Tag: discrimination

  • SAF – Integrating The Newcomers

    SAF – Integrating The Newcomers

    How has National Service (NS) — which has been described as a social glue — brought new citizens and permanent residents closer to Singaporeans, and shaped their lives? PIONEER speaks to three to find out.

    2LT Scott Alexander
    Permanent Resident / Country of origin: United Kingdom

    How come angmo (Hokkien for Caucasian) need to do NS? This is a question that 2nd Lieutenant (2LT) Alexander often gets from taxi drivers.

    The 20-year-old London-born is a second-generation Permanent Resident (PR) who came to Singapore as a toddler. His father and mother are PRs working here.

    Despite growing up in Singapore, he did not interact much with the locals, having studied in an international school since Primary 3. Imagine the kind of culture shock he had when he enlisted for NS in 2014!

    “Obviously I was very nervous,” he recalled. “It was a big culture shock, but in a good way. I’ve met people from all over Singapore, from all different walks of life.”

    For 2LT Alexander, NS has helped to build his character. The most challenging experience for him so far was the nine-day Jungle Confidence Course where he had to survive on just two days’ worth of combat rations. “I’d never felt so hungry before,” he recalled. “But it helped to build my mental strength. I learnt that if I set my mind on something, I can do it.”

    Now a staff officer in the Training and Development Branch, Officer Cadet School, he cherishes the special bonds and friendships that he has developed in the Army.

    “I feel that NS has brought me closer to Singaporeans. It is a common ground for everyone. No matter if you are a junior college or polytechnic student, or from any background, everybody serves two years,” said 2LT Alexander, who hopes to get his citizenship in the near future.

    “If you run out of conversation topics at a dinner table, you always have NS to fall back on — the times you had to crawl in the mud and dig trenches.”

    CFC Anuraj Rajesh
    New Citizen / Country of origin: India

    When Corporal First Class (CFC) Anuraj enlisted for NS in 2014, he got to know a different world — one that was markedly different from the one he grew up in.

    The 20-year-old comes from a well-off family, and studied in the United World College of Southeast Asia, an international school. In contrast, one of his section mates had to juggle work and studies in order to support his family. Another was already a father of a baby.

    Living and training with them enabled him to understand the struggles of people of different backgrounds. “In NS, they put you right in the middle of it. You start to understand and appreciate the hardship that others go through,” said CFC Anuraj, who came to Singapore at the age of four, and became a citizen in 2013.

    On one occasion, CFC Anuraj, an assistant investigation officer in the Military Police Command, escorted a drug offender for a house search.

    Upon entering the house, the offender collapsed to his knees and apologised to his mother for what he had done. She was crestfallen to see him in handcuffs, but there was no scolding — just tears and hugs from mother and son. “I couldn’t show my emotions as I needed to remain professional, but I was tearing inside,” he recalled.

    Part of his job requires him to assure the accused that they have a future if they learn from their mistakes. “My biggest takeaway from NS is having the chance to understand the different backgrounds that people come from, and being able to make an effort to help them in any way possible,” he said.

    LTA Tee Chze Hao
    New Citizen / Country of origin: Malaysia

    During his Full-time NS, booking out from camp meant a long journey across the Causeway. Lieutenant (LTA) Tee was then a second-generation PR, but resided in Johor Bahru. His Malaysian parents are PRs who have been working in Singapore for decades.

    “The journey didn’t bother me. I see meaning in NS. This country has given so much to me, it is only natural that I serve,” said the 26-year-old, who graduated from the National University of Singapore last year.

    He came to Singapore to study when he was in Secondary 3. So when he enlisted in 2009, LTA Tee did not have any problem integrating with the locals. He was clueless about the Army though. “I was very focused on my studies and didn’t know much about what’s Basic Military Training or command school.”

    However, the Army is where he found his calling. LTA Tee excelled in the School of Infantry Specialists (now Specialist Cadet School), and received the Silver Bayonet. He also received the NSF of the Year award in 2011 when he was a platoon sergeant in 4th Battalion, Singapore Infantry Regiment (4 SIR).

    After getting his citizenship in 2012, he became a career soldier. He was commissioned earlier this January, and received the Sword of Honour for being the top officer cadet in the Infantry Formation.

    One of his reasons for signing on was so that he could make an impact on the lives of others. He broke into a wide smile when he shared stories about how some of his former 4 SIR soldiers — delinquents with troubled pasts — went on to become better sons, and husbands, with successful careers.

