Tag: cheating

  • Lagun Sari Employee, Sunato Zaidi, Ran Away With Our Money, More Than 100 Couples Affected

    Lagun Sari Employee, Sunato Zaidi, Ran Away With Our Money, More Than 100 Couples Affected

    Eventually my heart broken into thousand of pieces when my dad show me this articles on Berita Harian on Saturday morning, 20th Aug … I immediately called Lagun Sari to set an appointment with the person incharge who took over Sunato’s clients… So on my way to Lagun Sari with fiance, my heart pumping fast and hoping Sunato left with a clear clean resignation… To our shocked, he did not… He took most of our deposit money for his own personal use and gave us a fake receipt…

    And not only us, there’s more den 100 couples affected… Imagine that!

    To cut it short, we went to lodge a police report as advised from Lagun Sari…

    So before proceed to the police station, we went to Teh Tarik at Tampines where we meet my fiance’s cousin and his fren which also affected… As we having our lunch and explained to them what did Lagun Sari said… Dengan izin allah, this Sunato walking across the road right at where we are… My fiance, his cousin and his fren stop eating and chase him for an explaination… So I waited there, but i dont feel right, so i followed them… This is what they manage to video him… Thanks to Nur Ahmad for the video…

    Look at what he’s holding on his hand… He promise to come over on tuesday 23 Aug at 10am to make an explaination… But as we expect, he did not turn up…

     

    So, to the rest who’s affected, pls pm me so we could do it together a file against Lagun Sari…

    Im making this PUBLIC, do share around ya! Thnks…

     

    Source: De La AsLam

     

     

  • 50% Of Divorce Cases Now Involve Cheating Wives

    50% Of Divorce Cases Now Involve Cheating Wives

    A noticeable number of marriages in Singapore break down because of an unfaithful spouse: the wife.

    Twenty veteran family lawyers and private investigators told The Sunday Times that out of every 10 cases they handle in which a spouse cheats, about half are because the wife strayed from the marriage.

    A decade ago, only two to three out of the 10 unfaithful parties were the wives. And 20 or 30 years ago, an adulterous wife being cited in divorce proceedings was quite unheard of, they added.

    Lawyer and former Member of Parliament Ellen Lee said that back then, divorce was not an easy option as women were financially dependent on their husbands.

    Divorce was also less socially accepted. “If a woman committed adultery in the past, she would have been condemned and ostracised by society for breaking up her family and bringing shame to them. The condemnation is not as strong now,” she said.

    There also appeared to be acceptance of men having a mistress and that this was something wives had to tolerate, she added.

    But that has been changing, with more women becoming financially independent, educated, assertive and vocal, said lawyers, private investigators and counsellors.

    Counsellor Jonathan Siew said: “In the past, women were expected to sacrifice for their families. But now, there is a greater sense of individualism. Women are less afraid and more willing to pursue their own needs, compared with their mothers’ generation.”

    There are also opportunities to fall for another man at work or through social media, lawyers said of the cases they handled.

    And contrary to popular perception, unfaithful wives are not only found among professionals and corporate types, or white-collar or higher-income earners. They come from all walks of life, including housewives and low-wage earners, and many have children.

    Lawyer Louis Lim tells of a client, a hawker’s assistant in her 40s, who was physically abused by her husband. The mother of two teenage daughters fell for a man who delivered vegetables to her stall and filed for divorce.

    While most of the women in divorce cases handled by the private investigators and lawyers were in their 30s and 40s, there were also grandmothers in their 50s who strayed. Private investigator Raymond Lim had such a case. A woman in her 50s, who runs a small shop, had an affair with a businessman. The pair would have meals and check into budget hotels almost weekly.

    And there are key differences between men and women when it comes to affairs.

    For one thing, an unfaithful woman is more likely than a man to end the marriage, said counsellors and lawyers.

    In their opinion, this is because women do not necessarily seek an extramarital affair. They may have been unhappy in their marriage, till someone comes along and offers them the emotional intimacy they find lacking in their marriage.

