Tag: CAD

  • Damanhuri Abas: Scandals Show That High Salary Is Not The Answer To Eradicate Corruption

    Damanhuri Abas: Scandals Show That High Salary Is Not The Answer To Eradicate Corruption

    The trail of scandals spanning just the last decade along the corridors of power, sadly results from the chronic malaise of institutionalised governance when a single dominant party rule continues unabated.

    We had the following scandals, CEO of NFK, TT Durai in 2005, Edwin Yeo of CPIB in 2008, Peter Lim Chief of SCDF in 2013, Lim Cheng Ho of MFA in 2014, Bernard Lim Yong Soon of NParks in 2014, CEO of NKF, Edmond Kwok 2016, and most recently, Kong Hee and Friends of City Harvest Church, 2017. Just to list a few of them.

    And we also had the personal indiscretion of PAP MPs in the case of Speaker of Parliament Mr Micheal Palmer and the infamous affair involving PAP MP for Bukit Batok that happened only last year, Mr David Ong and his married grassroots woman volunteer.

    Now we have the latest scandal involving none other than a former Mayor and PAP MP Zainudin Nordin further reminding the people to seriously relook at all PAP leaders. They are not as clean as their white garment looks.

    The list of corruptions in their ranks and files of cronies as well as their leaders are undeniable facts and not fake news. It is crystal clear now to all Singaporeans that the logic of high pay and incorruptible public officers or leaders are hollow PAP sloganeering promising leaders of integrity and merit but delivering otherwise.

    Will the PAP reform and correct themselves? Most unlikely as the signs are showing the opposite, seen from the constitutional amendments on the Elected Presidency to the most recent clipping of further Presidential powers passed in parliament.

    We are even seeing more reduction of space for critical input and feedback which are necessary and healthy developments needed for reform and progress in a maturing democracy. They in fact, do the reverse to entrench their unchallenged controlling power. They still prefer to trust their own self-checking and the above samplings of scandals suffices to discredit it.

    All hegemonic power feels threatened by the natural God ordained system of check and balance. Their obsession with perpetual and absolute control will become their very undoing. History recalls many past powers wanting to remain so even though their time is up. Eventually they went astray falling from grace on their own highway of luxury and greed.

    Singaporeans therefore must do our part by intervening to stop this slippery decline down the slope of democratic regression happening before our very eyes. The only way to do so, is to put into parliament more oppositions to raise the vital questions that they themselves will not. The longer we delay, the tougher it becomes, as they will resort to all machavillian means within their vast controlling disposal to ensure their hegemony remains forever.

    The stakes are very high. It is about our believe in the Singaporean spirit to rise up to collectively remake and better our citizen’s deal. To share what we have with each other, to not leave anyone behind and to demand from our elected leaders, service and priority to the people and not their vested crony interest. The scandals are reminders of what is wrong in our society and for us to collectively act together as one united people to affect that vital redirection for our beloved nation.

    Singaporeans must realise that the only constant is change. Ours is past due. The People needs a New Deal with a very fresh and vibrant New face of real Hope, Integrity, Honesty, Courage and Humility. God-willing, together we can make it happen.

     

    Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas

  • Game Over, Winston

    Game Over, Winston

    IN BETWEEN nasi ambeng and satay on Thursday evening, representatives of National Football League clubs explored a proposal to set up a café to raise money for their teams. The 24  sides playing in two divisions of the NFL are running on annual budgets of between $6,000 and $16,000.

    The higher figure belongs to Jungfrau Punggol FC, but it is an exception because the team owner is Salman Abdullah, who happens to run Padi@Bussorah’s restaurant. In reality, the average budget for the 24 amateur teams is about $8,000. They are struggling, which is unforgivable, and an embarrassment to the Football Association of Singapore.

    Why so?

    Well, because while the teams’ representatives were cracking their heads on how to generate revenue to keep their sides playing in the NFL, Commercial Affairs Department officers were in the midst of raiding the FAS offices.

    At the heart of the CAD investigation is a $500,000 cheque that Tiong Bahru Football Club chairman Bill Ng wrote to the FAS, who then donated the money to the ASEAN Football Federation. What it is for is immaterial, but details have been reported in the media over the last few days.

    What matters, though, is why did the FAS allow half a million dollars to benefit a non-Singapore football organisation when the money could have been used to help struggling local NFL clubs?

    This is a serious dereliction of duty by FAS general secretary Winston Lee, who is Singapore’s top football administrator. He made the unilateral decision to allow the donation to go to the AFF because he contended the FAS Council did not have to be informed about it.

    But the FAS’ constitution defines the Council as the association’s supreme body. Its primary responsibility is to ensure Singapore football is managed with integrity and not fall into disrepute, the kind of which has got Winston and, by extension, the FAS into a tangle.