    “That’s what we, as commanders, want to see. These are examples that make us feel that we have done a good job,” said the Company 2nd-In-Command in 5 SIR.

     

    Source: www.mindef.gov.sg

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Racism In Singapore Is Not New

    Zulfikar Shariff: Racism In Singapore Is Not New

    There seems to be more and more posts how Malays and Indians are treated by some racists in Singapura.

    Whether it is about a Chinese woman moving away with irritation from an Indian man who sat beside her on the MRT..

    a Malay man “paid” $20 to move away from a table because the payer’s children do not want to sit beside a Malay..

    A Hijabi told she had to remove her hijab if she worked at a Montessori preschool because Chinese children will be scared if she wore her hijab…

    An older Chinese man in Jurong who pulls off hijab of Muslim women who walk past…

    And some of us assume there is a change….that Singapura is becoming more racist.

    No it is not.

    Racism has been there for a long time. I still remember being called “kiao tor” (dig mud/ skin like mud) from when I was a kid…

    Used to work in sales and when I spoke with prospects in English..being told “if you cannot speak Chinese don’t talk to me”…

    Told “this is Chinese country why dont you speak Chinese?”

    When I worked for a shipping company…my Chinese colleague telling me that there was no way Malays and Indians would be promoted…

    When I told him a senior manager is Indian he replied…”because he has 7 different degrees. Dont think we would promote Indian if his qualification is the same with a Chinese”…

    My 15 year old Malay neighbour giving up and asked me why I bother to take A Levels….and said..

    “why do you bother to study? we are Malays…we cannot go anywhere” (Kau belajar tinggi tinggi buat apa? kita Melayu…tak boleh pergi mana mana).

    Applying to join the Navy when I was in school and told when I submitted the papers… not to bother because I am Muslim.

    Relatives told to remove hijab at work because their bosses do not like it.

    Hearing Chinese friends tell a joke “what do you call an Indian under a tree? Fertilizer”.

    And lots of other similar comments.

    Racism in Singapura is not new.

    There is no change to a more racist society.

    What changed is that there is now social media to show its existence.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • AWARE: Legal, Societal Discrimination Leaves LGBT People Vulnerable To Abuse

    AWARE: Legal, Societal Discrimination Leaves LGBT People Vulnerable To Abuse

    I read with dismay that a man extorted large sums from a male teacher by threatening to reveal their sexual relationship to the Ministry of Education and the teacher’s school (“Man pleads guilty to extorting S$197k, gifts from male teacher he had tryst with”, TODAYonline, Jan 12).

    These criminal acts were carried out by an unscrupulous individual. But he was enabled by the atmosphere of secrecy that our society has collectively imposed on LGBT people.

    While any married person might fear exposure of adultery, the teacher in this case faced further vulnerability because of the legal, societal and institutional discrimination that treats same-sex relationships as invalid and shameful.

    Section 377A of the Penal Code stigmatises sexual activity between men, LGBT people are not protected against employment discrimination, and same-sex relationships are routinely censored from media representation.

    As long as we demand that these relationships stay furtive, the people in them will remain vulnerable to abuse.

    Indeed, the prevalence of sexual blackmail was cited by British parliamentarians in the 1960s as one reason for decriminalising homosexuality.

    The experience of the Sexual Assault Care Centre (SACC) at the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) reveals a similar disturbing issue: Section 377A can discourage some men from reporting sexual violence against them to the police.

    They fear that in describing the sexual assault or their interactions with their attackers, they will reveal that they have, themselves, violated Section 377A, and thus be, themselves, subject to police investigation.

    Most people face great social and emotional barriers to reporting sexual assault.

    For some, Section 377A adds the fear that the authorities will treat them not as the victim of a crime, but as a perpetrator.

    The Government’s position that the law will not be proactively enforced does not adequately allay this concern.

    Individuals are understandably nervous about whether such a stand will truly override the weight of the written law, which plainly says they have committed a crime.

    Moreover, for someone who has faced a potentially traumatic sexual assault, even if he is not subsequently prosecuted, the prospect of police investigations for an alleged crime can be enough to deter reporting.

    His attacker is, therefore, never held to account.

    The extortion case and SACC’s experiences show some of the great human costs of a supposed moral stance against homosexuality.

    As long as our society continues to discriminate against LGBT people, we will aid and abet their abuse.

    The opinion by Jolene Tan, Programmes and Communications Senior Manager, Association of Women for Action and Research, was published in Voices, Today, on 19 Jan 2015.