    Said Mr Siew: “When women cheat, they are, to some extent, already thinking of divorce. So they allow themselves to go into the affair, which they see as a long-term commitment.”

    This is unlike men, who often want to keep the other woman on the side for a variety of reasons.

    Lawyer Koh Tien Hua said: “Some men see sex outside of marriage as no big deal and just as a matter of sexual release. Or they may have an emotional attachment – but one that is not strong enough for them to leave their wives.”

    So it is rare to see women who are “serial” adulterers, unlike some men who have one affair after another, lawyers said.

    That is not to say there are no women who “go around shopping for better husbands”, lawyer Ellen Lee said.

    The wife of one of her clients cheated on him repeatedly. The man forgave her time and again for the sake for their two young daughters. But after her fourth affair, he decided enough was enough and filed for a divorce.

    Between 2004 and 2014, based on data from the Department of Statistics (DOS), 1.3 per cent to 2.1 per cent of those who filed for divorce under the Women’s Charter cited adultery as the main reason.

    Of this group, between 27 per cent and 34 per cent were husbands who claimed their wives had been unfaithful, the DOS explained when asked about data obtained from the Statistics of Marriages and Divorces.

    Lawyers said official data from the courts does not reflect the reality of what they observe – which is that between a third and half the divorces they handle involve one cheating spouse.

    But few cite adultery as grounds for divorce as that requires evidence of an affair, and the third party must be named in divorce papers.

    So most choose to cite unreasonable behaviour instead.

    This is also because it can be costly to hire a private investigator to gather evidence. It costs between $5,000 and $8,000 for one week of surveillance.

    Adultery is also seen as shameful. So the offending party tends to negotiate with the spouse not to cite adultery as the reason, said lawyer Malathi Das.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Cheat Claimed To Be Brother Of Wong Kan Seng

    Cheat Claimed To Be Brother Of Wong Kan Seng

    You could argue the man in the dock looked a little like former Deputy Prime Minister Wong Kan Seng. But Wong Kok Keong, 63, is not related to the former DPM.

    Yet in 2007, Wong, who was then believed to be a freelance broker, told business acquaintances he was the then DPM’s brother.

    Three directors and shareholders of Manor Construction were then duped into giving him $420,000 over two non-existent business deals.

    Wong, who was represented by lawyer Edmond Pereira, was found guilty yesterday of two counts of cheating.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Hon Yi said Wong’s victims thought he had the right connections.

    FIRST DEAL

    In September 2007, he concocted an investment deal involving land at 8, Yung Ho Road in Jurong.

    He told his victims – Mr Lim Swee Guan, 55, Mr Chan Jee Khin, 42, and Mr Heng Choon Leng, 45 – he had acquired the rights to build a commercial building on the land.

    He then invited them to invest in the project and told them the Option to Purchase (OTP) for the land was valued at $900,000.

    The victims were required to pay 20 per cent of it, which came up to $180,000. After receiving a cheque for the amount from them on Sept 27, 2007, Wong immediately cashed it.

    His investors later asked him on a few occasions to furnish them with the OTP documents.

    Wong provided none and in April 2008, told the victims he would return the $180,000 as the investment had been unsuccessful.

    DPP Hon said: “There was no such OTP that the accused claimed to have access to, and he was not the brother of then-DPM Wong.”

    Similarly, Wong’s other investment dealturned out to be a sham.

    Wong had told Mr Lim he could acquire “preferential shares” of Advance Modules at $0.15 per share, which would rise to $0.50 per share.

    The trio wrote him cheques worth a total of $240,000 in October 2007.

    Wong did not fulfil his promise.

    Yesterday, Mr Pereira confirmed in court that Wong had made restitutions of around $200,000.

    Wong is expected to be sentenced in April. He is an undischarged bankrupt.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Employee Of Gadget Terminal At Sim Lim Square Jailed 28 Weeks For Cheating

    Employee Of Gadget Terminal At Sim Lim Square Jailed 28 Weeks For Cheating

    A former employee of the now-defunct Sim Lim Square electronics shop Gadget Terminal was sentenced to 28 weeks’ jail on Tuesday (Jan 5) for cheating two customers in September and October 2014.

