Tag: Gilbert Goh

  • Two Reasons Why PAP Won So Handsomely In The Recent Elections

    Two Reasons Why PAP Won So Handsomely In The Recent Elections

    Mr Goh,

    That is a very good analysis, but you missed two important points.

    The first is the external factor, namely all the things that are happening outside Singapore. Over the past year the world has gotten a whole lot more dangerous, politically and financially.

    The political paralysis in US, ISIS in the Middle East, the financial and refugees crises in Europe, the China’s economic slowdown that may lead to a world’s recession, Russia’s re-asserting itself, climate change, the gyrating stock markets, and others all add to a sense of an uncertain future. As the saying go, “you do not change horses at mid-stream”.

    Many feel that you do not want to leadership in the middle of a crisis, especially when the alternative only brings in more uncertainty.

    Which brings me to the second point, the oppositions. It is pointless to blame the ruling party to handing out goodies to get votes. That happens is every democracy, we hear it every time there is an election in the UK.

    Yet the government changes hand on a regular basis. For the opposition, it is not enough to offer candidates that are “as good as” the other side and hope that the “throw out the bastard” sentiment will carry the day.

    The opposition needs to have someone better. But honestly, are the opposition candidates in this election really significant better than their PAP counterparts? Do they really have a coherent plan of how to govern? Can they provide a compelling vision? Can they help Singapore, a small country, navigate in the choppy uncharted water?

    Let’s take your team as an example. In the last four years, how many times have the team walk through Ang Mo Kio talking to the residents and learning about their concerns? What do you really have to offer besides a distaste for the PAP?

    Singapore opposition parties need to build themselves up slowly. It may make you feel good to say that every seat is contested. But it is a warning sign to the voters. The PAP members may be a bunch of yahoos.

    But many who would cast a protest in order to have more opposition voices in the parliament voted for PAP instead just so that there would not be a fluke and a bunch of unknown and inexperienced yahoos ended up running the country.

    So the opposition parties need to reflect and come up with a better strategy. You did some analysis of the percents of swing votes that could have been the result of one action or the other by the ruling party.

    Here is another way to look at it. If those constituencies where the PAP won more than 75% (which meant they were PAP strongholds where the opposition parties have no chance) were uncontested, the PAP majority would have been only 67%, meaning that the decision of the opposition to contest every seat actually gave the PAP at least a 2% margin.

    Your own slate contributed 0.72% to that 2%. So the delusion of grandeur of the oppositions actually contributed to the PAP landslide.

    Thistoo Shallpass

     

    Source: www.transitioning.org

  • Reform Party – Definitely Not Anti-Foreigner. Serious.

    Reform Party – Definitely Not Anti-Foreigner. Serious.

    IT IS perhaps to be expected that when Mr Gilbert Goh gets up on stage, he would hold forth about foreigners in Singapore. This is the man whose claim to fame is the organisation of the protest against the unpopular White Paper on Population in 2013. Tonight, he was on the stage as a candidate for the Reform Party, contesting in Ang Mo Kio GRC.

    “We have foreigners snatching jobs away from Singaporeans,” he said and continued in like vein for some time. He claimed that there were thousands of foreigners with fake degrees and credentials taking up jobs here and that free trade agreements (he didn’t name which) allowed foreigners to enter “obstructed”, with 400,000 now residing here. He warned that Singaporeans will be replaced by new citizens who would “vote PAP”.

    His rally speech resounded with some people in the crowd at Yio Chu Kang stadium, who responded with “kick them out” when he mentioned foreigners. He also took a swipe at Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, suggesting that he had sold out his country, and how he had difficulty campaigning in Ang Mo Kio GRC because one in two people he spoke to on the ground were foreigners.

