Tag: government

  • GIC Faces Possible US$4b Loss On UBS Bet: IFR

    GIC Faces Possible US$4b Loss On UBS Bet: IFR

    Singapore sovereign wealth fund GIC Private Ltd is facing a loss in excess of 4 billion francs (US$4 billion, S$5.6 billion) on its emergency investment in Swiss bank UBS Group nine years ago, according to IFR calculations.

    GIC cut its stake in UBS on Monday evening (May 15), selling 93 million shares at 16.10 Swiss francs each to bring in 1.5 billion francs. The sale was conducted by UBS as sole bookrunner and wrapped up in two and a half hours.

    The bank accidentally announced the sale ahead of the market close when it had been due to launch. UBS’s ECM bankers were already talking to investors through a wall-crossing exercise so the deal was not too disrupted.

    The share price did drop on the news so the discount was 3 per cent to Monday’s close and 4.6 per cent to the undisturbed share price, but pricing was still above the bottom of the 16-franc to market guidance at launch.

    The deal was covered in 20 minutes and allocations reflected strong support from some investors, with the top 10 orders receiving half the shares. There were around 140 lines in the book.

    The Singapore soveriegn wealth fund invested 11 billion francs in UBS through mandatory convertibles in December 2007, which converted into shares two years later to make it the bank’s biggest shareholder. GIC said Monday’s sale realised a loss, but did not say how big the loss was.

    IFR calculates it has lost over 4 billion francs on the investment, based on conservative estimates of income from share sales, interest payments on the original instruments, dividends and the value of its remaining 2.7-per cent stake.

    GIC did not immediately reply to requests for comment on the size of its loss.

    It said on Monday it was disappointed its investment resulted in a loss, but said an emergency investment in Citigroup at around the same time had earned a positive return, and the combined return “has been positive in mark-to-market terms”.

    It invested US$6.9 billion in Citigroup in January 2008.

    “GIC made the UBS sale despite the loss because conditions have changed fundamentally since GIC invested … as have UBS’s strategy and business,” GIC chief executive Lim Chow Kiat said. “It makes sense now for GIC to reduce its ownership of UBS and redeploy these resources elsewhere,” he added.

    GIC’s investment in UBS has always been complex and it gives limited details on its portfolio.

    GIC and an unnamed Middle East investor invested 13 billion francs in UBS in December 2007. At that time UBS shares were trading at about 50 francs, as the scale of capital and trading problems were only just emerging.

    The investment was in mandatory convertible notes (MCNs) that were converted into 273 million UBS shares in March 2010. They were converted at 47.68 francs per share, well above UBS’s share at the time to reflect the higher share price at the time of the original investment.

    The conversion left GIC with 245.5 million shares in the bank for a 6.4 per cent stake. It reduced its holding to 196 million prior to Monday’s sale, which would have raised 1.1 billion francs only if it was sold at the maximum share price during the intervening period.

    Its remaining 2.7 per cent UBS stake, or about 103 million shares, is worth 1.7 billion francs at the current share price.

    As a result, the sale of shares and remaining holding totals about 4.3 billion francs for GIC.

    GIC received an additional 2 billion francs in interest payments in the two years it held the MCNs. The notes paid 9 per cent annual interest, but had a maximum life of two years.

    It has also received 2.45 franc per share in dividend payments between 2011 and 2016, amounting to up to 602 million francs.

    As a result, its total return has been 5.2 billion francs to date, with it still holding 1.7 billion of shares. That equates to a current loss of 4.1 billion francs from its investment, according to IFR calculations.

    GIC manages more than US$100 billion globally and UBS was its second most valuable investment, according to Thomson Reuters data. It was set up in 1981 to secure the financial future of Singapore by managing its foreign reserves in a range of long-term assets. Temasek, another Singapore state investor, has also made big bets on some banks, including Standard Chartered.

    GIC’s loss shows the importance of timing of investments during the financial crisis. Sovereign funds from Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Qatar, Kuwait and China all invested in western banks.

    Many investors who went in early, such as GIC in UBS, have lost money. Others who were later have made money – often as they got better terms.

    Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund made more than US$2 billion on a controversial bet on Britain’s Barclays in 2008, for example. Most of its proceeds came from warrants the bank included as part of the deal, plus MCNs that paid out 14 per cent a year.