    The FAS Council hires the general secretary but when it is oblivious to what its employee has been up to, the roof inevitably caves. Should anyone, therefore, be surprise at the sorry state of Singapore football today, especially the S-League? The dramatic slide from top ASEAN team to near minnows began under Winston’s watch, after he assumed his current post in 2008. National youth teams also floundered and flopped.

    But there is a silver lining.

    With the CAD hauling up Winston for questioning, including Bill and two others, his tenure as general secretary is all but over.

    It does not matter whether he is found complicit in any wrongdoing or not, but the new Council, when it is elected on April 29, must release him. Its mandate from voting members is to overhaul Singapore football and reverse the game’s dive and it must stay true to this mission. This means also ridding what other rot that has taken root in the secretariat and filling it with more capable staff.

    Many were hopeful that the election of new office bearers will trigger Winston’s exit and those closely linked to him. But the events of the past week that culminated in the CAD action, which came as a complete shock, are now forcing the issue.

    My only gripe: Why did it take so long for matters to reach this stage for real good to finally come upon Singapore football?

     

    Source: http://iandecotta.com

  • Galaxy Trio and Get-Rich-Quick Schemes Are Scams

    Credit: Singapore Police Force
    Credit: Singapore Police Force
    https://www.facebook.com/galaxytrioterbaik
    Credit: Alfie Romeo, https://www.facebook.com/galaxytrioterbaik

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=251EOwBSvgY

    If you see fraud, and you do not call fraud, you are a fraud.

    Recently I have noticed a large number of ‘get-rich-quick’ (GRQ) schemes that seem to target the Malay community such as Galaxy Trio. 
    Galaxy Trio claims that (directly taken from a promoter’s post):

    ● Not a business, Investment or MLM

    ● No monthly maintenance
    ● Low risk
    ● Highest return
    ● Safest concept
    ● Achievable by all
    ● NO SELLING REQUIRED
    ● Not a Ponzhi or pyramid Scheme
    ● A proven platform
    ● Training and full guidance provided

    And that by signing up for this program you can turn your initial investment of $2k into $11k.

    These above claims are FALSE. These schemes are merely referral schemes which involve a new member (coughing up S300-$2000) being required to find NEW referrals in order to recoup the initial investment and gain something out of this scheme.

    Organisers of such schemes claim it is ‘low risk, high return’. How is it low risk when there is no possible way of refunding the initial investment? How can it be the ‘safest concept’ to making money?

    If the deal seems too good, it probably isn’t. Such GRQ schemes show our fellow Malays with ‘fans’ of money in order to attract new members. No advertising on the actual product being sold or even a product list, just flamboyant displays of money fans.

    This is perhaps the worst and most unethical form of marketing available: selling hope. These schemes sell the hope of making quick fast money with no downside and that manyfold returns are ‘achievable by all’. Worst of all, these schemes target the Malay community for their scams, with the knowledge that they might be more susceptible to the BS of GRQ schemes.

    galaxytrioscam
    Credit: Berita Harian SG

    MUIS has recently released an irsyad on MLM and the like. I think that the irsyad underplays the nature of such schemes.

    I hope this has shed some light on what these schemes actually do and their inequitable nature and pray that members of our community do not get scammed any further.

    Read more on Hariz Bastion Junid’s perspective here

    Source: Hariz Bastion Junid

    EDITOR’S NOTE

    More and more readers are writing to Rilek1Corner to share information about the Get-Rich-Quick scams. We thank you for the contribution and we assure you that identities will be kept secret. We were also informed that readers who had openly share their grievances/concerns were harassed and threatened. We urged those affected parties to contact the authorities immediately. If you are uncertain on how to go about doing it, please do contact Rilek1Corner and we will gladly be of assistance to you. Otherwise you can do so by:

    You can lodge a complaint with the Department either in writing or in person:

    Written Complaint

    Complaint in Person

    Complaint via Electronic Police Centre

    Written Complaint

    The complaint letter may be submitted to:

    Director
    Commercial Affairs Department
    391 New Bridge Road #06-701
    Police Cantonment Complex Block D
    Singapore 088762

    The following information should be contained in the report:

    • An account of the relevant facts;
    • Copies of the relevant documents, if available; and
    • Your name, NRIC / passport number, contact number and address.

    Complaint in Person

    You may appear in person at the above address. To avoid any inconvenience, you are advised to call the Department at 1800-325 0000 (Toll-Free) to make an appointment. Our office hours are as follows:

    Monday – Friday (8.30am to 5.30pm)

    Complaint via Electronic Police Centre

    Alternatively, you may lodge an online complaint via the ePC at the following web-site:

    http://www.spf.gov.sg/epc/

    In order to lodge an online complaint, your NRIC Number, Date of Birth and Email Address are required.

    READ MORE ON GALAXY TRIO AND PONZI/MLM/GRQ RELATED ARTICLES HERE