    The presence of foreigners has been a lightning rod in recent years, and is arguably responsible for the swing against the PAP in GE2011. The publication of the White Paper with its 6.9 million projected population figure for 2030, exacerbated matters. The PAP acknowledged that infrastructural developments had had not kept pace with foreign inflows and plans were rolled out to improve the housing and public transport system. More drastically, the inflow of foreign workers as well as those granted permanent residency status was tightened and rules put in place to require that companies see to hiring Singaporeans first before recruiting foreigners.

    But the moves seem to have been lost on segments of the population who insist that their jobs, particularly those in the vulnerable professionals, managers and executives category, were being taken away by foreigners.

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has in recent time, including at his National Day rally, talked about finding a balance between having foreigners fill much needed job places while ensuring that Singaporeans were protected in the job market. On Thursday, Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say went to great lengths to talk about Singapore’s foreign worker policy, pledging to maintain the Singapore to foreigner ratio at two to one. He noted that the numbers look much better if the foreigners employed in the construction industry were left out. Then it would be one foreigner to three Singaporeans. He also refuted opposition claims that GE2011 and the presence of Opposition MPs in Parliament had been responsible for the shift. The policy change, he said, was announced by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam in 2010. He reminded the rally crowd that a freeze on foreign workers would affect the operations of small- and medium-sized businesses which would have to close down if they could not get enough manpower and, in the process, let go of Singaporeans too.

    That the foreign worker and immigration issue still rankles with Singaporeans is evident in the manifestos of all the opposition political parties. Some examples:

    The Workers’ Party proposes to “limit foreign workforce growth by holding steady the current level of foreign workforce numbers.” “Our approach involves keeping the non-resident population constant at around 1.5-1.6 million as long as we achieve the 1 per cent resident workforce growth target. This allows for a temporary addition of foreign workers to make up for shortfalls if we are not able to achieve the 1 per cent target.” It says its approach will result in a “projected population of 5.8 million in 2030…in contrast to the PAP’s projection of 6.9 million, of which 3.8 million, or just 55 per cent are citizens.”

    The Singapore Democratic Party wants a “merit-based system” that assesses “the skills and competencies of foreigners wanting to work here, and allow in only those whose are genuinely qualified”. It wants all Employment Pass and S Pass applicants with university degrees and diplomas earned outside Singapore to be subject to mandatory Educational Credential Assessments.

    The National Solidarity Party is vague in its 2015 manifesto on the issue beyond saying that “there must be quotas imposed on foreign PMETs seeking employment in Singapore.” In its paper on population two years ago, it called for a pause in the growth in foreign workforce until productivity grows at more than 1.5 per cent and public infrastructure has been expanded” as well as a uniform quota of 33 per cent for S Pass and Employment Pass holders.

    Singaporeans First said it will “restructure the economy by making it much less dependent on cheap low-skilled foreign labour as it depresses our wage levels, lowers overall productivity, sustains low skill industries and adds to over-crowding”. “We will review the need to give very favourable foreign worker quotas to certain industries that are highly dependent on foreign workers.”

    The issue of foreigners has been raised in various forms at opposition rallies over the three nights of hustings. WP’s Terence Tan described the White Paper as “just wrong” while fellow member Gurmit Singh wants the G to follow the Australian way of getting employers to justify their need for foreign staff. SingFirst has been leading the charge right from the get-go at its introduction of candidates before Nomination Day. In its party political broadcast, it said “the influx of foreign workers has broken families, taken away jobs and space from Singaporeans.”

    Even much smaller parties, like the Singapore People’s Party, have landed on the issue. It wants the minimum qualifying salary of Employment Pass holders to be raised from the current $3,300 a month. “At the current rate, even insurance firms can employ agents on the employment pass”.

    But of course, everyone said they were not “anti-foreigner” or “anti-immigration”.

    Just anti-G.

     

    Source: http://themiddleground.sg

  • 11 Reasons Why PAP Is Afraid Of GE2015

    11 Reasons Why PAP Is Afraid Of GE2015

    1. Resurgence of people’s voice

    Singaporeans, by and large, are very compliant and submissive to the leadership of the ruling party. They are ruled with a iron fist thus far and any dissent is being knocked down readily.