     

    Source: http://www.straitstimes.com/business/

  • Damanhuri Abas: The Malay Reserved President Is A Done Deal

    Damanhuri Abas: The Malay Reserved President Is A Done Deal

    The Malay Reserved President is a done deal no matter how much Dr Tan Cheng Bock try to argue for an Open Election. He will be admired for his tenacity and resolve to truly serve the people he love. So what can Singaporean hope for after Dr Tan Cheng Bock?

    Looking at the rank and file in Government, they are still mostly dominated by career civil servants from the uniformed or non-uniformed services. This reality undermines the Government’s claim that pegging Ministers salary to that of top private sector senior management will lead to more coming forward to join politics and becoming Ministers.

    In fact since the Government calibrated the salary of Ministers to be on par to that of private sector senior management, we have not seen any ground-breaking move that is worth mentioning. The truth is, if one has attained senior management position in business it is most unlikely that a political career is anywhere in his or her radar. Instead it is those who don’t see financial prospect in the private sector that will grab a chance of making big bucks as politician. It is definitely rare and extremely far between to expect anyone who is earning a handsome annual pay comfortably in the private sector to be so driven by a calling to serve the people.

    Singaporean yearns for that truly fresh face to rejuvenate their hopes and dreams amidst the gloom of a Machiavellian driven politically sterile landscape dominated by the powerful elite and their avarice. For now, such a one is imperceptible in both the near and far vista of our political horizon.

     

    Rilek1Corner

    Source: Damanhuri Bin Abas

  • Dr Tan Cheng Bock: Open Election First, If No Minority Malay President Wins In 2017 Then Reserved Election For 2023

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock: Open Election First, If No Minority Malay President Wins In 2017 Then Reserved Election For 2023

    The Government brushes off my press conference.
    MCI has missed my point totally.

    I do not dispute the Constitutional Commission’s report or the White Paper. However, I disagree with the way the Government has triggered the reserved election.

    I am simply asking if the government’s counting from President Wee Kim Wee FOLLOWED the SPIRIT AND PURPOSE that was proposed by the Constitutional Commission. The Constitutional Commission has said that a reserved election will be triggered if 5 open elections produce no minority President. So far we have 4 open elections with no minority Malay President. So 2017 must remain an open election and if no minority Malay President wins in 2017, than a reserved election will be triggered in 2023.

    The Attorney General’s Chambers (AGC) used a different format .
    AGC advised the Government to count the 5 year hiatus using “ 5 consecutive terms of Presidents who exercised elected powers” to include 1 nominated President and 4 openly elected Presidents. This is not in line with the spirit and purpose of the Constitutional Commission’s Report of 5 open elections.

    I’ve given my reasons why we should rightly count from our 1st openly elected President Ong Teng Cheong. It’s the government’s turn to give their reasons why they choose to count differently, having accepted the report. Why change the format?

    When asked in Parliament by an MP as recently as February 2017, it was brushed off with challenges to go to court and no debate.
    Singaporeans need to know the truth on such an important Constitutional matter.
    This is a chance for the Government to explain.
    They should not brushed it off again.

     

    Source: Dr Tan Cheng Bock

  • Singaporeans At The Centre Of Budget, COS Debates: Halimah

    Singaporeans At The Centre Of Budget, COS Debates: Halimah

    Amid the intense discussions about the big picture, and the nuts and bolts of Government programmes and policies, Members of Parliament (MPs) have — over the past fortnight — “never lost sight” of Singaporeans and the country, said Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob yesterday as she wrapped up the Budget and Committee of Supply (COS) debates.

    Adding that this shone through very clearly, she reminded the House that “this is as it should be”.

    “Singapore and our fellow Singaporeans … are always at the centre of it all,” she said.

    Madam Halimah noted that the Budget statement was delivered against the backdrop of “a world in the grips of growing uncertainty in the global economy brought about by disruptive technologies and innovation, and the accompanying rise of populism and protectionist sentiments in a number of countries”.

    Despite having different political beliefs, MPs from the ruling People’s Action Party and the opposition Workers’ Party came together “for matters touching on the country’s interests”, said Madam Halimah, who noted a “convergence of views … when it comes to protecting our sovereignty”. This could also be seen at overseas parliamentary meetings when Members are representing Singapore, she said.

    While praising the MPs for their “sharp, incisive minds that have become a hallmark of our Parliament”, Madam Halimah did have a quibble: “If only Members could learn to do away with long preambles and go straight to the point raised in their questions and clarifications, they would not need to deliver their speeches at breakneck speeds.”

