolences to my dear friend’s family. Below is the last conversation between Shek Salmin and his friend before he committed suicide. Do go and take a look at his wall and view his post.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • A Singaporean Woman Among Dead In Bangkok Blast

    A Singaporean Woman Among Dead In Bangkok Blast

    A Singaporean woman was killed in the bomb blast that rocked Bangkok’s Ratchaprasong area on Monday night, reported local media.

    According to a statement released by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), some Singaporeans were injured in the incident.

    MFA said its embassy staff are providing consular assistance to affected Singaporeans.

    Dozens of tourists were injured in the bombing, which appeared to have been targeted at foreigners.

    MFA urged Singaporeans in Bangkok to take necessary safety precautions, avoid the vicinity of the explosion and to monitor the local news closely.

     

    Source: http://news.asiaone.com

deneme bonusu