    Source: www.todayonline.com

     

     

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Malays’ Non-Confrontational Attribute Prevents Them From Raising Discrimination Issues More Frequently

    Zulfikar Shariff: Malays’ Non-Confrontational Attribute Prevents Them From Raising Discrimination Issues More Frequently

    When we raise issues of discrimination in Singapura, one common response from non-Malays (usually Chinese) is that…

    “It cannot be true. Why have I not heard of this before? I know some Malays and they did not tell me this.”

    There are several obvious reasons.

    1. You may know them but you do not really get to know them. They do not share with you.

    2. You are actually not interested to know. You just want to defend the system.

    3. You do not understand the culture and interaction style of the Malays.

    The Malay culture seeks to avoid conflict. They do not like confrontation.

    If saying something may make someone else uncomfortable they will rather keep quiet.

    Some accuse Malays of “Tidak apa” attitude. This attitude is actually born out of their desire for peaceful relations.

    Two of the main characteristics of Malay interaction are musyawarah and muafakat, usually translated as consultation and consensus building respectively.(Haacke, 2003, p. 4).

    However, while these words are translated into English, what they mean have not been fully understood.

    They mean much more than their translations.

    They miss the subtleties of musyawarah and muafakat as social and political traditions.

    Muafakat, which is a desired outcome of musyawarah, exists in the Malay social interaction as part of budi(Chong, 2012, p. 34). Budi in turn, is a key concept of Malay culture, and forms “part of the ethnic “self-image” of the Malay “bangsa, nation, race’”(Goddard, 2000, p. 87).

    Wan Norhasniah Wan Husin(cited in Chong, 2012, pp. 10-11) identify budi as a social norm that encompasses the Malay world from the Peninsula to Sulawesi, Borneo and the Malay groups in the Philippines.

    It refers to the Malay mode of social interaction that emphasizes harmony, good treatment of others, kindness and peaceful relations(Chong, 2012, p. 10; Goddard, 2000, p. 87).

    According to Dahlan, ‘‘budi is composed of virtuous qualities such as hemah tinggi (generosity), hormat (respect), ikhlas (sincerity), mulia (righteous), timbang rasa (considerate), jaga hati (caring), budi bicara (discretion)…’’

    He further notes that ‘‘the budi thinking man is never direct and forthright in his ways: his ways are subtle…to be blunt, direct and forthright especially if the end result is negative…is considered rude and out of tune in the Malay polite system…

    Hence a budi thinking man is by nature polite and conflict-avoiding’’(cited in Paramasivam, 2007, p. 95) .

    Muafakat can then be understood as the outcome of a social tradition that forms the Malay self-image which emphasizes virtue, subtlety, discretion, harmony and peaceful relations. It is not simply consensus building. Decision making has to lead to contentment and peaceful acceptance of every party involved.

    Muafakat, musyawarah and budi are part of the Malay identity. It is so strongly held that it is one of the most defining attributes.

    And the Malays expect a similar response. They expect those they interact with to similarly show these characteristics they hold as important.

    And when they stop showing these characteristics, it is a sign that for them, the relationship may be over.

    And do not expect anymore muafakat or budi from them.

    References:

    Acharya, A. (2003). Democratisation and the prospects for participatory regionalism in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 375-390.

    Chong, J. W. (2012). ” Mine, Yours or Ours?”: The Indonesia-Malaysia Disputes over Shared Cultural Heritage. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia, 27(1), 1-53.

    Goddard, C. (2000). ” Cultural Scripts” and Communicative Style in Malay (” Bahasa Melayu”). Anthropological linguistics, 81-106.

    Haacke, J. (2003). ASEAN’s diplomatic and security culture : origins, development and prospects. Richmond: Routledge.

    Paramasivam, S. (2007). Managing disagreement while managing not to disagree: Polite disagreement in negotiation discourse. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(2), 91-116.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Pemerintah Singapura Harus Mengambil Langkah Untuk Membasmi Diskriminasi Terhadap Kaum Muslimah

    Pemerintah Singapura Harus Mengambil Langkah Untuk Membasmi Diskriminasi Terhadap Kaum Muslimah