    There were a total of 545 cuts filed by MPs for the COS this year — a 9 per cent increase from last year and the highest in five years, said Leader of the House Grace Fu. The increase “speaks to the scale of the challenges we face and the dedication of the Members”, said Ms Fu, who is the Culture, Community and Youth Minister.

    Ms Fu said that the Budget came at a time when Singapore has to grapple with, and adapt to, changes. Businesses are bracing themselves for “difficult economic headwinds”, while workers are not concerned with just the short-term outlook on the job situation, but also their longer-term prospects.

    Hence, it came as “no surprise” that the Ministry of Manpower topped the list of total speech time for the cuts filed, with Members spending a significant amount of time scrutinising the Committee on the Future Economy initiatives, while others raised questions about how to help workers, and small and medium enterprises, she added.

    Ms Fu said she disagreed with the view of some MPs that the public service may have “lost its heart”. The Public Service is “bound closely to the people it serves”, with public servants across the sectors working hard to “transform our economy, safeguard our security, protect our environment, and build an inclusive society”, she stressed.

    “But the Government does not have all the answers, and we cannot steer this ship alone … If we all have that ‘heart’, that desire to forge a better future for all Singaporeans, we can build a stronger, a big-hearted Singapore,” said Ms Fu, urging businesses, unions, community organisations and individuals to work together.

     

    Source: Today

  • Protest Against Unjustified 30% Increase In Cost of Water: March 11

    Protest Against Unjustified 30% Increase In Cost of Water: March 11

    When finance minister Mr Heng Swee Kiat went to deliver the budget speech in Parliament, many people were relieved to know that the minister has finally recovered from his horrible stroke and ready to serve the country again.

    But the welcoming relief soon turned to shock as the minister drops a bombshell by announcing a 30% price hike in our water pricing.

    Though the hike will be spread over two years – one in July this year and the other in the same month next year with the assurance that Singaporeans will enjoy rebate subsidies to cushion the hike, nobody is smiling especially when the hike is carried out during the current economic crisis.

    Moreover, we realised that PUB has being enjoying profits from its operation and over the past 7 years, it has generated a massive S1.1 billion in profit. For FY 2015, it has generated $166.8 million profits – an increase of 77.3 per cent compared to FY2010’s profit of $94.1 million.

    The government has also tried to increase train fare few years ago when the transport operators are still reaping handsome profits triggering off a protest in January 2014. Protesters were unhappy with the fact that the two major transport companies, SMRT and SBS Transit, are making $120 million and $18 million in net profits respectively and this is set to increase rapidly with the rise in train ridership as well.

    For the latest 30% increase in water cost, the government has quoted the higher operating cost of treating water and that the reservoir in Malaysia is also drying up as mitigating reasons – factors which do not hold up well as all along PUB is still doing well in the black. The 30% increase in water pricing will probably add billions into the coffers of PUB but will certainly deepen the hardship of our poor and vulnerable who are already struggling with the country’s high cost of living.

    We have the unenviable record of being the world’s costliest city for the third time in a row this year. More shockingly, the water price hike also came on top of a slew of other recent price increases eg town council fee, ERP, electricity among others.

    Many have suggested that instead of increasing water pricing, why not ration water as during LKY’s time water rationing was very popular as it fosters community togetherness and people still value water as a precious commodity instead of having to pay dearly for it to be appreciated.

    The environment minister Mr Masagos did himself no favour by saying that:”The consumer must feel the price of water and realise how valuable water is in Singapore, every time he or she turns on the tap, right from the first drop.”

    It is as if Singaporeans need to be financially punished so we can better treasure our water supply. I am sure that we can look at other cheaper feasible alternatives to better appreciate water.

    It is unknown why the government could not use part of the tens of billions it has collected annually from GST, COE, taxes, ERP, land sales and other tariffs to offset the water hike but prefers to pass the pain directly to the people.

    The timing of the price hike is also damaging as many PMETs are still jobless or under-employed during this economic downturn. There is no social safety net for those who are jobless and such price hike only adds on to their growing frustration as a local Singaporean.

    All these recent utilities’ price hikes reveals a heartless merciless government bent on squeezing every drop of revenue from a struggling populace tired from paying all kinds of bills amidst stagnanting income growth.

    We call on all Singaporeans who are against this unjustified water price hike to turn up for our protest in a defiance show of unity.

    Though we may not be able to change the government’s stance but at least we will show them that we are unhappy and won’t take it laying down!

    Prepared by: Gilbert Goh
    Event Organiser
    3 March 2017

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Source: https://www.facebook.com/events/131704817353153/