    However, the rise of social media plus numerous open public protest at speakers’ corner have provided hope that the people indeed now have rose up in defiance against the dictatorial ruling party.

    There is so much that they people can take and for the past few years we have seen a huge increase in activism – showcased publicly by the social media.

    2. Rise of alternative voice via social media

    We witnessed the rise of social media in GE 2011 as alternative sites took to the stage for the first time to combat against the government-controlled mass media.

    More alternative sites sprouted up after GE 2011 and by now we should have close to ten  alternative voices battling for the hearts and minds of the people.

    Many enjoy wide readership as people have forsook the propaganda mouthpiece of the major newspapers here.

    It is believed that GE 2015 will be deemed the people’s election as with the click of a mouse they can enter into the election fray virtually unknown influencing thousands if they are creative and enterprising.

    TRS was shut down recently by the government but there are at least ten other sites entering the closely-watched alternative cyberspace right now – all jostling for a piece of the action.

    3. More professionals joining the opposition camp

    More professionals are joining the opposition camp now than ever before and we saw professors like SDP’s Paul Tambyah and WP’s Daniel Goh joining the fever for this coming GE.

    I also heard a Cambridge-educated young female lawyer is joining WP team.

    Such distinguished field of opposition candidates gave hope to the voters that they are voting for someone who is both intelligent and capable and not one who wore slippers to the election department hoping for a miracle.

    Besides voting for a credible party, voters also look at the credentials of the candidates before parting with their votes.

    Credibility features highly on the mind of many voters here and those parties who could showcase the distinguished educational and professional portfolio of their candidates seem to have a better head start in the campaign.

    For change to happen, capable Singaporeans must rise up and sacrifice for a better Singapore as politics can be dirty and unscrupulous.

    Some may get hurt in the process but one must be ready to pay the price to be an agent for change.

    4. Lack of confidence in PAP camp

    The prematured resignation of transport minister Lui Tuck Yew plus the recent mass resignation of many PAP MPs do not augur well with the public as it is unprecedented for a minister to do that so close to the coming election.

    It spoke volume of the unsettling atmosphere residing right now with the ruling party who always enjoy much confidence weeks before any general election.

    Gone are the care-free relaxed ambience of the PAP before a general election and even the recent PM’s national day rally speech is punctuated with traditional rhetoria – nothing which can stir the hearts of the country to part their votes with the incumbent.

    It is also the first time the ruling party looks increasingly defensive in a election as it has to handle mass public dissatisfaction with the huge transport and over-population issues.

    5. Post-LKY election

    Its the first election which will not feature LKY at all and many have mention that his appearance at any ward during campaigning will influence at least 10% of the voters to its camp.

    His presence will be sorely missed by the incumbent as it struggles with many issues that are still unresolved after GE 2011.

    Many elderly voters may simply swing their votes to the opposition camp as the loyalty factor is not longer valid now as the former patriach is gone forever.

    6. Population white paper

    Grievances heard from the ground were mostly related to the population white paper and it is widely believed that swing voters will have that in mind when they take to the polls.

    Singaporeans are by nature very down-to-earth practical voters and bread and butter issues remain top-most on their mind.

    They can do away with some personal rights or even sacrifice some of their dignity but when their livelihood is being compromised it will make them reconsider their choices at the polls.

    The population white paper has affected all Singaporeans from the recent transport problems to job insecurity – stuff that most people feel passionately about.

    Years of draconian rule has hardened the people to accept a communist-like democratic system but if they could not put food on the table for the family, they will rebel with a swing vote to the opposition camp.

    7. Opposition unity

    There are glimpses of a opposition unity floundering especially with the Goh Meng Seng-led Vote for Change button.