    Alhamdulillah, telah berlalu hampir 4 bulan sejak saya diizinkan Ilahi waktu berkempen di pilihanraya yang lalu untuk menyuarakan isu-isu diskriminasi terhadap penduduk Singapura yang berbangsa Melayu dan beragama Islam seperti hak kebebasan beragama dalam memakai tudung untuk wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang beragama Islam sewaktu menjalankan tugas sebagai seorang jururawat. Malangnya masih belum terdengar apa-apapun perubahan dasar yang akan dibuat untuk membetulkan ketidak-adilan ini. Isu ini menjadi sesuatu keaiban kepada maruah kita sebagai orang Melayu dan orang Islam yang tidak mampu membela hak segolongan wanita kita yang ingin bertudung sambil berkerjaya sebagai seorang jururawat. Diskriminasi ini adalah suatu perkara yang di luar kefahaman rasional kerana tidak ada sebab yang munasabah samada daripada aspek kebersihan mahupun dari aspek sosial yang boleh mempertahankan suatu dasar yang begitu kuno di zaman moden ini.

    Kebelakangan ini, pemerintah Singapura telah menunjukkan teladan yang sangat mengalakkan dengan penerimaan AP Melayu wanita PAP yang bertudung untuk menerajui sebahagian kepimpinan Negara. Namun pada masa yang sama menjadi suatu keanehan apabila wanita lain yang berbangsa Melayu ataupun kaum lain yang beragama Islam, masih lagi tidak dibenarkan bertudung semasa bertugas sebagai seorang jururawat mengikut dasar yang masih wujud oleh pihak-pihak yang berkewajiban. Alasan pakaian seragam jururawat sebagai halangan adalah suatu yang kurang peka dan sangat memperbodohkan kita yang berfikiran rasional kerana negera-negara yang lebih maju di barat telahpun menerima pemakaian tudung sebagai seragam seorang jururawat tanpa halangan kepada tugas profesionalnya. Alasan lain seperti kekuatiran ianya akan menimbulkan sifat kurang senang oleh para pesakit langsung tidak logik memandangkan betapa biasanya seorang wanita Islam yang bertudung boleh kelihatan di masyarakat umum. Malahan Dokter wanita Islam yang ingin bertudung dibenarkan tanpa masalah di hospital-hospital Singapura sekarang ini. Tiada bukti langsung untuk alasan keberadaan jururawat wanita Melayu atau dari kaum lain yang bertudung akan menimbulkan keresahan dan tidak senang oleh kaum lain. Malah alasan ini seolah-olah beranggapan kaum lain sekarang merasa kurang senang apabila melihat wanita Melayu Islam secara umumnya bertudung yang berlaku dalam banyak lagi kerjaya lain seperti guru-guru di sekolah pemerintah dan sebagainya.

    Baru-baru ini pemerintah Singapura telah menanda-tangani Konvensyen bagi Membasmikan Semua Jenis Diskriminasi Kaum (International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination) pada 19 Oktober 2015. Sebagai rakyat Singapura yang berbangsa Melayu dan beragama Islam saya mengalu-alukan tindakan ini, kerana ia membuka peluang untuk kita mengubah dasar-dasar pekerjaan dan lain-lain yang bersikap diskriminasi kepada orang Melayu Singapura. Sekarang telah tiba masanya untuk tindakan dalam bentuk perlaksanaan dengan membasmikan dasar-dasar pekerjaan yang terang-terang besifat diskriminasi terhadap wanita Melayu dan wanita kaum lain yang beragama Islam dari bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Kali ini, Rakyat Melayu Singapura tidak mahu lagi menerima alasan yang tidak munasabah dari pihak-pihak yang berkewajiban termasuk Pemerintah sendiri kerana alasan-alasan itu bercanggah langsung dengan apa yang telah ditanda-tangani oleh Pemerintah Singapura dalam Konvensyen tersebut. Rakyat Singapura yang berbangsa Melayu dan beragama Islam sudah hilang keyakinan dengan ketelusan pemimpin Melayu Islam pemerintah dan pihak-pihak lain yang berkewajiban kerana kegagalan mereka dalam bertindak adil dan jujur untuk menamatkan terusnya berlaku diskriminasi terhadap wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang beragama Islam untuk bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat. Rakyat Melayu Islam Singapura khususnya dan semua Rakyat umumnya berhak bersuara apabila berlakunya ketidak-adilan dalam melaksanakan dasar yang jelas mendiskriminasikan wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang ingin bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Saya secara peribadi kedepan dalam usaha ini melalui wadah lelaman FB ini dengan usaha semampu saya untuk mendesak campur tangan dan kebijaksanaan Pemerintah supaya menghentikan diskriminasi terhadap wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang ingin bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat. Usaha ini adalah lanjutan daripada usaha-usaha lain yang telah saban tahun berlaku di mana orang Melayu Islam hanya mampu merayu dengan penuh adab dan sopan melalui wadah-wadah yang sedia ada ataupun diadakan. Tiap kali jawapan pihak berkewajiban dan juga Pemerintah sama sahaja malah telah menimbulkan kemarahan rakyat Melayu Islam Singapura yang menganggap ini sebagai mencabar dan memperlekehkan maruah wanita bangsa Melayu dan wanita kaum lain yang beragama Islam dan juga maruah orang Islam umumnya. Namun kita masih bersabar, berusaha terus dan berharap.