    Justin Chew Chee Kin, 36, admitted to conspiring with the boss of Gadget Terminal, Gavin Chung Choon Cheik, 33, to cheat the shop’s customers. Chew was employed as a sales executive and earned S$1,800 a month, plus a commission on profits made by Gadget Terminal.

    Chung Choong Cheik, former general manager at Gadget Terminal. (Photo: Ngau Kai Yan) 

    Chew worked under Chung’s instructions to offer mobile devices to customers at an attractive price, before confronting them with various sales tactics after the customer made payment.

    On Sep 30, 2014, customer service officer Zhang Zhengqiang called the police after Chew demanded an additional S$480, on top of the S$300 that Chew had already collected from Mr Zhang for an iPhone 4S. When Mr Zhang refused to hand over more money, Chew threatened to complain to Mr Zhang’s employer. Despite the police’s involvement, Chew returned Mr Zhang just S$12, citing a “cancellation fee”.

    Chew cheated a second victim, student Gao Erxu, about one month later on Oct 20, 2014. Mr Gao’s girlfriend called the police after the couple paid Chew with a S$1,000 note and he refused to return them S$620 in change. Again, despite the police’s involvement, Mr Gao lost S$215 in “cancellation fees”.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Muhammad Faizal Nooraznan pointed to the vulnerability of the two victims as an aggravating factor in the case. Both Mr Zhang and Mr Gao are Chinese nationals, and Mr Zhang has “limited English proficiency”, the court heard. The victims were “exploited and cheated” and Chew “unmoved by police presence”, said the DPP.

    As Chew presented the matter to police as a “contractual dispute”, it was difficult for police to know that any illegality was involved, the DPP said.

    DPP Muhammad Faizal cited the prevalence of this kind of offences in recent times as well. Over the past three years, the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE) received 2,000 complaints against retailers in Sim Lim Square, Lucky Plaza and People’s Park Centre.

    The DPP also referred to past cases of cheating salesmen at Sim Lim Square. Jover Chew, the former boss of the now-defunct Mobile Air, and four employees were sentenced to jail last year for employing a similar modus operandi to cheat several customers of thousands of dollars.

    Chung and three other former salesmen have also been charged with cheating offences. Their cases are still before the courts.

    For each charge of cheating, Chew could have faced up to 10 years’ jail and a fine.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Mobile Air Employees Plead Not Guilty

    Mobile Air Employees Plead Not Guilty

    Four former employees of the defunct Mobile Air shop at Sim Lim Square did not plead guilty to cheating offences yesterday despite earlier indicating they would do so.

    Kam Kok Keong, 31; Edmund Lim Hong Ching, 33; and Kelvin Lim Zhi Wei, 32, yesterday asked the court for more time because they wanted to engage lawyers to “reduce charges”.

    They each face one to eight cheating-related charges, with the amounts involved ranging from S$330 to S$3,710.

    Koh Guan Seng, 38, the fourth accused, has engaged lawyer Edmund Wong, who told the court he had not been instructed if his client would plead guilty. Koh faces 15 charges of cheating involving S$9,789.

    Deputy Public Prosecutor Eunice Lim said yesterday that she was prepared to proceed with seven charges against Koh and have the remaining eight taken into consideration for sentencing, if he pleaded guilty.

    Kam will have four charges proceeded with and the remaining four will be taken into consideration for sentencing if he pleads guilty, she said.

    All of the accused are out on bail and their cases have been set for a pre-trial conference on Thursday, the same day as that of co-accused and Mobile Air owner Jover Chew Chiew Loon.

    Chew, 33, faces 25 cheating-related charges involving a total of S$14,449 as well as one charge of criminal intimidation.

    Mobile Air gained infamy last year after Vietnamese tourist Pham Van Thoai was filmed going down on his knees to beg for a refund for a phone he had purchased from there. The shop also made the news for returning S$1,010 in coins to a customer. However, both victims are not named in the charges.

    After the five men were arrested last month, the police said that their victims ended up paying for mobile phones at much higher prices or had to pay fees to cancel the deal.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com