    Its a campaign led by four other parties to vote for change in this coming election and though opposition giants WP and SDP are not in it, the sign of a united opposition front is promising.

    To counteract that, the ruling party has just issued a warning that opposition parties are not to participate in each other’s rally campaign for fear that this will breed more unity in the opposition camp.

    If the opposition parties will one day unite and form up a huge platform like Bersih to challenge the ruling party at the polls,  it is envisaged that the end will be in sight for PAP.

    The country is due for change but the opposition parties need to unite as one big force to challenge the incumbent.

    8. More uniformed people joining the ruling party

    More uniformed personnel are joining the ruling party and this does not augur well for the people.

    For example, the ex- army chief and asst commissioner have resigned to join politics and both are believed to be ministerial material.

    Army generals joining politics and later promoted to be ministers look like a norm in our politics these days but not many of them do well from the internal transfer.

    For example, ex-Admiral Lui Tuck Yew stepped down from politics after a horrendous experience helming transport and ex-army generals like Tan Chuan Jin and Chan Chun Sing were hammered by netizens for failing to speak wisely on sensitive issues like the cardboard collectors and foreign labour.

    Its still questionable how effective these unformed top-brass have been while they transitioned to politics from a regime-like environment.

    Long used to having people obeying their commands for a very long time, now they have to bend their body and even dirty their hands on the ground to serve the people.

    Its a steep learning curve for many of these paper generals and there do not have much time to adjust on the job.

    Even if they are promoted to ministerial level, they have to persuade gently rather than speaking as if everyone will listen to them – like those days in the army or police where dissent is not tolerated.

    Ministers like Lui Tuck Yew who could not adjust or tolerate much dissent both on and off line will simply pack their bag and left.

    It is hope that more private sector people will come in and serve as ministers as this lack of working experience in the outside world is hurting Singaporeans as policy-makers do not have a real feel of the problems on the ground.

    9. On-going movement around the world for change

    There is also this on-going movement around the world egging for change.

    People living in autocratic countries are all rising up together as one voice to go against dictatorship.

    Centuries-old monarchies like Egypt and Tunisia were overthrown by the people desperate for change in a very repressed society.

    Democratic societies in Europe have also voted for a change in government due mainly to the damaging immigration issue.

    Many have mentioned that Singapore is still alright as we have food to eat and a roof to live in.

    However, the current foreign influx has forced many Singaporeans to rethink if this country is truly meant for Singaporeans.

    Jobs were lost and more importantly our national identity is being diluted by the current influx.

    300,000 Singaporeans have emigrated and nobody aspires to return anytime soon – so long the ruling party is in power.

    10.  Growing pool of young anti-establishment voters

    Each year, more than 20,000 voters are eligible to vote as they turn 21 years old – all ready to vote for change.

    Many of our young adults are not used to the traditional draconian rule and it is believed that 70% of them will vote for the opposition.

    They want change and a better Singapore whereby one  is  free to express our opinion and not get knocked down every time you speak up against the establishment.

    With more pro-PAP elderly passing on with each election and a growing pool of young anti-establishment voters, it is only a matter of time before the incumbent gets knock off it’s 50-year-old power pedestal.

    11. Recent fall of European governments on anti-immigration sentiments

    Swiss voters in February 2014 approved a measure that tightens immigration quotas despite threats of penalties by the EU, though the vote was close. France’s anti-EU National Front party, which supports limits on immigration, won control of up to 15 municipalities in elections Sunday, more than tripling its previous high of four municipalities in the 1990s (source: USA Today March 31 2014).

    Such sentiment is also strong in other countries such as Sweden, the Netherlands and France, where France’s National Front is now supported by one in four voters in the country, recent polls show.

    Will the same thing happen in the coming election here?

    Many of the immigration-related problems face by Singapore are experienced by the European Union which is borderless.

    They face the same problem as us – over-crowding, job competition and weak integration.