    Melalui wadah ini mudah-mudahan ia akan menjadi tempat menyuarakan dengan jelas dan lantang kepada semua Rakyat Singapura bahawa orang Melayu Islam memang merasa didiskriminasikan oleh dasar-dasar pihak-pihak berkewajiban yang menghalang wanita-wanita Islam tak kira bangsa yang ingin bertudung dari bertudung semasa menjalankan tugas sebagai seorang jururawat. Wadah ini juga akan menjadi sumber maklumat untuk usaha-usaha lain yang akan dijalankan seperti rapat-rapat umum untuk menjelaskan isu ini jika tindakan itu diperlukan memandangkan jawapan yang bakal diterima dari pihak yang berkewajiban dan Pemerintah sendiri. Rakyat Melayu dan kaum lain yang beragama Islam juga harus mempertimbangkan untuk membawa isu diskriminasi ini langsung ke makhamah untuk mendapat pengadilan berdasarkan undang-undang Negara dan undang-undang antarabangsa demi membela hak kebebasan kaum Hawa kita yang ingin bertudung dan bekerjaya sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Jika pemerintah melihat usaha ini sebagai suatu yang ingin menimbulkan huru-hara dan kekecohan di masyarakat, itu adalah silap kerana ini adalah usaha murni seorang rakyat yang menggunakan wadah yang ada dan dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan pertimbangan rasional. Tiada apapun muslihat memecah belahkan rakyat malah sebaliknya ia adalah usaha menjalinkan jembatan kepada semua Rakyat Singapura tidak kira apapun bangsa dan agama, terhadap isu diskriminasi yang telah bertahun-tahun berlaku kepada wanita Melayu dan bukan Melayu yang beragama Islam kita dalam isu bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Pemerintah juga harus bersikap terbuka selari dengan kemajuan baik mereka untuk mendengar keluhan Rakyat yang kurang senang terhadap isu-isu semasa. Ia juga boleh jujur mempertimbangkan tujuan usaha ini dan usaha-usaha lain dengan tujuan yang sama yang telah bertahun-tahun berlaku di mana rayuan dan desakan dilaksanakan secara aman, jelas dan rasional melalui hujah-hujah yang munasabah, hanya untuk diketepikan tanpa penghujung dan tidak tahu berapa lama lagi penyelesaiannya. Adalah kesilapan besar untuk Pemerintah terus mengenepikan dan mempelekehkan isu maruah wanita Melayu Islam yang telah lama menjadi pekung yang menyakiti rakyat Melayu Islam Singapura. Semoga Pemerintah benar-benar mengkotakan nilai keadilan yang termaktub dalam ikrar Negara yang kita saling pegang sesama rakyat.

    Sebenarnya isu ini adalah isu yang seharusnya sudah lama diselesaikan dengan cara perbincangan dengan penuh kejujuran, berhikmah dan adil. Hakikatnya ialah isu ini masih lagi membelenggu kita dan ia hanya mencerminkan kelemahan kuasa menyuara pemimpin Melayu Islam kita dan pada masa yang sama kurang keprihatinan oleh Pemerintah yang mungkin belum benar-benar mendengar keluhan perasaan orang Melayu terhadap isu ini yang jelas berupa isu diskiriminasi yang mengguris hati kita semua. Semoga usaha ini mendapat sokongan sewajarnya oleh semua pihak yang berkewajiban dan Pemerintah juga dengan bertindak mengakhiri diskriminasi terhadap segolongan Rakyat kita. Ini akan menunjukkan kematangan kita sebagai sebuah masyarakat Singapura yang rasional, beretika, waras dan bersikap adil terhadap semua rakyat.

    Majulah Singapura!!!

     

    Source: Singaporeans For Ending Discriminatory Practices Towards Muslim Women