    Immigration should be the main election topic in this coming election and the one who could argue well against the 6.9m population white paper will probably be able to swing more votes for his opposition team.

    Moreover, Singaporeans have never before unite so strongly against one policy and this time round, the ruling party has its work all cut out.

    Gilbert Goh

    Gilbert Goh runs Transitioning.org, a support site for unemployed Singaporeans. He is a Reform Party candidate for Ang Mo Kio GRC in GE2015.

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Malay Diploma-Holder Working As Secretary Find It Hard To Make

    Malay Diploma-Holder Working As Secretary Find It Hard To Make

    Dear Gilbert,

    I heard about you from my friend who tells me that you are a labour activist representing the downtrodden in Singapore.

    Would just like to share with you my experience. I have a diploma from Republic Polytechnic and have been working for some years now as an secretary. Even though my salary has risen in the past few years, I am finding it increasingly difficult to maintain the costs of living.

    For example, my increment last year was $80 (about 3.5%) but the costs of food court near my workplace in CBD has grown way more. A set meal for example has risen from $3.90 to $5.00. What is more worrying is that I have just gotten engaged with my finance and I do not look at the future with optimism.

    My brother has told me about how his IT company has hired so many foreigners on S-pass for $2500 which is even higher that what I am earning. And the thing is that this is very cheap considered to locals whose pay is about $3.5 to $4k working as a IT engineer.

    I am worried that someone may steal my job in the near future.

    I am also about to get married soon and did a simple cost calculation that we need about $1.5k a month at least for payment for loans taken out for a simple wedding, 5 day honeymoon to Bali, and furniture. Also, our monthly mortgage will cost us at least $1.2k in CPF for a new HDB.

    After spending $550 for food, transport and groceries, $300 for general maintenance, and giving $400 to my aged parents and school going siblings, I find that I do not have enough money left.

    The reality today is that costs of living is really affecting the middle-class like myself. Sigh.

    Good luck for the upcoming elections as we need more people like you who has walked the ground to speak up for us in Parliament.

    Thanks,

    Fatimah

     

    Source: www.transitioning.org

  • Osman Sulaiman, M Ravi Dan Roy Ngerng Antara Yang Akan Turun Padang Menentang PAP Di GRC Ang Mo Kio

    Osman Sulaiman, M Ravi Dan Roy Ngerng Antara Yang Akan Turun Padang Menentang PAP Di GRC Ang Mo Kio

    Parti Reform (RP) hari ini mengumumkan barisan calonnya di GRC Ang Mo Kio bagi pilihan raya akan datang.

    Pasukan seramai enam orang itu akan diterajui oleh Encik M Ravi, seorang peguam.

    Turut menganggotai pasukan RP tersebut ialah penulis blog Roy Ngerng, yang disaman oleh Perdana Menteri Lee Hsien Loong atas tuduhan fitnah berhubung isu CPF, penerbit filem Siva Chandran, aktivis sosial Gilbert Goh, mantan pegawai bank Jesse Loo dan pengarah perniagaan di sebuah syarikat hiasan dalaman, Osman Sulaiman.

    Meskipun kedua-dua Encik Goh dan Encik Ngerng pernah menyertai bantahan-bantahan di Sudut Pidato di Hong Lim Park, setiausaha agung RP, Kenneth Jeyaretnam menegaskan pasukan itu bukanlah kumpulan pembantah.

    Encik Osman, 40 tahun, mengetuai pasukan RP di GRC Ang Mo Kio pada pilihan raya 2011, yang memperolehi 30.4 peratus undi.

    “Perlantikan ini datang dengan tanggungjawab yang berat. Saya diharapkan berjuang bukan sahaja untuk bangsa Melayu, bukan sahaja untuk penduduk Ang Mo Kio tetapi untuk semua warga Singapura dan sekaligus berbakti kepada masyarakat umum,” ujarnya.

    Source: http://berita.mediacorp.sg